Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:"

Transcription

1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST Chicago, IL, 6638 DATE LAST THREE YEAR REINSPECTION WAS COMPLETED 2/25/213 If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. SECTION II (Please type or print) PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING FOR YOUR THREE YEAR REINSPECTION: DATE REINSPECTION COMPLETED: 4/7/216 ENROLLMENT IDPH INSPECTOR LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED INSPECTOR NAME (Please Print): Allizon Brooks IDPH MP LICENSE NUMBER: IDPH LICENSED MANAGEMENT PLANNER NAME (Please Print): Daniel Juneau DESIGNATED PERSON (Please Print): Robert Christlieb PHONE: 665 (773) /7/216 Signature of Designated Person Date SECTION III PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLING INFORMATION FOR ANY CHANGES WITHIN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. School building has been sold. Date of Sale: School has been closed. Date closed: School building has been demolished. School building is asbestos free since last reinspection: Please explain in writing why the school building is now asbestos free and include the supporting documentation. If a new school building has been added to the district, submit either and exclusionary statement or a management plan and inspection report. Include the complete name, address and city of school building. Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: IL Revised 1.3

2 THREE YEAR REINSPECTION CHICAGO SCHOOL DIST 299 Chicago, IL, 6638 Unit: 2251 Building ID: 257 IDPH ID Number: REPORT DATE: Thursday, April 7, 216 Prepared for: 125 S. Clark Street Chicago, IL 663 Prepared by: 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone (312) Fax (312) DO NOT REMOVE FROM SCHOOL REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW

3 March 1, 216 Mr. R. Kent Cook Asbestos Program Illinois Department of Public Health 525 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois Re: Three-Year Reinspections Dear Mr. Cook:, Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC), conducted the ThreeYear Reinspections and performed management plan updates for the (CPS) facilities in Region 3,4,5 Elementary Schools. Please update your records with the following information. School District: 299 Unit: 2251 School: Region: 4 IDPH ID: Building ID: 257 Address: Chicago, IL, 6638 Building Contact: Rollins, John Contact Phone: Current Building Owners: Review 4/7/216 Inspector: Allizon Brooks Management Planner: Daniel Juneau Inspector IDPH License: Management Planner IDPH License: If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at (312) Sincerely, Daniel Juneau

4 Environmental tification to Occupants To: Faculty, Staff and Parents From: March 1, 216 RE:, Unit 2251 Chicago, IL, 6638 Dear Faculty, Staff and Parents, This letter is to notify you that the 216 asbestos three year re-inspection has been completed at Byrne School, following the Federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), 4 CFR Part 763, Subpart E and is available for your review at the main office of the school. Although asbestos-containing materials have been identified at, there is no reason to believe that any threat to the health of students or staff exists at this time. CPS will continue to carefully monitor the condition of asbestos-containing materials and if conditions warrant, all appropriate steps will be taken to maintain the health and safety of all building occupants. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please feel free to contact Robert Christlieb, the designated Local Education Authority's Designated Person at (773)

5 Table of Contents I. School and Inspection Information II. Executive Summary III. Methodology IV. Abatement History V. Reassessments and Recommendations VI. Conclusions Table I: Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table II: Management Planner's Review APPENDICES: Appendix A: Assessment Sheets, Drawings and Photos Appendix B: Inspector and Management Planner Licenses Appendix C: Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: Laboratory Results Appendix E: Chain of Custody Forms

6 SCHOOL AND INSPECTION INFORMATION 1. School Information School: Address: IDPH ID: Contact: Rollins, John Unit: 2251 Chicago, IL, 6638 Building ID: 257 Phone: Description of Facility Original Construction: 1935 Total Square Footage: Current Occupancy: Additional Construction: of Floors: 2 Phone: (773) Managing Environmental Consultant MEC: Contact: Dan Juneau Address 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector Inspector Name: Allizon Brooks Signature: 3/1/216 Inspector IDPH license # ,1948,23,1997,1997 LEA Designated Person Contact: Robert Christlieb Address: 125 South Clark Street, 17th Floor Chicago, IL Region: 4 Management Planner Management Planner Name: Daniel Juneau Signature: 4/7/216 Management Planner IDPH license # Review 4/7/ LEA Designated Person's Acknowledgement The reinspection report and recommendations have been received by me and appropriate action will be taken by the School District. Signature: 4/7/216 Name: Robert Christlieb Unit : 2251 Building: 257

7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY was retained by the (CPS) to perform a three-year asbestos reinspection of the. This inspection was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) part (b), and the ongoing Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M) originally designed in the School's Asbestos Management Plan. The purpose of this three-year reinspection is to record any condition changes in the asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) in the school since the previous three-year reinspection and the six-month periodic surveillance, to identify, assess, and include any Homogeneous Areas (HA) not identified in the Management Plan, and to recommend an appropriate response action to manage asbestos. The inspector conducted a three-year reinspection of this facility under Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) school reinspection requirements and AHERA, sections and The main building and each addition to the main building, if constructed at different dates, were inspected separately. Laboratory accreditations are included in Appendix C, laboratory results are included in Appendix D, and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix E. te: During previous inspections, some of the HA(s) were identified together as 9" x 9" floor tile (FT), mastics assoc. with 9" x 9" FT, 12" x 12" FT, mastics assoc. with 12" x 12" FT, pipe insulation, etc. Some of these HA(s) have been re-identified by areas that are uniform in color, texture, construction date, application date, and general appearance. The inspector has determined the following: A. The following HAs have changed assessment categories for Building 257: Unit: Boiler gaskets 33 Cloth duct tape 81 2 X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm 82 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile White 98 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile Building: 257

8 B. The following new homogenous areas have been identified for Building 257: Unit: 2251 Building: 257

9 C. This reinspection covered only physically accessible and visible areas and materials that were identified in the LEA's management plan. The following materials were concealed and/or contained in areas that were inaccessible for sampling and have been classified as Assumed: Unit: 2251 Blue Sheetgood Blue Sheetgood Mastic Pink Sheetgood Pink Sheetgood Mastic Aircell pipe insulation Aircell packing/joints Tank insulation Boiler gaskets Aircell pipe Aircell packing/joints Cloth duct tape Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes Cardboard joints/packing Aircell pipe Cellulose layered pipe Cellulose packing/ joints Cloth duct tape Horse hair covering Cloth duct tape 9 x 9 Light blond VFT 12 x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes 12 x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes (1935) 12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes Black chalkboards 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic 12x12 Cream FT 12x12 Cream floor tile mastic 12x12 Light Blue 12x12 Light Blue floortile mastic Grey Mix Terrazzo Tan Mix Terrazzo 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic 2 X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile White 12 X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Red Floor Tile 12 X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic Building: 257

10 X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile 12 X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/ Grey Floor Tile 12 X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic 4" Tan Vinyl Basecover 4" Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive Red Carpet Adhesive 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile Cloth Vibration Isolation The following areas were deemed to be inaccessible: Blue Sheetgood Mastic Pink Sheetgood Mastic Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes Mastic associated with the 9x9 black/red VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic assoc. w/12x12 Beige VFT w/dk brown stripes 12 x 12 VFTD blond w/ stripes/mastic 12x12 Blond VFT w/ stripes assoc. mastic (1935) Mastic Assoc. w/12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic 12x12 Cream floor tile mastic 12x12 Light Blue floortile mastic 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic 4" Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive Materials were also listed as "assumed" if they were in good condition and sampling was not conducted to avoid damage. This reinspection was conducted by Allizon Brooks, IDPH License # The Management Plan was updated by Daniel Juneau, IDPH License # Inspector and Management Planner Licenses are included in Appendix B. Unit: 2251 Building: 257

