Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:"

Transcription

1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST Chicago, IL, 669 DATE LAST THREE YEAR REINSPECTION WAS COMPLETED 3/19/213 If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. SECTION II (Please type or print) PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING FOR YOUR THREE YEAR REINSPECTION: DATE REINSPECTION COMPLETED: 7/2/216 ENROLLMENT IDPH INSPECTOR LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED INSPECTOR NAME (Please Print): Dionne Carey IDPH MP LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED MANAGEMENT PLANNER NAME (Please Print): Daniel Juneau DESIGNATED PERSON (Please Print): Robert Christlieb PHONE: 234 (773) /2/216 Signature of Designated Person Date SECTION III PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING INFORMATION FOR ANY CHANGES WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. School building has been sold. Date of Sale: School has been closed. Date closed: School building has been demolished. School building is asbestos free since last reinspection: Please explain in writing why the school building is now asbestos free and include the supporting documentation. If a new school building has been added to the district, submit either and exclusionary statement or a management plan and inspection report. Include the complete name, address and city of school building. Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: IL Revised 1.3

2 THREE YEAR REINSPECTION CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST 299 Chicago, IL, 669 Unit: Building ID: 393 IDPH ID Number: REPORT DATE: Wednesday, July 2, 216 Prepared for: 125 S. Clark Street Chicago, IL 663 Prepared by: 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone (312) Fax (312) DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCHOOL REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW

3 March 22, 216 Mr. R. Kent Cook Asbestos Program Illinois Department of Public Health 525 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois Re: Three-Year Reinspections Dear Mr. Cook:, Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC), conducted the ThreeYear Reinspections and performed management plan updates for the (CPS) facilities in Region 3,4,5 Elementary Schools. Please update your records with the following information. School District: 299 Unit: School: Region: 4 IDPH ID: Building ID: 393 Address: Chicago, IL, 669 Building Contact: Middleton, Glen Contact Phone: Current Building Owners: Review 7/2/216 Inspector: Dionne Carey Management Planner: Daniel Juneau Inspector IDPH License: Management Planner IDPH License: If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (312) Sincerely, Daniel Juneau

4 Environmental tification to Occupants To: Faculty, Staff and Parents From: March 22, 216 RE:, Unit Chicago, IL, 669 Dear Faculty, Staff and Parents, This letter is to notify you that the 216 asbestos three year re-inspection has been completed at, following the Federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 4 CFR Part 763, Subpart E and is available for your review at the main office of the school. Although asbestos-containing materials have been identified at, there is no reason to believe that any threat to the health of students or staff exists at this time. CPS will continue to carefully monitor the condition of asbestos-containing materials and if conditions warrant, all appropriate steps will be taken to maintain the health and safety of all building occupants. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please feel free to contact Robert Christlieb, the designated Local Education Authority's Designated Person at (773)

5 Table of Contents I. School and Inspection Information II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Abatement History V. Reassessments and Recommendations VI. Conclusions Table I: Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table II: Management Planner's Review APPENDICES: Appendix A: Assessment Sheets, Drawings and Photos Appendix B: Inspector and Management Planner Licenses Appendix C: Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: Laboratory Results Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

6 SCHOOL AND INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. School Information School: Address: IDPH ID: Contact: Middleton, Glen Unit: Chicago, IL, 669 Building ID: 393 Phone: Description of Facility Original Construction: 1954 Total Square Footage: Current Occupancy: Additional Construction: of Floors: 3 LEA Designated Person Contact: Robert Christlieb Address: 125 South Clark Street, 17th Floor Chicago, IL Phone: (773) Managing Environmental Consultant MEC: Contact: Dan Juneau Address 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector Inspector Name: Dionne Carey Signature: 3/22/216 Inspector IDPH license # Region: 4 Management Planner Management Planner Name: Daniel Juneau Management Planner IDPH license # Review 7/2/ LEA Designated Person's Acknowledgement Signature: 7/2/216 The reinspection report and recommendations have been received by me and appropriate action will be taken by the School District. Signature: 7/2/216 Name: Robert Christlieb Unit : Building: 393

7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY was retained by the (CPS) to perform a three-year asbestos reinspection of the. This inspection was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) part (b), and the ongoing Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M) originally designed in the School's Asbestos Management Plan. The purpose of this three-year reinspection is to record any condition changes in the asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in the school since the previous three-year reinspection and the six-month periodic surveillance, to identify, assess, and include any Homogeneous Areas (HA) not identified in the Management Plan, and to recommend an appropriate response action to manage asbestos. The inspector conducted a three-year reinspection of this facility under Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) school reinspection requirements and AHERA, sections and The main building and each addition to the main building, if constructed at different dates, were inspected separately. Laboratory accreditations are included in Appendix C, laboratory results are included in Appendix D, and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix E. te: During previous inspections, some of the HA(s) were identified together as 9" x 9" floor tile (FT), mastics assoc. with 9" x 9" FT, 12" x 12" FT, mastics assoc. with 12" x 12" FT, pipe insulation, etc. Some of these HA(s) have been re-identified by areas that are uniform in color, texture, construction date, application date, and general appearance. The inspector has determined the following: A. The following HAs have changed assessment categories for Building 393: Unit: 1 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 3 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 54 Terrazo Building: 393

8 B. The following new homogenous areas have been identified for Building 393: 54 Unit: Terrazo Building: 393

9 C. This reinspection covered only physically accessible and visible areas and materials that were identified in the LEA's management plan. The following materials were concealed and/or contained in areas that were inaccessible for sampling and have been classified as Assumed: M M M 52 52M 53 53M 54 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile TSI In Boiler by Doors Boiler Gasket Refractory Brick Roof Flashing - t AHERA Exterior Brick - t AHERA Exterior Mortar - t AHERA 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic Interior Material of Incinerator Vault Door 9"x9" Beige with brown streaks floor tile 9"x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic Sink Under Coating 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic Aircell pipe insulation Vibration dampers Cork board wall panels adhesive 12x12 Blue floor tile 12x12 Blue floor tile mastic 4" Dark Blue baseboard 4" Dark Blue baseboard mastic Mag pipe insulation Fittings on Mag pipe insulation Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic Plaster Blue Carpet Mastic 3' X 3' Rubber Floor White W/Black 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive 12"X12" Cream W/Tan Floor Tile 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic Terrazo The following areas were deemed to be inaccessible: Unit: Building: 393

