Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Transcription

1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST Chicago, IL, 6637 DATE LAST THREE YEAR REINSPECTION WAS COMPLETED 3/1/213 If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. SECTION II (Please type or print) PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING FOR YOUR THREE YEAR REINSPECTION: DATE REINSPECTION COMPLETED: 3/9/216 IDPH INSPECTOR LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED INSPECTOR NAME (Please Print): Brian Barry IDPH MP LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED MANAGEMENT PLANNER NAME (Please Print): DESIGNATED PERSON (Please Print): Robert Christlieb ENROLLMENT 715 Daniel Juneau PHONE: (773) /9/216 Signature of Designated Person Date SECTION III PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING INFORMATION FOR ANY CHANGES WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. School building has been sold. Date of Sale: School has been closed. Date closed: School building has been demolished. School building is asbestos free since last reinspection: Please explain in writing why the school building is now asbestos free and include the supporting documentation. If a new school building has been added to the district, submit either and exclusionary statement or a management plan and inspection report. Include the complete name, address and city of school building. Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: IL Revised 1.3

2 THREE YEAR REINSPECTION CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST 299 Chicago, IL, 6637 Unit: Building ID: 139 IDPH ID Number: REPORT DATE: Wednesday, March 9, 216 Prepared for: 125 S. Clark Street Chicago, IL 663 Prepared by: 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone (312) Fax (312) DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCHOOL REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW

3 February 23, 216 Mr. R. Kent Cook Asbestos Program Illinois Department of Public Health 525 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois Re: Three-Year Reinspections Dear Mr. Cook:, Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC), conducted the ThreeYear Reinspections and performed management plan updates for the (CPS) facilities in Region 3,4,5 Elementary Schools. Please update your records with the following information. School District: 299 Unit: School: Region: 5 IDPH ID: Building ID: 139 Address: Chicago, IL, 6637 Building Contact: Williams, Jesse Contact Phone: Current Building Owners: Review 3/9/216 Inspector: Brian Barry Management Planner: Daniel Juneau Inspector IDPH License: Management Planner IDPH License: If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (312) Sincerely, Daniel Juneau

4 Environmental tification to Occupants To: Faculty, Staff and Parents From: February 23, 216 RE:, Unit Chicago, IL, 6637 Dear Faculty, Staff and Parents, This letter is to notify you that the 216 asbestos three year re-inspection has been completed at Hyde Park Academy, following the Federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 4 CFR Part 763, Subpart E and is available for your review at the main office of the school. Although asbestos-containing materials have been identified at, there is no reason to believe that any threat to the health of students or staff exists at this time. CPS will continue to carefully monitor the condition of asbestos-containing materials and if conditions warrant, all appropriate steps will be taken to maintain the health and safety of all building occupants. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please feel free to contact Robert Christlieb, the designated Local Education Authority's Designated Person at (773)

5 Table of Contents I. School and Inspection Information II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Abatement History V. Reassessments and Recommendations VI. Conclusions Table I: Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table II: Management Planner's Review APPENDICES: Appendix A: Assessment Sheets, Drawings and Photos Appendix B: Inspector and Management Planner Licenses Appendix C: Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: Laboratory Results Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

6 SCHOOL AND INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. School Information School: Address: IDPH ID: Contact: Williams, Jesse Unit: Chicago, IL, 6637 Building ID: 139 Phone: Description of Facility Original Construction: 1937 Total Square Footage: 2369 Current Occupancy: Additional Construction: of Floors: 3 Phone: (773) Managing Environmental Consultant MEC: Contact: Dan Juneau Address 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector Inspector Name: Brian Barry Signature: 2/23/216 Inspector IDPH license # ,197,1937 LEA Designated Person Contact: Robert Christlieb Address: 125 South Clark Street, 17th Floor Chicago, IL Region: 5 Management Planner Management Planner Name: Daniel Juneau Management Planner IDPH license # Review 3/9/ LEA Designated Person's Acknowledgement Signature: 3/9/216 The reinspection report and recommendations have been received by me and appropriate action will be taken by the School District. Signature: 3/9/216 Name: Robert Christlieb Unit : Building: 139

7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY was retained by the (CPS) to perform a three-year asbestos reinspection of the. This inspection was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) part (b), and the ongoing Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M) originally designed in the School's Asbestos Management Plan. The purpose of this three-year reinspection is to record any condition changes in the asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in the school since the previous three-year reinspection and the six-month periodic surveillance, to identify, assess, and include any Homogeneous Areas (HA) not identified in the Management Plan, and to recommend an appropriate response action to manage asbestos. The inspector conducted a three-year reinspection of this facility under Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) school reinspection requirements and AHERA, sections and The main building and each addition to the main building, if constructed at different dates, were inspected separately. Laboratory accreditations are included in Appendix C, laboratory results are included in Appendix D, and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix E. te: During previous inspections, some of the HA(s) were identified together as 9" x 9" floor tile (FT), mastics assoc. with 9" x 9" FT, 12" x 12" FT, mastics assoc. with 12" x 12" FT, pipe insulation, etc. Some of these HA(s) have been re-identified by areas that are uniform in color, texture, construction date, application date, and general appearance. The inspector has determined the following: A. The following HAs have changed assessment categories for Building 139: Unit: 2 hard plaster 5 12x12 ceiling tile 6 2x2 ceiling tile 7 2x4 pinhole ceiling tile 8 2x4 perforated ceiling tile 17 spray-on fireproofing 24 2' ceiling tile 25 2' ceiling tile 34 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. Building: 139