11 III. METHODOLOGY Tasks performed on-site included the following: IV. 1. Review current management plan, identify HA(s) and extract appropriate information. 2. Examine and verify abatement records. 3. Touch and visually and physically reinspect and reassess the condition of all friable known or assumed ACBM. 4. Touch and visually and physically reinspect all non-friable known or assumed ACBM to determine whether these materials have become friable since the last inspection or periodic surveillance. 5. Identify any condition changes that may affect Hazard Ranking of known ACBM or Assumed ACBM, as well as any HA(s) that have become friable since the last reinspection. 6. Collect bulk samples from each newly discovered friable HA or previously assumed and submit for laboratory analysis. 7. Tabulate reinspection findings and submit for management planner review and recommendations with appropriate response actions based on the AHERA Damage Category of the ACBM. 8. Submit reinspection findings and management planner recommendations to the LEA within thirty (3) days for inclusion into the management plan. ABATEMENT HISTORY The information collected from the existing management plan and inspection report(s) and from interviews with the school official revealed that the following asbestos abatement was conducted at the school since the previous Three year Reinspection. Abatement Dates: V. REASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The reassessments and recommendations are summarized in Tables I and II on the following pages. Detailed Hazard Assessment Sheets and Drawings and Photos (if applicable) are included in Appendix A. VI. CONCLUSIONS The Building 257 Three-Year reinspection has been completed and response actions have been recommended for both friable and non-friable materials. A timely execution of the response actions recommended will enable the LEA and the Designated Person(s) to effectively manage the existing ACBM. This three-year reinspection report should be inspected in the current Management plan at the CPS Central Office, and one (1) copy should be kept at the school for use when planning any renovation and/or demolition activities in areas where ACBM has been identified. Also, periodic surveillance documentation and any summary reports from any response actions that are executed at the school should be used to update the Management Plan. Unit: 2251 Building: 257

12 Table I Inspector's Reinspection Findings

13 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 1 Blue Sheetgood 11 Blue Sheetgood Mastic Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units 3 ASSUMED N NONE 3 ASSUMED N NONE Pink Sheetgood 3 ASSUMED N NONE Pink Sheetgood Mastic 3 ASSUMED N NONE 21 Mag pipe 1 LF Mobile Units Boys Bathroom Mobile Units Boys Bathroom Girls Bathroom next to Rm. 123 Girls Bathroom next to Rm. 123 Basement crawl space Change in Assessment Category CHR TSI Y NONE 22 Fiberglass packing Pump room (1956) Aircell pipe insulation 1,3 LF Pump room (1956) NOT_TEST ED ASSUMED TSI 23 TSI Y NONE 24 Aircell packing/joints 13 LF Pump room (1956) ASSUMED TSI Y NONE Tank insulation Boiler gaskets 15 LF Boiler room Boiler room ASSUMED ASSUMED TSI TSI Y NONE Aircell pipe Aircell packing/joints Cloth duct tape 4 LF Rm. 17, 19 Rm. 17, 19 Crawl space, storage room (1935) ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED TSI TSI Y LOC 34 Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes 1, Storage room, crawlspace (1935) ASSUMED TSI Y DIST 35 Cardboard joints/packing 5 LF Crawl space (1935) ASSUMED TSI Y 36 Aircell pipe 2 LF Storage room, pipe chase (1935) ASSUMED TSI 37 Aircell joints/packing 2 LF Store room, pipe chase (1935) CHR 38 Cellulose layered pipe 15 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) ASSUMED Damage Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Yes Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 2 Yes 15 NONE Y NONE TSI Y NONE TSI Y NONE Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable ne Moderate 5 5

14 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 39 Cellulose packing/ joints 4 Cloth duct tape 41 Horse hair covering 42 Cloth duct tape 45.1 Mastic associated with 9x9 Light cream VFT Mastic associated with the light blond VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 black/red VFT x 9 Light yellow VAT/mastic Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic Assoc. w/9x9 Beige w/ brown strips VAT Mastic assoc. w/12x12 Beige VFT w/dk brown stripes 12 x 12 VFTD blond w/ stripes/mastic x12 Blond VFT w/ stripes assoc. mastic (1935) Mastic assoc. w/ 12x12 cream VFT w/ brown spots Mastic Assoc. w/12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes 5 Dark green linoleum mastic x 9 Light cream VFT x 9 Light blond VFT Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type 2 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) ASSUMED TSI Y NONE 2,9 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) ASSUMED TSI Y NONE 5 LF Boiler room (1935) ASSUMED TSI Y NONE 2 LF Crawl space (1935) ASSUMED TSI Y NONE Room 17, 19 CHR Room 17 (1935),19 Engineers office (1935), 12x12 Cream on top Kitchen room 16 Rooms 212 and 213 (1948) Room 212 and 213 CHR CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage CHR CHR N ne NONE CHR N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Room 112 NO_ACBM Both Floor classrooms (1956) Rm. 23, 2, 21, 22 Hallways both floors (1935) Room 18 CHR N NONE CHR N NONE CHR N NONE ABATED Hallways both floors, office, employee's room Room 111,113 (1948) Room 17 and 19, Lunchroom Room 15 and 17 (1935), Lunchroom CHR 7 1,5 1,5 1, 1, 3,5 2, Damage Quantity Damage Units Change in Assessment Category Damage Category suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Low ne Low ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ne N NONE Low Moderate ACBM with the potential for damage NO_ACBM CHR ASSUMED ne Low

15 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description x 9 Black / red VAT x 9 Light yellow VFT 9 x 9 Brown VFT 1, x 9 Red VFT 1, x 9 Beige VFT w/ brown stripes x 12 Beige VFT w/ dk brown stripes 1, x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes 1, x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes (1935) 2, x 12 VFT cream w/ brown spots x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes 8 57 Dark green linoleum 58 Black vinyl base board 59 Black vinyl base board mastic Cinderblock Cinderblock mortar Black chalkboards Red common brick Internal red common brick mortar Light brown face brick Light brown face brick exterior mortar Interior ivory face brick 68 Internal ivory face brick mortar Material Quantity 6 Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Engineering office CHR N NONE Kitchen room 16 Rooms 212, 213,112, Closet enterance to attic Rooms 212, 213, 112 Room 112 CHR CHR N ne NONE CHR N CHR Both floor class rooms (1956) Hallway both floors (1956) Hallways both floors (1935) Room 18 CHR ASSUMED ASSUMED Hallways both floors, room, office, employee's room (1948) Rooms # 111,113 (1948) Rooms # 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) Rooms 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) Boiler Room (1935) Boiler Room (1935) All classrooms Internal (1948) Internal (1948) Exterior (1956) External (1956) Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits Damage Category Change in Assessment Category ACBM with the potential for damage NONE N NONE N NONE N NONE N NONE CHR N NONE ASSUMED N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM ASSUMED NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM NO_ACBM Damage Quantity Damage Units ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential Moderate

16 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 69 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile 7 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type Damage Quantity Damage Units 5 ASSUMED N NONE 5 ASSUMED N NONE 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile 1, Storage Room and Room 15 Storage Room and Room 15 Kitchen room 16 Change in Assessment Category ASSUMED N NONE 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic 1, Kitchen room 16 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 Cream FT 5 N NONE 5 ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 Light Blue 1,5 Room 15, Engineers Office Room 15, Engineers Office Kitchen Room 16 ASSUMED 12x12 Cream floor tile mastic ASSUMED N NONE 12x12 Light Blue floortile mastic 1,5 Kitchen, Room 16 ASSUMED N NONE 77 Grey Mix Terrazzo 2, N NONE Tan Mix Terrazzo 1, Stairwells (Middle & South) rth Stairwell ASSUMED 78 ASSUMED N NONE 79 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile 6 N NONE 6 ASSUMED N NONE 81 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic 2 X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm 15, ASSUMED Y NONE Yes 82 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile White 5, Second Floor Elevator Lobby Second Floor Elevator Lobby 1st & 2nd Floor Hallways & Classroom Gym ASSUMED 8 ASSUMED Y NONE Yes X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 1,4 15 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 5 15 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 Red Floor Tile 45 Rm. 17, 19, 15 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic 35 17, 19 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile 35 17, 19 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic 35 17, 19 ASSUMED N NONE X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile 5 Room 15 bathroom ASSUMED N NONE Damage Category ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage Damage Reason Disturbance Potential

