Agenda Technical Committee on Testing and Maintenance of Fire Alarm and Signaling Systems June 23-24, 2014 La Jolla, CA

Transcription

1 Agenda Technical Committee on Testing and Maintenance of Fire Alarm and Signaling Systems June 23-24, 2014 La Jolla, CA Item No. Subject Call to Order (8:00 A.M) Roll Call Approval of Agenda Approval Meeting Minutes September 2013 [Enclosure] Staff Remarks & Using the New Process [Staff] Task Group Reports Public Comments and Second Revisions [Enclosures] Review of Committee Inputs [Enclosure] Other Business Adjournment

2 *There were no minutes taken during the First Draft meeting(?)

3 29 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 225-NFPA [ Section No ] Deficiency. A condition that interferes with the service or reliability for which the part, system, or equipment was intended but does not rise to the level of an imparement. (SIG-TMS) Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This issue was presented as a PI 545 and the comment returned was that it would create a conflict with the definition of impairment ( now) there now exists a conflict that this would help resolve because not all deficiencies are actually an impairment. A missing Record of completion is technically a deficiency but yet will not impact the operation of the system. this becomes critical in states that include a color tag reporting system where all impairments require a red tag and requisite notifications. This also brings NFPA 72 in alignment with NFPA 25 to ensure that the water based systems connected to the fire alarm systems have corresponding requirements. Related Item Public Input No. 545-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas Parrish Organization: Telgian Corporation Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 16 13:45:53 EDT 2014

4 35 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 231-NFPA [ Section No ] Maintenance. Work, including, but not limited to, repair, replacement, and inspections, testing and service, performed to ensure that equipment operates properly. (SIG-TMS) Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment when the PI 550 was acted on the committee statement was made that the intent of CH. 14 is to differentiate between inspection, testing and maintenance. Chapter 14 uses all 3 items in all sections of and does not define nor differentiate maintenance. This is an issue because in some jurisdictions people are only required to obtain licensing if they are conducting maintenance activities. Since the NFPA definition of maintenance does not include testing and inspection activities, they may be conducted by persons who are not properly licensed and may not be properly qualified requires that Inspection testing and maintenance programs shall verify operation of the system. This clearly defines the intent that all three of these elements, inspections, testing and maintenance are important to ensuring that systems work when required and I am simply trying to close a loophole that some possibly unqualified parties are exploiting to allow them to not meet the qualification requirements of other NFPA 72 sections as well as applicable state statutes. Related Item Public Input No. 550-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Thomas Parrish Organization: Telgian Corporation Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 16 14:24:28 EDT 2014

5 Public Comment No. 152-NFPA [ Section No ] * Inspection, Testing, and Service Personnel. (SIG-TMS) * Inspection Personnel. Inspections shall be performed by personnel who have developed competence developed knowledge through training and experience that are acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction or meet the requirement of * Testing Personnel. Testing personnel shall have knowledge and experience of the testing requirements contained in this Code, of the equipment being tested, and of the test methods. That knowledge and experience shall be acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction or meet the requirement of Service Personnel. Service personnel shall have knowledge and experience of the maintenance and servicing requirements contained in this Code, of the equipment being serviced or maintained, and of the servicing or maintenance methods. That knowledge and experience shall be acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction or meet the requirement of Qualified personnel shall include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: (1) (2) (3) * Personnel who are factory trained and certified for the specific type and brand of system being serviced * Personnel who are certified by a nationally recognized certification organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction * Personnel, either individually or through their affiliation with an organization that is registered, licensed, or certified by a state or local authority to perform service on systems addressed within the scope of this Code (4) Personnel who are employed and qualified by an organization listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for the servicing of systems within the scope of this Code * Programming Personnel Personnel programming a system shall be certified by the system manufacturer System installation personnel shall be permitted to configure systems in the field per manufacturers published instructions System end users shall be permitted to manage system operation per manufacturers published instructions or training Evidence of Qualification. Evidence of qualifications shall be provided to the authority having jurisdiction upon request. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Section of the Manual of Style states, All nonmandatory or informational text shall appear either in Annex A or as a separate annex in the case of specialized information. Because this section is a partial list of possible ways that personnel may become qualified, it is by definition, informational and therefore must be relocated to the annex. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 145-NFPA [Section No ] Relationship similar 80 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM

6 81 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 146-NFPA [New Section after A ] Public Comment No. 150-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 151-NFPA [New Section after A ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] similar similar similar Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 12:21:43 EDT 2014

7 82 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 153-NFPA [ Section No. A ] A It is not the intent to require personnel performing simple inspections or operational tests of initiating devices to require factory training or special certification, provided such personnel can demonstrate knowledge in these areas. Qualified personnel may include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: (1) * Personnel who are trained and certified by the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent for the specific type and brand of system being serviced (2) * Personnel who are certified by an organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction (3) * Personnel, either individually or through employment, that is registered, licensed, or certified by a state or local authority to perform service on systems addressed within the scope of this Code (4) Personnel who are employed and qualified by an organization listed by a testing laboratory for the servicing of systems within the scope of this Code Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Section of the Manual of Style states, All nonmandatory or informational text shall appear either in Annex A or as a separate annex in the case of specialized information. Because this section is a partial list of possible ways that personnel may become qualified, it is by definition, informational and therefore must be relocated to the annex. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 145-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 146-NFPA [New Section after A ] Public Comment No. 150-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 151-NFPA [New Section after A ] Public Comment No. 152-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] similar similar similar similar Relationship this PC deletes the text from the body of the code Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 12:26:04 EDT 2014

8 87 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 157-NFPA [ Section No ] Qualified personnel shall include, but not be limited to, demonstrate knowledge of all tasks required of them by this Code by one or more of the following: (1) * Personnel who are factory trained and certified for the certifiedby the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent for the specific type and brand of system being serviced (2)* Personnel who are Ccertified by a nationally recognized certification an organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction (3) * Personnel, either individually or through their affiliation with an organization that is registered, Rregistered, licensed, or certified by a state or local authority to perform service on systems addressed within the scope of this Code (4) Personnel who are employed Employed and qualified by an organization listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for the servicing of systems within the scope of this Code Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This format is used by SIG-SSS for This format more clearly creates a minimum requirement by stating that personnel must demonstrate competence. Section of the Manual of Style states that language shall be adoptable but the current language is circular in nature. If adopted, this Code would be the law but this section refers to state and local licensure regulations which would be the requirements of this Code which refers to state and local licensure regulations, and so on forever. This rewording and reformatting address the concern of using nationally recognized to describe a certification organization. Section of the Manual of Style states, Documents shall be written to enhance their international acceptability and adoptability which is achieved by removing this term. Additionally, the term nationally recognized fails to acknowledge and recognize that there are many state and local organizations that provide continuing education. This point speaks directly to the justification for PI349 which stated that as written the Code restricts trade. This rewording also removes but not limited to from the body of the code. Section states, This code establishes minimum required levels of performance Phrases of this nature are perfectly acceptable when applied to informational or explanatory material but do not establish a minimum standard. The term factory trained is reworded to represent training by the manufacturer or the manufacturer s agent. Factory trained is jargon and of the Manual of Style states that use of jargon shall be avoided. Using manufacturer or manufacturer s agent is reflective of industry practice. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 155-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 156-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] Relationship Similar Similar Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc.

9 88 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 12:50:39 EDT 2014

10 9 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 77-NFPA [ Section No ] Qualified personnel shall include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: (1) (2) (3) * Personnel who are factory are trained and certified by the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent for the specific type and brand of system being serviced * Personnel who are certified by a nationally recognized certification organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction * Personnel, either individually or through their affiliation with an organization that is registered, licensed, or certified by a state or local authority to perform service on systems addressed within the scope of this Code (4) Personnel who are employed and qualified by an organization listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for the servicing of systems within the scope of this Code Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This PC readdresses PI349. This change makes it clear that the training and certification should be provided by the manufacturer of the equipment or an authorized agent of the manufacturer, since this is the current industry practice. This wording has proven to be acceptable in the NFPA process as it appears in the current editions of other NFPA standards. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 73-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 74-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] Relationship Similar wording Similar wording Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 05 16:00:47 EDT 2014

11 02 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 161-NFPA [ Section No. A (1) ] A (1) Factory training and certification is Certification by the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent is intended to allow an individual to service equipment only for which he or she has specific brand and model training. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The term factory trained is reworded to represent training by the manufacturer or the manufacturer s agent. Factory trained is jargon and of the Manual of Style states that use of jargon shall be avoided. Using manufacturer or manufacturer s agent is reflective of industry practice. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 77-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] Relationship aligns with changes to the body of the code Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 13:10:52 EDT 2014

12 04 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 163-NFPA [ Section No. A (2) ] A (2) Nationally recognized fire alarm certification Certification programs might include those programs offered by the International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA), National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies (NICET), and the Electronic Security Association (ESA). NOTE: These organizations and the products or services offered by them have not been independently verified by the NFPA, nor have the products or services been endorsed or certified by the NFPA or any of its technical committees. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This rewording and reformatting address the concern of using nationally recognized to describe a certification organization. Section of the Manual of Style states, Documents shall be written to enhance their international acceptability and adoptability which is achieved by removing this term. Additionally, the term nationally recognized fails to acknowledge and recognize that there are many state and local organizations that provide continuing education. This point speaks directly to the justification for PI349 which stated that as written the Code restricts trade. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 157-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] Relationship aligns annex with the body of the code Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 13:17:44 EDT 2014

13 72 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 144-NFPA [ New Section after ] Inspection, Testing and Service Trainees shall be under the direct supervision of qualified Inspection, Testing and Service personnel. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Currently, there is no provision for trainees to develop the competence and experience required by the Code. This section is similar to Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 142-NFPA [New Section after ] Public Comment No. 143-NFPA [New Section after ] Related Item Public Input No. 349-NFPA [Section No. 10.5] Relationship Similar issue and text. Similar issue and text Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Todd Warner Organization: Brooks Equipment Company, Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 11:29:34 EDT 2014

14 1 of 1 5/28/2014 1:00 PM Public Comment No. 230-NFPA [ Section No. A ] A Initial and re-acceptance inspections are performed to ensure compliance with approved design documents whatever the quality or origin. This involves inspection to ensure that the correct equipment has been used and properly located and installed. Ensuring compliance helps to assure both operational reliability and mission reliability. This concept applies to any type of system, not just fire alarm and signaling systems. At this stage of a system s life, the responsibilities for such inspections rest with the designers of the systems and with the various applicable authorities having jurisdiction.special consideration should be given to occupancies that have individuals with intellectual disabilities. Special training for these individuals should be given to help them understand the audible and visual signaling and what action(s) are expected to be followed Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This is to alert Authorities Having Jurisdiction, building owners, property managers, testing and service personnel that additional training and notification be given to individuals with special needs and staff so that an understanding of what to expect during an alarm activation and testing of Protected Premise System s and the actions that they should take during these conditions. Related Item First Revision No. 296-NFPA [New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Knight Organization: City of Newton Fire Department Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri May 16 14:18:05 EDT 2014 Copyright Assignment I, Jeffrey Knight, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment. By checking this box I affirm that I am Jeffrey Knight, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

15 5 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 85-NFPA [ Section No ] In the event that any equipment is observed to be part of a recall program, the building owner system owner or the system owner's designated representative shall be notified in writing. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment I concur with a comment made during final balloting that reference to the owner or owner's designated representative should be made, along with the means of notification. The First Revision of this section has, therefore, been amended to reflect that. Related Item First Revision No. 296-NFPA [New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Joe Scibetta Organization: BuildingReports Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 07 17:39:42 EDT 2014

16 94 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 160-NFPA [ Section No ] *

17 01 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (iii) Lamps/ LED LEDXSemiannual X Semiannual (iv) Primary (main) power supply supplyxsemiannual X Semiannual (2) Secondary power batteries batteriesxsemiannual X Semiannual (3) Initiating devices devicesxsemiannual X Semiannual (4) Notification appliances appliancesxsemiannual X Semiannual (c) Antenna X Annual Verify AntennaXAnnualVerify location and condition. (d) Transceivers X Annual Verify TransceiversXAnnualVerify location and condition. Note: N/A = not applicable, no minimum requirement established. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The change is submitted as part of SIG-TMS Battery Task Group originating from Public Comments No. 602-NFPA and 625-NFPA Additional recommendations are proposed for Item 9 in Table with uploaded text. Related Item Public Input No. 602-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 625-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Herbert Hurst Organization: Savannah River Nuclear Solutio Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 13:09:49 EDT 2014

18 Visual Inspection Component Initial Periodic Method Reference Acceptance Frequency 9. Batteries q (a) VRLA Batteries X Ensure month and year of manufacture is marked in the month/year format on each battery cell/unit. Semiannually Verify marking of the month/year of manufacture on each battery cell/unit. Replace any cell/unit if alarm equipment manufacturer s replacement date has been exceeded. X Semiannually Verify tightness of battery connections. Inspect terminals for corrosion, excessive container/cover distortion, cracks in cell/unit or leakage of electrolyte. Replace any battery cell/unit if corrosion, distortion, or leakage is observed. (b) Primary (dry cell) X Semiannually Verify marking of the month/year of manufacture Replace if alarm equipment/battery manufacturer s replacement date has been exceeded, not to exceed 12 months. Verify tightness of connections. Inspect for corrosion or leakage. Replace any battery cell/unit if corrosion or leakage is observed.

