'EX~hnib;ritrA~~o r
|
|
- Marcus Cameron
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 'EX~hnib;ritrA~~o r e ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT I AR and minutes from 4/6/09 Council Study Session AGENDA ITEM # i:h'vj. Meetin TO: DATE: SUBMITTED BY: AN,l::K,;.uY COUNCIL APPROVED BY: +-I,,*,f-'<"" -V'lf\--'U-l"'\Ir-I'-J-- SUBJECT: Grade Separation Footprint Study Update - Downtown and Nortlt San Mateo RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide input regarding the initial findings ofthe San Mateo County Transportation Authority Grade Separation Footprint Study for downtown and north San Mateo. BACKGROUND: The San Mateo County Transportation Authority is preparing Grade Separation Footprint Studies for the potential grade separation of at-grade rail crossings within San Mateo County. The Footprint Studies are planning studies that evaluate a full range of rail and street alignment options for each grade separation and provide initial, planning level, cost estimates for the grade separations. For each option, cqst estimate ranges have been approximated for comparison purposes. The rough estimates should not be interpreted as actual costs. The Footprint Studies will be used by the Transportation Authority as input to select potential grade separation projects to advance into the Project Study Report phase. The Project Study Report will include more detailed design and environmental review. The 2004 Measure A Program provides funding for grade separation projects. The goal ofthe Grade Separation program is to improve safety and local traffic circulation. It is also anticipated that the Footprint Studies will be used as input for the design ofhigh Speed Rail within San Mateo County. The Transportation Authority will present the Draft Footprint Studies for all of the potential grade separations throughout the county during April and May The Draft Footprint Study for the grade separations at 25 1h, 28 1h and 3 lsi Avenues was presented to the City Council in February 12,2008. The Footprint Studies remain in draft form. Public Works staff has reviewed the draft documents with the Transportation Authority who will present the Footprint Study to the Council and respond to questions. Description of Footprint Study - The Footprint Study for downtown and north San Mateo evaluated all atgrade crossings between 1 51 and 9 th Avenues as well as all at~grade crossings north of the downtown area (Exhibit A). The Study evaluated ~ cort:\plete range of alignment options at each crossing. Change in the vertical rail alignment must be accomplished gradually.(maximum 1 percent grade). Therefore, it is not possible to achieve different rail alignment at each intersection. For this reason, Public Works statfrequested that the Transportation Authority evaluate two additional options: rail alignment depressed through the downtown and rail alignment elevated through the downtown. The resultant vertical alignment options are: Initial Alternatives Alternative I - Rail at-grade with street overcrossing Alternative 2 - Rail at-grade with street depressed Alternative 3 - Rail elevated with street at-grade Alternative 4 - Rail depressed with street at-grade Alternative 5 - Rail partially elevated with street partially depressed Alternative 6 - Rail partially depressed with street partially elevated Q:\pw\PWENG\A_AR\2009\Patlcrson\Footprint Sludy Update.DOC
2 StaffRequestedAlternatives Combination Alternative 3 - Rail transitions to an elevated alignment south of Poplar Avenue and remains elevated to 9 th Avenue. Combination Alternative 4 - Rail transitions to depressed alignment south of Poplar Avenue and remains depressed to 9 th Avenue. Staff has communicated to the Transportation Authority staff the long standing General Plan and Downtown Plan policies which state the City's preference for a depressed alignment through downtown. With this understanding, the city's preferred depressed alignment has been analyzed as well as all other technically feasible alignments to meet the purpose of the study. The horizontal alignment remained the same for all vertical alignment options. Previous analyses of the downtown rail alignment have anticipated a three-track cross section. Two-track and four-track cross sections are evaluated in the Footprint Study. The Footprint Study was based on a number of specific constraints that may have affected the feasibility of some alignment options. The assumed constraints were: SR 92 - The rail alignment must be at-grade to pass beneath the SR 92 structure and provide required.clearances. All alignments retained the existing grades at the Hayward Park station. San Mateo Transit Center - The alignment options assumed that the existing location ofthe downtown San Mateo rail station would be retained. The platforms would either be raised or depressed under the staffrequested elevated or depressed options. Tilton Avenue - The vertical alignment options within the downtown assume that the existing elevation of the Tilton Avenue grade separation will be maintained. This constraint in combination with assumptions that the existing downtown station platform would remain at its current location and elevation was a significant constraint and limited the feasibility of some alignment options. This constraint was relaxed under the staff requested elevated and depressed alignments through the.downtown. San Mateo Creek - San Mateo Creek crosses the rail alignment just north of the existing downtown station platform. This constraint encourages a vertical alignment that maintains existing rail elevations between the downtown station and Tilton Avenue. Poplar Avenue - All alignment options return to the existing grade at the Poplar Avenue grade separation. This constraint was relaxed under the staff requested depressed 'alignment (Combination Alt. 4). The Footprint Studies provide the first informed glimpse into possible grade separation projects within the County. They permit the elimination of alignment alternatives that are technically infeasible (i.e, cannot be accomplished within the adopted design criteria). The Footprint Studies also provide an early opportunity for the City Council and public to have input into the design process. This input will be considered in the more detailed design process for those.projects selected to proceed into the Project Study Report phase. Key Findings - The following, are key findings defined by Public Works staff from the draft Footprint Study for the downtown and north San Mateo alignments:. Downtown '. Feasible Vertical Alignments - Maintaining a consistent.alignment (at-grade, elevated or depressed) through downtown is the most realistic approach to grade separations within downtown San Mateo. Grade separation of individual crossings is expensive and change in rait alignment between intersections within the downtown is not feasible. Q:\pw.'PWENG\A_AR\2009\Patterson\Footprint Study Update.DOC