17 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Material Description 9 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/ Grey Floor Tile X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic 1, 95 4" Tan Vinyl Basecover 5 LF 96 4" Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive 5 97 Red Carpet Adhesive 98 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile 99 Cloth Vibration Isolation Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Type 1, Room 15 bathroom ASSUMED N NONE Change in Assessment Category 1, Room 16/ Kitchen ASSUMED N NONE 1, Room 16/ Kitchen ASSUMED N NONE 1, Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms 11119, and Out Buildings/ Trailer Rooms , and Out Buildings/Trailers Rooms Outbuildings/ Trailers Rooms Out Buildings/ Trailers ROOM 12 Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms Throughout Basement Fan Room ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N NONE ASSUMED N ASSUMED ASSUMED ASSUMED 7 5,6 2 LF Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Damage Reason Disturbance Potential ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM with the potential for damage NONE ACBM with the potential for damage N NONE NONE Yes N NONE ACBM with the potential for damage Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM ACBM with the potential for damage Y

18 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report Reinspection Date 3/1/216 Inspector Name Inspector's Comments Allizon Brooks /15/217 Inspector's IDPH License Number / Expiration Date HA Number: Inspector Comments: t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216

19 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: Inspector Comments: t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216 t observed 216

20 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: Inspector Comments:

21 School Unit 2251 Building ID 257 Address Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Inspector's Reinspection Findings Table 1 Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Inspector's Comments are Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number: Inspector Comments:

22 Table II Management Planner's Review

23 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response Blue Sheetgood Blue Sheetgood Mastic Pink Sheetgood Pink Sheetgood Mastic Mag pipe LF Mobile Units Boys Bathroom Mobile Units Boys Bathroom Girls Bathroom next to Rm. 123 Girls Bathroom next to Rm. 123 Basement crawl space Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Chrysotile TSI Yes LF 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Fiberglass packing Aircell pipe insulation 1,3 LF Pump room (1956) Pump room (1956) t Tested Assumed TSI TSI Yes LF 24 Aircell packing/joints 13 LF Pump room (1956) Assumed TSI Yes LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Tank insulation Boiler gaskets 15 LF Boiler room Boiler room Assumed Assumed TSI TSI Yes LF 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Aircell pipe Aircell packing/joints Cloth duct tape 4 LF Rm. 17, 19 Rm. 17, 19 Crawl space, storage room (1935) Assumed Assumed Assumed TSI TSI Yes 2 LF Remove 34 Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes 1, Storage room, crawlspace (1935) Assumed TSI Yes Cardboard joints/packing 5 LF Crawl space (1935) Assumed TSI Yes LF 36 Aircell pipe 2 LF Storage room, pipe chase (1935) Assumed TSI Yes LF 37 Aircell joints/packing 2 LF Store room, pipe chase (1935) Chrysotile TSI Yes LF 38 Cellulose layered pipe 15 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) Assumed TSI Yes LF 39 Cellulose packing/ joints 2 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) Assumed TSI Yes LF 4 Cloth duct tape 2,9 LF Unfinished pipe chase (1948) Assumed TSI Yes LF 41 Horse hair covering 5 LF Boiler room (1935) Assumed TSI Yes LF 42 Cloth duct tape 2 LF Crawl space (1935) Assumed TSI Yes LF 1 Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM 1 Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM Remove

24 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Mastic associated with 9x9 Light cream VFT Mastic associated with the light blond VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 black/red VFT x 9 Light yellow VAT/mastic Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Mastic Assoc. w/9x9 Beige w/ brown strips VAT Mastic assoc. w/12x12 Beige VFT w/dk brown stripes 12 x 12 VFTD blond w/ stripes/mastic 12x12 Blond VFT w/ stripes assoc. mastic (1935) Mastic assoc. w/ 12x12 cream VFT w/ brown spots Mastic Assoc. w/12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes Dark green linoleum mastic 9 x 9 Light cream VFT 9 x 9 Light blond VFT 9 x 9 Black / red VAT 9 x 9 Light yellow VFT 9 x 9 Brown VFT x 9 Red VFT 9 x 9 Beige VFT w/ brown stripes 12 x 12 Beige VFT w/ dk brown stripes 12 x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes 12 x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes (1935) 12 x 12 VFT cream w/ brown spots 12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes Dark green linoleum Black vinyl base board 59 Black vinyl base board mastic Material Quantity Material Units 7 1,5 1,5 1, 1, 3,5 2, 6 1,56 1,5 6 1, 1,4 2, 72 8 Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response Room 17, 19 Room 17 (1935),19 Engineers office (1935), 12x12 Cream on top Kitchen room 16 Rooms 212 and 213 (1948) Room 212 and 213 Room 112 Both Floor classrooms (1956) Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile ACBM Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Rm. 23, 2, 21, 22 Hallways both floors (1935) Room 18 Hallways both floors, office, employee's room Room 111,113 (1948) Room 17 and 19, Lunchroom Room 15 and 17 (1935), Lunchroom Engineering office Kitchen room 16 Rooms 212, 213,112, Closet enterance to attic Rooms 212, 213, 112 Room 112 Both floor class rooms (1956) Hallway both floors (1956) Hallways both floors (1935) Room 18 Hallways both floors, room, office, employee's room (1948) Rooms # 111,113 (1948) Rooms # 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) Rooms 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) Chrysotile Chrysotile Abated Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM Chrysotile Assumed Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Assumed Assumed Chrysotile Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM ACBM ACBM

25 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Cinderblock Cinderblock mortar Black chalkboards Red common brick Internal red common brick mortar Light brown face brick Light brown face brick exterior mortar Interior ivory face brick 68 Internal ivory face brick mortar " x 12" Cream Floor Tile 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic 12x12 Cream FT 12x12 Cream floor tile mastic 12x12 Light Blue 12x12 Light Blue floortile mastic Grey Mix Terrazzo Tan Mix Terrazzo 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic 2 X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm 5 5 1, 1, 5 5 1,5 1,5 2, 1, , 82 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile White X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Red Floor Tile 12 X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile 12 X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type ACBM ACBM Assumed ACBM ACBM ACBM ACBM ACBM Boiler Room (1935) Boiler Room (1935) All classrooms Internal (1948) Internal (1948) Exterior (1956) External (1956) Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits Storage Room and Room 15 Storage Room and Room 15 Kitchen room 16 Kitchen room 16 Room 15, Engineers Office Room 15, Engineers Office Kitchen Room 16 Kitchen, Room 16 Stairwells (Middle & South) rth Stairwell Second Floor Elevator Lobby Second Floor Elevator Lobby 1st & 2nd Floor Hallways & Classroom Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed 5, Gym 1, , Rm. 17, 19, 15 17, 19 17, 19 17, 19 Room 15 bathroom Room 15 bathroom Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response Yes Assumed Yes Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage ACBM

26 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, Region 4 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Num Material Description Material Quantity Material Units Material Location Asbestos Type Material Category Friable Damage Quantity Damage Units Damage Category Response X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile 12 X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic 12 X 12 White w/ Grey Floor Tile 1, 1, 1, Assumed Assumed Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic 1, Assumed 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 95 4" Tan Vinyl Basecover 5 LF Assumed LF 6 ACBM with the potential for damage " Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive Red Carpet Adhesive 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile 5 7 5,6 Assumed Assumed Assumed Yes Cloth Vibration Isolation 2 LF Assumed LF 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM 6 ACBM with the potential for damage 99 Room 16/ Kitchen Room 16/ Kitchen Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms , and Out Buildings/ Trailer Rooms , and Out Buildings/Trailers Rooms Outbuildings/ Trailers Rooms Out Buildings/ Trailers ROOM 12 Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms Throughout Basement Fan Room

27 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, 6638 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report 4/7/216 Review Date Manager Planner Name Daniel Juneau /15/216 Manager IDPH License /Expiration HA Number Management Comments If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M Repair or Remove as applicable. Continue O&M Repair or Remove as applicable. Continue O&M. If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M

28 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, 6638 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number Management Comments If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M If identified, implement O&M

29 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, 6638 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number Management Comments If identified, implement O&M