19 Testing Component 9. VRLA Battery and Charger r Initial Acceptance Periodic Frequency Method Prior to conducting any battery testing, verify by the person conducting the test, that all system software stored in volatile memory is protected from loss. (a) Temperature test X Semiannually Upon initially opening the cabinet door, measure and record the temperature of each battery cell/unit at the negative terminal with an infrared thermometer. Replace any battery cell/unit if the temperature is greater than 18 F (10 C) above ambient. (b) Charger test s X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage across the battery with a voltmeter. Verify the voltage is within the battery/alarm equipment manufacturer s recommendations. If the voltage is outside of the specified limits, either adjust the charger to within limits or replace the charger. (c) Cell/Unit voltage test X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage of each cell/unit. Replace the battery when any cell/unit measures a voltage less than volts. (d) Ohmic test t X When the battery is installed, establish a baseline ohmic value for each battery cell/unit or where available use baseline ohmic values provided by the battery or test equipment manufacturer. In either case record the base line ohmic value on each battery cell/unit. Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the internal ohmic value of each battery cell/unit. Record the test date and ohmic value on each cell/unit. Replace the battery when the ohmic measurement of any cell/unit deviates from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance. Where the battery or test equipment manufacturer s baseline ohmic values are used, replace the battery when any cell/unit has an internal ohmic value outside of the acceptable range. (e) Replacement/ Load test u 3 years Replace the battery or conduct a load test of the battery capacity. Load test the battery based on the manufacturer s specifications for a discharge rate of 3 hours or more by applying the current indicated for the selected hourly discharge rate continuously, until the terminal voltage decreases to the end voltage specified by the manufacturer. Record the test duration and calculate the battery capacity including adjustment for ambient temperature. Replace the battery if capacity is less than or equal to 80% or at the next scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. q For other than Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) or Primary (dry cell) batteries, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. r The battery tests in Table Item 9 are based on Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) batteries. For other secondary battery types, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. s If the charger is adjustable, adjust the output voltage to volts per cell ±0.015 volts at 77 F (25 C) or as specified by the equipment manufacturer. t See A Item 9. (d). u See A Item 9. (e).

20 A Table Item 9.(d) Ohmic testing is a means to determine the state-of-health of a Valve- Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) battery s cells by measuring some form of a cell s internal resistance. Typically ohmic testing equipment use one of three techniques, conductance, impedance, or resistance, to make these measurements. In simplest technical terms, ohmic technology is based on Ohm s Law, which expresses the relationship between volts, amperes, and ohms in an electrical circuit. Ohmic testing attempts to use voltage and current to determine the resistive characteristic of a battery s cells. As the cells in a battery age and start to lose capacity, the internal components of the battery are undergoing a degradation process. The degradation of these components (plates, grids, internal connection straps) within the battery s cells cause an increased resistance in the conduction paths of the cell, which in turn cause a change in the internal ohmic values. A measured increase in impedance or resistance, or a decrease in conductance, indicates the battery is losing its ability to produce the energy it was designed to deliver when called upon to support the connected loads. The key to effective application of ohmic testing is the appropriate trending of test results over time compared to a baseline or reference value. Studies have demonstrated that an individual battery produces a unique ohmic "signature" and the use of ohmic testing equipment to trend changes in this signature from installation through the life of the battery is the most effective use of the technology. A program that involves ohmic testing on a regular interval to note changes in the battery is a good maintenance practice. An ohmic baseline reference value is a benchmark value based on data collected from known good batteries. Reference values can be determined from site specific measurement, or from testing a sample of new healthy batteries, or by using a generic baseline value to get started. (1) The best baseline is one established on the installed battery within three to six months after installation and trend accordingly using good record keeping. Ideally the individual ohmic value should be measured at installation and again after the battery has been on float charge for at least 72 hours in order for it to reach a high state of stabilization. These initial site-specific values should be recorded and permanently affixed to the battery as a baseline for subsequent tests over the life of the battery. The ohmic value will typically increase for conductance and decrease for resistance and impedance between the initial installation and after being on float charge for 90 to 180 days (10% to 15% depending on battery type and size). Six months after installation measure and compare the ohmic readings to the readings taken at installation. Use whichever value is greater for conductance or lower for resistance and impedance, as the baseline for that particular battery at that site going forward. (2) A sample of new healthy batteries in a fully charged state can be tested to obtain a baseline value representative of a new battery. A sample size of at least 30 batteries from one manufacturer with the same make, model, amp-hour rating, age (within 6 months), and manufacturing lot is recommended. Record the following information for the batteries: (a) Battery manufacturer (b) Model number (c) Date of manufacture (d) Manufacturing lot number (if available) (e) Battery temperature (f) Has the battery had a freshening charge or not (g) Battery voltage (h) Ohmic test value Calculate the average ohmic value of the batteries. Do not include batteries that deviate more than 30% from the average because they could be outside of an acceptable range. Use the average value as a baseline starting point for this model battery. (3) A generic baseline value for a specific battery model can often be found by contacting the ohmic test equipment manufacturer or from the battery manufacturer. While it is important to note that the use of generic reference values may not be as accurate, it is still possible to identify grossly failed batteries and significant changes in battery condition by applying this method. Generic baseline values are typical averages to be used as general guidelines and should only be used when no other data is available. When testing older batteries for which no initial sitespecific ohmic value is available reference values can be obtained in the following ways: (a) Contact the equipment or battery manufacturer for assistance (b) Consult your company documentation to see if reference values were created for the battery you are testing. (c) Using ohmic readings of recently installed batteries of the same: (d) Manufacturer and model of the battery (e) Manufacturer and model of the alarm panel/system (f) Charging circuit (g) Temperature at time of measurements (h) Calculate an average of the top 8-10 batteries and use this value as a baseline reference As a battery ages and loses capacity, the internal ohmic values change. Although the change may not be perfectly consistent over all battery models and sizes, experience and extensive test data shows that a deviation of ohmic values from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance indicates that the actual battery capacity has dropped to 80% or lower. (For lead-acid batteries, capacity drops off rapidly once the 80% capacity point is reached in the lifetime curve, so this is known as the knee of the capacity vs. lifetime curve). This 80% capacity is the level

21 at which battery manufacturers recommend battery replacement. Figure A (d) illustrates an ohmic trend of a 5-yr design life battery with an actual expected service life of 3 years. Note that while battery Unit #1 still has good ohmic readings, it is desirable to replace both units at the same time. If one unit fails at 1-1/2 yrs, it is likely the second unit will fail in one of the next semiannual tests. Full replacement ensures that all units will float together. One exception would be in the case of infant mortality in which one of the units fails in the first year. FIGURE A (d) Example Ohmic Trend Analysis for a 24 Volt Battery Made Up of Two 12 Volt Units. Semiannual Measurements Show Unit #2 Failing Prematurely. For this Case Both Units Should be Replaced. Ohmic testing can be a safe, simple, accurate, and reliable means of determining the state of health of valve-regulated lead-acid batteries. It is important however to understand some basic guidelines in order to maximize the benefits and avoid possible misleading test results. (1) Follow safety regulations: wear eye protection, remove metal jewelry, etc. prior to working with batteries. (2) Conduct a visual inspection prior to testing. A cracked case, leaking terminal or post, or bulging battery should be replaced, not tested. (3) Temperature changes affect measured ohmic values and battery capacity. Ohmic measurements should be taken at 77 F (25 C), or within +/- 10 F (5 C) of 77 F (25 C). (4) For maximum accuracy and consistency, batteries should be tested when in a fully charged state. (5) Check the battery charging current prior to test. The charging current should be stable and be within the normal float current recommendations of the battery manufacturer for the battery model. If it is not, it is likely that the batteries have recently been discharged and a test is not appropriate until this float current stabilizes. (6) Whenever possible, ohmic readings should be taken each time with the same instrument, but as a minimum with the same model. Changing models will skew the data and require re-establishing the base line. (7) When test equipment is provided with an alert, set the ohmic baseline and/or thresholds prior to beginning the test to provide an indication of any deviations from baseline. (8) It is essential to take ohmic measurements at the battery terminal or post. For consistency and accuracy subsequent tests should always place probes or clamps at the same point while avoiding battery hardware such as bolt heads or washers. Connecting on the hardware will influence the readings and may cause replacement of a healthy battery. (9) Maintain good contact at the test point for the duration of the test. If the probe or clamp slips off during the test an incorrect reading will result. (10) For batteries with fully insulated quick disconnect connectors, the battery may be taken offline by removing the quick disconnects from the battery terminals and then measuring and recording the internal ohmic value of the battery. (11) A battery tested online may display a different value than when tested offline due to the charger circuit and load being across the battery. Always test the same way, either online or offline, to have consistent and meaningful results. (12) Do not condemn a battery based upon results of a single test without any trending data or an established baseline for that specific battery. (13) When one or more units in a battery fall outside the acceptable range from base line, replace the entire string. A Table Item 9. (e) Battery capacity is determined by the mass of active material contained in the battery and is a measure of the battery s stored energy. The rated capacity of small VRLA batteries used in fire system applications is typically measured in ampere-hours (Ah) where the ampere-hour rating is based on the battery s capability to provide a constant current at the nominal battery voltage for twenty hours. The rated capacity may vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. The actual battery capacity during service life can vary significantly from rated capacity due to aging, charging and discharge cycles, temperature, and other factors. The unique failure modes of VRLA batteries due to aging and internal degradation are attributed for a high failure rate where the actual battery capacity has degraded to 80 percent of the manufacturer s rated capacity. As a result, battery manufacturers often recommend replacement much sooner than the rated design life for critical systems. A test of battery capacity is designed to determine if the battery is capable of continuing to deliver the voltage level specified by the manufacturer. The results of a capacity test can also be used to estimate where the battery is in its service life. A test of capacity is performed by applying a continuous load to the battery based on the manufacturer s published discharge rates until voltage falls to specified levels. Although discharging the battery for capacity testing concerns some, VRLA batteries are designed to