10 11M M M 5 51M 52M 53M 6M 7M 6" x 12" Brown Floor Tile Mastic Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic Vault Door 9"x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic Cork board wall panels adhesive 12x12 Blue floor tile mastic 4" Dark Blue baseboard 4" Dark Blue baseboard mastic Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic Blue Carpet Mastic 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile Mastic Materials were also listed as "assumed" if they were in good condition and sampling was not conducted to avoid damage. This reinspection was conducted by Dionne Carey, IDPH License # The Management Plan was updated by Daniel Juneau, IDPH License # Inspector and Management Planner Licenses are included in Appendix B. Unit: Building: 393

11 III. METHODOLOGY Tasks performed on-site included the following: IV. 1. Review current management plan, identify HA(s) and extract appropriate information. 2. Examine and verify abatement records. 3. Touch and visually and physically reinspect and reassess the condition of all friable known or assumed ACBM. 4. Touch and visually and physically reinspect all non-friable known or assumed ACBM to determine whether these materials have become friable since the last inspection or periodic surveillance. 5. Identify any condition changes that may affect Hazard Ranking of known ACBM or Assumed ACBM, as well as any HA(s) that have become friable since the last reinspection. 6. Collect bulk samples from each newly discovered friable HA or previously assumed and submit for laboratory analysis. 7. Tabulate reinspection findings and submit for management planner review and recommendations with appropriate response actions based on the AHERA Damage Category of the ACBM. 8. Submit reinspection findings and management planner recommendations to the LEA within thirty (3) days for inclusion into the management plan. ABATEMENT HISTORY The information collected from the existing management plan and inspection report(s) and from interviews with the school official revealed that the following asbestos abatement was conducted at the school since the previous Three year Reinspection. Abatement Dates: V. REASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The reassessments and recommendations are summarized in Tables I and II on the following pages. Detailed Hazard Assessment Sheets and Drawings and Photos (if applicable) are included in Appendix A. VI. CONCLUSIONS The Building 393 Three-Year reinspection has been completed and response actions have been recommended for both friable and non-friable materials. A timely execution of the response actions recommended will enable the LEA and the Designated Person(s) to effectively manage the existing ACBM. This three-year reinspection report should be inspected in the current Management plan at the CPS Central Office, and one (1) copy should be kept at the school for use when planning any renovation and/or demolition activities in areas where ACBM has been identified. Also, periodic surveillance documentation and any summary reports from any response actions that are executed at the school should be used to update the Management Plan. Unit: Building: 393

12 Table I Inspector's Reinspection Findings

13 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 1 12" x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile 1 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 11 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Lunchroom, lunchroom storage Auditorium ABATED ASSUMED Y NONE CHR N CHR CHR TSI CHR Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category Yes NONE N NONE Y NONE TSI Y NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ne Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Low 2,1 12" x 12" Brown Floor Tile 45 11M 6" x 12" Brown Floor Tile Mastic TSI on Pipe with Metal Cover 8 13 TSI on Valve Coupler/2" Pipe 54 1st, 2nd, 3rd Floor Corridor Perimeter 1st, 2nd, 3rd floor Corridor Perimeter Girl's 2nd Floor and Girl's and Boy's 1st Floor Washrooms Boiler Room 14 TSI on <4" Valves 5 Boiler Room CHR TSI Y NONE 15 TSI Pipe Cover (12" Pipe) 45 AMO_CHR TSI Y NONE 16 TSI 12" Pipe Elbows/Fittings 46 CHR TSI Y NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 17 TSI Cardboard insulationsmall Pipe Elbows/Fittings 3 Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room Boiler Room and Passageway CHR TSI Y NONE 18 TSI Cardboard Insulation 375 Boiler Room and Passageway CHR TSI Y NONE 19 TSI 4" Valves 1 Boiler and Air Tunnel CHR TSI Y NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 1M 12" x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile Mastic ABATED 2 2 Cove Base Black TSI Small Pipe/Covers 4 Lunchroom and lunchroom storage Lunchroom Air Tunnel NO_ACBM AMO_CHR TSI Y NONE 21 TSI Cardboard Insulation 3 Air Tunnel CHR TSI Y NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ne

14 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 22 TSI on Small Pipes 23 TSI Boiler Coverings TSI In Boiler by Doors Boiler Gasket Refractory Brick Roof Flashing - t AHERA Exterior Brick - t AHERA Exterior Mortar - t AHERA 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type 28 Air Tunnel CHR TSI Y NONE 2, Boiler Room AMO_CHR TSI Y NONE 3,25 Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room Roof Building Exterior Building Exterior Lunchroom ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED TSI TSI Y NONE Yes Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive 3 All classrooms ASSUMED N NONE 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile 775 Room 31 ASSUMED N NONE 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile 775 Room 31 ASSUMED N NONE 1, Room 24 ASSUMED N NONE 1, Room 24 ASSUMED N NONE 28 Boiler Room Office ASSUMED ASSUMED N ne NONE Hallway outside 314 and 32, Hallway outside 311 and 312. Room 312 Lunchroom; 1srt, 2nd, 3rd floor corridors 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,3 2,34,38,312,31, main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED ASSUMED N NONE CHR N NONE " x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic Interior Material of Incinerator Vault Door 37 9"x9" Beige with brown streaks floor tile M 9"x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic Sink Under Coating 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic 3, " x 12" Tan Floor Tile 15, 34 Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage

15 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 4 Aircell pipe insulation 41 Vibration dampers 42 Cork board wall panels adhesive 43 12x12 Blue floor tile 44 12x12 Blue floor tile mastic 1,5 45 4" Dark Blue baseboard " Dark Blue baseboard mastic Mag pipe insulation 7 48 Fittings on Mag pipe insulation 3 49 Gray W/Black Dot linoleum 3,6 49M Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic 3,6 4M 12" x 12" Tan Floor Tile Mastic 21,6 Material Quantity Material Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category ACBM with the potential for damage NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage NONE N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ASSUMED TSI Y NONE 2nd floor mechanical room ASSUMED TSI Y NONE Room 35, 36, 33 ASSUMED N NONE Room 35, 36, 33 ASSUMED N NONE 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,3 2,34, 38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor CHR N NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 6 3 1,5 Material Location corridors Room 24 under lab sinks. 2nd floor mechanical space (fan rm #2) and fan room in lunchroom 2nd floor mechanical space Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, 211 Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, 211 Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 2nd floor mechanical room Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type ASSUMED TSI ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N ASSUMED N ASSUMED ASSUMED Damage Quantity Damage Units Unknown Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Low

16 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 5 Plaster 5 51 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 25, corridors Throughout ASSUMED SURFACE Y NONE Blue Carpet Mastic 2,1 Library ASSUMED N NONE 3' X 3' Rubber Floor White W/Black 1,625 ASSUMED N NONE 51M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive 3,25 ASSUMED N NONE 52 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White 1,925 ASSUMED N NONE 52M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive 3,25 ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 53 12"X12" Cream W/Tan Floor Tile 4,214 ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 53M 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic 4,214 ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 54 Terrazo 9 Lunchroom and lunchroom Storage Lunchroom and lunchroom storage Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym Stairs and Landings ASSUMED N NONE Yes 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile 21, CHR N NONE 6M 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile Mastic 21, CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 7 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile 39 CHR N NONE 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile Mastic 39 CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 7M 8 9 2'x4' Hanging Ceiling 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 37, 311 Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and 14 Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and 14 Gym Library ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage 6 NO_ACBM NO_ACBM

17 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report Reinspection Date 3/22/216 Inspector Name Inspector's Comments Dionne Carey /15/217 Inspector's IDPH License Number / Expiration Date HA Number: M M Inspector Comments: t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216

18 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: M M 4M M Inspector Comments: t observed - no access 216 t observed in Room 32 t observed 216 t observed 216

19 School Unit Building ID 393 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: 52 52M 53 53M M 7 7M 8 9 Inspector Comments:

20 Table II Management Planner's Review

21 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response " x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 2,1 Lunchroom, lunchroom storage Auditorium Abated Assumed Yes Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile TSI Yes Chrysotile TSI Yes Boiler Room Chrysotile TSI Yes Amosite, Chrysotile Chrysotile TSI Yes TSI Yes Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room Boiler Room and Passageway Chrysotile TSI Yes 375 Boiler Room and Passageway Chrysotile TSI Yes 1 Boiler and Air Tunnel Chrysotile TSI Yes 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 11 11M 12 12" x 12" Brown Floor Tile 6" x 12" Brown Floor Tile Mastic TSI on Pipe with Metal Cover st, 2nd, 3rd Floor Corridor Perimeter 1st, 2nd, 3rd floor Corridor Perimeter Girl's 2nd Floor and Girl's and Boy's 1st Floor Washrooms Boiler Room 13 TSI on Valve Coupler/2" Pipe TSI on <4" Valves 5 15 TSI Pipe Cover (12" Pipe) TSI 12" Pipe Elbows/Fittings TSI Cardboard insulationsmall Pipe Elbows/Fittings 3 18 TSI Cardboard Insulation 19 TSI 4" Valves 1M " x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile Mastic Cove Base Black TSI Small Pipe/Covers TSI Yes 3 Air Tunnel TSI Yes 22 TSI on Small Pipes 28 Air Tunnel Chrysotile TSI Yes 23 TSI Boiler Coverings 2, Boiler Room TSI Yes TSI In Boiler by Doors Boiler Gasket Refractory Brick Roof Flashing - t AHERA Exterior Brick - t AHERA Amosite, Chrysotile Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM TSI Cardboard Insulation Abated ACBM Amosite, Chrysotile Chrysotile 4 Lunchroom and lunchroom storage Lunchroom Air Tunnel 21 Boiler Room Boiler Room Boiler Room Roof Building Exterior TSI TSI

22 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units 29 3 Exterior Mortar - t AHERA 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile 3, M Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic Interior Material of Incinerator Vault Door 9"x9" Beige with brown streaks floor tile 9"x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic Sink Under Coating 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic , 1, , " x 12" Tan Floor Tile 15, 4 41 Aircell pipe insulation Vibration dampers Cork board wall panels adhesive 12x12 Blue floor tile 3 1, x12 Blue floor tile mastic 1,5 45 4" Dark Blue baseboard " Dark Blue baseboard mastic Mag pipe insulation 7 Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response Building Exterior Lunchroom Assumed Assumed Yes 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage All classrooms Room 31 Room 31 Room 24 Room 24 Boiler Room Office Hallway outside 314 and 32, Hallway outside 311 and 312. Room 312 Lunchroom; 1srt, 2nd, 3rd floor corridors 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212, 32,34,38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors Room 24 under lab sinks. 2nd floor mechanical space (fan rm #2) and fan room in lunchroom 2nd floor mechanical space Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, 211 Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, 211 Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 2nd floor mechanical room Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Assumed TSI 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed TSI Yes 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable

23 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units 48 Fittings on Mag pipe insulation 3 2nd floor mechanical room Assumed TSI Yes 49 49M 4M Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic 12" x 12" Tan Floor Tile Mastic 3,6 3,6 21,6 Assumed Assumed Chrysotile 5 Plaster 25, Room 35, 36, 33 Room 35, 36, 33 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212, 32,34, 38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors Throughout Assumed SURFACE Yes M 52 Blue Carpet Mastic 3' X 3' Rubber Floor White W/Black 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White 2,1 1,625 3,25 1,925 Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed 52M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive 3,25 Assumed 53 12"X12" Cream W/Tan Floor Tile 4,214 Assumed 53M 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic 4,214 Assumed 54 6 Terrazo 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile 9 21, 6M 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile Mastic 21, 7 7M " x 12" Beige Floor Tile 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile Mastic 2'x4' Hanging Ceiling 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Library Lunchroom and lunchroom Storage Lunchroom and lunchroom storage Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym Stairs and Landings 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 37, 311 Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and 14 Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and 14 Gym Library Damage Category suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Response 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Assumed Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Chrysotile Chrysotile ACBM ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage

24 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 669 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report 7/2/216 Review Date Manager Planner Name Daniel Juneau /15/216 Manager IDPH License /Expiration HA Number M Management Comments

25 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 669 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number M M Management Comments If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M

26 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 669 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number M 4M M 52 52M 53 53M M 7 7M 8 Management Comments If identified, implement O&M

27 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 669 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number 9 Management Comments

28 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 12" x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Lunchroom, lunchroom storage COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

29 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile Lunchroom, lunchroom storage 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

30 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Auditorium 21 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

31 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ ' x 1' Ceiling Tile Auditorium 21 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

32 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11 12" x 12" Brown Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st, 2nd, 3rd Floor Corridor Perimeter 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

33 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Brown Floor Tile 1st, 2nd, 3rd Floor Corridor Perimeter 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

34 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11M 6" x 12" Brown Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st, 2nd, 3rd floor Corridor Perimeter 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

35 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 6" x 12" Brown Floor Tile Mastic 1st, 2nd, 3rd floor Corridor Perimeter 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

36 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 12 TSI on Pipe with Metal Cover HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Girl's 2nd Floor and Girl's and Boy's 1st Floor Washrooms 8 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

37 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI on Pipe with Metal Cover Girl's 2nd Floor and Girl's and Boy's 1st Floor Washrooms 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

38 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 13 TSI on Valve Coupler/2" Pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room 54 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

39 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI on Valve Coupler/2" Pipe Boiler Room 54 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

40 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 14 TSI on <4" Valves HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

41 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI on <4" Valves Boiler Room 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

42 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15 TSI Pipe Cover (12" Pipe) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite, Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

43 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Pipe Cover (12" Pipe) Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

44 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 16 TSI 12" Pipe Elbows/Fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room 46 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

45 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI 12" Pipe Elbows/Fittings Hall/Passageway Fan Room, air tunnel, basement storage rooms, boiler room 46 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

46 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 17 TSI Cardboard insulationsmall Pipe Elbows/Fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room and Passageway 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

47 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Cardboard insulationsmall Pipe Elbows/Fittings Boiler Room and Passageway 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

48 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 18 TSI Cardboard Insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room and Passageway 375 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

49 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Cardboard Insulation Boiler Room and Passageway 375 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

50 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 19 TSI 4" Valves HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler and Air Tunnel 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

51 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI 4" Valves Boiler and Air Tunnel 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

52 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1M 12" x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom and lunchroom storage COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

53 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 12" x 12" Beige (Tan) Floor Tile Mastic Lunchroom and lunchroom storage 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

54 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 2 Cove Base Black HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

55 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Cove Base Black Lunchroom 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

56 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 2 TSI Small Pipe/Covers HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite, Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Air Tunnel 4 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

57 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Small Pipe/Covers Air Tunnel 4 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

58 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 21 TSI Cardboard Insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Air Tunnel 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

59 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Cardboard Insulation Air Tunnel 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

60 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 22 TSI on Small Pipes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Air Tunnel 28 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

61 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI on Small Pipes Air Tunnel 28 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

62 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 23 TSI Boiler Coverings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite, Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room 2 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

63 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI Boiler Coverings Boiler Room 2 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

64 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 24 TSI In Boiler by Doors HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

65 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ TSI In Boiler by Doors Boiler Room 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

66 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 25 Boiler Gasket HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

67 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Boiler Gasket Boiler Room 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

68 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 26 Refractory Brick HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

69 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Refractory Brick Boiler Room 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

70 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 27 Roof Flashing - t AHERA HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Roof COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

71 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Roof Flashing - t AHERA Roof 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

72 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 28 Exterior Brick - t AHERA HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Building Exterior COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

73 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Exterior Brick - t AHERA Building Exterior 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

74 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 29 Exterior Mortar - t AHERA HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Building Exterior COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

75 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Exterior Mortar - t AHERA Building Exterior 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

76 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

77 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ ' x 1' Ceiling Tile Lunchroom 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

78 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3 Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: All classrooms 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

79 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Chalk Board/Poster Board Adhesive All classrooms 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

80 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 31 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

81 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

82 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 32 12" x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

83 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Tan w/white Specks Floor Tile Mastic Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

84 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 33 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 24 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

85 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Room 24 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

86 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 34 12" x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 24 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

87 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Dark Green w/tan Floor Tile Mastic Room 24 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

88 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 35 Interior Material of Incinerator HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room COMMENTS: t observed - no access 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

89 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Interior Material of Incinerator Boiler Room 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

90 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 36 Vault Door HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Office 28 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

91 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Vault Door Office 28 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

92 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 37 9"x9" Beige with brown streaks floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallway outside 314 and 32, COMMENTS: t observed in Room 32 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

93 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ "x9" Beige with brown streaks floor tile Hallway outside 314 and 32, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

94 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 38 9"x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallway outside 311 and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

95 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ "x9" Beige with brown straks floor tile mastic Hallway outside 311 and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

96 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 39 Sink Under Coating HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 312 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

97 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Sink Under Coating Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

98 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3M 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom; 1srt, 2nd, 3rd floor corridors 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

99 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile Mastic Lunchroom; 1srt, 2nd, 3rd floor corridors 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

100 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 12" x 12" Tan Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,32,34,38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

101 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Tan Floor Tile 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,32,34,38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

102 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 Aircell pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Room 24 under lab sinks. COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

103 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Aircell pipe insulation Room 24 under lab sinks. 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

104 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 41 Vibration dampers HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor mechanical space (fan rm #2) and fan room in lunchroom 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

105 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Vibration dampers 2nd floor mechanical space (fan rm #2) and fan room in lunchroom 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

106 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 42 Cork board wall panels adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor mechanical space 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

107 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Cork board wall panels adhesive 2nd floor mechanical space 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

108 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 43 12x12 Blue floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

109 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ x12 Blue floor tile Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

110 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 44 12x12 Blue floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

111 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ x12 Blue floor tile mastic Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

112 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 45 4" Dark Blue baseboard HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 27 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

113 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " Dark Blue baseboard Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 27 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

114 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 46 4" Dark Blue baseboard mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 27 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

115 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " Dark Blue baseboard mastic Hallyway by 311, elevator vestibules, stage vestibule, 14 washroom, basm't passage 27 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

116 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 47 Mag pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor mechanical room 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

117 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Mag pipe insulation 2nd floor mechanical room 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

118 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 48 Fittings on Mag pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd floor mechanical room 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

119 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Fittings on Mag pipe insulation 2nd floor mechanical room 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

120 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 49 Gray W/Black Dot linoleum HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 35, 36, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

121 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Room 35, 36, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

122 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 49M Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 35, 36, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

123 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M Gray W/Black Dot linoleum Mastic Room 35, 36, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

124 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4M 12" x 12" Tan Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,32,34, 38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors 216 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

125 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 12" x 12" Tan Floor Tile Mastic 12,14,16,18,11,22,26,28,212,32,34, 38,312,31,main office,assembly hall, 2nd & 3rd floor corridors 216 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

126 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5 Plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Throughout 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

127 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Plaster Throughout 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

128 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5 Blue Carpet Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Library 21 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

129 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Blue Carpet Mastic Library 21 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

130 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 51 3' X 3' Rubber Floor White W/Black HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom and lunchroom Storage 1625 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

131 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ ' X 3' Rubber Floor White W/Black Lunchroom and lunchroom Storage 1625 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

132 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 51M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom and lunchroom storage 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

133 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Adhesive Lunchroom and lunchroom storage 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

134 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 52 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office 1925 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

135 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ ' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office 1925 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

136 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 52M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

137 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 3' X 3' Rubber Floor Blue W/White Adhesive Lunchroom, lunchroom storage, and lunchroom manager office 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

138 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 53 12"X12" Cream W/Tan Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym 4214 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

139 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ "X12" Cream W/Tan Floor Tile Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym 4214 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

140 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 53M 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym 4214 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

141 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 12"X12" Cream W/tan Floor Tile Mastic Main office, principal office, washroom, 1st floor hallway, and hallway by the gym 4214 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

142 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 6 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

143 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

144 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 6M 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 37, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

145 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 12" x 12" Dark Grey Floor Tile Mastic 2nd fl women's washroom, 11, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 25, 27, 37, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

146 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

147 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ " x 12" Beige Floor Tile Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

148 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7M 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

149 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ M 12" x 12" Beige Floor Tile Mastic Doorways of Rooms 11, 13, and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

150 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 8 2'x4' Hanging Ceiling HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Gym COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

151 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ 'x4' Hanging Ceiling Gym 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

152 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 9 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Library COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

153 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ ' x 1' Ceiling Tile Library 393 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

154 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (New Homogeneous Area) AHERA INSPECTOR: Dionne Carey INSPECTION DATE: 3/22/ INFORMATION FROM CURRENT INSPECTION 54 Terrazo Stairs and Landings 9 MATERIAL CATEGORY: FRIABLE: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY: CONDITION: 6 ACBM with the potential for damage ACCESSIBILITY: Within Reach DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/22/216

155 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 7/2/ Terrazo Stairs and Landings 9 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: COMMENTS: Management Planner's Signature: 7/2/216

156 APPENDIX B Inspector and Management Planner Licenses

157

158

159

160

161

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Youth Connection - J. Addams Alter HS

Youth Connection - J. Addams Alter HS ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska

Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska 845-001-14 DOCUMENT 00 31 26 - EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION 1.1 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION A. This Document with

More information

Three Year Asbestos Re-Inspection Report. Macomb Montessori Academy East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089

Three Year Asbestos Re-Inspection Report. Macomb Montessori Academy East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089 Three Year Re-Inspection Report For 14057 East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089 Prepared by: Northern Analytical Services, LLC. 14870 225 th Avenue Big Rapids, Michigan 49307 Dated: Project 160268

More information

NARRATIVE REPORT. Underlayment Paper for Linoleum. The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data.

NARRATIVE REPORT. Underlayment Paper for Linoleum. The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data. NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION Engineering and Technology was originally constructed in 1913; although specific information is unavailable, several renovations are evident. Engineering and Technology

More information

NARRATIVE REPORT. Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations.

NARRATIVE REPORT. Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations. NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations. Engineering Administration is a three-story, 9,579 ft

More information

Asbestos 3-Year Re-inspection Report and Updated Management Plan. Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street Lowell, Massachusetts, 01852

Asbestos 3-Year Re-inspection Report and Updated Management Plan. Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street Lowell, Massachusetts, 01852 Asbestos 3-Year Report Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street, 01852 Prepared by: Cardno ATC 600 West Cummings Park, Suite 5450 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 September 24, 2014 Cardno ATC Project

More information

AHERA Asbestos Management Plan

AHERA Asbestos Management Plan Our Services: Asbestos Inspections Asbestos Abatement Design Asbestos Abatement Oversight AHERA Asbestos Management Plan 720 Fairview Drive Carlisle, Ohio 45005 Asbestos Management Planning Phase I Environmental

More information

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors 1. Purpose ASBESTOS POLICY The purpose of the University of Denver Asbestos Policy is to establish the means to prevent personal asbestos exposures to DU and contractor workers by managing and controlling

More information

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for:

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for: ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota Prepared for: City of St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West 4 th Street

More information

DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY

DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX A: SITE PLAN Baltimore County Public Schools Site Plan-Appendix A Office of Engineering and Construction February 18, 2016 Dulaney High School Feasibility

More information

Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: Troy, OH Dayton, OH Fax:

Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: Troy, OH Dayton, OH Fax: Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: 937-335-8807 Troy, OH 45373 Dayton, OH 45402 Fax: 937-339-4882 March 24, 2016 Mr. Dennis Zimmer City of Dayton, Division

More information

ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT

ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT OF MARSHALL COURTS ROOF 3300 A&B, 3302 A&B, 3400 A & B, 3402 A & B MARSHALL AVE 800 A & B 35 TH STREET AND 801 A&B 33 RD STREET NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA 23606 MCS JOB #13-031S

More information

900 S. Colorado Blvd. - 5,609 square ft building (new automobile sales showroom and offices) built in 2000/2001; and

900 S. Colorado Blvd. - 5,609 square ft building (new automobile sales showroom and offices) built in 2000/2001; and Sent Via erims November 13, 2013 Sonic Automotive, Inc. 4401 Colwick Road Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 Attention: Mr. Doug Siska Re: Asbestos Survey Murray BMW of Denver 900 S Colorado Blvd and 4320

More information

ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator)

ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator) ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March 2014 Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator) Why Are You Here? You need to know - Where there is (or may be) asbestoscontaining

More information

Procedure. Procedure

Procedure. Procedure Procedure 4.1524 Asbestos Procedure A. Scope... 1 B. Applicability... 2 C. Definitions... 2 D. Responsibilities... 3 E. Hazards... 4 F. General Rules... 4 G. Asbestos Inventory... 5 H. Asbestos Identification...

More information

TCDSB Asbestos Containing Material Re-Assessment Form. Friability (F/NF) Asbestos Content

TCDSB Asbestos Containing Material Re-Assessment Form. Friability (F/NF) Asbestos Content TCDSB Containing Material June 3, 07 Page St. Josaphat Catholic School 50373 0/0A/0B/0/ 0A/0B/03/03 A/04/05/06/06B //4/5B/5 C/S0 Below Remnant Mastic - Below Tiles 00 (now 0A) Above Ceiling Pipe fitting

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 15, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Lead Based Coatings Flowchart

Lead Based Coatings Flowchart 1926.62 Any Detectable Levels of Lead / Stop No Testing or Compliance Issues Lead Coatings NOT Target Housing or Child Occupied Facility Target Housing Child Occupied Family Georgia Certified Firm & Inspect

More information

RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE ACM Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FORM B)

RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE ACM Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FORM B) Corporation Yard RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE AC Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FOR B) THREE-YEAR REINSPECTION CDS CODE 04-61424-0000000 SCHOOL Corporate Yard SCHOOL PHONE NUBER (530) 891-3095 ADDRESS

More information

EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS

EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS The OKLAHOMA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL RULES, Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100-13, Open Burning, specifically, subpart 5, Open burning prohibited, states:

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 16, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 8, 2018 thru May 10, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

The school s metal push-out windows were assessed and nothing of concern was noted.

The school s metal push-out windows were assessed and nothing of concern was noted. February 15, 2017 Courtney Wilton Portland Public Schools 501 North Dixon Portland, OR 97227 Via email: Regarding: cwilton@pps.net Lead Paint Condition Assessment Faubion at Tubman 2231 N Flint Avenue

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 1, 2018 thru May 3, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

VOTER BOND REFERENDUM 2018 SUMMARY OF WORK PROPOSED

VOTER BOND REFERENDUM 2018 SUMMARY OF WORK PROPOSED Ashton Elementary School 1 Masonry Repair $ 42,781.50 2 Replace HVAC $ 375,000.00 3 Replace SAT @ Various Locations $ 92,364.00 3 Recoat & Resurface Exterior Paved Play Area $ 135,978.30 3 Various Technological

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site:July 5, 2018 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora,

More information

Richard Henry Lee Elementary School

Richard Henry Lee Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

3520 A Energy Conservation Standards

3520 A Energy Conservation Standards 3520 A Energy Conservation Standards Regulation Original Adoption: 04/14/2009 Effective Date: 08/06/2009 Revision Dates: 08/05/2009 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this regulation is to establish the energy

More information

Safe Removal of Asbestos. Work Safe Week 2013

Safe Removal of Asbestos. Work Safe Week 2013 Safe Removal of Asbestos Work Safe Week 2013 Work Safe Week 2013 For the respect of others please ensure your mobile phone is switched off or on silent. In the event of an emergency a Convention Centre

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING SHELLY EDGERTON DIRECTOR March 7, 2017 1093 Wayne Rd RE: License #: AS040378598 1093 Wayne Road Dear : Attached

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Edward Jenner Elementary Academy of the Arts

Edward Jenner Elementary Academy of the Arts Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT

LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY 1022 NORTHWEST 27 TH STREET SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: LUCAS OLIVA ARGUS ENVIRONMENTAL SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY 10004 WURZBACH

More information

PBS observed paint chips in the garden, which is located approximately six to 10 feet from painted surfaces that were in intact condition.

PBS observed paint chips in the garden, which is located approximately six to 10 feet from painted surfaces that were in intact condition. December 30, 2016 Courtney Wilton Portland Public Schools 501 North Dixon Portland, OR 97227 Via email: Regarding: cwilton@pps.net Lead Paint Condition Assessment Arleta Elementary School 5109 SE 66th

More information

LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN May, 2017 BOARD OF EDUCATION Cathe Russe President Jackie Lutz Vice President Sam Ach Member John Heggie Member Natalie Jachtorowycz Member John J. Murphy Member

More information

Charles W Earle Elementary School

Charles W Earle Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DATE: July 10, 2007 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE PERSON(S): BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Joe A. Hairston, Superintendent ABBREVIATED FACILITY STATUS REPORT

More information

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _15:42

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _15:42 Phase II: School Safety Report_10112017_15:42 Phase II: School Safety Report Timothy Underwood 2431 W. KY 10 Tollesboro, Kentucky, 41189 United States of America Target Completion Date: 10/12/2017 Last

More information

Mr. Corrado Maltese, B.Sc., C.R.S.P Senior Manager, Occupational Health and Safety Department

Mr. Corrado Maltese, B.Sc., C.R.S.P Senior Manager, Occupational Health and Safety Department Toronto Catholic District School Board Catholic Education Centre 80 Sheppard Avenue East North York, Ontario M2N 6E8 Attention: Mr. Corrado Maltese, B.Sc., C.R.S.P Senior Manager, Occupational Health and

More information

Washington Irving Elementary School

Washington Irving Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

John Palmer Elementary School

John Palmer Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Occupant Load Calculations For Assembly Occupancies and Licensed Beverage Establishments

Occupant Load Calculations For Assembly Occupancies and Licensed Beverage Establishments FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION March 15, 2017 Bulletin 2017-002-FI Occupant Load Calculations For Assembly Occupancies and Licensed Beverage Establishments This bulletin provides guidance

More information

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL # KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL # KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL #17 7070 KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA Prepared for: City of Vancouver - Real Estate and Facilities Management #300 515 West 10 th Avenue Vancouver,

More information

Well managed building mean risk is normal. Fire action notices should be displayed by all alarm break glass call points.

Well managed building mean risk is normal. Fire action notices should be displayed by all alarm break glass call points. Record of significant findings Risk assessment for : Assessment undertaken by : Horsefair House Nigel Billing CMIOSH Date: 28/3/17 Overview of Premises: 2 buildings on 3 stories in an L shaped configuration,

More information

Genevieve Melody Elementary School

Genevieve Melody Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Josefa Ortiz De Dominguez Elementary School

Josefa Ortiz De Dominguez Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Allisonville Elementary School Facilities Highlights Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767

Allisonville Elementary School Facilities Highlights Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767 Allisonville Elementary School Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767 ADA improvements are Fire alarms need to be updated Playground equipment needs to be

More information

Agustin Lara Elementary Academy

Agustin Lara Elementary Academy Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY Revision No.: 11 Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE This procedure establishes a tool to help maintain a safe environment for all patients, visitors and staff by evaluating the loss of a life safety feature during

More information

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951)

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951) Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal 2300 Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA 92501 Ph. (951) 955-4777 Fax (951) 955-4886 Guideline Title: Residentially Based Care Facilities Group

More information

e. Potential sources of air contaminants do not exist near the building. (e.g. chimneys, stacks, industrial plants, exhaust from nearby buildings)

e. Potential sources of air contaminants do not exist near the building. (e.g. chimneys, stacks, industrial plants, exhaust from nearby buildings) 1. Ground Level Indoor Inspection a. Univents are on and air discharge grills are free of obstructions. If false, send email to building principal and facilities director asking staff to be instructed

More information

e. Potential sources of air contaminants do not exist near the building. (e.g. chimneys, stacks, industrial plants, exhaust from nearby buildings)

e. Potential sources of air contaminants do not exist near the building. (e.g. chimneys, stacks, industrial plants, exhaust from nearby buildings) 1. Ground Level Indoor Inspection a. Univents are on and air discharge grills are free of obstructions. If false, send email to building principal and facilities director asking staff to be instructed

More information

PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET

PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET The 2017 Edition supersedes all previous versions for Private Fire Service Installation To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION Illinois

More information

Facilities Management State-Funded and Billable Services

Facilities Management State-Funded and Billable Services Facilities Management State-Funded and Billable Services Facilities Management receives funding to provide maintenance in eligible state-supported areas only, per UCOP guidelines. State-supported areas,

More information

Greenwood Elementary School 5550 South Holly Street Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111

Greenwood Elementary School 5550 South Holly Street Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Greenwood Elementary School 5550 South Holly Street Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Year Opened 1958 Current Square Footage 50,504 Site Acreage 8.53 greenwood.cherrycreekschools.org $220,720 Electrical

More information

HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER. Architectural. January 13, 2014 DeForest Area School District

HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER. Architectural. January 13, 2014 DeForest Area School District HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER Architectural The existing building has approximately 41,823 square feet and sets on a lot about 4.14 acres in size. Parking lots are located along the east and west sides of the

More information

Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017

Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017 Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017 IXONIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ixonia Elementary is getting ready for the start of the new school year! Interior cleaning and classroom

More information

Alessandro Volta Elementary School

Alessandro Volta Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

C. None (No sprinkler system) K3 E. NUMBER OF BEDS CERTIFIED FOR MEDICAID

C. None (No sprinkler system) K3 E. NUMBER OF BEDS CERTIFIED FOR MEDICAID DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES FIRE SAFETY SURVEY REPORT - 2000 LIFE SAFETY CODE Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded LARGE PART I Figure

More information

LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION BEX IV COMMUNITY MEETING JUNE 23, 2016

LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION BEX IV COMMUNITY MEETING JUNE 23, 2016 LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL MODERNIZATION BEX IV COMMUNITY MEETING JUNE 23, 2016 PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW + PRE-DESIGN BEGAN IN FALL OF 2015 + EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS + PROJECTED GROWTH IN HIGH SCHOOL

More information

Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. Shelton School District Emergency Response Plan

Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. Shelton School District Emergency Response Plan Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES Introduction.8.1 Buildings with Inaccessible Exits for Individuals with Disabilities...8.1 Definitions...8.1

More information

Special attention should be given to new students, to students with special needs and to students enrolled in visiting classes.

Special attention should be given to new students, to students with special needs and to students enrolled in visiting classes. Fire Prevention Administrative Procedure 8.90 Board Governance Policy Cross Reference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 16, 17 Legal Reference: E10-468R, Section 36, Manitoba Fire Code Date Adopted: January, 1983 Date

More information

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING Final Focused Tiered Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2002072048 Prepared By: OFFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING University of California One Shields Avenue 376 Mrak Hall Davis,

More information

RESIDENTIAL CARE USER GUIDE UPDATES TO MANITOBA BUILDING/FIRE CODE:

RESIDENTIAL CARE USER GUIDE UPDATES TO MANITOBA BUILDING/FIRE CODE: RESIDENTIAL CARE USER GUIDE UPDATES TO MANITOBA BUILDING/FIRE CODE: Manitoba Regulation 221/2015 and Manitoba Regulation 222/2015 DATE: MARCH 17, 2016 1. INTRODUCTION On April 1, 2016, new building and

More information

This regulation outlines procedures to be followed for fire drills and all school event decorations.

This regulation outlines procedures to be followed for fire drills and all school event decorations. SUPPORT SERVICES September 14, 2016 SUPPORT SERVICES Fire Safety I. Purpose The purpose of this regulation is to establish guidelines for promoting fire safety awareness, practices, and policies to ensure

More information

1. Accident Prevention

1. Accident Prevention Office of Environmental Health & Safety Facility Inspection Program 333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 20 th Floor Los Angeles, Ca 90017 Phone: (213) 241-3199 Fax: (213) 241-6816 SCHOOL SAFETY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST

More information

NYC Department of Education

NYC Department of Education NYC Department of Education Building Assessment Survey 2017-2018 Asset: P.S. 16 - BROOKLYN, 157 WILSON STREET, New York, 11211 Inspection Id Inspection Type Time In Last Edited EE : Electrical 2017-11-30

More information

Joseph Brennemann Elementary School

Joseph Brennemann Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Francis M McKay Elementary School

Francis M McKay Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

Ch. 54 GROUP B EDUCATIONAL 34 CHAPTER 54. GROUP B EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY GROUP

Ch. 54 GROUP B EDUCATIONAL 34 CHAPTER 54. GROUP B EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY GROUP Ch. 54 GROUP B EDUCATIONAL 34 CHAPTER 54. GROUP B EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY GROUP Sec. 54.1. Group B occupancies. 54.2. Classification. 54.3. Nursery schools, day care centers and the like. 54.4. Separation

More information

Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program. School Radon Testing Checklist

Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program. School Radon Testing Checklist Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program School Radon Testing Checklist Purpose: This checklist has been prepared to provide school employees

More information

Briar Crest Elementary

Briar Crest Elementary Promises Kept This document includes partial lists of major projects completed at Pattonville Schools since 1986 as part of past bond issues approved by the Pattonville community. Briar Crest Elementary

More information

At least 10 calendar days prior to project start date Within the last 30 days of a project that will extend beyond 12 months

At least 10 calendar days prior to project start date Within the last 30 days of a project that will extend beyond 12 months New York State Department of Labor Division of Safety and Health (518) 485-9263 Filing an asbestos project notification Who must provide asbestos project notification If the asbestos removal project is:

More information

PLATTEVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL

PLATTEVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Architectural The building has aluminum clad wood awning windows in combination with aluminum fixed glass units. They appear to be exterior glazed with insulated glazing. See photo 2. Platteville Middle

More information

Hawthorn Building. Penn State Altoona Campus Altoona, PA. Walter Nichols. Lighting/Electrical Option Faculty Advisor: Dr.

Hawthorn Building. Penn State Altoona Campus Altoona, PA. Walter Nichols. Lighting/Electrical Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hawthorn Building Penn State Altoona Campus Altoona, PA Walter Nichols Lighting/Electrical Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Richard Mistrick 58,800 sq.ft. 2 Stories above grade Steel frame with curtain wall

More information

<< COMPANY LETTERHEAD >>

<< COMPANY LETTERHEAD >> Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program Attn: Engineering Department 142 E. Ontario Street Chicago, IL 60611 > < Date > RE: Request for Code Equivalency ABC General Hospital,

More information

TUFTS FACILITIES SERVICES BASELINE MAINTENANCE VS. CHARGEABLE SERVICES

TUFTS FACILITIES SERVICES BASELINE MAINTENANCE VS. CHARGEABLE SERVICES TUFTS FACILITIES SERVICES BASELINE MAINTENANCE VS. CHARGEABLE SERVICES Below is a list of services delivered by the University s Facilities Services Department. While all of these services are delivered

More information

Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence:

Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence: Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence: Bartley Residence, #6 Location #: 458, Marathon - Meeting Room, Floor: Marathon - 1, Room Number: RM100 Walls NI Drywall and joint cosurface

More information

WATER QUALITY TESTING FOR SCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 HOOVER SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS OCTOBER 3, 2017 PROJECT NUMBER:

WATER QUALITY TESTING FOR SCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 HOOVER SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS OCTOBER 3, 2017 PROJECT NUMBER: WATER QUALITY TESTING FOR SCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 HOOVER SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS OCTOBER 3, 2017 PROJECT NUMBER: 17-18350 1550 Hubbard Ave., Batavia, IL 60510, 630-879-3006 Schaumburg

More information

( )

( ) Course Title: Fire Dynamics (3087) Course Number: FST - 3087 Course Credit Hours: (3) Three Semester Hours Instructor Information: Bernard W. Becker, III, MS (937-751-7371) ccfdchiefbecker@yahoo.com Textbook:

More information

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURE

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURE TITLE: ISSUER: Occupancy Inspections for New Schools and Modernization Projects John Sterritt, Director Office of Environmental Health and Safety ROUTING Office of Environmental Health & Safety Staff DATE:

More information

September 30, Dear Fire Suppression System Contractor/Designer:

September 30, Dear Fire Suppression System Contractor/Designer: CITY OF BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 Phone (406) 582-2350 CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 20 E Olive St, STE 208 Bozeman, Montana 59715-4790 Phone (406) 582-2375

More information

2014 Bond Project Guide

2014 Bond Project Guide 2014 Bond Project Guide Bush Elementary School Page 1 Instructional Technology Computers, Projectors, Mobile Carts, Document Cameras and Printers Wireless Connectivity New Construction New Tech Center

More information

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE FIPT 202A CIC Approval: 12/21/2006 BOT APPROVAL: 05/13/1998 STATE APPROVAL: EFFECTIVE TERM: Fall 1998 SECTION I SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE SUBJECT

More information

BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE

BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE Checklist items A - L may receive a result of Pass or Fail A. Railing is present for interior and exterior steps with more

More information

MUKWONAGO SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT / MAINTENANCE STUDY

MUKWONAGO SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT / MAINTENANCE STUDY MUKWONAGO SCHOOL DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL The original school building was dedicated in 1954 as the High School, with an addition in 1959, a library addition in 1970, and an addition/renovation

More information

Occupancy Packet & Business License Application

Occupancy Packet & Business License Application YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A NEW OWNER/TENANT MUST OBTAIN AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT BEFORE OCCUPYING THE PREMISES AT ADDRESS OF PROPERTY In Franklin Park, Illinois 60131. Applications for Occupancy Permits

More information

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _08:56

Phase II: School Safety Report_ _08:56 Phase II: School Safety Report_10192017_08:56 Phase II: School Safety Report Robert Pollard 76 Patriot Lane Hindman, Kentucky, 41822 United States of America Target Completion Date: 10/31/2017 Last Modified:

More information

BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO

BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Division of Fire Prevention and Control BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO

More information