30 School Address Unit 2251 Building ID Chicago, IL, 6638 Region ASBESTOS REINSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Management Planner's Review Table II Managing Environmental Consultant (MEC) 6 West Van Buren St., Ste 5 Phone: (312) Fax: (312) Management Planner's Comments Summarized at the End of the Report HA Number Management Comments

31 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 1 Blue Sheetgood HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Mobile Units Boys Bathroom 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

32 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Blue Sheetgood Mobile Units Boys Bathroom 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

33 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 11 Blue Sheetgood Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Mobile Units Boys Bathroom 3 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

34 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Blue Sheetgood Mastic Mobile Units Boys Bathroom 3 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

35 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 12 Pink Sheetgood HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Girls Bathroom next to Rm COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

36 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Pink Sheetgood Girls Bathroom next to Rm In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

37 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 13 Pink Sheetgood Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Girls Bathroom next to Rm COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

38 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Pink Sheetgood Mastic Girls Bathroom next to Rm In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

39 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 21 Mag pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Basement crawl space 1 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

40 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mag pipe Basement crawl space 1 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

41 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 22 Fiberglass packing HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: t Tested FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Pump room (1956) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

42 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Fiberglass packing Pump room (1956) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

43 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 23 Aircell pipe insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Pump room (1956) 13 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

44 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell pipe insulation Pump room (1956) 13 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

45 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 24 Aircell packing/joints HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Pump room (1956) 13 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

46 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell packing/joints Pump room (1956) 13 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

47 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 26 Tank insulation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler room COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

48 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Tank insulation Boiler room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

49 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 27 Boiler gaskets HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler room 15 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

50 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Boiler gaskets Boiler room 15 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

51 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 29 Aircell pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate Rm. 17, 19 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

52 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell pipe Rm. 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

53 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 3 Aircell packing/joints HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rm. 17, 19 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

54 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell packing/joints Rm. 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

55 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 33 Cloth duct tape HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 1 Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Remove ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 1. Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Crawl space, storage room (1935) 4 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

56 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cloth duct tape Crawl space, storage room (1935) 4 LF 2 LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Remove Comments: Repair or Remove as applicable. Continue O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

57 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 34 Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 1 Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: Remove ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 1. Damaged or significantly damaged friable thermal system insulating ACBM DAMAGE REASON: Physical Damage DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Storage room, crawlspace (1935) 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

58 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cardboard duct, layered cellulose cover pipes Storage room, crawlspace (1935) 1 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Remove Comments: Repair or Remove as applicable. Continue O&M. Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

59 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 35 Cardboard joints/packing HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Crawl space (1935) 5 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

60 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cardboard joints/packing Crawl space (1935) 5 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

61 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 36 Aircell pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Storage room, pipe chase (1935) 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

62 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell pipe Storage room, pipe chase (1935) 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

63 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 37 Aircell joints/packing HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Store room, pipe chase (1935) 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

64 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Aircell joints/packing Store room, pipe chase (1935) 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

65 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 38 Cellulose layered pipe HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 15 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

66 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cellulose layered pipe Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 15 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

67 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 39 Cellulose packing/ joints HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

68 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cellulose packing/ joints Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

69 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 4 Cloth duct tape HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 29 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

70 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cloth duct tape Unfinished pipe chase (1948) 29 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

71 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 41 Horse hair covering HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler room (1935) 5 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

72 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Horse hair covering Boiler room (1935) 5 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

73 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 42 Cloth duct tape HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Crawl space (1935) 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

74 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cloth duct tape Crawl space (1935) 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

75 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 45.1 Mastic associated with 9x9 Light cream VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Room 17, 19 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

76 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic associated with 9x9 Light cream VFT Room 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

77 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 45.2 Mastic associated with the light blond VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Room 17 (1935),19 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

78 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic associated with the light blond VFT Room 17 (1935), In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

79 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 45.3 Mastic associated with the 9x9 black/red VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Engineers office (1935), 12x12 Cream on top 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

80 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic associated with the 9x9 black/red VFT Engineers office (1935), 12x12 Cream on top 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

81 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Light yellow VAT/mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Kitchen room 16 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

82 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Light yellow VAT/mastic Kitchen room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

83 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 46.1 Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 212 and 213 (1948) 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

84 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Rooms 212 and 213 (1948) 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

85 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 46.2 Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 212 and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

86 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic associated with the 9x9 brown/red VFT Room 212 and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

87 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 46.3 Mastic Assoc. w/9x9 Beige w/ brown strips VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 112 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

88 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic Assoc. w/9x9 Beige w/ brown strips VAT Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

89 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 47 Mastic assoc. w/12x12 Beige VFT w/dk brown stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Both Floor classrooms (1956) 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

90 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic assoc. w/12x12 Beige VFT w/dk brown stripes Both Floor classrooms (1956) 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

91 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 VFTD blond w/ stripes/mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rm. 23, 2, 21, 22 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

92 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 VFTD blond w/ stripes/mastic Rm. 23, 2, 21, 22 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

93 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x12 Blond VFT w/ stripes assoc. mastic (1935) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallways both floors (1935) 35 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

94 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x12 Blond VFT w/ stripes assoc. mastic (1935) Hallways both floors (1935) 35 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

95 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 48.3 Mastic assoc. w/ 12x12 cream VFT w/ brown spots HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Abated FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate Room 18 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

96 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic assoc. w/ 12x12 cream VFT w/ brown spots Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

97 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 49.1 Mastic Assoc. w/12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallways both floors, office, employee's room 2 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

98 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Mastic Assoc. w/12 x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes Hallways both floors, office, employee's room 2 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

99 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 5 Dark green linoleum mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 111,113 (1948) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

100 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Dark green linoleum mastic Room 111,113 (1948) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

101 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Light cream VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Low Room 17 and 19, Lunchroom COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

102 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Light cream VFT Room 17 and 19, Lunchroom In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

103 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Light blond VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 15 and 17 (1935), Lunchroom COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

104 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Light blond VFT Room 15 and 17 (1935), Lunchroom 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

105 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Black / red VAT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Engineering office 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

106 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Black / red VAT Engineering office 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

107 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Light yellow VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Moderate Kitchen room 16 COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

108 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Light yellow VFT Kitchen room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

109 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Brown VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 212, 213,112, Closet enterance to attic 156 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

110 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Brown VFT Rooms 212, 213,112, Closet enterance to attic 156 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

111 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Red VFT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 212, 213, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

112 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Red VFT Rooms 212, 213, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

113 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 9 Beige VFT w/ brown stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

114 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 9 Beige VFT w/ brown stripes Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

115 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 Beige VFT w/ dk brown stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Both floor class rooms (1956) 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

116 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 Beige VFT w/ dk brown stripes Both floor class rooms (1956) 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

117 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallway both floors (1956) 14 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

118 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes Hallway both floors (1956) 14 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

119 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes (1935) HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallways both floors (1935) 2 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

120 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 Blond VFT w/ stripes (1935) Hallways both floors (1935) 2 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

121 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 VFT cream w/ brown spots HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

122 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 VFT cream w/ brown spots Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

123 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Hallways both floors, room, office, employee's room (1948) 8 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

124 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x 12 VFT blond w/ stripes Hallways both floors, room, office, employee's room (1948) 8 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

125 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 57 Dark green linoleum HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms # 111,113 (1948) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

126 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Dark green linoleum Rooms # 111,113 (1948) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

127 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 58 Black vinyl base board HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms # 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

128 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Black vinyl base board Rooms # 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

129 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 59 Black vinyl base board mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rooms 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

130 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Black vinyl base board mastic Rooms 2-23, 1-13, 15 (1935, 1956) 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

131 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 6 Cinderblock HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room (1935) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

132 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cinderblock Boiler Room (1935) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

133 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 61 Cinderblock mortar HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Boiler Room (1935) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

134 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cinderblock mortar Boiler Room (1935) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

135 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 62 Black chalkboards HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: All classrooms COMMENTS: t observed 216 Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

136 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Black chalkboards All classrooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: If identified, implement O&M Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

137 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 63 Red common brick HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Internal (1948) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