22 handle numerous discharges within the limits established by the battery manufacturer. The discharge rate selected for testing should be representative of the duty cycle because at shorter test times the test duration has a greater effect on the capacity calculation. For example, a one minute difference in actual test time for a 5 minute discharge rate compared to a 3 hour discharge rate will result in a greater deviation of the calculated capacity. The battery is also operating less efficiently at shorter discharge rates and the effects of aging and degradation may not be as prevalent during shorter discharges. Fire alarm systems do not typically carry a sufficient load for the practical application of a load test because the battery is sized for a duty cycle consisting of a standby period of 24 hours or more followed by five minutes in an alarm condition. For this reason the panel loading will not likely align with published discharge rates, which is essential for test personnel to easily calculate capacity. In many installations, the fire system loading is inadequate to meet the functional requirements for capacity testing and in these cases a battery near failure could conceivably satisfy the low discharge rate applied by the fire system. scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. Temperature F K T Table A (e) Temperature Correction Factors. In order to satisfy the load test requirements of Table Item 9.(e), battery capacity testing can be performed in the following manner or in accordance with other methods such as those identified in IEEE Standard 1188: (1) Referring to the battery manufacturer s specifications, determine the load current for the 3 hour battery rating to the selected end voltage, typically 1.67 volts per cell (10.2 volts for 12 volt system or 20.4 volts for 24 volt system). (2) Record the battery temperature at the negative terminal. (3) Disconnect the charger and connect a load bank to the battery terminals. (4) Apply the constant current specified for the 3 hour rate to the battery. Once the constant current is applied continue the test until the battery terminal voltage decreases to the specified end voltage. (5) Stop the test when the selected end voltage is reached (6) Record the actual test duration in minutes (7) Disconnect the load bank and reconnect the charger (8) Calculate percent battery capacity as follows: %Capacity = (Tactual/180 x K T) x100 where: Tactual = the test duration in minutes K T = the temperature correction factor for the actual battery temperature at the start of the test from Table A (e). Additional Temperature Correction Factors can be obtained from IEEE (9) Replace the battery if battery capacity is less than or equal to 80%. Replace the battery at the next

23 32 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 124-NFPA [ Section No ]

24 43 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM alarm. Magnets are not acceptable for smoke entry tests. i There are some detectors that use magnets as a manufacturer's calibrated sensitivity test instrument. j For example, it might not be possible to individually test the heat sensor in a thermally enhanced smoke detector. k Manufacturer's instructions should be consulted to ensure a proper operational test. No suppression gas or agent is expected to be discharged during the test of the solenoid. See Test Plan of l Testing of CO device should be done to the requirements of NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and Warning Equipment. m A monitor module installed on an interface device is not considered a supervisory device and therefore not subject to the quarterly testing frequency requirement. Test frequencies for interface devices should be in accordance with the applicable standard. For example, fire pump controller alarms such as phase reversal are required to be tested annually. If a monitor module is installed to identify phase reversal on the fire alarm control panel, it is not necessary to test for phase reversal four times a year. n Chapter 18 would require 15 db over average ambient sound for public mode spaces. Sometimes the ambient sound levels are different from what the design was based upon. Private operating mode would require 10 db over average ambient at the location of the device. o Where building, system, or occupancy changes have been observed, the owner should be notified of the changes. New devices might need to be installed and tested per the initial acceptance testing criteria. p See A , and Table , Item 24. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment We believe that the original fixed interval testing intervals had no more technical substantiation than the intervals that there inadvertently changed. To borrow from Mr. Hurst s comment on the negative: Other more complex fire protection initiating devices require testing on an annual frequency, e.g., addressable detectors. Many of these devises are used in critical systems e.g., gaseous suppression. In an inquiry directed to Potter Electric Switch Co. concerning failure rates resulting from increased test frequencies the response was that there have been no reported or observed failures due to incremental increases in test frequency. While it may be too soon to make this determination it should also be noted that these devices are typically already supervised. The exposure time during which an inactive device would create a hazard for occupants is very small compared to the risks when other parts of a fire protection system fail. Related Item First Revision No. 302-NFPA [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Joshua Elvove Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue May 13 14:35:25 EDT 2014

25 From: JOSH ELVOVE Sent: Wednesday, May 21, :17 PM To: Depew, Jenny Subject: RE: Your Public Comment No. 124, NFPA 72 Jenny, I don't have word doc as I did this on line. All I did was change all the frequencies related to testing water from whatever they were to annual. Josh Sent from my Windows Phone From: Depew, Jenny Sent: 5/21/2014 1:57 PM To: josh.elvove@gsa.gov; jelvove@msn.com Subject: Your Public Comment No. 124, NFPA 72 Hello Joshua, I am looking for a little clarity on a Public Comment that you have submitted on NFPA 72. Public Comment No. 124 (Section No ) Would you happen to have a word document version of the changes that you are proposing on this Table? If so, please it to me, or Lee Richardson (lrichardson@nfpa.org), so that we may attach it to your public comment for review at the Technical Committee meeting. Thanks so much! Jenny Depew Administrator, Technical Projects National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA jdepew@nfpa.org Tel: Fax: Please consider the environment before printing this .

26 05 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 164-NFPA [ Section No ]

27 28 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The public comment is submitted as part of recommendations of SIG-TMS Battery Task Group to resolve battery testing issues. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 160-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 602-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 625-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 575-NFPA [Section No ] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Herbert Hurst Organization: Savannah River Nuclear Solutio Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 13:47:59 EDT 2014

28 Testing Component 9. VRLA Battery and Charger r Initial Acceptance Periodic Frequency Method Prior to conducting any battery testing, verify by the person conducting the test, that all system software stored in volatile memory is protected from loss. (a) Temperature test X Semiannually Upon initially opening the cabinet door, measure and record the temperature of each battery cell/unit at the negative terminal with an infrared thermometer. Replace any battery cell/unit if the temperature is greater than 18 F (10 C) above ambient. (b) Charger test s X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage across the battery with a voltmeter. Verify the voltage is within the battery/alarm equipment manufacturer s recommendations. If the voltage is outside of the specified limits, either adjust the charger to within limits or replace the charger. (c) Cell/Unit voltage test X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage of each cell/unit. Replace the battery when any cell/unit measures a voltage less than volts. (d) Ohmic test t X When the battery is installed, establish a baseline ohmic value for each battery cell/unit or where available use baseline ohmic values provided by the battery or test equipment manufacturer. In either case record the base line ohmic value on each battery cell/unit. Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the internal ohmic value of each battery cell/unit. Record the test date and ohmic value on each cell/unit. Replace the battery when the ohmic measurement of any cell/unit deviates from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance. Where the battery or test equipment manufacturer s baseline ohmic values are used, replace the battery when any cell/unit has an internal ohmic value outside of the acceptable range. (e) Replacement/ Load test u 3 years Replace the battery or conduct a load test of the battery capacity. Load test the battery based on the manufacturer s specifications for a discharge rate of 3 hours or more by applying the current indicated for the selected hourly discharge rate continuously, until the terminal voltage decreases to the end voltage specified by the manufacturer. Record the test duration and calculate the battery capacity including adjustment for ambient temperature. Replace the battery if capacity is less than or equal to 80% or at the next scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. q For other than Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) or Primary (dry cell) batteries, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. r The battery tests in Table Item 9 are based on Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) batteries. For other secondary battery types, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. s If the charger is adjustable, adjust the output voltage to volts per cell ±0.015 volts at 77 F (25 C) or as specified by the equipment manufacturer. t See A Item 9. (d). u See A Item 9. (e).

29 A Table Item 9.(d) Ohmic testing is a means to determine the state-of-health of a Valve- Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) battery s cells by measuring some form of a cell s internal resistance. Typically ohmic testing equipment use one of three techniques, conductance, impedance, or resistance, to make these measurements. In simplest technical terms, ohmic technology is based on Ohm s Law, which expresses the relationship between volts, amperes, and ohms in an electrical circuit. Ohmic testing attempts to use voltage and current to determine the resistive characteristic of a battery s cells. As the cells in a battery age and start to lose capacity, the internal components of the battery are undergoing a degradation process. The degradation of these components (plates, grids, internal connection straps) within the battery s cells cause an increased resistance in the conduction paths of the cell, which in turn cause a change in the internal ohmic values. A measured increase in impedance or resistance, or a decrease in conductance, indicates the battery is losing its ability to produce the energy it was designed to deliver when called upon to support the connected loads. The key to effective application of ohmic testing is the appropriate trending of test results over time compared to a baseline or reference value. Studies have demonstrated that an individual battery produces a unique ohmic "signature" and the use of ohmic testing equipment to trend changes in this signature from installation through the life of the battery is the most effective use of the technology. A program that involves ohmic testing on a regular interval to note changes in the battery is a good maintenance practice. An ohmic baseline reference value is a benchmark value based on data collected from known good batteries. Reference values can be determined from site specific measurement, or from testing a sample of new healthy batteries, or by using a generic baseline value to get started. (1) The best baseline is one established on the installed battery within three to six months after installation and trend accordingly using good record keeping. Ideally the individual ohmic value should be measured at installation and again after the battery has been on float charge for at least 72 hours in order for it to reach a high state of stabilization. These initial site-specific values should be recorded and permanently affixed to the battery as a baseline for subsequent tests over the life of the battery. The ohmic value will typically increase for conductance and decrease for resistance and impedance between the initial installation and after being on float charge for 90 to 180 days (10% to 15% depending on battery type and size). Six months after installation measure and compare the ohmic readings to the readings taken at installation. Use whichever value is greater for conductance or lower for resistance and impedance, as the baseline for that particular battery at that site going forward. (2) A sample of new healthy batteries in a fully charged state can be tested to obtain a baseline value representative of a new battery. A sample size of at least 30 batteries from one manufacturer with the same make, model, amp-hour rating, age (within 6 months), and manufacturing lot is recommended. Record the following information for the batteries: (a) Battery manufacturer (b) Model number (c) Date of manufacture (d) Manufacturing lot number (if available) (e) Battery temperature (f) Has the battery had a freshening charge or not (g) Battery voltage (h) Ohmic test value Calculate the average ohmic value of the batteries. Do not include batteries that deviate more than 30% from the average because they could be outside of an acceptable range. Use the average value as a baseline starting point for this model battery. (3) A generic baseline value for a specific battery model can often be found by contacting the ohmic test equipment manufacturer or from the battery manufacturer. While it is important to note that the use of generic reference values may not be as accurate, it is still possible to identify grossly failed batteries and significant changes in battery condition by applying this method. Generic baseline values are typical averages to be used as general guidelines and should only be used when no other data is available. When testing older batteries for which no initial sitespecific ohmic value is available reference values can be obtained in the following ways: (a) Contact the equipment or battery manufacturer for assistance (b) Consult your company documentation to see if reference values were created for the battery you are testing. (c) Using ohmic readings of recently installed batteries of the same: (d) Manufacturer and model of the battery (e) Manufacturer and model of the alarm panel/system (f) Charging circuit (g) Temperature at time of measurements (h) Calculate an average of the top 8-10 batteries and use this value as a baseline reference As a battery ages and loses capacity, the internal ohmic values change. Although the change may not be perfectly consistent over all battery models and sizes, experience and extensive test data shows that a deviation of ohmic values from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance indicates that the actual battery capacity has dropped to 80% or lower. (For lead-acid batteries, capacity drops off rapidly once the 80% capacity point is reached in the lifetime curve, so this is known as the knee of the capacity vs. lifetime curve). This 80% capacity is the level

