Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Bike / Pedestrian Count Project"

Morgan Lawrence
5 years ago
Views:

CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bike / Pedestrian Count Project October Introduction In, the Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) updated the Regional Bike/Ped Plan, The CRCOG

1 CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bike / Pedestrian Count Project October Introduction In, the Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) updated the Regional Bike/Ped Plan, The CRCOG Commitment to a Walkable and Bikeable Region. The plan highlights the positive impacts that walking and bicycling can have on local and state economies as well as on our overall health, air quality, and mobility. The plan also lists a set of recommended action steps that CRCOG will carry out in an effort to support the communities in our region in their Bike/Ped planning. Collecting bicycling and pedestrian data falls under recommendations. and. in the plan. The plan provides a snapshot of the current walking and bicycling patterns in our region, however, much of the data represents commuters traveling to and from work. At this time, there is no data source that allows us to truly understand what mode choices people are using for recreation or everyday activities in our region. Whereas vehicle counts are typically conducted as part of standard traffic studies, and bus ridership figures are collected to study ridership, there is not a comparable effort to collect data on bicycle and pedestrian volumes. In September 9, CRCOG participated in the National Bike/Ped Documentation Project (NBPD), a project sponsored by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and co-sponsored by Alta + Planning and Design. The nationwide effort provides a consistent model of data collection and ongoing data for use by planners, governments, and bicycle and pedestrian professionals. The purpose of the project is to encourage agencies nationwide to start conducting bicycle/pedestrian counts and surveys in a consistent manner similar to motor vehicle counts. Working in conjunction with the NBPD, we modified the count and instruction forms to represent our region. The purpose of participating in the NBPD was to initiate a bicyclist/pedestrian data collection program for the Capitol Region.

2 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project The 9 count was limited in scope, and in, counts were taken at even fewer locations. In, we expanded the program to include dozens of counters and locations. The extended count was undertaken again in. In all years, we counted in September, during the designated national count period. In, we were able to obtain automatic count data from a counter that was placed on the Hop River Trail in Bolton. We obtained data for September of 9 and. This report updates our earlier work with the count results but does not yet include results. Count Methodology/Implementation It was determined by CRCOG staff that counts would be conducted at intersections (including where paths/trails crossed) and screen line counts would be conducted on trails. In addition, it was determined that bicyclists and pedestrians would be counted at each location, as opposed to bicycle-only or pedestrian-only counts. We developed count forms and detailed instructions for our volunteers. The NBPD recommended that counts take place the second week of September, : to : PM during the weekday and : to : PM during the weekend. We modified the count period to take place at : to : PM during the weekday period which represents the standard peak commute times in our region. We also counted some trails between PM and PM on the weekend, as local trail advocates indicated that was the actual peak for the trail. We chose to conduct only weekday counts at those locations where we expected to measure bicycle commuting. We did both weekend and weekday counts at most trail locations. We were somewhat limited by availability of counters for the intersection counts and so counted most of those locations on weekdays only. Both bicyclist and pedestrians were counted and recorded on an intersection diagram. Bicyclists were recorded by the direction they approached the intersection and their destination (turning right, going straight, and turning left.) Counters also recorded if a bicyclist was travelling the wrong way or riding on the sidewalk. Pedestrians were counted as they crossed the intersection and recorded for the appropriate crosswalk. Diagonal crossings by pedestrians were also recorded. The counter noted if a pedestrian was using a wheelchair or cane, pushing a stroller, or using a skateboard or roller blades. Bicyclists and pedestrians counted were recorded by male and female. Screenline counters counted bicyclists and pedestrians who passed an imaginary line across the trail or roadway being counted. The following page shows the count forms used for the and counts (these are slight modifications of the 9, forms.)

3 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

4 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project Count Summaries and Findings Table represents a summary of the total bicyclist/pedestrian counts for the three years of counting. In 9, we counted locations and counted over, bicyclists and pedestrians. In we had increased our program to 9 locations and counted more than, bicyclists and pedestrians. As we increased our count locations, we also increased the number of bicyclists counted, as compared to the first year. Notably, in, we counted almost an equal number of bicyclists and pedestrians in our weekend counts, whereas in the first year, the percent of bicyclists in both weekday and weekend counts was much smaller. It should be noted, that with the automatic counts in (on the Hop River Trail in Bolton), we were unable to determine if trail users were bicyclists or pedestrians or male or female. Therefore, those counts are not included in any of these summary tables. TABLE SUMMARY OF COUNTS Weekday Weekend Totals Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists* 9.%.% 9.% Pedestrians 9 9.%.%.% Total 9.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations 9 9 Weekday Weekend Totals Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists 9 9.9% 99.9% 9 9.% Pedestrians.% 9.%.% Total.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations Weekday Weekend Totals 9 Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists.%.% 9.% Pedestrians 9.%.%.% Total 9.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations Table * Note, in shows, machine the counts counts by were female/male used for a and few locations shows that on trails. with We each attributed year we all have automatic counted counts greater to numbers bicyclists. of female bicyclists, and greater numbers of male pedestrians. Again, it needs to be noted, that we did not include the Bolton automatic counts in this summary. TABLE Female Male* Number % Number % Bicyclists*.%.% Pedestrian.%.% Total.% 9.% Female Male Number % Number % Bicyclists.9%.% Pedestrian 9.%.% Total.9%.% 9 Female 9 Male Number % Number % Bicyclists 9.9%.% Pedestrian.% 9 9.% Total.9%.% * In we used automatic counters for some trails. We attributed all automatic counts to male bicyclists.