138 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Red common brick Internal (1948) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

139 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 64 Internal red common brick mortar HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Internal (1948) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

140 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Internal red common brick mortar Internal (1948) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

141 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 65 Light brown face brick HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Exterior (1956) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

142 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Light brown face brick Exterior (1956) In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

143 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 66 Light brown face brick exterior mortar HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: External (1956) COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

144 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Light brown face brick exterior mortar External (1956) 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

145 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 67 Interior ivory face brick HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

146 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Interior ivory face brick Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

147 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) 2251 AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 68 Internal ivory face brick mortar HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: ACBM FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be. DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

148 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Internal ivory face brick mortar Internal, common to all additions, hallways and exits 257 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

149 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 69 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Storage Room and Room 15 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

150 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " x 12" Cream Floor Tile Storage Room and Room 15 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

151 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 7 12" x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Storage Room and Room 15 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

152 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " x 12" Cream Floor Tile Mastic Storage Room and Room 15 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

153 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 71 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Kitchen room 16 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

154 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " x 12" Blue Floor Tile Kitchen room 16 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

155 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 72 12" x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Kitchen room 16 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

156 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " x 12" Blue Floor Tile Mastic Kitchen room 16 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

157 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 73 12x12 Cream FT HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 15, Engineers Office 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

158 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x12 Cream FT Room 15, Engineers Office 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

159 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 74 12x12 Cream floor tile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 15, Engineers Office 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

160 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x12 Cream floor tile mastic Room 15, Engineers Office 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

161 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 75 12x12 Light Blue HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Kitchen Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

162 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x12 Light Blue Kitchen Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

163 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 76 12x12 Light Blue floortile mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Kitchen, Room COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

164 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ x12 Light Blue floortile mastic Kitchen, Room In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

165 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 77 Grey Mix Terrazzo HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Stairwells (Middle & South) 2 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

166 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Grey Mix Terrazzo Stairwells (Middle & South) 2 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

167 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 78 Tan Mix Terrazzo HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: rth Stairwell 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

168 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Tan Mix Terrazzo rth Stairwell 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

169 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 79 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Second Floor Elevator Lobby 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

170 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Second Floor Elevator Lobby 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

171 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 8 12" X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Second Floor Elevator Lobby 6 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

172 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " X 12" Tan w/lt. Brown Floor Tile Mastic Second Floor Elevator Lobby 6 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

173 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 81 2 X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 1st & 2nd Floor Hallways & Classroom 15 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

174 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 4 Ceiling Tile White Pinhole w/worm 1st & 2nd Floor Hallways & Classroom 15 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

175 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 82 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile White HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Gym 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

176 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 2 Ceiling Tile White Gym 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

177 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

178 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

179 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 15 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

180 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Lt. Brown w/ White Floor Tile 15 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

181 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Red Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Rm. 17, 19, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

182 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Red Floor Tile Rm. 17, 19, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

183 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 17, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

184 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Red Floor Tile Mastic 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

185 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 17, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

186 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

187 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: 17, COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

188 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Brown w/white Floor Tile Mastic 17, In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

189 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 15 bathroom 5 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

190 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Room 15 bathroom 5 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

191 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 9 12 X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 15 bathroom 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

192 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 White w/blue Floor Tile Mastic Room 15 bathroom 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

193 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 16/ Kitchen 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

194 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Room 16/ Kitchen 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

195 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Room 16/ Kitchen 1 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

196 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 Lt. Grey w/ White Floor Tile Mastic Room 16/ Kitchen 1 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

197 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 White w/ Grey Floor Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms , and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

198 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 White w/ Grey Floor Tile Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms , and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

199 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Out Buildings/ Trailer Rooms , and COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

200 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 12 White w/grey Floor Tile Mastic Out Buildings/ Trailer Rooms , and In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

201 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 95 4" Tan Vinyl Basecover HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Out Buildings/Trailers Rooms LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

202 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " Tan Vinyl Basecover Out Buildings/Trailers Rooms LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

203 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 96 4" Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Outbuildings/ Trailers Rooms COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

204 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ " Tan Vinyl basecover Adhesive Outbuildings/ Trailers Rooms In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

205 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 97 Red Carpet Adhesive HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Out Buildings/ Trailers ROOM 12 7 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

206 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Red Carpet Adhesive Out Buildings/ Trailers ROOM 12 7 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

207 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 98 2 X 2 Ceiling Tile HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 7 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: Yes RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 7. Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspect ACBM DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms Throughout 56 COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

208 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ X 2 Ceiling Tile Out Buildings / Trailers Rooms Throughout 56 In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

209 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Inspector Assessment Form (REASSESSMENT) AHERA INSPECTOR: Allizon Brooks INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/ INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS INSPECTION 99 Cloth Vibration Isolation HISTORICAL AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY 6 ACBM with the potential for damage HISTORICAL DAMAGE REASON: HISTORICAL RESPONSE ACTION: ASBESTOS TYPE: Assumed FRIABLE: RESULTS OF REINSPECTION AND REASSESSMENT This homogeneous area was reinspected and reassessed in accordance with Section and of AHERA and it's condition HAS NOT CHANGED when compared to the conditions of the last AHERA reinspection. The current AHERA DAMAGE CATEGORY is determined to be 6. ACBM with the potential for damage DAMAGE REASON: DISTURBANCE POTENTIAL: Basement Fan Room 2 LF LF COMMENTS: Inspector's Signature: 3/1/216

210 216 AHERA REINSPECTION Management Planner Review Form MANAGEMENT PLANNER: Daniel Juneau REVIEW DATE: 4/7/ Cloth Vibration Isolation Basement Fan Room 2 LF LF In accordance with Sections and of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) the LEA must select a management planner to review the results of the inspection and assessment and recommend appropriate response actions. The original inspection of the above identified homogeneous area has been reviewed in accordance with Sections and with the following recommendations. The RESPONSE ACTION recommendation is: Comments: Management Planner's Signature: 4/7/216

211 216 AHERA REINSPECTION

212 APPENDIX B Inspector and Management Planner Licenses

213

214

215

216

217

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation.

If the address on this form is different than the address of the building, submit a written explanation. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Youth Connection - J. Addams Alter HS

Youth Connection - J. Addams Alter HS ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form:

Explain in writing if the address of the building is different than the address on this form: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AHERA THREE YEAR REINSPECTION ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL INFORMATION FORM SECTION I NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT: SCHOOL ID NUMBER: ADDRESS OF SCHOOL: CITY: CHICAGO

More information

Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska

Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska Palmyra High School 07/16 Addition and Renovation Palmyra, Nebraska 845-001-14 DOCUMENT 00 31 26 - EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION 1.1 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION A. This Document with

More information

Three Year Asbestos Re-Inspection Report. Macomb Montessori Academy East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089

Three Year Asbestos Re-Inspection Report. Macomb Montessori Academy East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089 Three Year Re-Inspection Report For 14057 East Nine Mile Road Warren, Michigan 47089 Prepared by: Northern Analytical Services, LLC. 14870 225 th Avenue Big Rapids, Michigan 49307 Dated: Project 160268

More information

NARRATIVE REPORT. Underlayment Paper for Linoleum. The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data.

NARRATIVE REPORT. Underlayment Paper for Linoleum. The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data. NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION Engineering and Technology was originally constructed in 1913; although specific information is unavailable, several renovations are evident. Engineering and Technology

More information

NARRATIVE REPORT. Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations.