30 at which battery manufacturers recommend battery replacement. Figure A (d) illustrates an ohmic trend of a 5-yr design life battery with an actual expected service life of 3 years. Note that while battery Unit #1 still has good ohmic readings, it is desirable to replace both units at the same time. If one unit fails at 1-1/2 yrs, it is likely the second unit will fail in one of the next semiannual tests. Full replacement ensures that all units will float together. One exception would be in the case of infant mortality in which one of the units fails in the first year. FIGURE A (d) Example Ohmic Trend Analysis for a 24 Volt Battery Made Up of Two 12 Volt Units. Semiannual Measurements Show Unit #2 Failing Prematurely. For this Case Both Units Should be Replaced. Ohmic testing can be a safe, simple, accurate, and reliable means of determining the state of health of valve-regulated lead-acid batteries. It is important however to understand some basic guidelines in order to maximize the benefits and avoid possible misleading test results. (1) Follow safety regulations: wear eye protection, remove metal jewelry, etc. prior to working with batteries. (2) Conduct a visual inspection prior to testing. A cracked case, leaking terminal or post, or bulging battery should be replaced, not tested. (3) Temperature changes affect measured ohmic values and battery capacity. Ohmic measurements should be taken at 77 F (25 C), or within +/- 10 F (5 C) of 77 F (25 C). (4) For maximum accuracy and consistency, batteries should be tested when in a fully charged state. (5) Check the battery charging current prior to test. The charging current should be stable and be within the normal float current recommendations of the battery manufacturer for the battery model. If it is not, it is likely that the batteries have recently been discharged and a test is not appropriate until this float current stabilizes. (6) Whenever possible, ohmic readings should be taken each time with the same instrument, but as a minimum with the same model. Changing models will skew the data and require re-establishing the base line. (7) When test equipment is provided with an alert, set the ohmic baseline and/or thresholds prior to beginning the test to provide an indication of any deviations from baseline. (8) It is essential to take ohmic measurements at the battery terminal or post. For consistency and accuracy subsequent tests should always place probes or clamps at the same point while avoiding battery hardware such as bolt heads or washers. Connecting on the hardware will influence the readings and may cause replacement of a healthy battery. (9) Maintain good contact at the test point for the duration of the test. If the probe or clamp slips off during the test an incorrect reading will result. (10) For batteries with fully insulated quick disconnect connectors, the battery may be taken offline by removing the quick disconnects from the battery terminals and then measuring and recording the internal ohmic value of the battery. (11) A battery tested online may display a different value than when tested offline due to the charger circuit and load being across the battery. Always test the same way, either online or offline, to have consistent and meaningful results. (12) Do not condemn a battery based upon results of a single test without any trending data or an established baseline for that specific battery. (13) When one or more units in a battery fall outside the acceptable range from base line, replace the entire string. A Table Item 9. (e) Battery capacity is determined by the mass of active material contained in the battery and is a measure of the battery s stored energy. The rated capacity of small VRLA batteries used in fire system applications is typically measured in ampere-hours (Ah) where the ampere-hour rating is based on the battery s capability to provide a constant current at the nominal battery voltage for twenty hours. The rated capacity may vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. The actual battery capacity during service life can vary significantly from rated capacity due to aging, charging and discharge cycles, temperature, and other factors. The unique failure modes of VRLA batteries due to aging and internal degradation are attributed for a high failure rate where the actual battery capacity has degraded to 80 percent of the manufacturer s rated capacity. As a result, battery manufacturers often recommend replacement much sooner than the rated design life for critical systems. A test of battery capacity is designed to determine if the battery is capable of continuing to deliver the voltage level specified by the manufacturer. The results of a capacity test can also be used to estimate where the battery is in its service life. A test of capacity is performed by applying a continuous load to the battery based on the manufacturer s published discharge rates until voltage falls to specified levels. Although discharging the battery for capacity testing concerns some, VRLA batteries are designed to

31 handle numerous discharges within the limits established by the battery manufacturer. The discharge rate selected for testing should be representative of the duty cycle because at shorter test times the test duration has a greater effect on the capacity calculation. For example, a one minute difference in actual test time for a 5 minute discharge rate compared to a 3 hour discharge rate will result in a greater deviation of the calculated capacity. The battery is also operating less efficiently at shorter discharge rates and the effects of aging and degradation may not be as prevalent during shorter discharges. Fire alarm systems do not typically carry a sufficient load for the practical application of a load test because the battery is sized for a duty cycle consisting of a standby period of 24 hours or more followed by five minutes in an alarm condition. For this reason the panel loading will not likely align with published discharge rates, which is essential for test personnel to easily calculate capacity. In many installations, the fire system loading is inadequate to meet the functional requirements for capacity testing and in these cases a battery near failure could conceivably satisfy the low discharge rate applied by the fire system. scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. Temperature F K T Table A (e) Temperature Correction Factors. In order to satisfy the load test requirements of Table Item 9.(e), battery capacity testing can be performed in the following manner or in accordance with other methods such as those identified in IEEE Standard 1188: (1) Referring to the battery manufacturer s specifications, determine the load current for the 3 hour battery rating to the selected end voltage, typically 1.67 volts per cell (10.2 volts for 12 volt system or 20.4 volts for 24 volt system). (2) Record the battery temperature at the negative terminal. (3) Disconnect the charger and connect a load bank to the battery terminals. (4) Apply the constant current specified for the 3 hour rate to the battery. Once the constant current is applied continue the test until the battery terminal voltage decreases to the specified end voltage. (5) Stop the test when the selected end voltage is reached (6) Record the actual test duration in minutes (7) Disconnect the load bank and reconnect the charger (8) Calculate percent battery capacity as follows: %Capacity = (Tactual/180 x K T) x100 where: Tactual = the test duration in minutes K T = the temperature correction factor for the actual battery temperature at the start of the test from Table A (e). Additional Temperature Correction Factors can be obtained from IEEE (9) Replace the battery if battery capacity is less than or equal to 80%. Replace the battery at the next

32 38 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 172-NFPA [ Section No ]

33 39 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM *

34 40 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Systems and associated equipment shall be tested according to Table Table was revised by tentative interim amendments (TIAs). Table Testing Component Initial Acceptance Periodic Frequency 1. All equipment X See Table Control equipment and transponder 3. (a) Functions X Annually Method Verify correct receipt of alarm, supervisory, and trouble signals (inputs); operation of evacuation signals and auxiliary functions (outputs); circuit supervision, including detection of open circuits and ground faults; and power supply supervision for detection of loss of ac power and disconnection of secondary batteries. (b) Fuses X Annually Verify rating and supervision. (c) Interfaced equipment X Annually Verify integrity of single or multiple circuits providing interface between two or more control units. Test interfaced equipment connections by operating or simulating operation of the equipment being supervised. Verify signals required to be transmitted at the control unit. (d) Lamps and LEDs X Annually Illuminate lamps and LEDs. (e) Primary (main) power supply Fire alarm control unit trouble signals X Annually (a) Audible and visual X Annually (b) Disconnect switches (c) Ground-fault monitoring circuit (d) Transmission of signals to off-premises location X X X Annually Annually Annually Test under maximum load, including all alarm appliances requiring simultaneous operation. Test redundant power supplies separately. Verify operation of control unit trouble signals. Verify ring-back feature for systems using a trouble-silencing switch that requires resetting. If control unit has disconnect or isolating switches, verify performance of intended function of each switch. Verify receipt of trouble signal when a supervised function is disconnected. If the system has a ground detection feature, verify the occurrence of ground-fault indication whenever any installation conductor is grounded. Actuate an initiating device and verify receipt of alarm signal at the off-premises location. Create a trouble condition and verify receipt of a trouble signal at the off-premises location. Actuate a supervisory device and verify receipt of a supervisory signal at the off-premises location. If a transmission carrier is capable of operation under a single- or multiple-fault condition, activate an initiating device during such fault condition and verify receipt of an alarm signal and a trouble signal at the off-premises location.

35 41 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Semiannual Annually Quarterly Annually Quarterly Annually Quarterly Annually Quarterly Annually Component Initial Acceptance Periodic Frequency Method Operate valve and verify signal receipt to be within the first two revolutions of the handwheel or within one-fifth of the travel distance, or per the manufacturer s published instructions. (2) High- or low-air pressure switch X Operate switch and verify receipt of signal is obtained where the required pressure is increased or decreased a maximum 10 psi (70 kpa) from the required pressure level. (3) Room temperature switch X Operate switch and verify receipt of signal to indicate the decrease in room temperature to 40 F (4.4 C) and its restoration to above 40 F (4.4 C). (4) Water level switch X Operate switch and verify receipt of signal indicating the water level raised or lowered a maximum 3 in. (70 mm) from the required level within a pressure tank, or a maximum 12 in. (300 mm) from the required level of a nonpressure tank. Also verify its restoral to required level. (5) Water temperature switch X Operate switch and verify receipt of signal to indicate the decrease in water temperature to 40 F (4.4 C) and its restoration to above 40 F (4.4 C). (k) Mechanical, electrosonic, or pressure-type waterflow device (l) Multi-sensor fire detector or multi-criteria fire detector or combination fire detector X X Semiannually Annually Water shall be flowed through an inspector's test connection indicating the flow of water equal to that from a single sprinkler of the smallest orifice size installed in the system for wet-pipe systems, or an alarm test bypass connection for dry-pipe, pre-action, or deluge systems in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems. Test each of the detection principles present within the detector (e.g., smoke/heat/co, etc.) independently for the specific detection principle, regardless of the configuration status at the time of testing. Also test each detector in accordance with the published manufacturer's instructions. Test individual sensors together if the technology allows individual sensor responses to be verified. Perform tests as described for the respective devices by introduction of the physical phenomena to the sensing chamber of element. An electronic check (magnets, analog values, etc.) is not sufficient to comply with this requirement.

36 42 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM 18. Special hazard equipment (a) Abort switch (dead-man type) (b) Abort switch (recycle type) (c) Abort switch (special type) (d) Cross-zone detection circuit X X X X Annually Annually Annually Annually (e) Matrix-type circuit X Annually (f) Release solenoid Verify by using the detector manufacturer's published instructions that the test gas used will not impair the operation of either sensing chamber of a multisensor, multicriteria, or combination fire detector. Confirm the result of each sensor test through indication at the detector or control unit. Where individual sensors cannot be tested individually, test the primary sensor. j Record all tests and results. Operate abort switch and verify correct sequence and operation. Operate abort switch and verify development of correct matrix with each sensor operated. Operate abort switch and verify correct sequence and operation in accordance with authority having jurisdiction. Observe sequencing as specified on as-built drawings or in system owner s manual. Operate one sensor or detector on each zone. Verify occurrence of correct sequence with operation of first zone and then with operation of second zone. Operate all sensors in system. Verify development of correct matrix with each sensor operated. circuit k X Annually Verify operation of solenoid. (g) Squibb release circuit X Annually (h) Verified, sequential, or counting zone circuit (i) All above devices or circuits or combinations thereof 19. Combination systems (a) Fire extinguisher electronic monitoring device/system (b) Carbon monoxide l device/system X X X X Annually Annually Annually Annually 20. Interface equipment m X See Use AGI flashbulb or other test light approved by the manufacturer. Verify operation of flashbulb or light. Operate required sensors at a minimum of four locations in circuit. Verify correct sequence with both the first and second detector in alarm. Verify supervision of circuits by creating an open circuit. Test communication between the device connecting the fire extinguisher electronic monitoring device/system and the fire alarm control unit to ensure proper signals are received at the fire alarm control unit and remote annunciator(s) if applicable. Test communication between the device connecting the carbon monoxide device/system and the fire alarm control unit to ensure proper signals are received at the fire alarm control unit and remote annunciator(s) if applicable. Test interface equipment connections by operating or simulating the equipment being supervised. Verify signals required to be transmitted are received at the control unit. Test

37 43 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM 21. Guard s tour equipment X Annually 22. Alarm notification appliances (a) Audible n X N/A frequency for interface equipment is the same as the frequency required by the applicable NFPA standard(s) for the equipment being supervised. Test the device in accordance with the manufacturer s published instructions. For initial and reacceptance testing, measure sound pressure levels for signals with a sound level meter meeting ANSI S1.4a, Specifications for Sound Level Meters, Type 2 requirements. Measure sound pressure levels throughout the protected area to confirm that they are in compliance with Chapter 18. Set the sound level meter in accordance with ANSI S3.41, American National Standard Audible Evacuation Signal, using the time-weighted characteristic F (FAST). N/A Annually o For periodic testing, verify the operation of the notification appliances. (b) Audible textual notification appliances (speakers and other appliances to convey voice messages) X N/A For initial and reacceptance testing, measure sound pressure levels for signals with a sound level meter meeting ANSI S1.4a, Specifications for Sound Level Meters, Type 2 requirements. Measure sound pressure levels throughout the protected area to confirm that they are in compliance with Chapter 18. Set the sound level meter in accordance with ANSI S3.41, American National Standard Audible Evacuation Signal, using the time-weighted characteristic F (FAST). Verify audible information to be distinguishable and understandable and in compliance with N/A Annually (c) Visible X N/A Exit marking audible notification appliance N/A X Annually Annually Emergency control functions p X Annually o For periodic testing, verify the operation of the notification appliances. Perform initial and reacceptance testing in accordance with the manufacturer s published instructions. Verify appliance locations to be per approved layout and confirm that no floor plan changes affect the approved layout. Verify that the candela rating marking agrees with the approved drawing. Confirm that each appliance flashes. For periodic testing, verify that each appliance flashes. Perform tests in accordance with manufacturer's published instructions. For initial, reacceptance, and periodic testing, verify emergency control function interface device activation. Where an emergency control function interface device is disabled or disconnected during initiating device testing, verify that the disabled or disconnected emergency control function interface device has