5 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project The following graphs show how bicyclists were operating on the roads at the count locations. (we do not show data from because most of the counts that year were on trails, and very few roadway bicyclists were counted.) In 9, most roadway bicyclists counted were on the sidewalk (%), only % were riding on the roadway with traffic. In, the number of bicyclists counted on the road riding with traffic increased to % and the number riding on the sidewalk decreased to %. We don t know if this shows an improvement in bicyclist behavior or if this resulted because of the count locations selected. As the program continues and the same locations are counted each year, we will be able to evaluate trends for riding behavior. 9 Roadways Cyclist Maneuvers % % Riding with Traffic % Riding Against Traffic % Riding on Sidewalk % % Roadways Cyclist Maneuvers % % Riding with Traffic % Riding Against Traffic % Riding on Sidewalk % % The next two charts show the difference in female bicyclist and male bicyclist behavior relative to riding position. The findings are very interesting, with a majority of women preferring sidewalk riding in the 9 count, and few riding with traffic. In, this is flipped, with female bicyclists preferring to ride on the road over sidewalk riding. More years of data may

6 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project show whether this is a trend or an anomaly based upon count locations in 9. Male bicyclists also rode more often on the sidewalk in the 9 count, and in they were split evenly between riding on the sidewalk and riding with traffic. Both sexes decreased riding against traffic..% 9 Roadway Totals.%.%.%.%.9%.%.%.%.% 9.9%.%.%.%.% 9.%.% Riding With Traffic Riding Against Traffic Riding on the Sidewalk Male Bicyclist Female Bicyclist Total.%.% Roadway Totals.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.9%.99%.9%.% Riding With Traffic Riding Against Traffic Riding on the Sidewalk Male Bicyclist Female Bicyclist Total The charts showing riding behavior by sex can be somewhat misleading without understanding how many males and females were actually counted on the roadways. The following charts show that the percentage of females counted on the roadways has actually declined from 9 to. And the actual count of females riding on the road decreased from 9 to ( to ). So while the chart above seems to indicate a nearly equivalent number of male and female

Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project bicyclists riding on the roadways, in fact, the number of men riding on the roadways

7 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project bicyclists riding on the roadways, in fact, the number of men riding on the roadways far exceeds the number of women 9 Roadways Male/ Female Bicyclists % 9 Female 9 Male % The next three charts show the split in male/female bicyclists on trails:

8 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project Next steps The count data and database used to summarize the data are a very rich source of information, limited only by the manpower available to analyze and evaluate the data. It would be useful to develop standard queries for the database that would enable us to extract the data for individual towns and locations and then share that information with the towns, for their own analysis. Going forward CRCOG might want to develop a program of counting locations every other year. This might make the counting program more manageable. Additionally, CRCOG should investigate how to incorporate more automatic counters into the program, as this method of counting could lead to understanding of bicycle and pedestrian peaks by type of facility, by time of day, day of week, and month of year. Detailed Count Information The following pages provide detailed information on the counts. The first table summarizes the bike and pedestrian counts, by location, for each year of the count. The counts have been completed, but have not yet been entered into our database for evaluation. The second table

9 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project gives the list of count location ID numbers and actual locations. The final set of pages gives the detailed results for each location that was counted at least once from 9 to. 9