NARRATIVE REPORT. Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations. NARRATIVE REPORT 1.0 BUILDING INFORMATION Engineering Administration was originally constructed in 1965; the building has had no major renovations. Engineering Administration is a three-story, 9,579 ft

More information

Asbestos 3-Year Re-inspection Report and Updated Management Plan. Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street Lowell, Massachusetts, 01852

Asbestos 3-Year Re-inspection Report and Updated Management Plan. Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street Lowell, Massachusetts, 01852 Asbestos 3-Year Report Edith Nourse Rogers School 43 Highland Street, 01852 Prepared by: Cardno ATC 600 West Cummings Park, Suite 5450 Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 September 24, 2014 Cardno ATC Project

More information

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors

ASBESTOS POLICY. 2. Authority. 3. Scope. 4. Definitions. 4. Responsibilities. 1. Purpose. Department supervisors 1. Purpose ASBESTOS POLICY The purpose of the University of Denver Asbestos Policy is to establish the means to prevent personal asbestos exposures to DU and contractor workers by managing and controlling

More information

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for:

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota. Prepared for: ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY 696/698 Hawthorne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota Prepared for: City of St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West 4 th Street

More information

AHERA Asbestos Management Plan

AHERA Asbestos Management Plan Our Services: Asbestos Inspections Asbestos Abatement Design Asbestos Abatement Oversight AHERA Asbestos Management Plan 720 Fairview Drive Carlisle, Ohio 45005 Asbestos Management Planning Phase I Environmental

More information

900 S. Colorado Blvd. - 5,609 square ft building (new automobile sales showroom and offices) built in 2000/2001; and

900 S. Colorado Blvd. - 5,609 square ft building (new automobile sales showroom and offices) built in 2000/2001; and Sent Via erims November 13, 2013 Sonic Automotive, Inc. 4401 Colwick Road Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 Attention: Mr. Doug Siska Re: Asbestos Survey Murray BMW of Denver 900 S Colorado Blvd and 4320

More information

Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: Troy, OH Dayton, OH Fax:

Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: Troy, OH Dayton, OH Fax: Turn-Key Environmental Consultants, Inc. 790 Barnhart Rd. 714 Monument Ave. Phone: 937-335-8807 Troy, OH 45373 Dayton, OH 45402 Fax: 937-339-4882 March 24, 2016 Mr. Dennis Zimmer City of Dayton, Division

More information

RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE ACM Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FORM B)

RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE ACM Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FORM B) Corporation Yard RECORD OF FRIABLE AND NONFRIABLE AC Inspection Date(s) July 31, 2013 (FOR B) THREE-YEAR REINSPECTION CDS CODE 04-61424-0000000 SCHOOL Corporate Yard SCHOOL PHONE NUBER (530) 891-3095 ADDRESS

More information

DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY

DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY DULANEY HIGH SCHOOL FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX A: SITE PLAN Baltimore County Public Schools Site Plan-Appendix A Office of Engineering and Construction February 18, 2016 Dulaney High School Feasibility

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Rollins Elementary School 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 950 Kane Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 15, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT

ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT ASBESTOS ROOF INSPECTION REPORT OF MARSHALL COURTS ROOF 3300 A&B, 3302 A&B, 3400 A & B, 3402 A & B MARSHALL AVE 800 A & B 35 TH STREET AND 801 A&B 33 RD STREET NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA 23606 MCS JOB #13-031S

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Waldo Middle School 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 56 Jackson Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 8, 2018 thru May 10, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Fred Rodgers Magnet Academy 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 501 College Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 16, 2018 thru May 18, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Procedure. Procedure

Procedure. Procedure Procedure 4.1524 Asbestos Procedure A. Scope... 1 B. Applicability... 2 C. Definitions... 2 D. Responsibilities... 3 E. Hazards... 4 F. General Rules... 4 G. Asbestos Inventory... 5 H. Asbestos Identification...

More information

EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS

EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS EPA/ODEQ DEMOLITION BY FIRE REQUIREMENTS The OKLAHOMA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL RULES, Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100-13, Open Burning, specifically, subpart 5, Open burning prohibited, states:

More information

Lead Based Coatings Flowchart

Lead Based Coatings Flowchart 1926.62 Any Detectable Levels of Lead / Stop No Testing or Compliance Issues Lead Coatings NOT Target Housing or Child Occupied Facility Target Housing Child Occupied Family Georgia Certified Firm & Inspect

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Oak Park Elementary School 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site:July 5, 2018 1200 Front Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora,

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. Krug Elementary School 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 240 Melrose Avenue Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 1, 2018 thru May 3, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

Safe Removal of Asbestos. Work Safe Week 2013

Safe Removal of Asbestos. Work Safe Week 2013 Safe Removal of Asbestos Work Safe Week 2013 Work Safe Week 2013 For the respect of others please ensure your mobile phone is switched off or on silent. In the event of an emergency a Convention Centre

More information

835 S. Canyon Blvd., John Day, OR 97845 Phone: (541) 575-1349 Fax: (541) 575-3601 Robert Waltenburg-Superintendent waltenburgr@grantesd.k12.or.us Stacie Holmstrom Deputy Clerk holmstroms@grantesd.k12.or.us

More information

Allisonville Elementary School Facilities Highlights Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767

Allisonville Elementary School Facilities Highlights Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767 Allisonville Elementary School Built: 1960 Last Major Renovation: 28 years ago Capacity: 650 Current Enrollment: 767 ADA improvements are Fire alarms need to be updated Playground equipment needs to be

More information

LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN LONG-TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN May, 2017 BOARD OF EDUCATION Cathe Russe President Jackie Lutz Vice President Sam Ach Member John Heggie Member Natalie Jachtorowycz Member John J. Murphy Member

More information

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For:

Radon Measurement Survey Report. McKnight School Service Center 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois Prepared For: Radon Measurement Survey Report Site: 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois 60505 Survey Dates: May 9, 2018 thru May 11, 2018 Prepared For: East Aurora School District 131 417 Fifth Street Aurora, Illinois

More information

ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator)

ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator) ASBESTOS AWARENESS New Employee Training March 2014 Environmental, Facilities Services Eddie Pena (HazMat & IAQ Coordinator) Why Are You Here? You need to know - Where there is (or may be) asbestoscontaining

More information

Bethel School District Radon Testing Plan

Bethel School District Radon Testing Plan The 2015 Oregon Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 2931 so that elevated radon levels in Oregon schools would be known. House Bill 2931 later became Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 332.166-167. As directed

More information

The school s metal push-out windows were assessed and nothing of concern was noted.

The school s metal push-out windows were assessed and nothing of concern was noted. February 15, 2017 Courtney Wilton Portland Public Schools 501 North Dixon Portland, OR 97227 Via email: Regarding: cwilton@pps.net Lead Paint Condition Assessment Faubion at Tubman 2231 N Flint Avenue

More information

EagleRidge High School. Radon Testing Plan

EagleRidge High School. Radon Testing Plan EagleRidge High School Radon Testing Plan The 2015 Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 2931 so that elevated radon levels in Oregon schools would be known. House Bill 2931 later became Oregon Revised Statute

More information

LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT

LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT LIMITED INDOOR MOLD ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY 1022 NORTHWEST 27 TH STREET SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: LUCAS OLIVA ARGUS ENVIRONMENTAL SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY 10004 WURZBACH

More information

THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY

THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY FIRE SAFETY BUREAU 23-A North Main Street Cranbury, NJ 08512 PHONE 609-664-3137 FAX 609-395-8861 Dear Cranbury Resident/Real Estate Agent: There have been some changes to the Certificate

More information

RADON PLAN. Eugene School District 4J Facilities Management 715 West Fourth Avenue Eugene, OR

RADON PLAN. Eugene School District 4J Facilities Management 715 West Fourth Avenue Eugene, OR RADON PLAN The 2015 Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 2931 so that if elevated radon levels in Oregon schools existed they would be known. House Bill 2931 later became Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 332.166-167.

More information

I. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

I. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS I. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS A. Foundations Type of Foundation(s): Pier & Beam - Crawlspace Opinion: All exposed areas of the foundation were examined visually. Examination of the foundation was limited to photographs

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING RICK SNYDER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING SHELLY EDGERTON DIRECTOR March 7, 2017 1093 Wayne Rd RE: License #: AS040378598 1093 Wayne Road Dear : Attached

More information

EXHIBIT C DUCTLESS HEAT PUMP SPECIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT C DUCTLESS HEAT PUMP SPECIFICATIONS Page 1 of 5 DUCTLESS HEAT PUMP SPECIFICATIONS 1. NEW EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS a. Materials Equipment shall be a split system Ductless Heat Pump (DHP) with an inverter-driven, variable speed compressor, a

More information

Well managed building mean risk is normal. Fire action notices should be displayed by all alarm break glass call points.