38 44 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM 25. Area of refuge two-way communication system 26. Special procedures 27. X Annually (a) Alarm verification X Annually (b) Multiplex systems X Annually Supervising station alarm systems receiving equipment (a) All equipment X Monthly been properly restored. [ Use the manufacturer s published instructions and the as-built drawings provided by the system supplier to verify correct operation after the initial testing phase has been performed by the supplier or by the supplier s designated representative. Test the two-way communication system to verify operation and receipt of visual and audible signals at the transmitting unit and the receiving unit, respectively. Operate systems with more than five stations with a minimum of five stations operating simultaneously. Verify voice quality and clarity. Verify directions for the use of the two-way communication system, instructions for summoning assistance via the two-way communication system, and written identification of the location is posted adjacent to the two-way communication system. Verify that all remote stations are readily accessible. Verify the timed automatic communications capability to connect with a constantly attended monitoring location per Verify time delay and alarm response for smoke detector circuits identified as having alarm verification. Verify communications between sending and receiving units under both primary and secondary power. Verify communications between sending and receiving units under open-circuit and shortcircuit trouble conditions. Verify communications between sending and receiving units in all directions where multiple communications pathways are provided. If redundant central control equipment is provided, verify switchover and all required functions and operations of secondary control equipment. Verify all system functions and features in accordance with manufacturer s published instructions. Perform tests on all system functions and features in accordance with the equipment manufacturer s published instructions for correct operation in conformance with the applicable sections of Chapter 26.

39 45 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (b) Digital alarm communicator receiver (DACR) (c) Digital alarm radio receiver (DARR) X X Monthly Monthly (d) McCulloh systems X Monthly (e) Radio alarm supervising station receiver (RASSR) and radio alarm repeater station receiver (RARSR) X Monthly Actuate initiating device and verify receipt of the correct initiating device signal at the supervising station within 90 seconds. Upon completion of the test, restore the system to its functional operating condition. If test jacks are used, perform the first and last tests without the use of the test jack. Disconnect each transmission means in turn from the DACR, and verify audible and visual annunciation of a trouble signal in the supervising station. Cause a signal to be transmitted on each individual incoming DACR line (path) at least once every 6 hours (24 hours for DACTs installed prior to adoption of the 2013 edition of NFPA 72 ). Verify receipt of these signals. Cause the following conditions of all DARRs on all subsidiary and repeater station receiving equipment. Verify receipt at the supervising station of correct signals for each of the following conditions: (1) AC power failure of the radio equipment (2) Receiver malfunction (3) Antenna and interconnecting cable failure (4) Indication of automatic switchover of the DARR (5) Data transmission line failure between the DARR and the supervising or subsidiary station Test and record the current on each circuit at each supervising and subsidiary station under the following conditions: (1) During functional operation (2) On each side of the circuit with the receiving equipment conditioned for an open circuit Cause a single break or ground condition on each transmission channel. If such a fault prevents the functioning of the circuit, verify receipt of a trouble signal. Cause each of the following conditions at each of the supervising or subsidiary stations and all repeater station radio transmitting and receiving equipment; verify receipt of correct signals at the supervising station: (1) RF transmitter in use (radiating) (2) AC power failure supplying the radio equipment (3) RF receiver malfunction (4) Indication of automatic switchover Cause each of the following conditions at each of the supervising or subsidiary stations and all repeater station radio transmitting and receiving equipment; verify receipt of correct signals at the supervising station: (1) AC power failure supplying the radio equipment

40 46 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (f) Private microwave radio systems (g) Performance-based technologies Public emergency alarm reporting system transmission equipment (a) Publicly accessible alarm box X X X Monthly Monthly Semiannually (b) Auxiliary box X Annually (c) Master box (2) RF receiver malfunction (3) Indication of automatic switchover, if applicable Cause each of the following conditions at each of the supervising or subsidiary stations and all repeater station radio transmitting and receiving equipment; verify receipt of correct signals at the supervising station: (1) RF transmitter in use (radiating) (2) AC power failure supplying the radio equipment (3) RF receiver malfunction (4) Indication of automatic switchover Perform tests to ensure the monitoring of integrity of the transmission technology and technology path. Where a single communications path is used, disconnect the communication path. Verify that failure of the path is annunciated at the supervising station within 60 minutes of the failure (within 5 minutes for communication equipment installed prior to adoption of the 2013 edition of NFPA 72 ). Restore the communication path. Where multiple communication paths are used, disconnect both communication paths and confirm that failure of the path is annunciated at the supervising station within not more than 6 hours of the failure (within 24 hours for communication equipment installed prior to adoption of the 2013 edition of NFPA 72 ). Restore both communication paths. Actuate publicly accessible initiating device(s) and verify receipt of not less than three complete rounds of signal impulses. Perform this test under normal circuit conditions. If the device is equipped for open circuit operation (ground return), test it in this condition as one of the semiannual tests. Test each initiating circuit of the auxiliary box by actuation of a protected premises initiating device connected to that circuit. Verify receipt of not less than three complete rounds of signal impulses. (1) Manual operation X Semiannually Perform the tests prescribed for 28(a). (2) Auxiliary operation X Annually Perform the tests prescribed for 28(b). Low-power radio (wireless systems) X N/A The following procedures describe additional acceptance and reacceptance test methods to verify wireless protection system operation: (1) Use the manufacturer s published instructions and the as-built drawings provided by the system supplier to verify correct operation after the initial testing phase has

41 47 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM 30. Mass notification systems (a) Functions X Annually been performed by the supplier or by the supplier s designated representative. (2) Starting from the functional operating condition, initialize the system in accordance with the manufacturer s published instructions. Confirm the alternative communications path exists between the wireless control unit and peripheral devices used to establish initiation, indication, control, and annunciation. Test the system for both alarm and trouble conditions. (3) Check batteries for all components in the system monthly unless the control unit checks all batteries and all components daily. At a minimum, test control equipment to verify correct receipt of alarm, supervisory, and trouble signals (inputs); operation of evacuation signals and auxiliary functions (outputs); circuit supervision, including detection of open circuits and ground faults; and power supply supervision for detection of loss of ac power and disconnection of secondary batteries. (b) Fuses X Annually Verify the rating and supervision. (c) Interfaced equipment X Annually Verify integrity of single or multiple circuits providing interface between two or more control units. Test interfaced equipment connections by operating or simulating operation of the equipment being supervised. Verify signals required to be transmitted at the control unit. (d) Lamps and LEDs X Annually Illuminate lamps and LEDs. (e) Primary (main) power supply (f) Audible textual notification appliances (speakers and other appliances to convey voice messages) X X Annually Annually (g) Visible X Annually Disconnect all secondary (standby) power and test under maximum load, including all alarm appliances requiring simultaneous operation. Reconnect all secondary (standby) power at end of test. For redundant power supplies, test each separately. Measure sound pressure level with a sound level meter meeting ANSI S1.4a, Specifications for Sound Level Meters, Type 2 requirements. Measure and record levels throughout protected area. Set the sound level meter in accordance with ANSI S3.41, American National Standard Audible Evacuation Signal, using the time-weighted characteristic F (FAST). Record the maximum output when the audible emergency evacuation signal is on. Verify audible information to be distinguishable and understandable. Perform test in accordance with manufacturer s published instructions. Verify appliance locations to be per approved layout and confirm that no floor plan changes affect the approved layout. Verify that the candela rating marking agrees with the approved drawing. Confirm that each appliance flashes.

42 48 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (h) Control unit functions and no diagnostic failures are indicated X Annually (i) Control unit reset X Annually (j) Control unit security X Annually (k) Audible/visible functional test X Annually (l) Software backup X Annually (m) Secondary power test X Annually (n) Wireless signals X Annually (o) Antenna X Annually (p) Transceivers X Annually Review event log file and verify that the correct events were logged. Review system diagnostic log file; correct deficiencies noted in file. Delete unneeded log files. Delete unneeded error files. Verify that sufficient free disk space is available. Verify unobstructed flow of cooling air is available. Change/clean filters, cooling fans, and intake vents. Power down the central control unit computer and restart it. If remote control software is loaded onto the system, verify that it is disabled to prevent unauthorized system access. Send out an alert to a diverse set of predesignated receiving devices and confirm receipt. Include at least one of each type of receiving device. Make full system software backup. Rotate backups based on accepted practice at site. Disconnect ac power. Verify the ac power failure alarm status on central control equipment. With ac power disconnected, verify battery voltage under load. Check forward/reflected radio power is within specifications. Check forward/reflected radio power is within specifications. Verify solid electrical connections with no observable corrosion. Verify proper operation and mounting is not compromised. a Some transmission equipment (such as but not limited to cable modems, fiber-optic interface nodes, and VoIP interfaces) are typically powered by the building's electrical system using a secondary (standby) power supply that does not meet the requirements of this Code. This is intended to ensure that the testing authority verifies full secondary (standby) power as required by Chapter 10. Additionally, refer to Table , items 7 through 9, for secondary (standby) power supply testing. b The automatic transmission of the check-in (handshake) signal can take up to 60 minutes to occur. c See Table , Item 4(a) for the testing of transmission equipment. d Example: 4000 mah 1 25 = 160 ma charging current at 77 F (25 C). e The voltmeter sensitivity has been changed from 1000 ohms per volt to 100 ohms per volt so that the false ground readings (caused by induced voltages) are minimized. f Initiating devices such as smoke detectors used for elevator recall, closing dampers, or releasing doors held in the open position that are permitted by the Code (see NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 9.6.3) to initiate supervisory signals at the fire alarm control unit (FACU) should be tested at the same frequency (annual) as those devices when they are generating an alarm signal. They are not supervisory devices, but they initiate a supervisory signal at the FACU. g Fusible thermal link detectors are commonly used to close fire doors and fire dampers. They are actuated by the presence of external heat, which causes a solder element in the link to fuse, or by an electric thermal device, which, when energized, generates heat within the body of the link, causing the link to fuse and separate. h Note, it is customary for the manufacturer of the smoke detector to test a particular product from an aerosol provider to determine acceptability for use in smoke entry testing of their smoke detector/ smoke

43 49 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM alarm. Magnets are not acceptable for smoke entry tests. i There are some detectors that use magnets as a manufacturer's calibrated sensitivity test instrument. j For example, it might not be possible to individually test the heat sensor in a thermally enhanced smoke detector. k Manufacturer's instructions should be consulted to ensure a proper operational test. No suppression gas or agent is expected to be discharged during the test of the solenoid. See Test Plan of l Testing of CO device should be done to the requirements of NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and Warning Equipment. m A monitor module installed on an interface device is not considered a supervisory device and therefore not subject to the quarterly testing frequency requirement. Test frequencies for interface devices should be in accordance with the applicable standard. For example, fire pump controller alarms such as phase reversal are required to be tested annually. If a monitor module is installed to identify phase reversal on the fire alarm control panel, it is not necessary to test for phase reversal four times a year. n Chapter 18 would require 15 db over average ambient sound for public mode spaces. Sometimes the ambient sound levels are different from what the design was based upon. Private operating mode would require 10 db over average ambient at the location of the device. o Where building, system, or occupancy changes have been observed, the owner should be notified of the changes. New devices might need to be installed and tested per the initial acceptance testing criteria. p See A , and Table , Item 24. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Given the supervisory function of these initiating devices, we are notified of a problem and they are serviced/repaired should any issue develop during the course of the testing interval. The more frequent testing intervals were apparently established by anecdotal assumptions and without recoverable scientific documentation. Other system components of equivalent importance to system operations are permitted to utilize an annual test frequency. Related Item First Revision No. 302-NFPA [Global Input] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CRAIG GRANT Organization: ILLINOIS UNIV OF Code Compliance and Fire Safety Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 15:46:14 EDT 2014