3 Requested City Council Input: Does the City Council concur with staffthat alternatives that atte.,!,pt to grade separate individual crossings within downtown San Mateo are infeasible and should be eliminatedfrom further consideration? It was found that partially raised or partially depressed alignments (All. 5 & Alt. 6) generally resulted in greater impacts than either the fully elevated or fully depressed alignment options. Requested City Council Input: Does the City Council concur with staffthat Alternatives 5 and 6 should be eliminated from further consideration due to the higher costs and significant property impacts?. At-Grade Rail Alignment - Property and access impacts of the at-grade rail alignment option far exceed those under either the elevated or depressed alignment options. Changing street grades requires the construction of retaining walls along the east-west streets thus impacting property access and parking. The change in street grades may also impact north-south streets~ B Street and Claremont in particular. Access and property impact estimates in the Footprint Study suggest that full blocks of the downtown on both sides oftherail alignment would be impacted during construction and in many cases permanently under the at-grade rail option. To illustrate, grade separation by eitherelevating or. depressing 2 nd Avenue would require modification of the profile on B and Claremont Streets thus changing aece ss to adjacent properties and parking in the area. Requested City Council Input: Does the City Council recommendthat the at grade alternative be eliminated from further consideration in downtown San Mateo due to the higher costs and significantproperly impacts? Depressed Alignment - Depressing the alignment within the downtown has been the stated preference of the City for years. The Footprint Study provides some initial information regarding the potential. impacts of depressing the alignment. In particular, it is clear that a depressed alignment will require enclosing San Mateo Creek in the area of the Transit Center so that it can be routed under the rail alignment. This would likely be accomplished by constructing a siphon under the tracks. This can be done but will produce some interesting design challenges. Depressing the alignment will also impact Tilton Avenue. It will not be possible to return the depressed alignment to the current elevation of the Tilton grade separation. It will be necessary to either keep the alignment depressed or close Tilton Avenue to automobile traffic. RequestedCity Council Input: Does thefact that a depressed alignment downtown would require closure of Tilton Avenue and would result in significant property impacts in north San Mateo affect the City Council's established preference for a depressed alignment through downtown San Mateo? Elevated Alignment - Elevating the alignment through the downtown results in visual impacts. This is particularly true ifthe alignment is placed on retained fill. Construction ofan elevated structure instead ofusing retaining walls would reduce these impacts. (Exhibit D). Reqf;lested City CouncilInput: Would the City Council consider an elevatedalignment in the downtown given that an elevated alignment would reduce property impacts ofgrade separations at some locations in north San Mateo? If the alignment was on bridge structure rather than constructed using continuous retaining walls, would that make the elevated alignment more acceptable? Q:\pw\PWENG\A_ARU009\Panerson\Footprint Study Update.DOC
4 e e Right ofway Requirement - It is assumed that both the depressed or elevated alignment would be coll~tructed for the four track alignment. It is unlikely that a 2-track option would be depressed or elevated through the downtown. It is estimated that a 4-track, depressed alignment will require a width of 110 feet during construction. This will impact access to many buildings along both sides of the tracks and will require acquisition of some parcels. Once constructed, both the elevated and depressed alignments can be accommodated within a right of way of about 70 feet for the 4-track option and therefore can be accommodated within the existing right ofway in most areas south ofthe downtown. Expansion of the existing right of way will be required in the area between lsi and 3 rd Avenues. Property impacts are, also anticipated north ofthe downtown to construct the depressed alignment and to a slightly lesser degree the elevated alignment. The property impacts will result from the width required to construct the alignment. Post construction property impacts will depend on the horizontal and vertical alignments selected during the detailed design phase. A 4-track, elevated alignment can be constructed within slightly less width than the depressed option. However, due to the limited available right of way between JSI and 3 rd Avenues where the right of way is 50 to 60 feet in width, property and access impacts during construction of an elevated alignment are expected to be similar to those under the depressed alignment. Minor impacts to the former Kinko's site are anticipated during construction of the depressed alignment under the current horizontal alignment. More significant construction impacts to the site may result if the horizontal alignment is shifted to the east. Closure of Railroad Avenue may be required' depending upon the horizontal