Pine Street Waterfront Overlay CITY OF ROSEBURG PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY FEBRUARY City of Roseburg

Transcription

1 Pine Street Waterfront Overlay CITY OF ROSEBURG PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY FEBRUARY 2018 City of Roseburg

2 Purpose of this project Create an overlay zone for Pine Street Retain the project area s historic character Allow multi-modal transportation access Promote small-scale, pedestrianoriented development

3 What this Project is Not Overlay zone will remove barriers to development but it s not a streetscape plan This effort is the first step in planning for future development and street improvements The focus of this project is on Pine Street and the overlay district, not on the river trail

4

5 A B * C

6 Pine Street Waterfront Overlay Zone PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY Community Development Department 900 SE Douglas Ave., Roseburg, Oregon Legend Potential Pine Street Waterfront Overlay C3 [General Commercial] PR [Public reserve] 1" = 150' SOUTH UMPQUA RIVER DEER CREEK NE STEPHENS ST SE SPRUCE ST SE DOUGLAS AVE 320 CORP RAILROAD SE PINE ST SE STEPHENS ST 700 SE ROSE ST Map is for informational purposes only and is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. The City of Roseburg is not responsible for map errors, ommissions, misuse, or misinterpretation. Not for determining legal ownership or identification of property boundaries Feet

7 Key Documents CITY OF December 2006 COMPREHENSIVE PARKS MASTER PLAN ADOPTED APRIL 2008 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE City of Roseburg Waterfront Master Development Plan ORDINANCE NO.3487 ADOPTED: JULY 24, 2017 CC Ord. No November 11, 2010 ORIGINALLY ADOPTED: JUNE 28, 1982: ORD. NO. 2363

8 Comprehensive Plan Plan Highlights Increase the potential for convention and tourist-related economic activities. Develop and expand public awareness of the Roseburg urban area s origin, development and history. Encourage preservation and restoration of sites, structures, objects and areas of cultural, historic or archaeological significance for the enjoyment and knowledge of present and future generations.

9 Transportation System Plan December 2006 Plan Highlights The TSP, as written, currently treats Pine Street not as a street but as a multi-use path. This is an opportunity for the Pine Street Overlay project to set new standards for its design. New standards that borrow more from the design of plazas and other shared urban spaces, rather than from streets.

10 Bike and Pedestrian Plan Plan Highlights The key components to successful paths include: continuous separation from traffic, scenic qualities, connection to land uses, well-designed street crossings, visibility, good design, and proper maintenance.

11 Parks Master Plan CITY OF COMPREHENSIVE PARKS MASTER PLAN ADOPTED APRIL 2008 Plan Highlights...this plan recommends a conceptual overlay to all park and open space properties within the city limits that are adjacent to the river. Individual parks along the river will retain their own identities and particular uses, but these sites should also be considered as a whole... Develop consistent signage and install at all city park sites to create system identity. Provide wayfinding signage from adjacent streets for parks not located on a major street.

12 City Limits Main Map SP-6 CP-1 Quintus Park W HARVARD AVE NP-6 E S H U C R E S T E S F U L L E R TO N Brown Park SP-7 SP-5 YMCA DUCK POND Stewart Park F I R G R O V E E S FIR GROVE S o u t h U m p q u a R i v e r F R E E M O N T M S SKATE PARK SP-4 GARDEN VALLEY VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL Charles S Gardiner Park Riverfront Park Templin Beach Park Micelli Park R O S E B U R G M U N I C I P A L A I R P O R T NP-1 OS-1 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB Gaddis Park R O S E B U R G H S Laurelwood Park ALAMEDA UMPQUA RIVE R BIKE PATH Riverside Park Willis Park OS-3 R O S E E S J O S E P H L A N E M S NE STEPHENS ST SP-1 SP-2 Eagles Park NP-3 Deer Creek Park Beulah Park NP-2 Commercial Street Park NP-5 Eastwood Park k DIAMOND LAKE BLVD OS-2 Inset Map E A S T W O O D E S SP-3 NP-4 P H O E N I X S C H O O L Sunshine Park Miles City of Roseburg Urban Growth Boundary City Limits Main Map Parks & Recreation Master Plan City of Roseburg, Oregon Map 2: Proposed Park System Proposed Open Space Proposed Community Park Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Mini Park Greenway Special Use Areas Undeveloped Park Proposed School Park Proposed Neighborhood Park â â â â Existing Bike/ Pedestrian Path â â â â Proposed Bike/ Pedestrian Path Railroad City Limits UGB Stream River School Property o Miles Inset Map o Miles INTERSTATE FIVE D O U G L A S C O U N T Y F A I R G R O U N D S Thompson Park Parrot Creek Park Data Source: City of Roseburg GIS March 2008

13 Waterfront Master Plan City of Roseburg Waterfront Master Development Plan CC Ord. No November 11, 2010 Plan Highlights Improve north end of Pine Street with better paving and landscape and encourage redevelopment of adjoining properties....delineated with pavement markings to guide cyclists and pedestrians and perhaps delineate a lane for cars... Replace the fence, with at least a black chain link fence or a metal railing fence and add plantings.

14 City of Roseburg Waterfront Master Development Plan CC Ord. No November 11, 2010 New lighting should be installed on the corridor, consistent with light standards on other sections of riverfront and tying to downtown. Redevelopment should be required to locate close to the trail corridor, to create a sense of activation and direct observation of the corridor.