44 1 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 18-NFPA [ Section No ]

45 8 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM VoIP interfaces) are typically powered by the building's electrical system using a secondary (standby) power supply that does not meet the requirements of this Code. This is intended to ensure that the testing authority verifies full secondary (standby) power as required by Chapter 10. Additionally, refer to Table , items 7 through 9, for secondary (standby) power supply testing. b The automatic transmission of the check-in (handshake) signal can take up to 60 minutes to occur. c See Table , Item 4(a) for the testing of transmission equipment. d Example: 4000 mah 1 25 = 160 ma charging current at 77 F (25 C). e The voltmeter sensitivity has been changed from 1000 ohms per volt to 100 ohms per volt so that the false ground readings (caused by induced voltages) are minimized. f Initiating devices such as smoke detectors used for elevator recall, closing dampers, or releasing doors held in the open position that are permitted by the Code (see NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 9.6.3) to initiate supervisory signals at the fire alarm control unit (FACU) should be tested at the same frequency (annual) as those devices when they are generating an alarm signal. They are not supervisory devices, but they initiate a supervisory signal at the FACU. g Fusible thermal link detectors are commonly used to close fire doors and fire dampers. They are actuated by the presence of external heat, which causes a solder element in the link to fuse, or by an electric thermal device, which, when energized, generates heat within the body of the link, causing the link to fuse and separate. h Note, it is customary for the manufacturer of the smoke detector to test a particular product from an aerosol provider to determine acceptability for use in smoke entry testing of their smoke detector/ smoke alarm. Magnets are not acceptable for smoke entry tests. i There are some detectors that use magnets as a manufacturer's calibrated sensitivity test instrument. j For example, it might not be possible to individually test the heat sensor in a thermally enhanced smoke detector. k Manufacturer's instructions should be consulted to ensure a proper operational test. No suppression gas or agent is expected to be discharged during the test of the solenoid. See Test Plan of l Testing of CO device should be done to the requirements of NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and Warning Equipment. m A monitor module installed on an interface device is not considered a supervisory device and therefore not subject to the quarterly testing frequency requirement. Test frequencies for interface devices should be in accordance with the applicable standard. For example, fire pump controller alarms such as phase reversal are required to be tested annually. If a monitor module is installed to identify phase reversal on the fire alarm control panel, it is not necessary to test for phase reversal four times a year. n Chapter 18 would require 15 db over average ambient sound for public mode spaces. Sometimes the ambient sound levels are different from what the design was based upon. Private operating mode would require 10 db over average ambient at the location of the device. o Where building, system, or occupancy changes have been observed, the owner should be notified of the changes. New devices might need to be installed and tested per the initial acceptance testing criteria. p See A , and Table , Item 24. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Item 7. of Table requires a loading of the fire alarm panel batteries. SIG-TMS should review Item 7 as it potentially impacts test reults when perfoming battery tests under Item 9. In addition Battery Task Team recommendations for Items 9. (c) (3) and (4) may also be applicable. Related Item Public Input No. 602-NFPA [Section No ]

46 9 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Input No. 575-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Herbert Hurst Organization: Savannah River Nuclear Solutio Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Mar 19 14:59:13 EDT 2014

47 Testing Component 9. VRLA Battery and Charger r Initial Acceptance Periodic Frequency Method Prior to conducting any battery testing, verify by the person conducting the test, that all system software stored in volatile memory is protected from loss. (a) Temperature test X Semiannually Upon initially opening the cabinet door, measure and record the temperature of each battery cell/unit at the negative terminal with an infrared thermometer. Replace any battery cell/unit if the temperature is greater than 18 F (10 C) above ambient. (b) Charger test s X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage across the battery with a voltmeter. Verify the voltage is within the battery/alarm equipment manufacturer s recommendations. If the voltage is outside of the specified limits, either adjust the charger to within limits or replace the charger. (c) Cell/Unit voltage test X Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the voltage of each cell/unit. Replace the battery when any cell/unit measures a voltage less than volts. (d) Ohmic test t X When the battery is installed, establish a baseline ohmic value for each battery cell/unit or where available use baseline ohmic values provided by the battery or test equipment manufacturer. In either case record the base line ohmic value on each battery cell/unit. Semiannually With the battery fully charged and connected to the charger, measure the internal ohmic value of each battery cell/unit. Record the test date and ohmic value on each cell/unit. Replace the battery when the ohmic measurement of any cell/unit deviates from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance. Where the battery or test equipment manufacturer s baseline ohmic values are used, replace the battery when any cell/unit has an internal ohmic value outside of the acceptable range. (e) Replacement/ Load test u 3 years Replace the battery or conduct a load test of the battery capacity. Load test the battery based on the manufacturer s specifications for a discharge rate of 3 hours or more by applying the current indicated for the selected hourly discharge rate continuously, until the terminal voltage decreases to the end voltage specified by the manufacturer. Record the test duration and calculate the battery capacity including adjustment for ambient temperature. Replace the battery if capacity is less than or equal to 80% or at the next scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. q For other than Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) or Primary (dry cell) batteries, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. r The battery tests in Table Item 9 are based on Valve-Regulated-Lead-Acid (VRLA) batteries. For other secondary battery types, refer to the battery manufacturer s instructions or the appropriate IEEE standard. s If the charger is adjustable, adjust the output voltage to volts per cell ±0.015 volts at 77 F (25 C) or as specified by the equipment manufacturer. t See A Item 9. (d). u See A Item 9. (e).

48 A Table Item 9.(d) Ohmic testing is a means to determine the state-of-health of a Valve- Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) battery s cells by measuring some form of a cell s internal resistance. Typically ohmic testing equipment use one of three techniques, conductance, impedance, or resistance, to make these measurements. In simplest technical terms, ohmic technology is based on Ohm s Law, which expresses the relationship between volts, amperes, and ohms in an electrical circuit. Ohmic testing attempts to use voltage and current to determine the resistive characteristic of a battery s cells. As the cells in a battery age and start to lose capacity, the internal components of the battery are undergoing a degradation process. The degradation of these components (plates, grids, internal connection straps) within the battery s cells cause an increased resistance in the conduction paths of the cell, which in turn cause a change in the internal ohmic values. A measured increase in impedance or resistance, or a decrease in conductance, indicates the battery is losing its ability to produce the energy it was designed to deliver when called upon to support the connected loads. The key to effective application of ohmic testing is the appropriate trending of test results over time compared to a baseline or reference value. Studies have demonstrated that an individual battery produces a unique ohmic "signature" and the use of ohmic testing equipment to trend changes in this signature from installation through the life of the battery is the most effective use of the technology. A program that involves ohmic testing on a regular interval to note changes in the battery is a good maintenance practice. An ohmic baseline reference value is a benchmark value based on data collected from known good batteries. Reference values can be determined from site specific measurement, or from testing a sample of new healthy batteries, or by using a generic baseline value to get started. (1) The best baseline is one established on the installed battery within three to six months after installation and trend accordingly using good record keeping. Ideally the individual ohmic value should be measured at installation and again after the battery has been on float charge for at least 72 hours in order for it to reach a high state of stabilization. These initial site-specific values should be recorded and permanently affixed to the battery as a baseline for subsequent tests over the life of the battery. The ohmic value will typically increase for conductance and decrease for resistance and impedance between the initial installation and after being on float charge for 90 to 180 days (10% to 15% depending on battery type and size). Six months after installation measure and compare the ohmic readings to the readings taken at installation. Use whichever value is greater for conductance or lower for resistance and impedance, as the baseline for that particular battery at that site going forward. (2) A sample of new healthy batteries in a fully charged state can be tested to obtain a baseline value representative of a new battery. A sample size of at least 30 batteries from one manufacturer with the same make, model, amp-hour rating, age (within 6 months), and manufacturing lot is recommended. Record the following information for the batteries: (a) Battery manufacturer (b) Model number (c) Date of manufacture (d) Manufacturing lot number (if available) (e) Battery temperature (f) Has the battery had a freshening charge or not (g) Battery voltage (h) Ohmic test value Calculate the average ohmic value of the batteries. Do not include batteries that deviate more than 30% from the average because they could be outside of an acceptable range. Use the average value as a baseline starting point for this model battery. (3) A generic baseline value for a specific battery model can often be found by contacting the ohmic test equipment manufacturer or from the battery manufacturer. While it is important to note that the use of generic reference values may not be as accurate, it is still possible to identify grossly failed batteries and significant changes in battery condition by applying this method. Generic baseline values are typical averages to be used as general guidelines and should only be used when no other data is available. When testing older batteries for which no initial sitespecific ohmic value is available reference values can be obtained in the following ways: (a) Contact the equipment or battery manufacturer for assistance (b) Consult your company documentation to see if reference values were created for the battery you are testing. (c) Using ohmic readings of recently installed batteries of the same: (d) Manufacturer and model of the battery (e) Manufacturer and model of the alarm panel/system (f) Charging circuit (g) Temperature at time of measurements (h) Calculate an average of the top 8-10 batteries and use this value as a baseline reference As a battery ages and loses capacity, the internal ohmic values change. Although the change may not be perfectly consistent over all battery models and sizes, experience and extensive test data shows that a deviation of ohmic values from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance indicates that the actual battery capacity has dropped to 80% or lower. (For lead-acid batteries, capacity drops off rapidly once the 80% capacity point is reached in the lifetime curve, so this is known as the knee of the capacity vs. lifetime curve). This 80% capacity is the level

49 at which battery manufacturers recommend battery replacement. Figure A (d) illustrates an ohmic trend of a 5-yr design life battery with an actual expected service life of 3 years. Note that while battery Unit #1 still has good ohmic readings, it is desirable to replace both units at the same time. If one unit fails at 1-1/2 yrs, it is likely the second unit will fail in one of the next semiannual tests. Full replacement ensures that all units will float together. One exception would be in the case of infant mortality in which one of the units fails in the first year. FIGURE A (d) Example Ohmic Trend Analysis for a 24 Volt Battery Made Up of Two 12 Volt Units. Semiannual Measurements Show Unit #2 Failing Prematurely. For this Case Both Units Should be Replaced. Ohmic testing can be a safe, simple, accurate, and reliable means of determining the state of health of valve-regulated lead-acid batteries. It is important however to understand some basic guidelines in order to maximize the benefits and avoid possible misleading test results. (1) Follow safety regulations: wear eye protection, remove metal jewelry, etc. prior to working with batteries. (2) Conduct a visual inspection prior to testing. A cracked case, leaking terminal or post, or bulging battery should be replaced, not tested. (3) Temperature changes affect measured ohmic values and battery capacity. Ohmic measurements should be taken at 77 F (25 C), or within +/- 10 F (5 C) of 77 F (25 C). (4) For maximum accuracy and consistency, batteries should be tested when in a fully charged state. (5) Check the battery charging current prior to test. The charging current should be stable and be within the normal float current recommendations of the battery manufacturer for the battery model. If it is not, it is likely that the batteries have recently been discharged and a test is not appropriate until this float current stabilizes. (6) Whenever possible, ohmic readings should be taken each time with the same instrument, but as a minimum with the same model. Changing models will skew the data and require re-establishing the base line. (7) When test equipment is provided with an alert, set the ohmic baseline and/or thresholds prior to beginning the test to provide an indication of any deviations from baseline. (8) It is essential to take ohmic measurements at the battery terminal or post. For consistency and accuracy subsequent tests should always place probes or clamps at the same point while avoiding battery hardware such as bolt heads or washers. Connecting on the hardware will influence the readings and may cause replacement of a healthy battery. (9) Maintain good contact at the test point for the duration of the test. If the probe or clamp slips off during the test an incorrect reading will result. (10) For batteries with fully insulated quick disconnect connectors, the battery may be taken offline by removing the quick disconnects from the battery terminals and then measuring and recording the internal ohmic value of the battery. (11) A battery tested online may display a different value than when tested offline due to the charger circuit and load being across the battery. Always test the same way, either online or offline, to have consistent and meaningful results. (12) Do not condemn a battery based upon results of a single test without any trending data or an established baseline for that specific battery. (13) When one or more units in a battery fall outside the acceptable range from base line, replace the entire string. A Table Item 9. (e) Battery capacity is determined by the mass of active material contained in the battery and is a measure of the battery s stored energy. The rated capacity of small VRLA batteries used in fire system applications is typically measured in ampere-hours (Ah) where the ampere-hour rating is based on the battery s capability to provide a constant current at the nominal battery voltage for twenty hours. The rated capacity may vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. The actual battery capacity during service life can vary significantly from rated capacity due to aging, charging and discharge cycles, temperature, and other factors. The unique failure modes of VRLA batteries due to aging and internal degradation are attributed for a high failure rate where the actual battery capacity has degraded to 80 percent of the manufacturer s rated capacity. As a result, battery manufacturers often recommend replacement much sooner than the rated design life for critical systems. A test of battery capacity is designed to determine if the battery is capable of continuing to deliver the voltage level specified by the manufacturer. The results of a capacity test can also be used to estimate where the battery is in its service life. A test of capacity is performed by applying a continuous load to the battery based on the manufacturer s published discharge rates until voltage falls to specified levels. Although discharging the battery for capacity testing concerns some, VRLA batteries are designed to

50 handle numerous discharges within the limits established by the battery manufacturer. The discharge rate selected for testing should be representative of the duty cycle because at shorter test times the test duration has a greater effect on the capacity calculation. For example, a one minute difference in actual test time for a 5 minute discharge rate compared to a 3 hour discharge rate will result in a greater deviation of the calculated capacity. The battery is also operating less efficiently at shorter discharge rates and the effects of aging and degradation may not be as prevalent during shorter discharges. Fire alarm systems do not typically carry a sufficient load for the practical application of a load test because the battery is sized for a duty cycle consisting of a standby period of 24 hours or more followed by five minutes in an alarm condition. For this reason the panel loading will not likely align with published discharge rates, which is essential for test personnel to easily calculate capacity. In many installations, the fire system loading is inadequate to meet the functional requirements for capacity testing and in these cases a battery near failure could conceivably satisfy the low discharge rate applied by the fire system. scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. Temperature F K T Table A (e) Temperature Correction Factors. In order to satisfy the load test requirements of Table Item 9.(e), battery capacity testing can be performed in the following manner or in accordance with other methods such as those identified in IEEE Standard 1188: (1) Referring to the battery manufacturer s specifications, determine the load current for the 3 hour battery rating to the selected end voltage, typically 1.67 volts per cell (10.2 volts for 12 volt system or 20.4 volts for 24 volt system). (2) Record the battery temperature at the negative terminal. (3) Disconnect the charger and connect a load bank to the battery terminals. (4) Apply the constant current specified for the 3 hour rate to the battery. Once the constant current is applied continue the test until the battery terminal voltage decreases to the specified end voltage. (5) Stop the test when the selected end voltage is reached (6) Record the actual test duration in minutes (7) Disconnect the load bank and reconnect the charger (8) Calculate percent battery capacity as follows: %Capacity = (Tactual/180 x K T ) x100 where: Tactual = the test duration in minutes K T = the temperature correction factor for the actual battery temperature at the start of the test from Table A (e). Additional Temperature Correction Factors can be obtained from IEEE (9) Replace the battery if battery capacity is less than or equal to 80%. Replace the battery at the next

51 32 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 167-NFPA [ New Section after A ] A Table Item 9.(d) Ohmic testing is a means to determine the state-of-health of a Valve-Regulated Lead-Acid (VRLA) battery s cells by measuring some form of a cell s internal resistance. Typically ohmic testing equipment use one of three techniques, conductance, impedance, or resistance, to make these measurements. In simplest technical terms, ohmic technology is based on Ohm s Law, which expresses the relationship between volts, amperes, and ohms in an electrical circuit. Ohmic testing attempts to use voltage and current to determine the resistive characteristic of a battery s cells. As the cells in a battery age and start to lose capacity, the internal components of the battery are undergoing a degradation process. The degradation of these components (plates, grids, internal connection straps) within the battery s cells cause an increased resistance in the conduction paths of the cell, which in turn cause a change in the internal ohmic values. A measured increase in impedance or resistance, or a decrease in conductance, indicates the battery is losing its ability to produce the energy it was designed to deliver when called upon to support the connected loads. The key to effective application of ohmic testing is the appropriate trending of test results over time compared to a baseline or reference value. Studies have demonstrated that an individual battery produces a unique ohmic "signature" and the use of ohmic testing equipment to trend changes in this signature from installation through the life of the battery is the most effective use of the technology. A program that involves ohmic testing on a regular interval to note changes in the battery is a good maintenance practice. An ohmic baseline reference value is a benchmark value based on data collected from known good batteries. Reference values can be determined from site specific measurement, or from testing a sample of new healthy batteries, or by using a generic baseline value to get started. (1) The best baseline is one established on the installed battery within three to six months after installation and trend accordingly using good record keeping. Ideally the individual ohmic value should be measured at installation and again after the battery has been on float charge for at least 72 hours in order for it to reach a high state of stabilization. These initial site-specific values should be recorded and permanently affixed to the battery as a baseline for subsequent tests over the life of the battery. The ohmic value will typically increase for conductance and decrease for resistance and impedance between the initial installation and after being on float charge for 90 to 180 days (10% to 15% depending on battery type and size). Six months after installation measure and compare the ohmic readings to the readings taken at installation. Use whichever value is greater for conductance or lower for resistance and impedance, as the baseline for that particular battery at that site going forward. (2) A sample of new healthy batteries in a fully charged state can be tested to obtain a baseline value representative of a new battery. A sample size of at least 30 batteries from one manufacturer with the same make, model, amp-hour rating, age (within 6 months), and manufacturing lot is recommended. Record the following information for the batteries: (a) Battery manufacturer (b) Model number (c) Date of manufacture (d) Manufacturing lot number (if available) (e) Battery temperature (f) Has the battery had a freshening charge or not (g) Battery voltage (h) Ohmic test value Calculate the average ohmic value of the batteries. Do not include batteries that deviate more than 30% from the average because they could be outside of an acceptable range. Use the average value as a baseline starting point for this model battery.

52 33 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (3) A generic baseline value for a specific battery model can often be found by contacting the ohmic test equipment manufacturer or from the battery manufacturer. While it is important to note that the use of generic reference values may not be as accurate, it is still possible to identify grossly failed batteries and significant changes in battery condition by applying this method. Generic baseline values are typical averages to be used as general guidelines and should only be used when no other data is available. When testing older batteries for which no initial site-specific ohmic value is available reference values can be obtained in the following ways: (a) Contact the equipment or battery manufacturer for assistance (b) Consult your company documentation to see if reference values were created for the battery you are testing. (c) Using ohmic readings of recently installed batteries of the same: (d) Manufacturer and model of the battery (e) Manufacturer and model of the alarm panel/system (f) Charging circuit (g) Temperature at time of measurements (h) Calculate an average of the top 8-10 batteries and use this value as a baseline reference As a battery ages and loses capacity, the internal ohmic values change. Although the change may not be perfectly consistent over all battery models and sizes, experience and extensive test data shows that a deviation of ohmic values from the established baseline by 30% or more for conductance and 40% or more for resistance or impedance indicates that the actual battery capacity has dropped to 80% or lower. (For lead-acid batteries, capacity drops off rapidly once the 80% capacity point is reached in the lifetime curve, so this is known as the knee of the capacity vs. lifetime curve). This 80% capacity is the level at which battery manufacturers recommend battery replacement. Figure A (d) illustrates an ohmic trend of a 5-yr design life battery with an actual expected service life of 3 years. Note that while battery Unit #1 still has good ohmic readings, it is desirable to replace both units at the same time. If one unit fails at 1-1/2 yrs, it is likely the second unit will fail in one of the next semiannual tests. Full replacement ensures that all units will float together. One exception would be in the case of infant mortality in which one of the units fails in the first year. FIGURE A (d) Example Ohmic Trend Analysis for a 24 Volt Battery Made Up of Two 12 Volt Units. Semiannual Measurements Show Unit #2 Failing Prematurely. For this Case Both Units Should be Replaced. Ohmic testing can be a safe, simple, accurate, and reliable means of determining the state of health of valve-regulated lead-acid batteries. It is important however to understand some basic guidelines in order to maximize the benefits and avoid possible misleading test results. (1) Follow safety regulations: wear eye protection, remove metal jewelry, etc. prior to working with batteries. (2) Conduct a visual inspection prior to testing. A cracked case, leaking terminal or post, or bulging battery should be replaced, not tested. (3) Temperature changes affect measured ohmic values and battery capacity. Ohmic measurements should be taken at 77 F (25 C), or within /- 10 F (5 C) of 77 F (25 C). (4) For maximum accuracy and consistency, batteries should be tested when in a fully charged state. (5) Check the battery charging current prior to test. The charging current should be stable and be within the normal float current recommendations of the battery manufacturer for the battery model. If it is not, it is likely that the batteries have recently been discharged and a test is not appropriate until this float current stabilizes. (6) Whenever possible, ohmic readings should be taken each time with the same instrument, but as a minimum with the same model. Changing models will skew the data and require re-establishing the base line. (7) When test equipment is provided with an alert, set the ohmic baseline and/or thresholds prior to beginning the test to provide an indication of any deviations from baseline.

53 34 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM (8) It is essential to take ohmic measurements at the battery terminal or post. For consistency and accuracy subsequent tests should always place probes or clamps at the same point while avoiding battery hardware such as bolt heads or washers. Connecting on the hardware will influence the readings and may cause replacement of a healthy battery. (9) Maintain good contact at the test point for the duration of the test. If the probe or clamp slips off during the test an incorrect reading will result. (10) For batteries with fully insulated quick disconnect connectors, the battery may be taken offline by removing the quick disconnects from the battery terminals and then measuring and recording the internal ohmic value of the battery. (11) A battery tested online may display a different value than when tested offline due to the charger circuit and load being across the battery. Always test the same way, either online or offline, to have consistent and meaningful results. (12) Do not condemn a battery based upon results of a single test without any trending data or an established baseline for that specific battery. (13) When one or more units in a battery fall outside the acceptable range from base line, replace the entire string. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This public input is submitted as part SIG-TMS Battery Task Group. Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 160-NFPA [Section No ] Public Comment No. 164-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 602-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 625-NFPA [Section No ] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Herbert Hurst Organization: Savannah River Nuclear Solutio Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 14:22:19 EDT 2014