Well managed building mean risk is normal. Fire action notices should be displayed by all alarm break glass call points. Record of significant findings Risk assessment for : Assessment undertaken by : Horsefair House Nigel Billing CMIOSH Date: 28/3/17 Overview of Premises: 2 buildings on 3 stories in an L shaped configuration,

More information

Occupancy Packet & Business License Application

Occupancy Packet & Business License Application YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A NEW OWNER/TENANT MUST OBTAIN AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT BEFORE OCCUPYING THE PREMISES AT ADDRESS OF PROPERTY In Franklin Park, Illinois 60131. Applications for Occupancy Permits

More information

Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Prevention Bureau Standard

Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Prevention Bureau Standard Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Prevention Bureau Standard Title: Fire Alarm and Monitoring Systems Standard # 9-3 Effective: May 2002 Number of Pages: 7 Updated: December 2016 for consistency

More information

3520 A Energy Conservation Standards

3520 A Energy Conservation Standards 3520 A Energy Conservation Standards Regulation Original Adoption: 04/14/2009 Effective Date: 08/06/2009 Revision Dates: 08/05/2009 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this regulation is to establish the energy

More information

Inspection Report. Mr. Happy Homeowner. Property Address: Focal Point Home Inspection Ltd.

Inspection Report. Mr. Happy Homeowner. Property Address: Focal Point Home Inspection Ltd. Page 1 of 19 Inspection Report Mr. Happy Property Address: Joseph Poelsterl 450.010220 6334 W. Grace st Chicago Illinois 60634 1-773-454-6700 Page 2 of 19 Table of Contents Cover Page Table of Contents

More information

Steve Ramsey Home Inspections

Steve Ramsey Home Inspections Steve Ramsey Home Inspections I. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS X A. Foundations Type of Foundation(s): Slab Foundation There is evidence of some foundation movement. Excessive caulk around windows, mortar and brick

More information

Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence:

Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence: Lakehead University Asbestos Removals (2014 Audit) Residence: Bartley Residence, #6 Location #: 458, Marathon - Meeting Room, Floor: Marathon - 1, Room Number: RM100 Walls NI Drywall and joint cosurface

More information

BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE

BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE BALTIMORE CITY RENTAL LICENSE INSPECTION FORM RENTAL LICENSING INSPECTOR GUIDANCE Checklist items A - L may receive a result of Pass or Fail A. Railing is present for interior and exterior steps with more

More information

Emergency Management Resource Guide. Appendix A: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CPTED Principles Checklist for Kentucky Public Schools

Emergency Management Resource Guide. Appendix A: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CPTED Principles Checklist for Kentucky Public Schools Appendix A: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CPTED Principles Checklist for Kentucky Public Schools 143 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CPTED Principles Checklist for Kentucky

More information

John Palmer Elementary School

John Palmer Elementary School Facility Assessment Summary This report summarizes the findings of a facility assessment completed on the date noted in the document footer below. Assessors rate each facility feature and system by visual

More information

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL # KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL # KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT SURVEY FIRE HALL #17 7070 KNIGHT STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA Prepared for: City of Vancouver - Real Estate and Facilities Management #300 515 West 10 th Avenue Vancouver,

More information

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951)

Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA Ph. (951) Fax (951) Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal 2300 Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA 92501 Ph. (951) 955-4777 Fax (951) 955-4886 Guideline Title: Residentially Based Care Facilities Group

More information

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY Revision No.: 11 Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE This procedure establishes a tool to help maintain a safe environment for all patients, visitors and staff by evaluating the loss of a life safety feature during

More information

BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO

BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Division of Fire Prevention and Control BUILDING, FIRE, AND LIFE SAFETY CODE ENFORCEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INSPECTORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO

More information

CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT HEALTHY AND SAFE SCHOOLS PLAN

CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT HEALTHY AND SAFE SCHOOLS PLAN CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT HEALTHY AND SAFE SCHOOLS PLAN March 17, 2017 Introduction Clackamas Education Service District has developed this model Healthy and Safe Schools Plan to comply with

More information

PBS observed paint chips in the garden, which is located approximately six to 10 feet from painted surfaces that were in intact condition.

PBS observed paint chips in the garden, which is located approximately six to 10 feet from painted surfaces that were in intact condition. December 30, 2016 Courtney Wilton Portland Public Schools 501 North Dixon Portland, OR 97227 Via email: Regarding: cwilton@pps.net Lead Paint Condition Assessment Arleta Elementary School 5109 SE 66th

More information

MONTECITO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

MONTECITO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Section 5a MONTECITO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE PROTECTION PLAN Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler System Installations I Automatic Fire Sprinkler System Standards 1. Definition and Standard: An automatic

More information

International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures

International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures International Fire Code 2006 Requirements for Construction Plan Reviews of Commercial and Multi-Family Structures Please note this is not an all-inclusive list. The type and complexity of your project

More information

MWL Consulting Company

MWL Consulting Company MWL Consulting Company NFPA Member since1990 Fire Service Section Fire Marshal (retired) Newport Fire Department Michael W. Leber 17 Whitwell Avenue Newport, RI 02840 Mobile Phone 401-439-5322 mlebernpt@aol.com

More information

September 30, Dear Fire Suppression System Contractor/Designer:

September 30, Dear Fire Suppression System Contractor/Designer: CITY OF BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 Phone (406) 582-2350 CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 20 E Olive St, STE 208 Bozeman, Montana 59715-4790 Phone (406) 582-2375

More information

PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET

PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION PACKET The 2017 Edition supersedes all previous versions for Private Fire Service Installation To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION Illinois

More information

HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER. Architectural. January 13, 2014 DeForest Area School District

HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER. Architectural. January 13, 2014 DeForest Area School District HOLUM EDUCATION CENTER Architectural The existing building has approximately 41,823 square feet and sets on a lot about 4.14 acres in size. Parking lots are located along the east and west sides of the

More information

All Around Home Inspections Ltd 1346 Hurford Ave Courtenay, BC. 123 Sample 6 Plex

All Around Home Inspections Ltd 1346 Hurford Ave Courtenay, BC. 123 Sample 6 Plex 1346 Hurford Ave Courtenay, BC 123 Sample 6 Plex Page 1 of 62 Table of Contents Definitions 2 General Information 2 Lots and Grounds 3 Exterior 4 Structure 5 Roof 6 Electrical 9 Plumbing 11 Air Conditioning

More information

Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017

Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017 Oconomowoc Area School District Facility Construction Update August 25, 2017 IXONIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ixonia Elementary is getting ready for the start of the new school year! Interior cleaning and classroom

More information

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE FIPT 202A CIC Approval: 12/21/2006 BOT APPROVAL: 05/13/1998 STATE APPROVAL: EFFECTIVE TERM: Fall 1998 SECTION I SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MIRAMAR COLLEGE ASSOCIATE DEGREE COURSE OUTLINE SUBJECT

More information

(Inspector) Scott Ullrich Mailing Address (if Different from Business Location): Address. (FIRE) David Topping City State Zip

(Inspector) Scott Ullrich Mailing Address (if Different from Business Location): Address. (FIRE) David Topping City State Zip CITY OF BARTLESVILLE CHILD CARE HOME BASED BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION 401 S. Johnstone, Bartlesville, OK 74003 Phone (918) 338-4233 or (918) 338-4244 INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete application (print

More information

Department of Planning & Community Jefferson Station 1526 E. Forrest Avenue Suite 100 East Point, GA 30344

Department of Planning & Community Jefferson Station 1526 E. Forrest Avenue Suite 100 East Point, GA 30344 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Commercial Requirements In order to occupy a commercial property or rent space in the City of East Point, it is required that tenants and owners of a commercial building obtain

More information

1970s building housing main school reception and support offices. Well managed buildings with no significant risk of a fire occurring.