alignment selected. No impacts to the property are anticipated under the elevated alignment given the currently proposed horizontal alignment. More significant construction impacts could result ifthe alignment is shifted to the east. Horizontal Alignment - The horizontal alignment was not varied significantly between Footprint Study alternatives. The downtown horizontal alignment results in most impacts along the west sideof the existing rail right of way. Some adjustment ofthe horizontal alignment could reduce or change the type of property impacts within the downtown. The area of potential property impacts is illustrated in Exhibit B. The horizontal alignment assumed in the draft Footprint Study produces greater property impacts on the west side of the tracks. This would impact the downtown Cinema, Main Street Garage and Transit Center under the 4-track option. Requested City Council Input: Does the City Council agree with staff that the horizontal rail alignment must he estahlished to eliminate impacts to the downtown cinema, Main Street Garage and Transit Center? Relative Costs - The order of magnitude costs for the depressed alignment through the downtown are approximately twice those for the elevated alignment. Leaving the tracks at-grade and modifying the street grade to go over or under the tracks would be among the most expensive alternatives due to the. resultant property impacts and would be more, expensive than an elevated alignment in the downtown.,,' North San Mateo Impact to Existing Grade Separations - The Footprint Study assumes that existing grade separations remain in place at or near their existing elevations. Q:\pw\PWENG\A_AR\2Q09\Patterson\Footprint Study Update. DOC
5 e e. Impact To Existing At-Grade Rail Crossings - The at-grade crossings at Villa Terrace and Bellevue Avenue would be grade separated. Either depressing these streets or elevating them over the at-grade rail alignment would have significant impacts to residential properties fronting the street. (Exhibit C) Depressing the tracks may impact fewer properties than the elevated street option due to greater clearances that must be achieved over the rail (24.5 feet to bottom ofthe structure) when compared to clearances over the street (15.5 feet to bottom of structure). Peninsula Avenue would also be grade separated. This crossing is shared by Burlingame and San Mateo so both agencies will be providing input to the Transportation Authority regarding grade separation options at this location. Requested City Council input: Should the City ask the Transportation Authority to evaluate the potential tradeoff between traffic impacts of closure of Bellevue or Villa Terrace versus the property impacts ofgrade separating these two streets at the tracks? Impact ofdowntown Alignment Alternatives - Depressing the rail alignment in downtown impacts a significant number of properties in the northern segment between Bellevue Avenue and Monte Diablo. This is the segment where the rail alignment begins to descend. However, since the rail is not fully depressed until south of Monte Diablo, the street profiles must be raised. Raising the street profiles prevents access to properties along.the impacted street. In some cases, the raised profile also impacts streets near and parallel to the tracks since raising the elevation of an intersection requires elevating the profile of all intersection approaches. An example would be Ramona Street between Poplar Avenue and Santa Inez. Elevating the alignment through downtown also elevates the rail alignment. north to Poplar Avenue. Since the streets are partially depressed below the existing rail alignment, elevating the rail profile in this area does not require modification of street profiles and therefore results in fewer property and acc~ss impacts. Estimated Costs - The cost ofgrade separation ofthe at-grade crossings in north San Mateo will vary depending on the selected alignment alternative. The estimated range in rough costs to grade separate the intersections in north San Mateo assuming an at-grade rail alignment are: Peninsula Villa Terrace - Bellevue - $140 to $240 million $88 to $140 million $60 to $110 million BUDGET IMPACT: The Footprint Study is funded by the Transportation Authority. Staff review of the Study is funded through the Transportation Engineering Program ( ). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Footprint Stydy is a planning level analysis and does not represent a project under CEQA. Environmental review of the grade separations considered in the Project Study Report phase ofproject development. NOTICING: The Downtown San Mateo Association, Ch!lmber of Commerce and all neighborhood Associations were provided copies of the staff report and notices were sent to individuals on our High Speed Rail Interested Parties list. EXIDBITS: A. Study Area B. Area ofpotential Property Impacts in Downtown San Mateo Q:\pw\PWENG\A_AR\2009\Panerson\Footprint Study Update.DOC
6 C. Area ofpotential Property Impacts - Illustrative North San Mateo Grade Separation D. Elevated Rail Design Options c: City Attorney City Clerk Business Administrator Susanna Chan> Deputy Director ofpublic Works/City Engineer Transportation Authority File - Downtown Footprint Study Downtown San Mateo Association San Mateo Chamber ofcommerce Neighborhood Associations Ron Holmes, SMCTA Public Works A.R. Binder Q:\pw\PWENG\A:...AR\2009\Patterson\Footprinl Study Update. DOC
7 «.0.-..c >< W «w c:: ~ > o ::> I (I)
8 m I- - III - J: r:i D
9 Area of Potential Significant Property Impacts Villa Terrace
10 TRACK ALIGNMENT \ EXHIBIT.D : 'ELEVATED RAIL DESIGN OPTIONS (lllustra TIVE NOT TO SCALE) BALLAST BRIDGE STRUCTURE '<I' ':.s ~.,j'" ".,', ' RET-AiNIM3',,,':,,<1', : W~L~S.c3, : 4,4,., 'c ' ~", 4 'Z COLUMN EXISTING GRADE, 'q~ A, ".d' :q.,4 ' ' :.<\ ",4 <1. ~ " ', ' q " FILL ~.,'" 'MATERiAL ' '. '4 ' ; <II ~. : -<J, :.<1 ~~',.ij, ij,: <1,j,,~,,.q,.;:',', ': ~, "'.', ',', <1,.1'4,, :. 4' ELEVATED STRUCTURE ELEVATED ON RETAINED WALL " ' '