10 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

11 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

12 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

13 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project

14 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project CRCOG_ID Municipality Street Street AV Avon Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Fisher Dr. Route / AV Avon Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Country Club Road BO Bolton Hop River Trail Steeles Crossing Road BO Bolton Camp Meeting Town line BO Bolton Route Town Line CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St. / Front St. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St. / Center St. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Center St. / Maple Ave. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St/River St CA Canton Farmington River Trail Maple/ Allen Intersection CA Canton Farmington River Trail Route EG East Granby Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Bridge EG East Granby Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route EH East Hartford Silver Lane Applegate Lane EH East Hartford Charter Oak Greenway Forbes Street EL Ellington Route Route EL Ellington Route Route FA Farmington Farmington Canal Heritage Trial Red Oak Hill Road FA Farmington Farmington River Trail Route FA Farmington Farmington River Trail Route Tunnel FA Farmington Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Brickyard Road GL Glastonbury Main St. Hebron Ave. GL Glastonbury Hebron Ave. New London Turnpike GL Glastonbury Main St. Douglas Rd. HF Hartford Franklin Ave. Brown St. HF Hartford Founders Bridge HF Hartford Bulkeley Bridge HF Hartford Charter Oak Bridge HF Hartford Asylum Ave. Sigourney St. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Sisson Ave. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Sigourney St. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Whitney St. HF9 Hartford Farmington Ave Woodland St. HF Hartford Main St. North of Park HF Hartford Washington St. Park St. HF Hartford Capitol Laurel HF Hartford Church St. High St. HF Hartford Main St. Pleasant St. HF Hartford Park St. Park Terrace MC Manchester Charter Oak Greenway Main St./ Hartford Rd. MC Manchester Middle Turnpike Wickham Park, across Fountain Village Apt. MC Manchester Clark St. Chapel Rd.

15 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project NE Newington Main St. Cedar St. NE Newington Cedar St. Willard Ave. NE Newington Cedar St Fenn Rd. NE Newington Willard Ave. West Hill Rd. NE Newington Linear Greenway Griswoldville RH Rocky Hill Route Route (Cromwell/ New Britain Ave) SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Sand Hill Road SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route (Bidwells/ Old Agway) SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route / SU Suffield Farmington Canal Heritage Trail North of Phelps Rd. SW South Windsor Bissell Bridge Old Main SW South Windsor Buckland Road Tamarack WH West Hartford Farmington Ave. LaSalle Rd. WH West Hartford Farmington Ave. Main St. WH West Hartford Boulevard Quaker Ln WH West Hartford Boulevard Prospect Ave. WH West Hartford Asylum Ave. Quaker Ln. WH West Hartford Fern Rd. Quaker Ln. WI Windsor Broad St. Maple Ave.

16 Bike/Pedestrian Count Details ################### Avon CRCOG ID: AV Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

17 CRCOG ID: AV Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 Page of

18 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

19 Bolton CRCOG ID: BO Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Under, ADT - - MPH -, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of

20 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of

21 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of

22 Date: 9// Time Period: Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of

23 Canton CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

24 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page 9 of

25 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

26 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of

27 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

28 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of

29 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Page of

30 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

31 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

32 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

33 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

34 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page 9 of

35 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Page of

36 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

37 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

38 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

39 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

40 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

41 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Very High Traffic (>, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

42 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

43 East Granby CRCOG ID: EG Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

44 CRCOG ID: EG Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page 9 of

45 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 Page of

46 East Hartford CRCOG ID: EH Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Suburban - Poor Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of

47 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

48 CRCOG ID: EH Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Limited Connections (one end only Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): -, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

49 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

50 Ellington CRCOG ID: EL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Rural Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - No Connections, Poor Access - Part of Sidewalk Network - Poor Direct Access from Adj Neighborhoods - Poor Community System of Bikeways or Walkways -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Poor Condition (Rough Surf, Vandalism,Debrs)i - Moderate Grades Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of

51 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Page of

52 CRCOG ID: EL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - High Scenic Qualities - No Connections, Poor Access - Poor Direct Access from Adj Neighborhoods - Poor Community System of Bikeways or Walkways -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of

53 Farmington CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

54 CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Very High Traffic (>, ADTs) Condition: Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page 9 of

55 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

56 CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): -, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of

57 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

58 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of

59 Glastonbury CRCOG ID: GL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - Limited Connections (one end only - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Good Community System (Continuous, Good Cond) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

60 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of

61 CRCOG ID: GL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - Limited Connections (one end only - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Good Community System (Continuous, Good Cond) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

62 Hartford CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

63 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

64 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page 9 of

65 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

66 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 99 Page of

67 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of

68 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

69 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of

70 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of

71 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of

72 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

73 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Urban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - < Mile - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Page of

74 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Page 9 of

75 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline,,, Page of

76 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline Page of

77 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

78 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of

79 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Urban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - < Mile - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - None - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

80 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of

81 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

82 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of

83 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

84 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page 9 of

85 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

86 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

87 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

88 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

89 CRCOG ID: HF9 Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

90 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

91 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

92 Manchester CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Limited Connections (one end only - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH -, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of

93 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

94 CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page 9 of

95 CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Limited Connections (one end only Length of Facility: - Part of Sidewalk Network Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: -, -, ADT Traffic Speed: - - MPH Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of

Tolland Turnpike Manchester Q1 final design submission re-scheduled from 7/31/2017 to 10/27/2017

Tolland Turnpike Manchester Q1 final design submission re-scheduled from 7/31/2017 to 10/27/2017 241 Main Street / Hartford / Connecticut / 06106 Phone (860) 522-2217 / Fax (860) 724-1274 www.crcog.org To: From: Cost Review Subcommittee Sotoria Montanari, Program Manager Date: November 3, 2017 c: