Australian Institute of Architects. Barangaroo Stage 1. Submission to Barangaroo Delivery Authority
|
|
- Harvey Fowler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Australian Institute of Architects Submission to Barangaroo Delivery Authority
2 SUBMISSION BY Australian Institute of Architects NSW Chapter ABN Tusculum, 3 Manning Street POTTS POINT NSW 2011 Telephone: Facsimile: nsw@raia.com.au PURPOSE This submission is made by the NSW Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects (the Institute) to the Barangaroo Delivery Authority in response to the Lend Lease proposal for Stage 1 of the Barangaroo development site and the associated display. At the time of the submission the office bearers of the NSW Chapter are: Brian Zulaikha (President), Dr Deborah Dearing (Immediate Past- President), Joe Agius, Abbie Galvin, Adam Haddow, Ben Hewett, Esteban Insausti*, Chris Jenkins, Steve Kennedy, Matthew Pullinger, Gerard Reinmuth, Howard Smith, Glen Spicer, David Springett, Agi Sterling. The Office Manager of the NSW Chapter is Roslyn Irons. This paper was prepared by Murray Brown, Policy & Advocacy Manager for the NSW Chapter. INFORMATION Who is making this submission? The Australian Institute of Architects (the Institute) is an independent voluntary subscription-based member organization with approximately 9,783 members, of which 5,557 are registered architect members. Members are bound by a Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures. The Institute, incorporated in 1929, is one of the 96 member associations of the International Union of Architects (UIA) and is represented on the International Practice Commission. The Institute s New South Wales Chapter has 3,059 members, of which 1,610 are registrable architect members representing 53% of all registered architects in NSW. * Mr Insausti is an employee of Lend Lease design. In recognition of his declared conflict of interest he has not been involved in any Chapter Council discussions on Barangaroo. ii
3 Where does the Institute rank as a professional association? At 9,783 members, the RAIA represents the largest group of non-engineer design professionals in Australia. Other related organisations by membership size include: The Design Institute of Australia (DIA) - 1,500 members; the Building Designers Association of Australia (BDAA) - 2,200 members; the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects (AILA) 1,000 members; and the Australian Academy of Design (AAD) members. iii
4 BARANGAROO STAGE 1 The Australian Institute of Architects NSW Chapter is pleased to respond to the recent public display presented by the Barangaroo Delivery Authority within the Old Ports Building at Millers Point. The views expressed in this submission reflect a statement by the Institute printed in the current issues of the Institute publications Architecture Australia and Architecture Bulletin. The Institute considers that Barangaroo offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to dramatically increase public engagement with Sydney Harbour. It s a major missing link in the chain of sites providing permanent public access to the foreshore of Sydney s greatest asset. Our primary concerns are that public access to the harbour is not compromised and that the development of the site serves the public interest ahead of commercial interests. One of the key roles of the NSW Government is therefore to plan the site in its role as protector of the public interest. The size and strategic position of the site require best practice in all matters related to its planning and design. What happens at Barangaroo could set the scene for the future planning and development of other prime harbourside sites, particularly the Bays Precinct west of Pyrmont, which is already being considered for re-development during the next decade. The Institute has prepared a proposal for a well considered, professional and participatory planning process for the Bays Precinct in association with the Planning Institute of Australia NSW Division and Australian Institute of Landscape Architects NSW Group. It is unfortunate that a process of this kind has not been a feature of the Barangaroo development to date. The planning process We are disappointed that the Government has appeared to have abdicated from its role as protector of the public interest in regard to the planning for this site. The 2005/6 competition could have been the first stage of an appropriately transparent process. It is difficult to have confidence in the current process when a scheme that won the jury s approval (with modifications) has been ignored in favour of a rival scheme that won a commendation but did not win the competition. The concept plan prepared by the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and approved by then Planning Minister Frank Sartor in February 2007 was only loosely based on the competition winning proposal. Approved floor space for this proposal was 388,300 square metres, 25% of which would be residential. The total allowable floor space was increased by 30% to 508,300 square metres in February 2009, three months after the creation of the Barangaroo Delivery Authority. This increase in commercial floor space is larger than the total amount of residential floor space in the concept plan. 1
5 The Government has justified the increase as being consistent with the Government s objective of creating a world-class city precinct that will contribute to Sydney s future. (Premier s media release, 25 February 2009). But what makes 508,300 square metres inherently better than 388,300? We can understand the benefit to a commercial developer, but how does this increase the impact on transport and other infrastructure? Have those impacts been considered in relation to the assumptions behind the plan? We note that the announcement of Lend Lease s winning bid for the Stage 1 development was made on the weekend before Christmas, timing guaranteed to elicit a muted response from a substantially depleted media contingent. The subsequent exhibition of the winning proposal at the Old Ports Building did not provide an adequate explanation of the public domain proposals it contains, nor was it clear why the winning bid was favoured over its competitor s. All concept drawings so far displayed have a monumental quality that militates against any sense of urbanity; there is none of the fine grain that would allow smaller developments to create a more friendly environment at the ground level, the place where cities really work. It is all so much Dubai bling rather than real urban development. We are dissatisfied with a process that has appeared to be neither rigorous in its protection of the public domain nor in its explanation of the decisions that have been made. Private development vs public interest The Institute believes that the present proposal to