11 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Minutes ofthe Special Meeting ofapril 6, 2009 Prior to the Special Meeting, the City Council met in Closed Session at 4:30 p.m. in City Hall Conference Room C, regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section Agency Designated Representative: Diana Doughtie, IEDA. Employee Organizations: All Units. The Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Brandt Grotte at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room C, Those present were Council Members Jan Epstein, John Lee, Jack Matthews, and Brandt Grotte. Council Member Fred Hansson was absent and excused. I. Grade Separation Footprint StUdy Update - Downtown and North San Mateo Public Works Director Larry Patterson requested the Council provide input regarding the initial findings of the San Mateo County Transportation' Authority Grade Separation Footprint Study'ror the Downtown and north San Mateo. He introduced Marian Lee-Skowronek and Ron Holmes, reptesenting the San Mateo County Transportation Authority who offered presentations on the Grade Separation S~tegic Plan Program Members ofthe public spoke to the item. Council Members raised questions, offered comments and expressed unanimous support for the following first four items:» Alternatives that attempt to grade separate individual crossings within Downtown San Mateo are infeasible and should be eliminated from further consideration; > Alternativ~ 5 and 6 should be 'eliminated from further consideration due to the " higher costs and significant property impacts;» "the at grade alternative be eliminated from further consideration in Downtown San Mateo due to the higher costs and significant property impacts;» The Council expressed concern regarding significant property impacts a depressed alignment would cause in the Downtown and noted they needed more information regarding those impacts to make a decision. It was noted that ifa tunnel were to be built, closureoftilton Avenue would not be required;» The Council expressed a preference for an elevated alignment on a bridge structure in the downtown;» The Council noted they needed to have more information on the impacts ofmoving the horizontal rail alignment east prior to consideration; }> The Council requested staff provide more information regarding the property - "Impacts in thearea north ofdowntown and the BellevueNillaTerrace area and that staffmake contact with those residents; }> The Council requested staff inform and involve San Mateo residents along the railroad corridor ofthis process. There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor GroUe adjourned the special meeting at the hour of6:35 p.m. (SEAL) lsi NORMA GOMEZ Norma Gomez, City Clerk and Clerk ofthe City Council... Minutes approved as corrected, on April 20,2009. to replace the 5 th bullet in Item 1 to read: "The Council indicated a preference for a tunnel, but acknowledged that an elevated structure could continue to be studied as a possible solution." 4/6/09-1
City of San Mateo General Plan Circulation Element. Adopted October 18, 2010
City of San Mateo General Plan Circulation Element. Adopted October 18, 2010 TRANSIT (pp III-20 to III-21) Exhibit A - Item 20 Excerpt from 2010 Downtown Plan Update and enacting Resolution C 3.4: Hillsdale
More informationRESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension
RESOLUTION NO. R2018-32 Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee Board PROPOSED ACTION 09/13/2018
More informationPROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks
PROJECT BACKGROUND Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks The purpose of this Study is the development of preliminary designs for intersection improvements for Trunk Highway (TH) 36 at the intersections of
More informationSBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I
SBCAG STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Cabrillo-UPRR Bridge Project MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I STAFF CONTACT: Fred Luna RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the chair to sign a Memorandum of Understanding
More information112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH
112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG060310124909PGH C ontents Introduction 1 Project Overview 1 Public Involvement and Technical Coordination 4 Description
More informationStation Area Plan Introduction & Draft Alternatives Review
Station Area Plan Introduction & Draft Alternatives Review City Council Meeting - February 22, 2016 Project Background: California High-Speed Rail San Jose to San Fernando Valley Segment CHSRA will select
More informationEast Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement
East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement Alternatives Considered Operating Plan The requirements for opening day operations versus year 2030 are based on ridership and operations. Opening day
More informationREPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL
REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.a TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: May 26, 2015 SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 15-33, 15-34, 15-35, AND 15-36, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
More informationDESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. Phase II
CITY OF SYRACUSE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING STEPHANIE A. MINER, Mayor MARY E. ROBISON, City Engineer DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING Phase II City of Syracuse Onondaga County Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. Southwest
More informationAGENDA 07/14/11 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting
AGENDA 07/14/11 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting MEETING DATE: Thursday, July 14, 2011 MEETING TIME: MEETING PLACE: VIDEO: 5:30 p.m. City Council Chambers, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245-0989
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION
NOTICE OF PREPARATION To: All Interested Parties Subject: Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report From: City of Petaluma Address: 11 English Street, Petaluma, CA 94952-2610 Contact: Heather
More informationPROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.
PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S. 67 HEARING LOCATION: ERICKSEN COMMUNITY CENTER 1401 11 TH AVENUE NORTH
More informationRight-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum
Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum Southeast Extension Project Lincoln Station to RidgeGate Parkway Prepared for: Federal Transit Administration Prepared by: Denver Regional
More informationCommunity Meeting US 101/Peninsula Avenue Interchange Project JUNE 25, 2015
Community Meeting US 101/Peninsula Avenue Interchange Project JUNE 25, 2015 Project Team Gary Heap, Engineering Division Manager Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Ramesh Sathiamurthy, AECOM Peter DeStefano,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. DATE: July 19, Patrick D. O Keeffe, City Manager. Economic Development & Housing
M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 19, 2011 TO: FROM: Patrick D. O Keeffe, City Manager Economic Development & Housing SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Emeryville Approving the Application
More informationMayor Dave Netterstrom and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services
CITY COMMISSION BRIEFING & DOWNTOWN COCOA BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Planning Board and Landscape Committee Report For Meeting Scheduled for February 7, 2013 Minutemen Causeway Low Impact Design
More informationRegarding actual construction when development occurs, the following applicable guidelines are provided to address public safety issues:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING General Comments 1. COMMENT: A careful review of the application provided shows that there is likely to be an impact on the Miami-Dade Police Department
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Talyn Mirzakhanian, Senior Planner FILE NO.: 160001710 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a
More informationNORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Background As congestion continues to affect mobility in the region, the Ozarks Transportation Organization (OTO) is particularly concerned with traffic movement. The North-South Corridor
More informationServices Department F May 28, 2007
Report To: Development Services Committee Item: Date of Report: From: DS-07-144 May 23, 2007 Commissioner, Development File: Date of Meeting: Services Department F-7000-0013 May 28, 2007 Subject: Gibb
More informationTransportation Committee
Transportation Committee Business Item No. 2013-286SW Meeting date: October 14, 2013 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of October 16, 2013 Subject: Southwest Light Rail Transit (Green Line Extension):
More informationChesterfield County Project Update
Chesterfield County Project Update SOUTHEAST HIGH SPEED RAIL TIER II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RICHMOND, VA, TO RALEIGH, NC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA OFFICIALS BRIEFING February 2013 Federal Railroad
More informationDraft Environmental Assessment Appendix A. SHPO Correspondence, January 19, 2017
Draft Environmental Assessment Appendix A. SHPO Correspondence, January 19, 2017 Rosecrans/Marquardt Grade Separation Project April 2018 Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey
More informationPREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2016 Introduction The Platteview Road Corridor Study was led by the Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA) with assistance from
More informationSTAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue
STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Holly Smyth, Planning Director Conduct Public Hearing
More informationEast Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment
Page 1 of 7 L003 : East Panorama Ridge Concept Plan Amendment Corporate NO: L003 Report COUNCIL DATE: March 4, 2002 REGULAR COUNCIL LAND USE TO: Mayor & Council DATE: February 27, 2002 FROM: General Manager,
More information4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1
MEETING DATE: April 8, 2015 PREPARED BY: Christy Villa, Associate Civil Engineer DEPT. DIRECTOR: Glenn Pruim DEPARTMENT: Public Works CITY MANAGER: Larry Watt SUBJECT: NORTH COAST HIGHWAY 101 STREETSCAPE
More informationCITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. August 21, 2013 Council Meeting UPDATE ON TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN (TAM) GREENBRAE CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP
AGENDA ITEM 7.1 CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report August 21, 2013 Council Meeting DATE: August 16, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor Hillmer and Members of the City Council Dan Schwarz, City Manager
More informationSubject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No
Committee Report Business Item No. 2017-21 Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of January 25, 2017 Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development
Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR January 29, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and
More informationREPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular Meeting. PRESENTED: April 1, 2008 FILE: , Byl 1932 & 1936
DISTRICT OF SQUAMISH REPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular Meeting PRESENTED: April 1, 2008 FILE: 2006-08, Byl 1932 & 1936 DEPARTMENT: Planning Department SUBJECT: First and Second Readings for Bylaws 1932 (rezoning)
More information2290+ STADIUM VILLAGE STATION ABOVE FIELD) (T.O "
1 + PROPOSED o.8 UROU 3 15 + 32+ 32 CROSS-OVER PROPOSED o.8 PROPOSED o.8 CROSS-OVER DOUBLE at H ia ha LR w 1:1 33 + 3 5+ 33 34 h:\projects\\hi-mu\layou\feasibiliy SUDY\Enhanced\_alignment_comparison.dgn
More informationWelcome. Northern Segment of Hwy 100 I-90 to South of Madison Street Meeting Goals:
