Fostering and implementing Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)

Transcription

1 Fostering and implementing Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Solutions, examples and lessons learned Gilles Bentayou Urban Mobility Forum II Cairo (Egypt)

2 What s TOD? 2

3 A planning concept Compact developments near public transport stations or nodes providing mixed uses designed as walkable areas with a high quality of public spaces Born as a label 25 years ago (Peter Calthorpe, 1993) Derived from diverse emblematic experiences Worldwide spread 3

4 Sources: Niels Østergård, Conference UrbaLyon, L. Valicceli &J. A. Twardowski, Conference Codatu XV, Addis- Abeba, Vivre en Ville, 2013, Retisser la ville. Leçons de cinq expériences de TOD, Copenhagen Curitiba Rosslyn-Ballston 1947 Integrated planning since HLS Bus line corridors General Land-Use Plan since

5 Key features of TOD half-a-mile radius mixed uses density quality of public spaces diversity of housing programs housing & shops& jobs efficient & attractive footpaths Half-a-mile radius = 800 m radius sq m Diversity Design Vivre en Ville Density Robert Cervero 5

6 The Scales of TOD Regional Station Station and ½ mile area Transit Line Parcel Corridor Parcel Source: Center for TOD, Transit Corridors and TOD, TOD-203 6

7 Some insight on diverse experiences ( ) 7

8 Source: Arrington & Cervero, Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel, TCRP Report 128, Which effects of TOD? Comparing US TOD areas with other areas of the same regions Mixed results, but on average: TOD residents own usually less cars They use more public transport, and walk more They spend less money for transport in their everyday-life TOD can contribute to higher land-values (keeping housing at affordable prices is a challenge) + 13% + 9% + 4% M M Ex. Montréal, CA 8

9 Financing TOD: a Snapshot of some Mechanisms 9

10 Public investments in transport infrastructure, stations, roads, public space, housing programs Grants or Subsidies (general / conditional) Public Authorities Funds Value- Creation on Public Land Leasing or Selling of Public Land Joint Development (USA, Hong-Kong) Anticipated Tax-Increment Financing Value- Capture on Private Ownership Betterment Fees Benefit- Assessment Financing (USA) Business Improvement Districts Tax-Increment Financing (USA) Business Rate Supplement (UK) 10

11 Potomac Yard Metrorail Station (Virginia, USA) Future (2021) infill station of Metrorail Convert a big-box retail center into a mixeduse development ( m²) Station cost $ 270 million covered by: Public subsidies or grants Tax-increment financing Contribution of the owner of the shopping center ($ 55 million) Two special tax-districts on future developments Source: City of Alexandria, North Potomac Yard Small Area Plan, sept

12 Wikimedia / Jucember, 2012 Zhongshan Park Station (Shanghai) Interchange station between 3 metro lines Cloud Nine : 58-floor, 238-metre tall skyscraper with a shopping mall at its base, close to the station Interconnection between lines 2 & 3 paid by the developer, as counterpart of a rise by 20% of the building rights Source: Delpirou et al., Coordonner urbanisme et transports collectifs : un référentiel à l épreuve de la ville made in China, Flux 2015/3 ( ) 12

13 Axis Contracts: a French Bottom-Up Approach 13

14 Transport and urban planning: cooperation needed! (Transport competence transferred to Régions in 2017) 14

15 Principle of axis contracts A mutual engagement between: The transport authority The municipalities deserved Implementation of a new transport supply New dense and high-quality developments around stations Bottom-up initiatives that have spread in different regions, around diverse public transport lines (tram, metro, bus, train) A challenge: deserving peripheral and low-density areas A wider cooperation between several public bodies 15

16 Overview of the axis contracts Île-de-France Extension of metro line 11 Urban Transport Intercity Bus Transport Rail Transport (french TER ) French Outskirts of Geneva (Ain) Cross-border tram+bus Périgueux vallée de l Isle Grenoble Tramway E line Nice Digne Chemins de fer de Provence Pau Two lines Alès Nîmes Avignon Carpentras Toulouse Several BRT projects 16

17 The main added-values For the transport system Better coherence between the transport offer and the territorial needs more clients! Rationalisation and improvement of multimodality Less pressure on car parking areas (P+R) Better socio-economical efficiency of the investments made 17

18 The main added-values At the scale of the corridor deserved Benefits of an integrated approach Design of a shared vision to reduce urban sprawl Less car-dependency for everyday trips Reduce traffic congestion and air pollution 18

19 Lebunetel Architects The main added-values For the (For some!) municipalities Better appropriation of the transport project Extra technical support to foster the implementation of TOD Better accessibility, added-value for the stations areas, attractiveness 19

20 Key Lessons Axis contracts Corridor-based approach Favoring dialogue between public bodies beyond administrative limits Governance frame: create the conditions to implement TOD Better coordination of transport and urban planning policies TOD Multilevel approach, even if Further involvement of the private sector More concrete land-development outcomes Inspiring financing mechanisms, with value-capture possibilities 20

21 Key Lessons Axis contracts Corridor-based approach Favoring dialogue between public bodies beyond administrative limits Governance frame: create the conditions to implement TOD Better coordination of transport and urban planning policies TOD Multilevel approach, even if Further involvement of the private sector More concrete land-development outcomes Inspiring financing mechanisms, with value-capture possibilities 21

22 Thank you for your attention! Gilles Bentayou Engineer PhD Urban Studies Project manager Mobility & Urban Planning Strategies Cerema Central-Eastern Regions URBAN MOBILITY FORUM II Efficient Transport for Sustainable Cities Cairo November 27 th, 2017 English pdf version available on 22