1970s building housing main school reception and support offices. Well managed buildings with no significant risk of a fire occurring. Record of significant findings Risk assessment for : Assessment undertaken by : 71a The Close Nigel Billing CMIOSH Date: 21/3/17 Overview of Premises: 1970s building housing main school reception and support

More information

Fire Prevention Bureau INFORMATION PACKAGE

Fire Prevention Bureau INFORMATION PACKAGE Fire Prevention Bureau INFORMATION PACKAGE Evanston Fire & Life-Safety Services 909 Lake Street Evanston, IL. 60201 Phone: 847-448-4311 Fax: 847-866-8729 Fire Chief: Brian Scott 847-866-5925 bscott@cityofevanston.org

More information

Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program. School Radon Testing Checklist

Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program. School Radon Testing Checklist Ohio Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental Health and Radiation Protection, Radon Licensing Program School Radon Testing Checklist Purpose: This checklist has been prepared to provide school employees

More information

BID PROPOSAL-REVISED

BID PROPOSAL-REVISED BID PROPOSAL-REVISED PROJECT: B17-13, Bldg 1300 HVAC ( the Work ) CABRILLO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Bidder Name Bidder Representative(s) Bidder Representative(s) Contact Information Bidder Mailing Address

More information

At least 10 calendar days prior to project start date Within the last 30 days of a project that will extend beyond 12 months

At least 10 calendar days prior to project start date Within the last 30 days of a project that will extend beyond 12 months New York State Department of Labor Division of Safety and Health (518) 485-9263 Filing an asbestos project notification Who must provide asbestos project notification If the asbestos removal project is:

More information

Understand what asbestos is and how to avoid exposure

Understand what asbestos is and how to avoid exposure Understand what asbestos is and how to avoid exposure. PINCHIN & AFFILIATES A leader in engineering, environmental health & safety solutions Multi-disciplinary approach by highly qualified, experienced

More information

For additional information regarding R-3.1 residential care facilities please contact (951)

For additional information regarding R-3.1 residential care facilities please contact (951) Riverside County Fire Department Fire/Life Safety Inspection Division Riverside Office: 2300 Market St., Ste. 150, Riverside, CA 92501 Ph. (951) 955-4823 Fax (951) 955-4886 Palm Desert Office: 77-933 Las

More information

Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Exhibit CC BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DATE: July 10, 2007 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE PERSON(S): BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Joe A. Hairston, Superintendent ABBREVIATED FACILITY STATUS REPORT

More information

Mobile Food Vendors Business License Requirement Checklist

Mobile Food Vendors Business License Requirement Checklist Mobile Food Vendors Business License Requirement Checklist In accordance with the Vineyard Municipal Code Part 9-460, mobile food business owners must complete and submit the following to Vineyard before

More information

VOTER BOND REFERENDUM 2018 SUMMARY OF WORK PROPOSED

VOTER BOND REFERENDUM 2018 SUMMARY OF WORK PROPOSED Ashton Elementary School 1 Masonry Repair $ 42,781.50 2 Replace HVAC $ 375,000.00 3 Replace SAT @ Various Locations $ 92,364.00 3 Recoat & Resurface Exterior Paved Play Area $ 135,978.30 3 Various Technological

More information

WELDING, CUTTING, AND BRAZING SAFETY PROGRAM

WELDING, CUTTING, AND BRAZING SAFETY PROGRAM WELDING, CUTTING, AND BRAZING SAFETY PROGRAM HOT WORK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Scope 2.0 Responsibilities 2.1 Building Office 2.2 Building Personnel 2.3 Individuals Performing

More information

Certificate of Completion

Certificate of Completion Love the Lungs You re With 630-325-4443 800-244-4242 Certificate of Completion Every parent or guardian is notified that this facility has performed radon measurements to ensure the health and safety of

More information

BUILDING SECURITY and EVACUATION RELATED POLICIES: REVIEWED: AS NEEDED

BUILDING SECURITY and EVACUATION RELATED POLICIES: REVIEWED: AS NEEDED POLICY 120 BUILDING SECURITY and EVACUATION REVISED: 1/93, 01/02, 09/08, 08/10, 04/11, 07/11, 12/13, 10/15, 07/16, 08/18 CFA STANDARDS: RELATED POLICIES: REVIEWED: AS NEEDED A. PURPOSE The purpose of this

More information

TCDSB Asbestos Containing Material Re-Assessment Form. Friability (F/NF) Asbestos Content

TCDSB Asbestos Containing Material Re-Assessment Form. Friability (F/NF) Asbestos Content TCDSB Containing Material June 3, 07 Page St. Josaphat Catholic School 50373 0/0A/0B/0/ 0A/0B/03/03 A/04/05/06/06B //4/5B/5 C/S0 Below Remnant Mastic - Below Tiles 00 (now 0A) Above Ceiling Pipe fitting

More information

Maintence/Renewal Report

Maintence/Renewal Report Maintence/Renewal Report Property Address: C4U Inspections Lloyd Kenzle CPBC # 47652 3518 Webber Rd. West Kelowna, BC V4T 1H9 866 765-4434 Table of Contents Cover Page... 1 Table of Contents...2 I SUMMARY...

More information

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP SPRINGBROOK HIGH SCHOOL

RADON SCREENING SURVEY FOLLOW-UP SPRINGBROOK HIGH SCHOOL RADON SCREENING SURVEY OLLOW-UP SPRINGBROOK HIGH SCHOOL, Silver Spring, Maryland 20904 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Date of Test Report: 9 ebruary 2016 Round of Testing: Initial ollow-up Post Remediation # rooms

More information

MISSION To prevent the loss of life and property and to reduce injury by providing emergency response, education and prevention services.

MISSION To prevent the loss of life and property and to reduce injury by providing emergency response, education and prevention services. MISSION To prevent the loss of life and property and to reduce injury by providing emergency response, education and prevention services. History of Fires and Fire Codes Since its inception, fire has been

More information

22A Belvedere Avenue, Parry Sound Sprinkler System Consulting Review

22A Belvedere Avenue, Parry Sound Sprinkler System Consulting Review Parry Sound District Social Services Administration Board Housing and Community Services October 10, 2018 c/o Andrew Ball, Properties and Capital Projects Coordinator Email:aball@psdssab.org 22A Belvedere

More information

Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. Shelton School District Emergency Response Plan

Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES. Shelton School District Emergency Response Plan Section 9 THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AN EVACUATION PLAN FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES Introduction.8.1 Buildings with Inaccessible Exits for Individuals with Disabilities...8.1 Definitions...8.1

More information

Bold items are particular to the City of Euless

Bold items are particular to the City of Euless EULESS FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHAL S OFFICE INFORMATION LINE: Revised 8/2004 Fire Chief Lee Koontz Fire Marshal Paul Smith EFD-FMO 3-1 2003 International Fire & Building Code as Amended NFPA Standards

More information

Safety Policy Manual Policy No. 145

Safety Policy Manual Policy No. 145 Policy: Interim Life Safety (ILS) Program Page 1 of 9 APPLICATION NYU Langone PURPOSE To ensure adequate life safety protection: When a standpipe, sprinkler, or fire alarm system is out-of-service. When

More information

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING Final Focused Tiered Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse No. 2002072048 Prepared By: OFFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING University of California One Shields Avenue 376 Mrak Hall Davis,

More information

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURE

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURE TITLE: ISSUER: Occupancy Inspections for New Schools and Modernization Projects John Sterritt, Director Office of Environmental Health and Safety ROUTING Office of Environmental Health & Safety Staff DATE:

More information

Emergency Evacuation Plans and Exercises. Risk Management Services

Emergency Evacuation Plans and Exercises. Risk Management Services Emergency Evacuation Plans and Exercises Services Table of Contents I. Program Goals and Objectives... 2 II. Scope and Application... 2 III. Responsibilities... 2 IV. Emergency Evacuation Plans and Maps...

More information

Riverview West Side Elementary 160 Isabel Avenue East

Riverview West Side Elementary 160 Isabel Avenue East 160 Isabel Avenue East Project Summary: At the center of Hispanic culture in St. Paul is Riverview Elementary - and it s truly the center of the West Side community. Our newly renovated location offers

More information