Welcome Northern Segment of Hwy 100 I-90 to South of Madison Street Meeting Goals: - Review Environmental Assessment - Share Preferred Alternative -Receive Public Comments 2003 EA Preferred Alternative
More informationEglinton West LRT Update
Eglinton West LRT Update Community Consultation Update May 16, 2016 Background Rapid transit along Eglinton Ave between Kennedy Station and Pearson Airport was included in the Metrolinx Regional Transportation
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF CENTRAL SAANICH. CENOTAPH COMMITTEE - 4:00 PM Wednesday, October 12, 2016 Council Chambers AGENDA
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF CENTRAL SAANICH CENOTAPH COMMITTEE - 4:00 PM Wednesday, October 12, 2016 Council Chambers AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3.1. Draft
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF Meeting Date: October 25, 2011 Agenda Item: Community Development Department Planning Division P. O. Box 151560, San Rafael, CA 94915-1560 PHONE: (415) 485-3085/FAX: (415) 485-3184 Case Numbers:
More informationAt first Work Session on October 22, At second Work Session on November 19, At third Work Session on December 3, 2015
At first Work Session on October 22, 2015 Staff Reviewed Infrastructure: Transportation Capacity School Capacity Willett Branch Proposed Staging Language At second Work Session on November 19, 2015 Land
More informationWest Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo
West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo 5/22/2015 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Methodology... 1 Screening... 5 Screening Criteria...
More informationBOISE, IDAHO COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA September 19, :00 PM City Hall - Council Chambers
BOISE, IDAHO COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA September 19, 2017 5:00 PM City Hall - Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. WORK SESSION ITEMS 1. Interim Changes (10 mins) Presenter: Brent Davis, Finance and
More informationSAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Item No: 7.b Meeting Date: December 4, 2017 SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Department: Public Works/City Attorney Prepared by: Kevin McGowan, Asst. Director of Public Works Lisa Goldfien,
More informationOfficial Plan Amendment for Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension Final Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Official Plan Amendment for Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension Final Report Date: April 27, 2010 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Planning and Growth Management Committee
More informationClay Street Bridge Replacement Project
Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) No. 2 April 4, 2018 The project is located in downtown Placerville on Clay Street between US Highway 50 and Main Street and Cedar
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening Arterial BRT on Lake Street - Overall Rating: RATING Metropolitan Council recommendations stated in the Transportation
More informationAlaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS Appendix D - Supplemental Draft EIS Comments and Responses October 2016.
B-001-001 The use of Columbia Street for two-way transit was a decision made by King County Metro as part of its Southwest Transit Pathway evaluation. This project is separate from AWPOW. B-001-002 Modeling
More informationPennsy Greenway Trail
Town of Schererville Pennsy Greenway Trail DES. #s: 0401062, 1173595 & 1382661 Construction of Pennsy Greenway Trail beginning at Wilhelm Street and continuing northwest along the former Penn Central railroad
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.3 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Approving the removal of Municipal Railway bus zones at various
More informationCITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT
CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 9 Date: February 19, 2013 To: From: Presentation by: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council Public Works Department George Musallam, Public Works Director
More informationBucks Bar Road Bridge Project Public Informational Meeting Wednesday, January 6, 2010
PRESENTED BY: Bucks Bar Road Bridge Project Public Informational Meeting Wednesday, January 6, 2010 Matthew Smeltzer, P.E. Deputy Director of Engineering, DOT Supervisor Ray Nutting El Dorado County, District
More informationMEMORANDUM HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. SHERI REPP LOADSMAN, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ PLANNING & BUILDING DIRECTOR /s/
MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #: 13 Meeting Date: 9/12/17 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ANTON DAHLERBRUCH, CITY MANAGER /s/ SHERI REPP LOADSMAN, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ PLANNING
More informationAppendix G Response to Comments
Appendix G Response to Comments This appendix contains the comments received during the public circulation and comment period (May 27, 2008 to July 11, 2008). The comments have been numbered (Comment Set
More informationWHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE? OPEN HOUSE PURPOSE The purpose of the open house is to provide an update on the study process and introduce the preliminary concept alternatives. The open house provides
More informationHistoric Resources. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant
Historic Resources City of San Mateo Planning Division Community Development Department 330 West 20 th Avenue www.cityofsanmateo.org San Mateo, CA 94403 planning @cityofsanmateo.org Updated: March 20,
More informationMeeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.
Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014. Board 1: Welcome Welcome to the Wilson Transfer Station Project Public Hearing. The purpose
More informationSCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Table 2-4: North Segment Alignment Analysis 2-21
Table 2-4: North Segment Alignment Analysis 2-21 SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT Based on the above analysis (detailed analysis is contained in Appendix A-4), North Alignment 3 is preferred because it: Has the
More informationJordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department
Date December 8, 2015 To: Through: From: Subject: Recreation and Park Commission Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division Jordan Harrison, Planner III,
More informationBeaverton City Council: Work Session. SIDEDistrict. May 6, 2014
BEAVERTON Beaverton City Council: CREEK Work Session SIDEDistrict May 6, 2014 Tonight s Agenda BEAVERTON CREEK SIDE Brief updates Creekside Vision Scenarios & discussion: Redevelopment & Parking Project
More informationOconee Rivers Greenway Project. TSPLOST 2018 Project # 5 Project Concept Sub-projects 7, 8, 9, 10, & 11. Mayor & Commission Work Session
Oconee Rivers Greenway Project Project # 5 Project Concept Sub-projects 7, 8, 9, 10, & 11 Mayor & Commission Work Session February 13, 2018 North Oconee River Greenway 1 Project # 05 - Oconee Rivers Greenway
More informationALTERNATIVES. NCDOT made an early decision to first determine how to build the project (construction method) followed by what to build (alternatives).
III. ALTERNATIVES A. CONSTRUCTION METHOD ALTERNATIVES NCDOT made an early decision to first determine how to build the project (construction method) followed by what to build (alternatives). One of the
More informationBOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Endorsement of Design for Route 7/George Washington Boulevard Overpass. Algonkian and Broad Run
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting: March 7, 2017 # 14 SUBJECT: ELECTION DISTRICTS: CRITICAL ACTION DATE: STAFF CONTACTS: Endorsement of Design for Route 7/George Washington
More informationNORTH, NORTH REDWOOD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY
BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY Southern Central Northern STUDY AREA OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS BOULEVARD CORRIDOR WORKSHOP Constraints Wetlands For illustrative purposes only BINFORD RD RUSH LANDING RD BOULEVARD
More informationLake Oswego to Portland Transit Project. Lessons Learned. John Cullerton Senior Project Manager, URS 2012 APTA/TRB Light Rail Conference
Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project Lessons Learned John Cullerton Senior Project Manager, URS 2012 APTA/TRB Light Rail Conference Overview Project Location and Context Corridor History and Project
More informationRt 29 Solutions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel. September 14, 2017
Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel September 14, 2017 Agenda Item 1: Introductions Hydraulic Planning Advisory Panel members Technical Team members 2 Agenda item 2: Public Interaction and Feedback Live
More informationHIGH-SPEED RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE. Gilroy Unified School District & Gilroy City Council September 24, 2018 Gilroy City Council Chambers, Gilroy, CA
HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Gilroy Unified School District & Gilroy City Council September 24, 2018 Gilroy City Council Chambers, Gilroy, CA OVERVIEW Introductions High-Speed Rail Project Update Overview
More informationEastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Technical Study Update Community Outreach Meeting February 2017
Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Technical Study Update Community Outreach Meeting February 2017 Purpose of Tonight s Meeting Recap of Board motion (2014) and technical study process Provide update on
More informationJuly 12, Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH RE: I-70/71 Columbus Crossroads Project
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 400 EAST WILLIAM STREET DELAWARE, OHIO 43015 800.372.7714 Columbus City Council City Hall 90 West Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215-9015 RE: I-70/71 Columbus
More information2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT
2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT This chapter discusses the process carried out for conducting agency coordination and public involvement activities. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE A Technical
More informationARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)
ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25) Preliminary Design Report February 2015 Prepared For: City of Inver Grove Heights Dakota County Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates,
More information1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED The FasTracks Plan includes the extension of the Central Corridor from its current terminus at 30th/Downing to a connection to the East Corridor commuter rail service planned
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director
MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2019 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director SUBJECT: Camino Square, IDA No. CRP-16-02, located at 171
More informationROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018
Page 1 of 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application proposes redesignating two parcels in the community of Silver Springs from Special Purpose Future Urban Development (S-FUD) District and undesignated road
More informationPROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed improvements for each alternative carried forward are discussed below. A. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS The classifications of the roadways
More informationCITY OF COCOA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING BOARD BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for April 1, 2013 Agenda Item C2
CITY OF COCOA BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING BOARD BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for April 1, 2013 Agenda Item C2 TO: FROM: RE: City of Cocoa Beach Planning Board Anthony Caravella,
More informationTO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009
Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PASADENA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT 1515 NORTH LOS ROBLES AVENUE AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE
More informationPlanning Commission March 8, 2017 MINUTES Regular Meeting City of Hagerstown, Maryland
Douglas S. Wright, Jr., chair, called the meeting to order at 4:04 p.m., on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, in the Conference Room, Fourth Floor, City Hall. Also present were commission members D. Miller, J.
More informationNOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project
Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project Notice
More informationIsabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives
Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives Presented by: Lori Parks, Associate Planner February 2, 2015 Agenda 1. Background on BART to Livermore 2. Isabel Neighborhood Plan 3. Alternative Scenarios 4. General
More informationMetro Orange Line Extension Four Years Early and $61 Million Under Budget
White Paper: Metro Orange Line Extension Four Years Early and $61 Million Under Budget July 2013 Innovation for better mobility Metro Orange Line Extension Iteris, Inc. was the prime consultant leading
More informationA. INTRODUCTION B. PROJECT LOCATION
Chapter 1: Project Description A. INTRODUCTION The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), a subsidiary of the New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as the Empire State Development
More informationAMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN URS CORPORATION GREAT LAKES AND THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN URS CORPORATION GREAT LAKES AND THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR The City of Ann Arbor, a Michigan municipal corporation, with offices at 301 E. Huron
More informationAppendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation
Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix E Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation E.1 Introduction This appendix addresses a federal regulation known as Section 4(f), which protects parks, recreation areas,
More informationCITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016
Item 11, Report No. 38, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan on November 15, 2016. Regional Councillor Di Biase declared an interest
More informationCall to Artists Public Art for Los Angeles Metro Stations
Conceptual Design for Call to Artists Public Art for Los Angeles Metro Stations Artesia Transit Center Union Station/Patsaouras Transit Plaza Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority February
More informationMayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services
CITY COMMISSION BRIEFING & Planning Board Report For Meeting Scheduled for January 6, 2011 Chickie Hair Salon Site Plan/Architectural Review Downtown Overlay District/Cottage Row Area Site Plan Consent
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 planning@cupertino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. Agenda Date:
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:
More informationPrepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests a Design Review Permit Modification
More informationPRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GLEN COVE
PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GLEN COVE Step III BOA Implementation Strategy for the Orchard Neighborhood and Sea Cliff Avenue Corridor November 13, 2018 This presentation and the materials
More informationWHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed DDS-600 requesting a departure for the location of two loading spaces without driveway access along Toledo Terrace in
More informationRegional Municipality of Wood Buffalo. Design Review Panel DRAFT REPORT
Design Review Panel DRAFT REPORT March 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Report to Council... 3 3. Terms of Reference... 8 4. Design Review Panel Bylaw for the... 10 Page 2 Draft Report
More informationExpo Line Transit Project. Project Status Update Meeting West End Corridor Segment C
Exposition Light Rail Transit Project Project Status Update Meeting West End Corridor Segment C Culver City Senior Center November 18, 2010 Phase 1 Project Description Phase 1 from Downtown Los Angeles
More informationMARINA BAY. City of Richmond Officer Bradley A. Moody Memorial Underpass. April 14, 2010
MARINA BAY NEIGHBORHOOD G O OO PRESENTATION S O City of Richmond Officer Bradley A. Moody Memorial Underpass April 14, 2010 TEAM INTRODUCTIONS Project Oversight and Approval City of Richmond Richmond Community
More informationMississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report CITY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 2014 City of RAMSEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Need and Intent The Mississippi Skyway pedestrian bridge
More informationCITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO
CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO. 2012-4 AMENDING SECTION 27.38.090, OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, OF CHAPTER 27.38, CBD DISTRICTS-CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, SECTION 27.64.023, PARKING PROHIBITED ON LAWNS, FLOWERS,
More informationPLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE
PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE Fall Meeting/Luncheon Welcome! October 16, 2009 PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE Fall Meeting/Luncheon WELCOME! WELCOME! October 16, 2009 October 16, 2009 Agenda I. Lunch/Socialize
More informationMETRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting. August 23, 2018
METRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting August 23, 2018 1 Today s Topics Introductions Corridor Management Committee Update Public Engagement Update History of Alignment Project Scope Discussions Upcoming CBAC
More informationORDINANCE NO
ATTACHMENT CC-1 ORDINANCE NO. 13-2113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRE AREA FROM PARK AND RECREATION (PR) TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK (P(MP))
More informationCity Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001
City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES... LIST OF FIGURES... INDEX... OVERVIEW...
More information22a. Existing Condition. 22b. Simulation of NE 20th Street Alternative (D3)
Appendix F4.5 Visual Consistency and Key Observation Point Analyses EXHIBIT F4.5-22 Key Observation Point 22 (looking east along NE 20th Street) 22a. Existing Condition 22b. Simulation of NE 20th Street
More informationBACKGROUND, GOALS, STUDY AREA, EVALUATION CRITERIA, ORGANIZATION
CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND, GOALS, STUDY AREA, EVALUATION CRITERIA, ORGANIZATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works Office of Transportation Planning (Planning) initiated
More informationWelcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012
Welcome Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012 Agenda Proposed future land use plan Comprehensive Plan strategies Traffic forecasts Future traffic operations Possible future
More information