15 Lane Mosher Oak Washington Elk Island Douglas Pine Deer Creek Floodplain Highlights If a building is in the floodplain, residential uses are not permitted on the ground floor. Non-residential uses (commercial and retail) are permitted on the ground floor but the building must be flood-proofed through engineering, design and construction. Floodplain Map Pine Stephens A riverbank trail could provide secondary access and visibility to retail located in the ground floor of buildings in the floodplain, facing the river or facing perpendicular passageways.

16 LUDO LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO.3487 ADOPTED: JULY 24, 2017 ORIGINALLY ADOPTED: JUNE 28, 1982: ORD. NO Plan Highlights Bed and breakfast is a permitted use, and one off-street parking space for each guest room is required. Parking should be more flexible, with local shared parking arrangements. Several uses are inconsistent with the city s goals for this area. Sidewalk cafes are conditional and should be permitted.

17 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO.3487 ADOPTED: JULY 24, 2017 ORIGINALLY ADOPTED: JUNE 28, 1982: ORD. NO New standards should promote the vision and current character of smallscale architecture. At the same time, LUDO amendments should optimize the redevelopment potential that is severely challenged by floodplain and historic structure limitations. It will require an intricate approach that balances competing requirements and objectives.

18 Historical Resources Inventory Highlights There are seven designated properties within the Pine Street area. These properties must comply with Historic District Overlay standards. Overlay standards include height and bulk restrictions. In addition, most of these are also within the floodplain and must comply with floodplain regulations.

19

20 Hierarchy of Regulations National Historic Registry Fire and Life Safety Federal and State FEMA Flood Regulations LEAST FLEXIBLE CITY OF ROSEBURG PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY FEBRUARY 2018 State Historic Preservation Office Building Code ADA Standards County and Local Planning Zoning * Documents Code Public Works Standards MOST FLEXIBLE

21 FEMA Retrofitting Methods * Elevation Relocation Demolition Wet Floodproofing Dry Floodproofing Barrier Systems

22 Lifting the building above the flood level Mandeville, Louisiana: B-3 Elevated Building Design Guidelines 5.2 Elevated Building a) Incorrect Details b) Correct Details Columns are ill proportioned and devoid of architectural detailing Beam depth is too shallow in relation to span. Pier expressed with base and capital Beam has substantial depth in relation to span Gallery Building on Piers Pier spacing is not related to principal structure No screening provided at base level aligning with face of principal building Parking is not properly screened Pier spacing related to porch columns and openings of principal structure Maintain a void at face of porch Solid screening provided at base level aligning with face of principal building Parking is properly screened 5.2

23 500 SE Douglas Avenue

24 Mandeville, Louisiana: B-3 Elevated Building Design Guidelines 5.1 Elevated Buildings a) Asymmetrical Single Story The primary design problem encountered when buildings are elevated is respecting the original architectural proportion and pattern of the principal structure. The new base zone is generally created by placing the structure on a base zone of raised columns or piers. This base zone shall be architecturally treated to mitigate the appearance of a building on stilts. Column or pier vertical proportions shall be a minimum of 1 unit wide to 12 units tall. Principal Structure b) Symmetrical Two Story Post & Lintel Expression Piers engage porch rhythm Solid panels with siding used as infill Wall with Openings Opening rhythm reflects wall openings in principal structure. Solid stucco panels recessed between piers Piers shall be treated with an architectural finish. Permissible finish materials include stucco, brick, wood, or cementitious siding. Columns or piers shall be treated with an architectural finish. Permissible finish materials include stucco, brick, wood, or cementitious siding. The spacing of piers shall respect the rhythm of the principal structure. Common elements that will dictate pier spacing include porch columns and bays, wall openings and major building elements. Principal Structure Post & Lintel Expression Columns with capital, base & shaft; Board & batten infill panels Wall with Openings Openings reflect wall openings in principal structure; base has louvered infill panels 5.1

25 Inspiration West down Douglas to South Umpqua River. Riverfront trail uses the sidewalk to connect to Pine Street Figure 4I: Pine Street ROW and 20 easement north of Douglas

26 Roseburg Waterfront Master Development Plan Inspiration The following improvements are recommended for this corridor (see Figure 4J): Improved paving, with unit pavers preferred instead of asphalt. At very least, the corridor should be delineated with pavement markings to guide cyclists and pedestrians and perhaps delineate a lane for cars to use when accessing riverfront properties. The existing fence separating northern Pine from the railroad is stark and unattractive. Replace the fence, with at least a black chain link fence or a metal railing fence and add plantings. New lighting should be installed on the corridor, consistent with light standards on other sections of riverfront and tying to downtown. Properties along the corridor are zoned C3, which allows them to redevelop as small-scale retail. One vision imagines this corridor becoming a district with local arts and crafts shops, along with bed and breakfast-type accommodation (photos at right). Redevelopment should be required to locate close to the trail corridor, to create a sense of activation and direct observation of the corridor. A future trail connection directly on the riverbank could be realized as willing sellers make their property available and the City responds by purchasing these properties or access rights to create a public parcel. It is not anticipated that additional right-of-way acquisition is required for the improvements above. Small-scale crafts shop Bed and Breakfast in an historic house New Trees New Lighting New Fencing Special Paving Figure 4J: Conceptual cross-section for Pine Street improvements 62 Pine Street Improvements

27 BUILDINGS

28 SIGNAGE

29 Inspiration Roseburg Waterfront Master Development Plan Existing Pine Street Figure 4K: Concept for Pine Street improvements

30 STREET

31 Pine Street Waterfront Overlay City of Roseburg Thank you CITY OF ROSEBURG PINE STREET WATERFRONT OVERLAY FEBRUARY 2018 This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management ( TGM ) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST- Act), local government, and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. urbs w o r k s