8 Unit: 64 12x12 ceiling tile text 93 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic 94 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 95 Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile HA-11 new 2'x2' white ceiling tile HA-12 new 2'x4' white ceiling tile J fiberglass fittings Building: 139

9 B. The following new homogenous areas have been identified for Building 139: Unit: 93 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic 94 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 95 Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Building: 139

10 C. This reinspection covered only physically accessible and visible areas and materials that were identified in the LEA's management plan. The following materials were concealed and/or contained in areas that were inaccessible for sampling and have been classified as Assumed: Unit: plaster hard plaster 12x12 ceiling tile 2x4 pinhole ceiling tile 2x4 perforated ceiling tile ceiling tectum panels 12x12 metal ceiling tile 12x12 ceiling tile text (material not observed) 2' ceiling tile 2' ceiling tile 9x9 med.brn. F.T. 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 12x12 off-white F.T. 12x12 white F.T. 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 9x9 tan F.T. 12x12 dark tan F.T. mastic 12x12 white F.T. mastic 12x12 ceiling tile text 12x12 ceiling tile text mastic ceiling/tile system 12x12 ceiling tile matsic 2'x4' ceiling tile drop-in ceiling tile 2'x4' ceiling tile black trim vinyl baseboard black trim vinyl baseboard transite wind/sill transite windowsill grey carpet mastic green carpet mastic brown carpet mastic dr. orange carpet mastic orange carpet mastic 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Gray mix Terrazzo 12" x 12" White w/gray and black floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile 12" x 12" white with blue and red floor tile Building: 139

11 HA-1 HA-11 HA-12 HA-13 P Q Q-1 R R-1 S S-1 T T-1 Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile Black Chalk boards Black Chalk Board Adhesive 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Glue for 1'x1' white ceiling tile with grooves new 2'x2' white ceiling tile new 2'x4' white ceiling tile Black sink undercoating 2'x2' WHITE CEILING TILE LINOLEUM FLOORING Grey with white LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC 12x12 BROWN VFT 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC 12x12 BLUE VFT 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT-MASTIC The following areas were deemed to be inaccessible: Unit: 12x12 ceiling tile text ceiling tectum panels 12x12 metal ceiling tile 9x9 light brown F.T. mastic 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 12x12 tan F.T. mastic 12x12 tan F.T. mastic 12x12 lt. Brn. Tile mastic 9x9 med. brn. F.T. mastic 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 12x12 beige F.T. Mastic 12x12 brown F.T. mastic 12x12 dark tan F.T. mastic 12x12 lt. Grn. F.T. mastic 12x12 off-white F.T. mastic 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. mastic 9x9 brown F.T. mastic 9x9 drk.brn. F.T. mastic 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 9x9 brown F.T. mastic Building: 139

12 I J K L N Q-1 R-1 S-1 T-1 12x12 ceiling tile text mastic 12x12 ceiling tile matsic black trim vinyl baseboard mastic blk. Trim vinyl baseboard mastic black trim vinyl baseboard mastic grey carpet mastic green carpet mastic brown carpet mastic dr. orange carpet mastic orange carpet mastic Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile Black Chalk Board Adhesive 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile cardboard fittings fiberglass fittings aircell duct insulation aircell pipe insulation fiber glass fittings LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT-MASTIC Materials were also listed as "assumed" if they were in good condition and sampling was not conducted to avoid damage. This reinspection was conducted by Brian Barry, IDPH License # The Management Plan was updated by Daniel Juneau, IDPH License # Inspector and Management Planner Licenses are included in Appendix B. Unit: Building: 139

13 III. METHODOLOGY Tasks performed on-site included the following: IV. 1. Review current management plan, identify HA(s) and extract appropriate information. 2. Examine and verify abatement records. 3. Touch and visually and physically reinspect and reassess the condition of all friable known or assumed ACBM. 4. Touch and visually and physically reinspect all non-friable known or assumed ACBM to determine whether these materials have become friable since the last inspection or periodic surveillance. 5. Identify any condition changes that may affect Hazard Ranking of known ACBM or Assumed ACBM, as well as any HA(s) that have become friable since the last reinspection. 6. Collect bulk samples from each newly discovered friable HA or previously assumed and submit for laboratory analysis. 7. Tabulate reinspection findings and submit for management planner review and recommendations with appropriate response actions based on the AHERA Damage Category of the ACBM. 8. Submit reinspection findings and management planner recommendations to the LEA within thirty (3) days for inclusion into the management plan. ABATEMENT HISTORY The information collected from the existing management plan and inspection report(s) and from interviews with the school official revealed that the following asbestos abatement was conducted at the school since the previous Three year Reinspection. Abatement Dates: V. REASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The reassessments and recommendations are summarized in Tables I and II on the following pages. Detailed Hazard Assessment Sheets and Drawings and Photos (if applicable) are included in Appendix A. VI. CONCLUSIONS The Building 139 Three-Year reinspection has been completed and response actions have been recommended for both friable and non-friable materials. A timely execution of the response actions recommended will enable the LEA and the Designated Person(s) to effectively manage the existing ACBM. This three-year reinspection report should be inspected in the current Management plan at the CPS Central Office, and one (1) copy should be kept at the school for use when planning any renovation and/or demolition activities in areas where ACBM has been identified. Also, periodic surveillance documentation and any summary reports from any response actions that are executed at the school should be used to update the Management Plan. Unit: Building: 139