sell the rights for the development of Barangaroo to a single private sector organization has significant risks attached to it. What is needed at Barangaroo is natural city growth; the public needs to be assured that the outcome will be diverse and exciting new city fabric, a world leader in design and sustainability, providing generous and inviting public spaces - and full access to the harbour. The Institute acknowledges that the engagement of the private sector is a necessary step in the evolution of our cities. But private organisations must inevitably balance the cost-benefit equation in their own interests and those of their shareholders. The Government needs to fulfil its responsibility as an informed client and advocate for the public interest by defining the broad scope of the project - rather than leaving this critical step to a development tender. Concept plan modification Since winning the right to develop Stage 1 of Barangaroo Lend Lease has submitted a concept plan modification that includes: additional gross floor area in Block 1 additional height across Blocks 1-4 a 6,000 square metre encroachment of the Block 1 building into the recreation zone 2
6 the proposed hotel to be built in the harbour west of the site boundary pedestrian bridges over Hickson Road non-compliance with four of the built form controls in the concept plan In short, the developer has proceeded as developers always do to push the envelope of any controls in place and to extract the maximum floor space from the site. In part this is a consequence of the decision to restrict intensive development to Stage 1 at the southern end of the site, leaving the remainder of the site as largely open space. The dangers of the current approach are evident in the Director-General s Requirements for the Barangaroo Concept Plan amendment (Modification No 4) issued on 3 May. The environmental assessment of the amendment must explore the relationship of urban spaces and their adjoining built form, consider the relationship between the public domain and ground floor uses of the landmark building, demonstrate the new access hierarchy, including the relationship between streets, footpaths and buildings and detail the amendments to the foreshore promenade. These are major issues affecting the long-term public amenity of the precinct and access to it, yet they are under consideration nearly six months after the selection of the winning bid and three months after the government has signed a contract with the developer. They should all have been determined through a transparent master planning process so that the amount and configuration of the public domain in the precinct was decided well before any developer had the opportunity to tender for development rights. The present process is the reverse: the developer has been chosen and the extent and configuration of the public domain have yet to be determined. It is another demonstration of the way the government has turned planning principles on their head in undertaking this project: appoint the developer for the most commercially viable stage first (leaving a question mark over how development of the rest of the site will proceed) consider increases in previously determined maximum building height and floor space after the contract is signed welcome the intention to erect a 50 storey building over the harbour seek clarification from the developer on its intentions regarding the public domain for Stage 1, rather than determining the size and style of the public domain before seeking commercial tenders Commercial interests have taken absolute preference over sound urban design principles. The hotel proposal The current proposal includes a so-called public pier that is in fact the forecourt to a 50 storey hotel building containing 8% of the total gross floor area of the site. It is proposed to be built outside the western boundary of the 3
7 site over Sydney's most valuable public asset, its harbour. This is an example of how public and private interest are confused in the winning bid. In the Institute s view the only justification for a pier on this busy stretch of the harbour is to provide a wharf for ferries and other small craft that can serve the water transport needs of the precinct. In addition, the hotel and the bulk and height of the proposed high rise towers will create a significant afternoon overshadowing problem, particularly for the recently constructed medium rise buildings in the King Street precinct. What is needed The Institute urges the Government to develop a master plan for the precinct with a clear framework of streets, squares and parks that are designed for the people of NSW, not the interests of any single developer. Public infrastructure and public space should be clearly defined and delivered early, as occurs in many other first-world cities. There should be no ambiguity of public and private space and no privatisation of the harbour. The master plan should create and protect views and connections to and from the city; it should come replete with a transport strategy. The plan also needs to closely consider the relationship between this seven hectare site with its neighbouring precincts, which include the King Street / Shelley Street commercial city area, the Walsh Bay commercial/entertainment/residential precinct and the largely residential historic precinct of Millers Point on the hill overlooking the site. It needs to take some cues from these areas in the provision of public streets, walkways and parks. With the increase in commercial floor space in 2009 the percentage of residential floor space has dropped from 25% to less than 20; the 10% provision for tourist uses takes this to a potential total of 30%. In the Institute s view a residential population of between 25% and 35% would establish the conditions for a precinct with street life in after-work hours. Anything less and the Stage 1 development risks becoming a commercial enclave, not an urbane precinct; certainly not one that will add to Sydney s claims to world-city status. Conclusion The Institute is concerned at the Government s refusal to adopt a more active role in determining the future of Barangaroo. We want to see the Government involved in preparing a master plan for the whole site, and we want that plan to clearly define the precinct s public spaces. Commercial interests must have a role to play, but not to the exclusion of all others. 4
Medium Density Design Guide. Submission to the Department of Planning & Environment
Medium Density Design Guide Submission to the Department of Planning & Environment SUBMISSION BY Australian Institute of Architects NSW Chapter ABN 72 000 023 012 Tusculum, 3 Manning Street POTTS POINT
More informationThe Australian Institute of Architects welcomes the opportunity to provide comment on the DA Submission for this important project.
NSW Chapter 3 Manning Street Potts Point NSW 2011 T +612 9246 4055 nsw@architecture.com.au architecture.com.au 15 December 2017 Director Key Sites Assessments, Planning Services Department of Planning
More informationSEPP 65 & APARTMENT DESIGN GUIDE
SEPP 65 & APARTMENT DESIGN GUIDE Response to draft Issued for public consultation Submission from Planning Institute of Australia November 2014 NSW Office Suite 3, Level 11 221 Miller Street North Sydney
More informationPDA SUBMISSION: Queen s Wharf, Brisbane (DEV2017/846)
PDA SUBMISSION: Queen s Wharf, Brisbane (DEV2017/846) Date:: 17 October 2017 Contact Officer: Jonathon Fisher Chief Executive Officer Email: heritage@nationaltrustqld.org Phone: 07 3223 6666 NATIONAL TRUST
More informationChapter 2: OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION PROPOSALS. A New Garden Neighbourhood Matford Barton 17
Chapter 2: OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION PROPOSALS A New Garden Neighbourhood Matford Barton 17 2.1. SUMMARY AND STATUS OF THE PROPOSALS 2.1.1. The parameter plans and associated wording in this chapter
More informationDraft Western District Plan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Western District Plan Submission_id: 31440 Date of Lodgment: 15 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: Goodman Property Services Australia Pty Ltd
More informationBuilt Form and Massing
Initial Urban Design Assessment Former Gasworks Site, 111 Queens Parade and 433 Smith Street, Fitzroy North Prepared for Protect Fitzroy North Incorporated by David Pryor, Place Design Studio 6 April 2018
More informationInstitute Response to Design Guidelines: Design Quality and Housing Choice
Institute Response to Design Guidelines: Design Quality and Housing Choice The Australian Institute of Landscape Architects South Australian Chapter (AILA SA) is pleased to provide a response on the Draft
More informationExhibition of Oran Park and Turner Road Precincts
22 June 2007 Growth Centres Commission Mr. Angus Dawson PO Box 1457 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124 Dear Sir Exhibition of Oran Park and Turner Road Precincts UDIA NSW commends the Growth Centres Commission (GCC)
More informationINCREMENTAL CHANGE AREA REVIEW March 2015 Page 1
INCREMENTAL CHANGE AREA REVIEW March 2015 Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Background to Review... 3 Comparison of the Schedules to the General Residential Zone... 7 Methodology... 7 Policy Context...
More informationOfficial Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies
PG.30.1 REPORT FOR ACTION Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies Date: May 15, 2018 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
More informationStatement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE
LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Pre-application Discussions 4 3. The Consultation Process 5 4. Consultation Feedback 7 5. Responses to Consultation Feedback
More informationDescription Details submitted pursuant to discharge of condition 5 (Design Code) attached to planning permission 13/01729/OUT.
ITEM 9 Application Number: 18/00266/DISCON Description Details submitted pursuant to discharge of condition 5 (Design Code) attached to planning permission 13/01729/OUT. AT The Point, 602 Midsummer Boulevard,
More informationRE: QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT PLANNING POLICY REVIEW
Planning Group Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning PO Box 15009 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Via email: planningpolicy@dilgp.qld.gov.au 9 February 2017 Dear Sir/ Madam, RE: QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT
More informationEastern Golf Course, Doncaster Road, Doncaster
, 463-535 Road, Heritage Assessment in accordance with Schedule to the Development Plan Overlay July 2013 bryce raworth conservation urban design 19 Victoria Street St Kilda Vic 3182 , 463-535 Road, Heritage
More informationresponse sent to: Dear Sir/Madam Response to: The Review of Designated Landscapes in Wales Stage 2
Royal Town Planning Institute Cymru (RTPI Cymru) PO Box 2465 Cardiff CF23 0DS Tel +44 (0)29 2047 3923 email walespolicy@rtpi.org.uk Website: www.rtpi.org.uk/rtpi_cymru e-mail response sent to: designatedlandscapesreview@wales.gsi.gov.uk
More informationVictorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal. VCAT Ref: P1853/2017 REVIEW: Application to Review Conditions to Planning Permit PLN 16/0925 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Development of the land for construction
More informationRe: The Northern Road and 1-29 Bradley Street, Glenmore Park Submission to Draft Sydney West District Plan
3 April 2017 Mr. Sean O Toole West District Commissioner Greater Sydney Commission PO Box 257 Parramatta NSW 2124 Dear Sean, Re: 2065-2113 The Northern Road and 1-29 Bradley Street, Glenmore Park Submission
More informationFixing the Foundations Statement
Fixing the Foundations Statement 13 th August 2015 The Heritage Alliance is the largest coalition of non-government heritage interests in England, bringing together 98 national organisations which are
More informationSubmission to Dublin City Council regarding the proposed Poolbeg West SDZ Planning Scheme
Submission to Dublin City Council regarding the proposed Poolbeg West SDZ Planning Scheme 25 th July 2016 Introduction The Poolbeg West Strategic Development Zone (SDZ) was established by Government on
More informationPHASE ONE. A summary report: What the community told Alcoa during Phase One of the community engagement program for Point Henry 575.
PHASE ONE A summary report: What the community told Alcoa during Phase One of the community engagement program for Point Henry 575. DECEMBER 2015 FEBRUARY 2016 INTRODUCTION In 2014 Alcoa closed its Point
More informationDraft Eastern District Plan
Draft Eastern District Plan Submission_id: 31238 Date of Lodgment: 13 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: Turrulla Gardens Pty Ltd C/- Mecone Organisation type: Industry First name:
More informationSPG 1. * the northern and western sections which are open fields used for pasture and grazing;
SPG 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This development brief is based on the allocation of the Priors Hall site for employment and countryside recreational purposes in the Corby Borough Local Plan. The brief is intended
More informationAmendment C146 Melton Planning Scheme Expert Evidence Statement Traffic & Transport Beattys Road, Plumpton
235 311 Beattys Road, Plumpton 16585REP001C-F 21 November 2016 onemilegrid.com.au 1/59 Keele Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 (03) 9939 8250 onemilegrid ABN: 79 168 115 679 (03) 9939 8250 1/59 Keele Street
More informationI539. Smales 2 Precinct
I539. Smales 2 Precinct I539.1. Precinct Description The Smales 2 Precinct applies to a 4.8 hectare block of land located on the southern side of Northcote Road and fronting Lake Pupuke, Takapuna. The
More information3 Urban Design and the State Highway Network
NZ Transport Agency Page 1 of 14 Urban Design Professional Services Guide 1 Introduction This is a professional services guide on urban design, which provides direction to the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA)
More informationSTATEMENT OF OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT CHURCH CLIFF DRIVE FILEY
STATEMENT OF OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT CHURCH CLIFF DRIVE FILEY You will be aware that Scarborough borough council have adopted a new local plan that includes land at Church Cliff
More informationAs will be detailed, our site plays a strategic role in providing these opportunities.
29 March 2017 Greater Sydney Commission PO Box 257 Parramatta NSW 2124 Email: info@gsc.nsw.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam, RE: DISTRICT PLAN-SOUTH WEST AREA. Woodward Park and Liverpool CBD. I have been requested
More informationGREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES
GREATER SHEPPARTON CULTURAL HERITAGE AWARDS GUIDELINES Adopted by Resolution of Council on 21 August 2018 Greater Shepparton City Council is proud to present the Cultural Heritage Awards program. The Awards
More information12 TH ANNUAL CHILTERNS AONB PLANNING CONFERENCE ENGLISH HERITAGE: HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT GOOD PRACTICE ADVICE
12 TH ANNUAL CHILTERNS AONB PLANNING CONFERENCE ENGLISH HERITAGE: HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT GOOD PRACTICE ADVICE MARTIN SMALL HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT PLANNING ADVISER ENGLISH HERITAGE Policy ENGLISH HERITAGE GOOD
More informationSCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN
DD/MM/YY Proposed C120 SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO12. GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN 1.0 Design objectives DD/MM/YY Proposed
More informationROYAL PINES SECURITY REVIEW - REPORT TO PBC
ROYAL PINES SECURITY REVIEW - REPORT TO PBC Committee Statement This report represents the consensus findings of a majority of 4 out of 5 of the Security Sub Committee and is prepared after completing
More informationSchedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:
Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May 2018 Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date: 22-05-2018 Applicant: Proposal: Site: Mr Gillett Change of use to the
More informationWelcome. Proposals for land at Smug Oak Lane BRICKET WOOD
Proposals for land at Smug Oak Lane BRICKET WOOD Previous Linden Homes and Wates Developments scheme Welcome Welcome to Linden Homes and Wates Developments public exhibition. Working together as joint
More informationLINDEN HOMES McArthur s Warehouse, Gas Ferry Road. Welcome. Feedback
LINDEN HOMES McArthur s Warehouse, Gas Ferry Road Welcome Linden Homes, part of Galliford Try plc, would like to redevelop the McArthur s Warehouse site off Gas Ferry Road on Bristol s harbourside. Linden
More informationA VISION FOR BLAIRGOWRIE
Welcome to the Westpark Partnership and Lidl UK GmbH Community Presentation. The purpose of this presentation is for you to view and comment upon the revised and updated proposals for the allocated development
More informationProjects Include: Joseph Rega. The Regalia Partnership
Projects Include: Kensington Urban Improvement Program and Kensington Town Centre Development Control Plan for Randwick City Council and DIPNR Matraville Town Centre Development Control Plan for Randwick
More informationSOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Planning Committee 5 June 2013 AUTHOR/S: Planning and New Communities Director S/0747/13/FL HISTON Construction of Car Park at Histon Baptist Church, Station
More informationWelcome THE SITE PHASE 1 EXCLUSION ZONE.
THE SITE PHASE 1 Aerial view of the whole site with Phase 1 indictated Welcome Barratt London and Hyde Group are working with Pollard Thomas Edwards on redevelopment proposals for Harrow View East, part
More informationPlanning Proposal Charlestown Swim and Leisure Centre LEP Amendment
Planning Proposal Charlestown Swim and Leisure Centre LEP Amendment Amendment No. 4 to Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plan 2014 (PP_2014_LAKEM_005_00) Local Government Area: Name of Draft LEP: Lake
More informationSOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities)
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Planning Committee 12 January 2011 AUTHOR/S: Executive Director (Operational Services) Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) Notes: S/1848/10
More informationDraft Western District Plan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Draft Western District Plan Submission_id: 31356 Date of Lodgment: 14 Dec 2017 Origin of Submission: Online Organisation name: APP Corporation PTY LTD Organisation type:
More informationChapter 5 Urban Design and Public Realm
5.1 Introduction Public realm is all areas of the urban fabric to which the public have access. It is where physical interaction takes place between people. It therefore, includes buildings and their design,
More informationPHASE III: Reserved Matters Submission
Statement of Compliance with the outline approval for the proposed residential development of land at: BURGES LANE, WIVELISCOMBE PHASE III: Reserved Matters Submission Foreword Contents: This Statement
More informationEastern City District Plan
OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 Revised Draft Eastern City District Plan OVERVIEW Bayside Burwood Canada Bay City of Sydney Inner West Randwick Strathfield Waverley Woollahra Snapshot of the Eastern City District
More informationURBAN DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING PLANNING FOR A BETTER OUTCOME
URBAN DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING PLANNING FOR A BETTER OUTCOME PETER EGERTON DISCIPLINE LEAD URBAN DESIGN February 2018 DEMYSTIFYING URBAN DESIGN WHAT IS URBAN DESIGN Surveyors created the towns Engineers
More informationPMP PRINTING SITE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT - PHASE 2
PMP PRINTING SITE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT - PHASE 2 FEBRUARY 2019 0317-0511 - PMP Printng - M001 (8 -Floors) -Final date 14.11.2018 Vision: The PMP Printing site will be transformed into a contemporary mixed-use
More informationTāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole
B2. Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone - Urban growth and form B2.1. Issues Tāhuhu whakaruruhau ā-taone The sheltering ridge pole Auckland s growing population increases demand for housing, employment, business,
More informationAustralia ICOMOS submission on the Greater Sydney Commission s (GSC) Vision and District Plans
Australia ICOMOS Secretariat Faculty of Arts & Education Deakin University 221 Burwood Highway Burwood Vic 3125 Ph: +61 3 9251 7131 austicomos@deakin.edu.au www.icomos.org/australia ABN: 85 073 285 798
More informationPLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. 313 of 2010
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL NO. 313 of 2010 BARNES & COOK v SOUTHERN DOWNS REGIONAL COUNCIL & ORS TOWN PLANNING REPORT by Annette Doherty July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Description
More informationCase Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1
Case Officer: Sarah Kay File No: CHE/14/00515/REM Tel. No: (01246) 345786 Plot No: 2/6132 Ctte Date: 15 th September 2014 ITEM 1 APPROVAL OF RESERVED MATTERS FROM APPLICATION CHE/12/00234/OUT (1) LAYOUT,
More informationDraft Newcastle Urban Renewal Strategy Submission by Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division)
Draft Newcastle Urban Renewal Strategy Submission by Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) March 2013 The Planning The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) is the peak body representing professionals
More information3/29 Rhu Marina Reporter David Russell. Body or person(s) submitting a representation raising the issue (including reference number):
Development Plan Reference: 3/29 Rhu Marina Reporter David Russell The Council s submission to the Reporters starts on page 194 of the report. It is in four parts, 1. Summary of representations, 2. Modifications
More informationUrban Design Expert Evidence Leanne Hodyl
Fishermans Bend GC81 Panel Hearing Urban Design Expert Evidence Leanne Hodyl 14 March 2018 1 Fishermans Bend GC81 Panel Hearing - Urban Design Expert Evidence Leanne Hodyl Overview 1. Role of the Urban
More informationSUPPORTING INFORMATION
CITY OF HOBART SUPPORTING INFORMATION CITY PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING OPEN PORTION OF THE MEETING MONDAY, 28 NOVEMBER 2016 AT 5:00 PM VENUE: LADY OSBORNE ROOM, TOWN HALL TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.1.1 1-3 Elizabeth
More informationPlan Modification to Chapter B2 of the Auckland Unitary Plan(AUP) Operative in part (15 November 2016)
UNITARY PLAN UPDATE REQUEST MEMORANDUM TO FROM Phill Reid Linley Wilkinson DATE 25 September 2018 SUBJECT Plan Modification to Chapter B2 of the Auckland Unitary Plan(AUP) Operative in part (15 November
More informationWestern Sydney Parklands Australia s Largest Urban Park
Western Sydney Parklands Australia s Largest Urban Park 37 WLA 1 MAGAZINE 21 38 WESTERN SYDNEY PARKLANDS AUSTRALIA S LARGEST URBAN PARK Large urban parks have dual roles to play in meeting the demands
More informationSouth Worcestershire Development Plan. South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
South Worcestershire Development Plan South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document Statement of Consultation: Early Engagement Scoping Paper February 2017 1. Introduction 1.1 This
More informationLake Macquarie City. A copy of the published amendment including the instrument and maps, is provided in Attachment 7 of this report.
Planning Proposal Amendment No. 77 to Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plan 2004 and proposed Amendment to Draft Lake Macquarie Local Environmental Plan 2013 Minor Zone Boundary Adjustment - Pasminco
More informationPlanning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. Pg12013 (File No NNY 34 OZ)
865 York Mills Road Official Plan Amendment Application Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Date: February 28, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Planning and Growth Management Committee
More informationBloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1638-1644 Bloor St. W. Rezoning - Preliminary Report Date: April 1, 2008 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Acting Director, Community
More informationDepartment of Planning
NSW GOVERNMENT Department of Planning Contact: Sumathi Navaratnam Phone: 02 9228 6361 Fax: 02 9228 6540 E-mail: sumathi.navaratnam@planning.nsw.gov.au Mr Robert Domm Chief Executive Officer Redfern - Waterloo
More informationJoint submission to the Greater Sydney Commission by the Australian Institute of Architects and the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects
Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan and Draft District Plans Joint submission to the Greater Sydney Commission by the Australian Institute of Architects and the Australian Institute of Landscape Architects
More informationNorth York Moors National Park Authority Planning Committee
Item 8 North York Moors National Park Authority Planning Committee 12 December 2013 Consultation from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council on proposed Wind Farm at Bank Field Guisborough 1. Purpose of
More informationAmendment C147 Melton Planning Scheme Expert Evidence Statement Traffic & Transport , Taylors Road, Plumpton
905 959, 961 1025 Taylors Road, Plumpton 16520REP001B-F 22 November 2016 onemilegrid.com.au 1/59 Keele Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 (03) 9939 8250 onemilegrid ABN: 79 168 115 679 (03) 9939 8250 1/59 Keele
More informationToronto and East York Community Council. Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design
56 Blue Jays Way - Public Art Plan STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Date: September 14, 2011 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design
More informationVICTORIA PARK (BAKKABAKKANDI) MASTER PLAN
VICTORIA PARK (BAKKABAKKANDI) MASTER PLAN Submission by: GPO Box 2653 Adelaide SA 5001 Te: 8410 2988 Email: sa@planning.org.au Web: www.planning.org.au/sa 30 March 2007 Submission - Victoria Park (Bakkabakkandi)
More informationOverView INSIDE THIS ISSUE
There have been big developments since our last edition. With initial plot prices revealed and the LDO approved, we are moving closer each day. DECEMBER 2015 OverView INSIDE THIS ISSUE Order Given for
More informationGroup Executive Liveability and Natural Assets
Strategic policy Community Gardens Policy Corporate Plan reference: Endorsed by Council on: Policy Owner: A healthy environment Maintaining and enhancing the region s natural assets, liveability and environmental
More informationInterim Advice Note 76 / 06 ASSESSMENT PART 1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Contents
Interim Advice Note 76 / 06 VOLUME 11 SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION PART 1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Contents 1. Introduction and Application 2. Aims and Objectives
More informationLEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN MATTER 3 GREEN BELT KCS DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 2017
LEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN MATTER 3 GREEN BELT KCS DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 2017 Smith Limited Suite 9C Joseph s Well Hanover Walk Leeds LS3 1AB T: 0113 2431919 F: 0113 2422198 E: planning@peacockandsmith.co.uk
More informationPlanning and Providing Our Infrastructure
Item: 13.06 Subject: THRUMSTER DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN: REFORMATTING AND INCLUSION OF NEW PROVISIONS FOR SOUTH OXLEY - SUBMISSIONS REPORT Presented by: Development & Environment, Matt Rogers Alignment
More informationRoad Safety Impact Assessment
Road Safety Impact Assessment October 2016 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS About TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is responsible for managing and improving the country s national
More informationCity of Norwich Policy Regarding Monuments on City Property
City of Norwich Policy Regarding Monuments on City Property I. Introduction The city of Norwich may, from time to time, install or permit permanent monuments on city property to provide commemoration of
More informationCasey Planning Scheme Amendment C207 Part 2 Evan and Margaret Street Precinct, Berwick
Planning and Environment Act 1987 Panel Report Casey Planning Scheme Amendment C207 Part 2 Evan and Margaret Street Precinct, Berwick 14 January 2019 Planning and Environment Act 1987 Panel Report pursuant
More informationVicálvaro. Madrid Calle Pirotecnia s/n. Madrid
Vicálvaro. Madrid Calle Pirotecnia s/n. Madrid Located in the Vicálvaro district in southeast Madrid, the scope of the tender covers a municipal plot with an area of 28,493 m 2, next to the railway. It
More informationHobart A Strategic Framework
Hobart 2025 A Strategic Framework Adopted by the Hobart City Council 15 October 2007 Table of Contents Introduction...2 Vision and Future Directions...3 FD1 Offers opportunities for all ages and a city
More informationMendip Local Plan Part II: Sites and Policies - Issues and Options Consultation MDC LPP2 consultation response.pdf
From: Nicola Duke Sent: 15 February 2018 11:17 To: PlanningPolicy Subject: Mendip Local Plan Part II: Sites and Policies - Issues and Options Consultation Attachments: 180215
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE UNDER CLAUSE 5 OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 PLAN CHANGE 12 TO THE OPERATIVE CITY OF NAPIER DISTRICT PLAN
PUBLIC NOTICE UNDER CLAUSE 5 OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 PLAN CHANGE 12 TO THE OPERATIVE CITY OF NAPIER DISTRICT PLAN Public notice is given in accordance with Clause 5 of Schedule
More information7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 7437, 7439 and 7441 Kingston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Preliminary Report Date: August 13, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More information2.0 Strategic Context 4
2.0 Strategic Context 4 2.1 The Area Action Plan is a non-statutory plan, which forms a corporate policy document, expressing particular issues and areas of concern while also providing a vision for the
More informationNEWCASTLE LIGHT RAIL Review of Environmental Factors (REF) Submission 20 May 2016
NEWCASTLE LIGHT RAIL Review of Environmental Factors (REF) Submission 20 May 2016 INTRODUCTION The Hunter Business Chamber is the largest regional business chamber in Australia and was established in 1886.