54 35 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 168-NFPA [ New Section after A ] A Table Item 9. (e) Battery capacity is determined by the mass of active material contained in the battery and is a measure of the battery s stored energy. The rated capacity of small VRLA batteries used in fire system applications is typically measured in ampere-hours (Ah) where the ampere-hour rating is based on the battery s capability to provide a constant current at the nominal battery voltage for twenty hours. The rated capacity may vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. The actual battery capacity during service life can vary significantly from rated capacity due to aging, charging and discharge cycles, temperature, and other factors. The unique failure modes of VRLA batteries due to aging and internal degradation are attributed for a high failure rate where the actual battery capacity has degraded to 80 percent of the manufacturer s rated capacity. As a result, battery manufacturers often recommend replacement much sooner than the rated design life for critical systems. A test of battery capacity is designed to determine if the battery is capable of continuing to deliver the voltage level specified by the manufacturer. The results of a capacity test can also be used to estimate where the battery is in its service life. A test of capacity is performed by applying a continuous load to the battery based on the manufacturer s published discharge rates until voltage falls to specified levels. Although discharging the battery for capacity testing concerns some, VRLA batteries are designed to handle numerous discharges within the limits established by the battery manufacturer. The discharge rate selected for testing should be representative of the duty cycle because at shorter test times the test duration has a greater effect on the capacity calculation. For example, a one minute difference in actual test time for a 5 minute discharge rate compared to a 3 hour discharge rate will result in a greater deviation of the calculated capacity. The battery is also operating less efficiently at shorter discharge rates and the effects of aging and degradation may not be as prevalent during shorter discharges. Fire alarm systems do not typically carry a sufficient load for the practical application of a load test because the battery is sized for a duty cycle consisting of a standby period of 24 hours or more followed by five minutes in an alarm condition. For this reason the panel loading will not likely align with published discharge rates, which is essential for test personnel to easily calculate capacity. In many installations, the fire system loading is inadequate to meet the functional requirements for capacity testing and in these cases a battery near failure could conceivably satisfy the low discharge rate applied by the fire system. In order to satisfy the load test requirements of Table Item 9.(e), battery capacity testing can be performed in the following manner or in accordance with other methods such as those identified in IEEE Standard 1188: (1) Referring to the battery manufacturer s specifications, determine the load current for the 3 hour battery rating to the selected end voltage, typically 1.67 volts per cell (10.2 volts for 12 volt system or 20.4 volts for 24 volt system). (2) Record the battery temperature at the negative terminal. (3) Disconnect the charger and connect a load bank to the battery terminals. (4) Apply the constant current specified for the 3 hour rate to the battery. Once the constant current is applied continue the test until the battery terminal voltage decreases to the specified end voltage. (5) Stop the test when the selected end voltage is reached (6) Record the actual test duration in minutes (7) Disconnect the load bank and reconnect the charger (8) Calculate percent battery capacity as follows: %Capacity = (Tactual/180 x K T ) x100 where: Tactual = the test duration in minutes K = the temperature correction factor for the actual battery temperature at the start of the test from T

55 36 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Table A (e). Additional Temperature Correction Factors can be obtained from IEEE (1) Replace the battery if battery capacity is less than or equal to 80%. Replace the battery at the next scheduled test interval if battery capacity is less than 85%. Temperature F K T Table A (e) Temperature Correction Factors. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment This Public Input submitted as part of SIG-TMS Battery Task Group Related Public Comments for This Document Related Comment Public Comment No. 164-NFPA [Section No ] Related Item Public Input No. 602-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 625-NFPA [Section No ] Relationship Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Herbert Hurst Organization: Savannah River Nuclear Solutio Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 14 14:33:44 EDT 2014

56 6 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 86-NFPA [ Section No. A ]

57 7 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM A

58 8 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Table , Item 24. The extent of testing of a fire alarm or signaling system, including devices that were not tested, should be documented per the Test Plan in NFPA 72 does not require testing of an emergency control function, such as elevator recall, but does require testing of the emergency control function interface device, such as the relay powered by the fire alarm or signaling system. Where the emergency control function is not being tested concurrent with the fire alarm or signaling system testing, measurement of the emergency control function interface device output should be verified using the proper test devices. This might require reading or observing the condition of a relay, a voltage measurement, or the use of another type of test instrument. Once testing is complete, verification that any disabled or disconnected interface devices have been restored to normal is essential and this verification should be documented in the testing results. Testing of the emergency control functions themselves is outside of the scope of NFPA 72. A complete end-to-end test that demonstrates the performance of emergency control functions activated by the fire alarm or signaling system might be required by some other governing laws, codes, or standards, or the authority having jurisdiction. In that situation, other applicable installation standards and design documents, not NFPA 72, would address testing and performance of the emergency control functions. NFPA 3, Recommended Practice for Commissioning and Integrated Testing of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems, provides guidance for integrated (end-to-end) testing of combined systems. The following excerpt from NFPA 3 includes guidance on when integrated testing should be performed. 7.2 Test Frequency. [3:7.2] In new construction, integrated testing of fire protection and life safety systems should occur following: (1) Verification of completeness and integrity of building construction (2) Individual system functional operation and acceptance as required in applicable installation standards tests (3) Completion of pre-functional tests of integrated systems [3:7.2.1] Existing fire protection and life safety systems should have periodic integrated testing. [3:7.2.2] Integrated systems that were commissioned upon installation in accordance with Chapter 6 should have integrated testing at the interval specified in the commissioning plan. [3: ] For integrated systems that were not commissioned, an integrated testing plan should be developed to identify the appropriate extent and frequency of integrated system testing. [3: ] In addition to periodic integrated testing, integrated system testing should be done when any of the following events occurs: (1) New component fire protection or life safety systems are installed and interconnected to existing fire protection and life safety systems. (2) Existing fire protection or life safety systems are modified to become components of interconnected systems. (3) Interconnections or sequence of operations of existing integrated fire protection and life safety systems are modified. [3:7.2.3] NFPA 3 also includes guidance on test methods for integrated testing. It is important to note that the appropriate NFPA standard would provide the acceptance criteria for the overall emergency control function operation requirements including performance and test methods while NFPA 72 covers the required performance and testing of the emergency function interface device. For instance, if an end-to-end test for a building with an engineered smoke control system is required by some other governing laws, codes, standards, or the authority having jurisdiction, the test protocol would have unique criteria for the smoke control system design and a special inspector would be responsible for the overall operation and performance of the smoke control system in accordance with the appropriate standard (NFPA 92, Standard for Smoke Control Systems, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code) during the testing, including measuring pressure differentials and ensuring proper fan and damper operation. Refer to the following extract from NFPA 101 on smoke control: The engineer of record shall clearly identify the intent of the system, the design method used, the appropriateness of the method used, and the required means of inspecting, testing, and maintaining the system. [ 101:9.3.2] Acceptance testing shall be performed by a special inspector in accordance with Section 9.9. [ 101:9.3.3]

59 9 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Even though the fire alarm or signaling system initiating device might activate the smoke control system, the actual testing of the dampers and fan operation would be as required by the smoke control design and not part of the fire alarm or signaling system. Other emergency control operation requirements might be as follows: For fan shutdown and smoke damper operation, the fan and damper operations would be in accordance with NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, and NFPA 105, Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protectives, respectively, and those equipment operations would be verified by those responsible for HVAC systems in combination with the fire alarm system personnel. Guidance for elevator inspection and testing can be found in ASME A.17.2, Guide for Inspection of Elevators, Escalators and Moving Walks. For elevator systems, the recall function, elevator power shutdown, and hat illumination would be done with the elevator mechanics present during the test. This operational test is often accomplished during routine periodic fire alarm testing. For fire door holder and fire shutter release, it would be expected that the emergency control function operation of the doors/shutters would be verified in accordance with NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, and NFPA 101 during the test. In some cases, the door manufacturer representative might need to be present to reset the equipment. Guidance on documenting and handling of faults, failures, and corrective action for integrated testing can be found in of NFPA 3. Table Item 22(a) and 22(b) If during the course of the periodic test of audible appliances, it is suspected that alarm sound levels could be lower than the required minimum, the building system owner or the system owner's designated building representative should be notified in writing. Such notification will allow the building owner or designated building representative to determine whether sound pressure level readings should be taken for the area(s) in question. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The revised wording of this First Revision addresses both the system owner and system owner's designated representative (which is the same terminology used in Chapter 14) and specifies the type of notification recommended. Related Item First Revision No. 297-NFPA [Section No. A ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Joe Scibetta Organization: BuildingReports Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed May 07 17:57:28 EDT 2014

60 4 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 40-NFPA [ Section No ] For software-based systems, a copy of the site-specific software shall be provided to the system owner or owner s designated representative. The site-specific software documentation shall include both the user passcode and either the system programming password or specific instructions on how to obtain the programming password from the system manufacturer. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The programming password is needed and the language show is good. The more problematic password for a user to obtain is their user passcode. This passcode is used for example, to set the time and date, disable a point, run a report, review historical logs, etc. It is important that an installer supply this as well as the programming passcode or how to obtain that passcode. Related Item Public Input No. 597-NFPA [New Section after 7.5.8] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Rodger Reiswig Organization: Tyco/SimplexGrinnell Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Apr 15 14:24:31 EDT 2014

61 of 346 5/19/ :24 AM Public Comment No. 9-NFPA [ Section No ] For software-based systems, a copy of the site-specific software, including specific instructions on how to obtain the means of system and software access (password) shall be provided to the system owner or owner s designated representative. The site-specific software documentation shall include either the system programming password or specific instructions on how to obtain the password from the system manufacturer. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment The text should be revised for consistency with the language used in FR-267 Section of the first draft. Related Item First Revision No. 267-NFPA [Section No ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Andrew Berezowski Organization: Honeywell Inc. Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Mar 14 15:35:35 EDT 2014

62 4 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Committee Input No. 207-NFPA [ Section No ] This was a First Revision that has been modified or deleted as the result of First Correlating Revision: FCR-11-NFPA

63 5 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM 7.8.2* Forms for Record of Completion, and Record of Inspection and Testing, and Risk Analysis.

64 6 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Unless otherwise permitted or required in 7.5.6, 7.6.6, or , Figure 7.8.2(a) through Figure 7.8.2(l) shall be used to document the record of completion and record of inspection and testing. (SIG-FUN) Figure 7.8.2(a) System Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN) Figure 7.8.2(a) Continued Figure 7.8.2(a) Continued

65 7 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(b) Emergency Communications System Supplementary Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN) Figure 7.8.2(b) Continued

66 8 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(b) Continued Figure 7.8.2(c) Power Systems Supplementary Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN)

67 9 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(c) Continued Figure 7.8.2(d) Notification Appliance Power Panel Supplementary Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN)

68 0 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(e) Interconnected Systems Supplementary Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN) Figure 7.8.2(f) Deviations from Adopted Codes and Standards Supplementary Record of Completion. (SIG-FUN)

69 1 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(g) System Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS) Figure 7.8.2(g) Continued

70 2 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(g) Continued Figure 7.8.2(g) Continued

71 3 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(h) Notification Appliance Supplementary Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS) Figure 7.8.2(h) Continued

72 4 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(i) Initiating Device Supplementary Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS) Figure 7.8.2(i) Continued

73 5 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(j) Mass Notification System Supplementary Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS) Figure 7.8.2(j) Continued

74 6 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(k) Emergency Communications Systems Supplementary Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS) Figure 7.8.2(k) Continued

75 7 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(k) Continued Figure 7.8.2(k) Continued

76 8 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(k) Continued Figure 7.8.2(l) Interface Component Supplementary Record of Inspection and Testing. (SIG-TMS)

77 9 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Figure 7.8.2(l) Continued Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: [ Not Specified ] Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Sep 13 15:39:39 EDT 2013

78 0 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The title of is modified to remove "Risk Analysis" since it is not in the mandatory requirements of the Code and no form is present. Public Input No. 192-NFPA [Section No ] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 29 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 28 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Abner, James C. Berezowski, Andrew G. Bonifas, Robert A. Clary, Shane M. David, Manuelita E. Decker, Daniel G. DiTaranto, James Egesdal, Sanford E. Farr, Tommy L. Frable, David W. Goodyear, David Green, Kevin M. Gruner, Kimberly A. Hancock, Jeffrey S. Jacobs, Scott Kapis, Jon Kessler, Jr., Walter J. Leber, A. M. Fred Maciaszek, Chester S. Malady, Richard A. McNamara, Jack Mundy, Jr., James M. Nash, Louis Norton, Thomas F. Sanedrin, Allan Troyanski, Emily Warner, Todd W. Wayman, Jr., William F. Affirmative with Comment Gauvin, Daniel J. The Committee Statement does not appear to address all changes made to the Record of Completion attached to

79 1 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM this FR (some of the changes in the attachment belong to FR-210)

80 9 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Committee Input No. 303-NFPA [ Section No. A ]

81 0 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM A.7.8.2

82 1 of 68 5/29/2014 9:03 AM Examples of completed record of completion forms are shown in Figure A.7.8.2(a) through Figure A.7.8.2(f), and a risk analysis checklist form can be found in Figure A.7.8.2(g). Figures 7.8.2(g) through 7.8.2(l) are sample forms intended to reflect the general information that should be provided as part of a system inspection and test report, but are not intended to mandate a specific format for the report. A report format customized to the specific system configuration, devices, appliances, and system functions being tested meets the intent of the requirement. Figure A.7.8.2(a) Example of Completed System Record of Completion. Figure A.7.8.2(a) Continued Figure A.7.8.2(a) Continued