14 Table I Inspector's Reinspection Findings

15 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 1 plaster 2 hard plaster 3 hard plaster 4 12x12 ceiling tile text 5 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units 14, building 1911 ASSUMED SURFACE N NONE Change in Assessment Category Damage Category Damage Reason 14, building 1937 CHR SURFACE Y NONE Yes 14, building 197 ASSUMED SURFACE N NONE building room 142 CHR Y NONE 12x12 ceiling tile 1, 1937 building ASSUMED Y NONE Yes 6 2x2 ceiling tile 34, building AMO Y NONE Yes 7 2x4 pinhole ceiling tile 34, building ASSUMED Y NONE Yes 8 2x4 perforated ceiling tile 1, building ASSUMED Y NONE Yes 9 ceiling tectum panels 13, ASSUMED N NONE 1 9x9 light brown F.T. 16,8 CHR N DIST 5 ACBM with the potential for damage x12 tan F.T. 99, CHR N DIST 1 ACBM with the potential for damage x12 metal ceiling tile 3,75 ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage 13 transite table tops 1, 1911 buildings (5 ft. in air inaccessible to sample) 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, , 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, natatorium ( ceiling is inaccessible) Science labs CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Disturbance Potential

16 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 14 transite panel material 15 accoustical ceiling tile (no material) x12 ceiling tile text (material not observed) spray-on fireproofing 45, 18 9x9 light brown F.T. mastic 16,8 19 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 11,4 2 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 21, 21 12x12 tan F.T. mastic 99, 22 12x12 tan F.T. mastic x12 lt. Brn. Tile mastic 1,7 24 2' ceiling tile 14, 25 2' ceiling tile 1,2 26 9x9 tan F.T. 11,4 27 9x9 med.brn. F.T. 21, 28 12x12 tan F.T x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 1,7 Material Quantity 2,5 Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Science labs 312, building CHR N NONE UNDEFINE D ASSUMED BLDG 1911 above 2nd & 3rd floor ceiling tile 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, 346 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 197 building, weight room 1937 building CHR SURFACE Y CHR CHR 197/ rear of rm nd flr. S/W corridor 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 197 building, 1937 building Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Change in Assessment Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage NONE Yes N NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage N NONE CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ASSUMED Y NONE Yes ASSUMED Y NONE Yes CHR N NONE ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the

17 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 3 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. 2,5 31 9x9 tan F.T. 1, x12 beige F.T x12 brown F.T. 4, 34 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 11, 35 12x12 dark tan F.T x12 lt. Grn. F.T. 1, x12 off-white F.T. 1, x12 white F.T x12 Tan speckled F.T. 4 9x9 brown F.T. 41 9x9 drk.brn. F.T. 42 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location weight room Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor Room 21, 311 Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category CHR N NONE CHR N NONE Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. Locker rooms 1st floor 1911 building CHR N NONE CHR N NONE ASSUMED N NONE Yes CHR N NONE 1911 building, patched areas Room 133 CHR N NONE Engineer's office ASSUMED N NONE 2,5 Rooms 135, 137 ASSUMED N NONE 49 CHR N NONE 95 CHR N NONE 75 CHR N NONE 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 1,5 ASSUMED N NONE 43 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. 1,8 CHR N 44 9x9 tan F.T. 425 Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 1937 building ASSUMED 45 9x9 brown F.T. 3,1 CHR 46 9x9 brown F.T. 6 SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways CHR Damage Category potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage NONE ACBM with the potential for damage N NONE NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage N N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage

18 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 47 9x9 med. brn. F.T. mastic 48 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 49 12x12 beige F.T. Mastic 5 12x12 brown F.T. mastic x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 12x12 dark tan F.T. mastic x12 lt. Grn. F.T. mastic 1, x12 off-white F.T. mastic 55 12x12 white F.T. mastic x9 drk.brn. F.T. mastic 59 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type 2,5 CHR N NONE 1,3 Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor Room 21, 311 CHR N 75 CHR N 4, CHR ABATED ASSUMED Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. Locker rooms 1st floor Auditorium 1911 building, patched areas Room 133 CHR 1,825 Engineer's office CHR 2,5 Rooms 135, 137 ASSUMED 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. mastic 49 9x9 brown F.T. mastic x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 1,5 6 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 1,8 61 9x9 tan F.T. mastic 425 Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 1937 buildng 62 9x9 brown F.T. mastic 3,1 63 9x9 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic x12 ceiling tile text 25, SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 1911 building Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Change in Assessment Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage NONE N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage N NONE NONE N NONE N NONE CHR N NONE CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage N CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR N NONE N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage CHR CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ASSUMED Y NONE Yes Any remaining friable ACBM or friable

19 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 65 12x12 ceiling tile text mastic 66 ceiling/tile system 67 12x12 ceiling tile matsic 68 2'x4' ceiling tile 69 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category 25, 1911 building ASSUMED N NONE 15, 1911 building ASSUMED Y NONE 1, building ASSUMED N NONE building ASSUMED Y NONE drop-in ceiling tile 8, building ASSUMED Y NONE 7 2'x4' ceiling tile 1,2 197 building ASSUMED Y NONE 71 black trim vinyl baseboard 18, LF 1911 building ASSUMED N NONE 72 black trim vinyl baseboard mastic 18, LF 1911 building CHR N NONE 73 blk. Trim vinyl baseboard 275 LF 1937 building CHR N NONE 74 blk. Trim vinyl baseboard mastic 275 LF 1937 building CHR N NONE 75 black trim vinyl baseboard 3 LF 197 building ASSUMED N NONE 76 black trim vinyl baseboard mastic 77 transite wind/sill 78 transite windowsill 79 grey carpet mastic 8 green carpet mastic 81 brown carpet mastic 82 dr. orange carpet mastic 83 orange carpet mastic 84 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile 3 LF 197 building CHR N NONE 3, 1911 building ASSUMED N NONE building ASSUMED N NONE building ASSUMED N NONE 1, building ASSUMED N NONE 1, building ASSUMED N NONE 15, 1911 building ASSUMED N NONE 21, 1911 building ASSUMED N NONE 3,6 Auditorium, Rm 142 ASSUMED N NONE Damage Category suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the Damage Reason Disturbance Potential

20 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Gray mix Terrazzo 87 12" x 12" White w/gray and black floor tile 88 Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile 89 12" x 12" white with blue and red floor tile 9 91 Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile Black Chalk boards 92 Black Chalk Board Adhesive 93 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic 94 Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type 3, Auditorium ASSUMED N NONE 5, ASSUMED N NONE 3,2 ASSUMED N NONE 5 ASSUMED N NONE 1,8 Entrance and stairwells Room 114 and patches in room 21 Room 114 and patches in Room 21 Room 117 ASSUMED N NONE 1,8 Room 117 ASSUMED N NONE 13, Classrooms ASSUMED N NONE 13, Classrooms ASSUMED N NONE 2, Library ASSUMED N NONE Yes 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 8, ASSUMED N NONE Yes 95 Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 8, ASSUMED N NONE Yes A B C Mag block mag block mag block ABATED ABATED ABATED TSI TSI TSI D E F mag block ABATED mag block preform pipe ABATED ABATED ABATED TSI TSI TSI G H preform fittings cardboard pipe insulation ABATED ABATED TSI TSI HA-1 Glue for 1'x1' white ceiling tile with grooves new 2'x2' white ceiling tile Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A boiler garage suspened in pump room pump rm. boiler room boiler room & tunnel basement & tunnels compressor rm./ pump rm. Absorption rm./ tunnels Rm. 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 311 throughout 1st and 3rd floor ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED Y NONE Yes HA-11 Material Quantity 34,5 35, Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ne ne Moderate ne Moderate ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM

21 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description HA-12 new 2'x4' white ceiling tile HA-13 Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units 35, throughout 1st and 3rd floors ASSUMED Y NONE Change in Assessment Category Yes Black sink undercoating 15 SURFACE N NONE I 4 LF Art rooms 41, 42, 46 tunnels/compressor rm. ASSUMED cardboard fittings CHR TSI Y NONE J fiberglass fittings 1,8 LF 1911 building CHR TSI Y NONE Yes K aircell duct insulation 3 tunnels CHR TSI Y NONE L aircell pipe insulation 2,24 LF pump rm. Tunnels CHR TSI Y NONE M fittings on aircell 14 LF pump room 1911 CHR TSI Y NONE N fiber glass fittings 4 LF 1937 building CHR TSI Y NONE O fiberglass fittings 197bldg P 2'x2' WHITE CEILING TILE NOT_TEST ED ASSUMED Y NONE Q LINOLEUM FLOORING Grey with white Q-1 LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC R R-1 Damage Category Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with potential for significant damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ne Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Moderate 69, THROUGHOUT 1911 BLDG 2, ROOM 245, and 343 ASSUMED N NONE 95 ROOM 245, and 343 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 BROWN VFT 2,3 ROOMS 341, 333 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC 2,3 ROOMS 341, 333 ASSUMED N NONE S 12x12 BLUE VFT 3,25 ASSUMED N NONE S-1 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC 3,25 EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM EAST STAIRWELL, ASSUMED N NONE Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage

22 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description Material Quantity Material Units T 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT 45 T-1 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFTMASTIC 45 Material Location FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N NONE Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage

23 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report Reinspection Date 2/23/216 Inspector Name Inspector's Comments Brian Barry /15/217 Inspector's IDPH License Number / Expiration Date HA Number: Inspector Comments: Damage is located throughout the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd corridors Damage is located in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor corridors t observed 216

24 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: Inspector Comments:

25 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: Inspector Comments:

26 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: A B C D E F G H HA-1 HA-11 HA-12 HA-13 I J K L Inspector Comments:

27 School Unit Building ID 139 Address Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: M N O P Q Q-1 R R-1 S S-1 T T-1 Inspector Comments:

28 Table II Management Planner's Review

29 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response 1 2 plaster hard plaster 14, 14, building 1911 building 1937 Assumed Chrysotile SURFACE SURFACE Yes 3 4 hard plaster 12x12 ceiling tile text 14, 7 building building room 142 Assumed Chrysotile SURFACE Yes 5 12x12 ceiling tile 1, 1937 building Assumed Yes 6 2x2 ceiling tile 34, building Amosite Yes 7 2x4 pinhole ceiling tile 34, building Assumed Yes 8 2x4 perforated ceiling tile 1, building Assumed Yes 9 ceiling tectum panels 13, Assumed 1 9x9 light brown F.T. 16,8 Chrysotile x12 tan F.T. 99, Chrysotile x12 metal ceiling tile 3,75 Assumed transite table tops transite panel material accoustical ceiling tile (no material) 12x12 ceiling tile text (material not observed) spray-on fireproofing 1, 2,5 Chrysotile Chrysotile Undefined Assumed Chrysotile 45, SURFACE Yes 9x9 light brown F.T. mastic 16,8 Chrysotile 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM buildings (5 ft. in air inaccessible to sample) 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, , 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, natatorium ( ceiling is inaccessible) Science labs Science labs 312, building 1937 building BLDG 1911 above 2nd & 3rd floor ceiling tile 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM

30 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response x9 tan F.T. mastic 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 11,4 21, Chrysotile Chrysotile 21 12x12 tan F.T. mastic 99, Chrysotile 22 12x12 tan F.T. mastic 9 Chrysotile x12 lt. Brn. Tile mastic 2' ceiling tile 1,7 14, 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 197 building, weight room 1937 building Chrysotile Assumed Yes 25 2' ceiling tile 1,2 Assumed Yes x9 tan F.T. 9x9 med.brn. F.T. 11,4 21, Chrysotile Assumed 28 12x12 tan F.T. 9 Chrysotile x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. 1,7 2,5 Assumed Chrysotile x9 tan F.T. 12x12 beige F.T. 1,3 75 Chrysotile Chrysotile x12 brown F.T. 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 12x12 dark tan F.T. 12x12 lt. Grn. F.T. 12x12 off-white F.T. 12x12 white F.T. 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. 9x9 brown F.T. 4, 11, 8 1,6 1,825 2, Chrysotile Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile 41 9x9 drk.brn. F.T. 75 Chrysotile 42 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 1,5 197/ rear of rm nd flr. S/W corridor 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 197 building, weight room Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor Room 21, 311 Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. Locker rooms 1st floor 1911 building 1911 building, patched areas Room 133 Engineer's office Rooms 135, 137 Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Assumed

31 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response 43 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. 1,8 Chrysotile x9 tan F.T. 9x9 brown F.T ,1 Assumed Chrysotile 46 9x9 brown F.T. 6 Chrysotile 47 9x9 med. brn. F.T. mastic 2,5 Chrysotile x9 tan F.T. mastic 12x12 beige F.T. Mastic 1,3 75 Chrysotile Chrysotile x12 brown F.T. mastic 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 12x12 dark tan F.T. mastic 12x12 lt. Grn. F.T. mastic 12x12 off-white F.T. mastic 12x12 white F.T. mastic 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. mastic 9x9 brown F.T. mastic 4, Chrysotile Abated Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile 8 1,6 1,825 2, x9 drk.brn. F.T. mastic 75 Chrysotile 59 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 1,5 Chrysotile 6 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic 1,8 Chrysotile x9 tan F.T. mastic 9x9 brown F.T. mastic 425 3,1 Chrysotile Chrysotile 63 9x9 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 6 Chrysotile 64 12x12 ceiling tile text 25, Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 1937 building SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor Room 21, 311 Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. Locker rooms 1st floor Auditorium 1911 building, patched areas Room 133 Engineer's office Rooms 135, 137 Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 1937 buildng SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 1911 building Assumed Yes x12 ceiling tile text mastic ceiling/tile system 25, 15, 1911 building 1911 building Assumed Assumed Yes 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable

32 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units x12 ceiling tile matsic 2'x4' ceiling tile 1, building 1937 building Assumed Assumed Yes 69 drop-in ceiling tile 8, building Assumed Yes 7 2'x4' ceiling tile 1,2 197 building Assumed Yes black trim vinyl baseboard black trim vinyl baseboard mastic blk. Trim vinyl baseboard blk. Trim vinyl baseboard mastic black trim vinyl baseboard black trim vinyl baseboard mastic transite wind/sill transite windowsill grey carpet mastic green carpet mastic brown carpet mastic dr. orange carpet mastic orange carpet mastic 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Gray mix Terrazzo 12" x 12" White w/gray and black floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile 12" x 12" white with blue and red floor tile Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile Black Chalk boards Black Chalk Board Adhesive 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 18, 18, , ,9 1,2 15, 21, 3,6 3, 5, 3,2 5 LF LF LF LF LF LF 1911 building 1911 building 1937 building 1937 building 197 building 197 building 1911 building 1937 building 1911 building 1911 building 1911 building 1911 building 1911 building Auditorium, Rm 142 Auditorium Entrance and stairwells Room 114 and patches in room 21 Room 114 and patches in Room 21 Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed Chrysotile Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed LF LF LF LF LF LF suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 1,8 1,8 Room 117 Room 117 Assumed Assumed 13, 13, 2, 8, Classrooms Classrooms Library Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Damage Category Response

33 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response 95 Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile 8, Assumed A B C D E F G H Mag block mag block mag block mag block ABATED mag block preform pipe preform fittings cardboard pipe insulation Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI TSI HA1 HA11 HA12 HA13 I Glue for 1'x1' white ceiling tile with grooves 34,5 Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A boiler garage suspened in pump room pump rm. boiler room boiler room & tunnel basement & tunnels compressor rm./ pump rm. Absorption rm./ tunnels Rm. 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 311 Assumed new 2'x2' white ceiling tile 35, throughout 1st and 3rd floor Assumed Yes new 2'x4' white ceiling tile 35, throughout 1st and 3rd floors Assumed Yes Black sink undercoating 15 Art rooms 41, 42, 46 Assumed SURFACE cardboard fittings 4 LF tunnels/compressor rm. Chrysotile TSI Yes LF J fiberglass fittings 1,8 LF 1911 building Chrysotile TSI Yes LF K aircell duct insulation 3 tunnels Chrysotile TSI Yes L aircell pipe insulation 2,24 LF pump rm. Tunnels Chrysotile TSI Yes LF M fittings on aircell 14 LF pump room 1911 Chrysotile TSI Yes LF N fiber glass fittings 4 LF 1937 building Chrysotile TSI Yes LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 5 ACBM with potential for significant damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM O P fiberglass fittings 2'x2' WHITE CEILING TILE 69, 197bldg THROUGHOUT 1911 BLDG t Tested Assumed Yes Q Q-1 LINOLEUM FLOORING Grey with white LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC 2, 95 ROOM 245, and 343 ROOM 245, and 343 Assumed Assumed 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM

34 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 5 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response R R-1 S 12x12 BROWN VFT 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC 12x12 BLUE VFT 2,3 2,3 3,25 Assumed Assumed Assumed S-1 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC 3,25 Assumed T 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT 45 Assumed T-1 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT-MASTIC 45 ROOMS 341, 333 ROOMS 341, 333 EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY Assumed

35 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6637 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report 3/9/216 Review Date Manager Planner Name Daniel Juneau /15/216 Manager IDPH License /Expiration HA Number Management Comments Repair or Replace when possible. Continue O&M Repair or Replace when possible. Continue O&M If observed, implement O&M.

36 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6637 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number Management Comments

37 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6637 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number Management Comments

38 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6637 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number A B C D E F G H HA-1 HA-11 HA-12 HA-13 Management Comments

39 School Address Unit Building ID Chicago, IL, 6637 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number I J K L M N O P Q Q-1 R R-1 S S-1 T T-1 Management Comments

40 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

41 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ plaster building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

42 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 2 hard plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

43 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ hard plaster building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

44 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3 hard plaster HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

45 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ hard plaster building In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

46 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 12x12 ceiling tile text HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

47 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile text 1937 building room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

48 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5 12x12 ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

49 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile 1937 building 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

50 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 6 2x2 ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with potential for significant damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Amosite FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 345 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

51 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x2 ceiling tile 1911 building 345 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

52 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7 2x4 pinhole ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 345 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

53 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x4 pinhole ceiling tile 1911 building 345 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

54 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 8 2x4 perforated ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

55 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x4 perforated ceiling tile 1911 building 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

56 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 9 ceiling tectum panels HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 buildings (5 ft. in air inaccessible to sample) 13 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

57 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ ceiling tectum panels 1911 buildings (5 ft. in air inaccessible to sample) 13 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

58 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 9x9 light brown F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, COMMENTS: Damage is located throughout the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd corridors Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

59 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 light brown F.T. 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Repair or Replace when possible. Continue O&M Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

60 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11 12x12 tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, COMMENTS: Damage is located in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor corridors Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

61 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 tan F.T. 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Repair or Replace when possible. Continue O&M Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

62 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 12 12x12 metal ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 natatorium ( ceiling is inaccessible) 375 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

63 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 metal ceiling tile 1911 natatorium ( ceiling is inaccessible) 375 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

64 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 13 transite table tops HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Science labs 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

65 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ transite table tops Science labs 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

66 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 14 transite panel material HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Science labs 312, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

67 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ transite panel material Science labs 312, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

68 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 15 accoustical ceiling tile (no material) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Undefined FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

69 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ accoustical ceiling tile (no material) 1911 building 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

70 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 16 12x12 ceiling tile text (material not observed) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

71 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile text (material not observed) 1937 building 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If observed, implement O&M. Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

72 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 17 spray-on fireproofing HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with potential for significant damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: BLDG 1911 above 2nd & 3rd floor ceiling tile 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

73 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ spray-on fireproofing BLDG 1911 above 2nd & 3rd floor ceiling tile 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

74 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 18 9x9 light brown F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

75 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 light brown F.T. mastic 13, 132, 136, 138, 14, , 21, 232, 236, 238, 24, 33, 35, 37, 39, 31, 332, 334, 336, 338, 34, 344, 345, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

76 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 19 9x9 tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 114 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

77 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T. mastic 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 114 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

78 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 2 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 21 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

79 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 21 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

80 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 21 12x12 tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 99 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

81 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 tan F.T. mastic SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 99 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

82 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 22 12x12 tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 9 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

83 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 tan F.T. mastic 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 9 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

84 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 23 12x12 lt. Brn. Tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197 building, weight room 17 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

85 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. Tile mastic 197 building, weight room 17 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

86 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 24 2' ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 14 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

87 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ ' ceiling tile 1937 building 14 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

88 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 25 2' ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197/ rear of rm nd flr. S/W corridor 12 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

89 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ ' ceiling tile 197/ rear of rm nd flr. S/W corridor 12 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

90 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 26 9x9 tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 114 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

91 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T. 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 114 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

92 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 27 9x9 med.brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 21 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

93 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med.brn. F.T. SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 21 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

94 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 28 12x12 tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 9 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

95 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 tan F.T building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd flr hallway 9 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

96 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 29 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197 building, weight room 17 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

97 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. F.T. 197 building, weight room 17 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

98 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

99 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med. Brn. F.T. Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

100 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 31 9x9 tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 21, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

101 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T. Room 21, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

102 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 32 12x12 beige F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

103 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 beige F.T. Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

104 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 33 12x12 brown F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Locker rooms 1st floor 4 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

105 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 brown F.T. Locker rooms 1st floor 4 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

106 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 34 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 11 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

107 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. F.T building 11 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

108 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 35 12x12 dark tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building, patched areas 8 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

109 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 dark tan F.T building, patched areas 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

110 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 36 12x12 lt. Grn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

111 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Grn. F.T. Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

112 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 37 12x12 off-white F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Engineer's office 1825 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

113 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 off-white F.T. Engineer's office 1825 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

114 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 38 12x12 white F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 135, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

115 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 white F.T. Rooms 135, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

116 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 39 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 49 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

117 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 Tan speckled F.T. Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 49 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

118 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 9x9 brown F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 95 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

119 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 brown F.T building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 95 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

120 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 41 9x9 drk.brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

121 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 drk.brn. F.T building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

122 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 42 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

123 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. F.T building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

124 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 43 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 18 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

125 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med. Brn. F.T. Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 18 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

126 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 44 9x9 tan F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 425 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

127 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T building 425 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

128 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 45 9x9 brown F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 31 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

129 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 brown F.T. SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 31 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

130 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 46 9x9 brown F.T. HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

131 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 brown F.T. Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

132 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 47 9x9 med. brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

133 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med. brn. F.T. mastic Room 246, southeastern hall on 2nd floor 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

134 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 48 9x9 tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 21, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

135 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T. mastic Room 21, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

136 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 49 12x12 beige F.T. Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

137 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 beige F.T. Mastic Small hallways leading to library on 2nd and 3rd floors. 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

138 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5 12x12 brown F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Locker rooms 1st floor 4 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

139 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 brown F.T. mastic Locker rooms 1st floor 4 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

140 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 51 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Auditorium COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

141 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic Auditorium 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

142 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 52 12x12 dark tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building, patched areas 8 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

143 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 dark tan F.T. mastic 1911 building, patched areas 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

144 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 53 12x12 lt. Grn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

145 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Grn. F.T. mastic Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

146 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 54 12x12 off-white F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Engineer's office 1825 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

147 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 off-white F.T. mastic Engineer's office 1825 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

148 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 55 12x12 white F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 135, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

149 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 white F.T. mastic Rooms 135, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

150 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 56 12x12 Tan speckled F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 49 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

151 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 Tan speckled F.T. mastic Patched areas of 1st flr north hallway 49 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

152 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 57 9x9 brown F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 95 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

153 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 brown F.T. mastic 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 95 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

154 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 58 9x9 drk.brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 75 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

155 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 drk.brn. F.T. mastic 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd, 3rd flr hallways 75 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

156 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 59 12x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

157 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic 1937 building, patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

158 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 6 9x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 18 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

159 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 med. Brn. F.T. mastic Team, Visitor, Boy's & Girl's Locker Rooms 18 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

160 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 61 9x9 tan F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 buildng 425 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

161 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 tan F.T. mastic 1937 buildng 425 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

162 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 62 9x9 brown F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 31 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

163 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 brown F.T. mastic SEE COMMENTS FOR ROOM LOCATIONS 31 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

164 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 63 9x9 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

165 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x9 lt. Brn. F.T. mastic Patched areas of 1st, 2nd & 3rd floor south hallways 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

166 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 64 12x12 ceiling tile text HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

167 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile text 1911 building 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

168 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 65 12x12 ceiling tile text mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 25 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

169 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile text mastic 1911 building 25 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

170 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 66 ceiling/tile system HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

171 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ ceiling/tile system 1911 building 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

172 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 67 12x12 ceiling tile matsic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 13 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

173 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ x12 ceiling tile matsic 1937 building 13 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

174 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 68 2'x4' ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 8 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

175 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ 'x4' ceiling tile 1937 building 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

176 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 69 drop-in ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 85 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

177 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ drop-in ceiling tile 1937 building 85 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

178 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7 2'x4' ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197 building 12 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

179 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ 'x4' ceiling tile 197 building 12 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

180 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 71 black trim vinyl baseboard HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 18 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

181 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ black trim vinyl baseboard 1911 building 18 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

182 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 72 black trim vinyl baseboard mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 18 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

183 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ black trim vinyl baseboard mastic 1911 building 18 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

184 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 73 blk. Trim vinyl baseboard HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 275 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

185 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ blk. Trim vinyl baseboard 1937 building 275 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

186 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 74 blk. Trim vinyl baseboard mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 275 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

187 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ blk. Trim vinyl baseboard mastic 1937 building 275 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

188 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 75 black trim vinyl baseboard HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197 building 3 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

189 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ black trim vinyl baseboard 197 building 3 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

190 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 76 black trim vinyl baseboard mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 197 building 3 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

191 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ black trim vinyl baseboard mastic 197 building 3 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

192 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 77 transite wind/sill HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

193 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ transite wind/sill 1911 building 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

194 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 78 transite windowsill HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 55 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

195 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ transite windowsill 1937 building 55 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

196 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 79 grey carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 95 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

197 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ grey carpet mastic 1911 building 95 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

198 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 8 green carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 19 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

199 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ green carpet mastic 1911 building 19 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

200 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 81 brown carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 12 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

201 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ brown carpet mastic 1911 building 12 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

202 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 82 dr. orange carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

203 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ dr. orange carpet mastic 1911 building 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

204 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 83 orange carpet mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 21 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

205 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ orange carpet mastic 1911 building 21 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

206 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 84 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Auditorium, Rm COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

207 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ " x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Auditorium, Rm In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

208 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 85 Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Auditorium 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

209 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Mastic for 12" x 12" Light gray with white floor tile Auditorium 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

210 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 86 Gray mix Terrazzo HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Entrance and stairwells 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

211 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Gray mix Terrazzo Entrance and stairwells 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

212 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 87 12" x 12" White w/gray and black floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 114 and patches in room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

213 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ " x 12" White w/gray and black floor tile Room 114 and patches in room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

214 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 88 Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 114 and patches in Room 21 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

215 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Mastic for 12" x 12" white with gray and black floor tile Room 114 and patches in Room 21 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

216 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 89 12" x 12" white with blue and red floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

217 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ " x 12" white with blue and red floor tile Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

218 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 9 Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

219 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Mastic for 12" x 12" white with Blue and Ref floor tile Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

220 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 91 Black Chalk boards HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Classrooms 13 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

221 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Black Chalk boards Classrooms 13 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

222 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 92 Black Chalk Board Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Classrooms 13 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

223 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Black Chalk Board Adhesive Classrooms 13 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

224 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION A Mag block HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

225 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ A Mag block boiler 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

226 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION B mag block HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: garage COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

227 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ B mag block garage 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

228 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION C mag block HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: suspened in pump room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

229 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ C mag block suspened in pump room 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

230 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION D mag block ABATED HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump rm. COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

231 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ D mag block ABATED pump rm. 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

232 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION E mag block HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: boiler room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

233 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ E mag block boiler room 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

234 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION F preform pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate boiler room & tunnel COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

235 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ F preform pipe boiler room & tunnel 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

236 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION G preform fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate basement & tunnels COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

237 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ G preform fittings basement & tunnels 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

238 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION H cardboard pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: compressor rm./ pump rm. Absorption rm./ tunnels COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

239 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ H cardboard pipe insulation compressor rm./ pump rm. Absorption rm./ tunnels 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

240 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION HA-1 Glue for 1'x1' white ceiling tile with grooves HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rm. 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

241 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ HA-1 Glue for 1'x1' white ceiling tile with grooves Rm. 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

242 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION HA-11 new 2'x2' white ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: throughout 1st and 3rd floor 35 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

243 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ HA-11 new 2'x2' white ceiling tile throughout 1st and 3rd floor 35 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

244 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION HA-12 new 2'x4' white ceiling tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: throughout 1st and 3rd floors 35 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

245 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ HA-12 new 2'x4' white ceiling tile throughout 1st and 3rd floors 35 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

246 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION HA-13 Black sink undercoating HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 5 HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 5. ACBM with potential for significant damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Art rooms 41, 42, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

247 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ HA-13 Black sink undercoating Art rooms 41, 42, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

248 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION I cardboard fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: tunnels/compressor rm. 4 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

249 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ I cardboard fittings tunnels/compressor rm. 4 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

250 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION J fiberglass fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1911 building 18 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

251 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ J fiberglass fittings 1911 building 18 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

252 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION K aircell duct insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: tunnels 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

253 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ K aircell duct insulation tunnels 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

254 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION L aircell pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump rm. Tunnels 224 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

255 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ L aircell pipe insulation pump rm. Tunnels 224 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

256 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION M fittings on aircell HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: pump room LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

257 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ M fittings on aircell pump room LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

258 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION N fiber glass fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1937 building 4 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

259 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ N fiber glass fittings 1937 building 4 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

260 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION O fiberglass fittings HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: t Tested FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate 197bldg COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

261 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ O fiberglass fittings 197bldg 139 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

262 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION P 2'x2' WHITE CEILING TILE HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: THROUGHOUT 1911 BLDG 69 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

263 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ P 2'x2' WHITE CEILING TILE THROUGHOUT 1911 BLDG 69 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

264 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION Q LINOLEUM FLOORING Grey with white HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: ROOM 245, and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

265 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Q LINOLEUM FLOORING Grey with white ROOM 245, and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

266 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION Q-1 LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: ROOM 245, and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

267 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Q-1 LINOLEUM FLOORING-MASTIC ROOM 245, and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

268 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION R 12x12 BROWN VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: ROOMS 341, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

269 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ R 12x12 BROWN VFT ROOMS 341, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

270 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION R-1 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: ROOMS 341, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

271 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ R-1 12x12 BROWN VFT-MASTIC ROOMS 341, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

272 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION S 12x12 BLUE VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

273 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ S 12x12 BLUE VFT EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

274 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION S-1 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM 325 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

275 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ S-1 12x12 BLUE VFT-MASTIC EAST STAIRWELL, FRONT OF AUDITORIUM & ALL OF AUDITORIUM 325 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

276 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION T 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

277 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ T 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

278 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION T-1 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT-MASTIC HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY 45 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

279 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ T-1 12x12 ORANGE W/ GREEN VFT-MASTIC BACK STAGE OF AUDITORIUM W/ HALLWAY 45 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

280 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (New Homogeneous Area) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM CURRENT INSPECTION 94 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A 8 MATERIAL CATEGORY: FRIABLE: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY: CONDITION: ACCESSIBILITY: Within Reach DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

281 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ " x 12" Gray Floor Tile Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: COMMENTS: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

282 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (New Homogeneous Area) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM CURRENT INSPECTION 93 2' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic Library 2 MATERIAL CATEGORY: FRIABLE: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY: CONDITION: ACCESSIBILITY: t Reachable DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

283 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ ' x 2' Carpet Square Mastic Library 2 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: COMMENTS: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

284 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (New Homogeneous Area) AHERA INSPECTOR: Brian Barry INSPECTION DATE: 2/23/ INFORMATION FROM CURRENT INSPECTION 95 Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A 8 MATERIAL CATEGORY: FRIABLE: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY: CONDITION: ACCESSIBILITY: t Reachable DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: DAMAGE REASON: COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 2/23/216

285 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 3/9/ Mastic Associated w/ 12" x 12" Gray Floor Tile Rooms 142, 341, 344, 345, and Stage 17A 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: COMMENTS: Management Planner's Signature: 3/9/216

286 APPENDIX B Inspector and Management Planner Licenses

287

288

289

290

291