More informationREDWatch 1 June 2017 Ben Pechey A/Exec Manager Strategic Planning & Urban Design
Waterloo State Significant Precinct REDWatch 1 June 2017 Ben Pechey A/Exec Manager Strategic Planning & Urban Design Waterloo State Significant Precinct Process City s involvement Study requirements Next
More information1992 No. 564 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 SYDNEY REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN NO. 26 CITY WEST
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT 1979 SYDNEY REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN NO. 26 CITY WEST NEW SOUTH WALES [Published in Gazette No. 125 of 16 October 1992] I, the Minister for Planning, in pursuance
More informationARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
More informationMemorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy
Memorials, Plaques & Interpretive Signs Policy APPROVAL COUNCIL DATE / CEO VERSION NO: Version 0.4 TRIM REF: 16/31097 REVIEW 30 June 2020 RESPONSIBLE EXECUTIVE General Manager City Assets & Environment
More information4121 Lawrence Avenue East Rezoning Application Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 4121 Lawrence Avenue East Rezoning Application Preliminary Report Date: October 11, 2011 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director, Community
More informationWELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS
WELLINGTON HOSPITAL DESIGN GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction Page 2 The Place of Wellington Hospital 2 The Future of the Hospital 2 2.0 The Intention of the Design Guide 3 3.0 Analysis 4 General
More informationCA//17/02777/FUL. Scale 1:1,250. Planning Services Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW
O CA//17/02777/FUL Scale 1:1,250 Map Dated: 15/03/2018 Planning Services Canterbury City Council Military Road Canterbury Kent CT1 1YW AGENDA ITEM NO 16 PLANNING COMMITTEE APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE LOCATION:
More informationSawtell Town Centre Development Control Plan
Sawtell Town Centre Development Control Plan ABN 79 126 214 487 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 PREAMBLE... 1 HOW TO USE THIS DCP... 1 LAND TO WHICH THIS PLAN APPLIES... 1 MASTERPLAN... 2 VISION... 2 CHARACTER
More information1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:
Location 59 Greenway Close London N20 8ES Reference: 16/00011/HSE Received: 30th December 2015 Accepted: 7th January 2016 Ward: Totteridge Expiry 3rd March 2016 Applicant: Mr Ankit Shah Proposal: Part
More informationPractices about Site:
Practices about Site: Reflecting on the design of the Museum of Liverpool Fig 01. The Museum of Liverpool Picture from official website of the 3XN Yuan Chen 100202902 MAAD University of Sheffield 4th May,
More informationAppendix 7 Precinct Analysis Carlton
Appendix 7 Precinct Analysis Carlton (Andover Street) Rezone from R2 Low Density Residential to R3 Medium Density Residential Retain existing B1 Neighbourhood Centre zone Existing Zoning Map (R2 Low Density
More informationCotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016
Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines June 2016 Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines Introduction The evolution of the landscape of the Cotswolds AONB is a result of the interaction
More informationWELCOME. Welcome to our second public exhibition on proposals for the redevelopment of the Paddington Central Management Office.
WELCOME Management Office Paddington Central Welcome to our second public exhibition on proposals for the redevelopment of the Paddington Central Management Office. Following feedback from meetings with
More informationDesign Review Report Llanfoist to Abergavenny Footbridge DCFW Ref: 118 Meeting of 10th August 2016
Design Review Report Llanfoist to Abergavenny Footbridge DCFW Ref: 118 Meeting of 10 th August 2016 Declarations of Interest Panel members, observers and other relevant parties are required to declare
More information280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 11, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More informationPART AOTEA PRECINCT
CONTENTS... PAGE AOTEA PRECINCT...4 14.5.1 INTRODUCTION...4 14.5.2 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ISSUES...4 14.5.3 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES... 4 14.5.4 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY...5 14.5.5
More informationThe Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (notified 30 September 2013)
3 Business zones Introduction There are 10 business zones in the Unitary Plan: City Centre Metropolitan Centre Town Centre Local Centre Neighbourhood Centre Mixed Use General Business Business Park Light
More informationOctober 26, Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for Paramount Pictures Master Plan, ENV EIR. Dear Mr. Villani,
October 26, 2015 Submitted by email Mr. Adam Villani City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning 6262 Van Nuys Boulevard, Rm. 351 Van Nuys, CA 91401 Email: adam.villani@lacity.org Re: Draft Environmental
More information