A delegation from Ms. Carmen Diges of 106 Banbury Road, Toronto, in regard to item EX7.1 - Hearing Report.

Transcription

1 FURTHER TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #3/10 To be held on Friday, May 7, 2010 FURTHER TO: Pages EX4. DELEGATIONS EX4.2 A delegation from Ms. Carmen Diges of 106 Banbury Road, Toronto, in regard to item EX7.1 - Hearing Report. EX6. CORRESPONDENCE EX6.1 A letter day April 30, 2010 from Brenda Patterson, General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, City of Toronto, in regard to dredging at Bluffers Park Marina. EX9. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION NEW ITEM - EX9.8 EX9.8 LONG TERM OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Acquisition Update EX11. APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses ERRATA UPDATE SHEET NEW PERMITS - ITEM EX EX CITY OF VAUGHAN EX FLETCHER DRIVE To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Lot 124, Plan, (242 Fletcher Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. The purpose is to construct an inground pool and conduct minor landscaping works within a Regulated Area of the Don River watershed at 242 Fletcher Drive in the City of Vaughan.

2 TOWN OF CALEDON EX FERNBROOK HOMES (ETOBICOKE CREEK) LIMITED To site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Part Lot 18, Concession 1 EHS, (Mayfield Road and Kennedy Road), in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed. The purpose is to place fill and construct within a Regulated area to facilitate grading and pre-servicing works associated with a new residential subdivision. TOWN OF MARKHAM EX TOWN OF MARKHAM To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere in a Regulated Area on Birchmount Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham. The purpose is to complete road works and install stormsewers. No timing window will apply to the works. TOWNSHIP OF KING EX TH SIDEROAD To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Part Lot 21, Concession 11, ( th Sideroad), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new single family dwelling within a Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed at th Sideroad in the Township of King.

3 CORRESPONDENCE EX

4 TO: FROM: Chair and Members of the Executive Committee Meeting #3/10, May 7, 2010 James W. Dillane, Director, Finance and Business Services Item EX9.8 RE: LONG TERM OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Acquisition Update KEY ISSUE Directs staff to pursue acquisition of suitable office accommodation and report to the Authority at the earliest opportunity. RECOMMENDATION THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff be directed to pursue acquisition of suitable office accommodation and report to the Authority at the earliest opportunity. BACKGROUND The Authority established the Long Term Office Accommodation Working Group to work with staff in considering all options to resolve TRCA's long term office accommodation needs. Staff has consulted at regular intervals with the working group and advised of the following options: 1. FULL BUILD OUT - 120,000 square feet LEED Platinum building located adjacent to Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV) $40 million - $50 million project 2. NEEDS ONLY BUILDING - 80,000 square feet LEED Gold building located adjacent to BCPV $20 million - $24 million project 2.(A) NEEDS ONLY BUILDING - 40,000 square feet LEED Gold building located adjacent to BCPV $10 million - $12 million project 3. ADAPTIVE REUSE OF INDUSTRIAL/INSTITUTIONAL SITE - 60, ,000 square feet - LEED rated, location to be determined $12 million - $15 million project 4. LEASE/JOINT VENTURE WITH YORK REGION - minimum 40,000 square feet - LEED Gold (minimum), location at subway/transit hub, Steeles Avenue $ - unknown 5. MIXED USE PROJECT - commercial/residential redevelopment of parking lot, BCPV $ - unknown 203

5 6. PURCHASE OF EXISTING OFFICE SITE - existing facility (office/commercial) of 60,000 to 100,000 sq ft $5 million - $10 million project 7. SHORT TERM LEASE - up to 20,000 square feet, close to 5 Shoreham Drive, short term (less than 10 years) $ - unknown 8. "VIRTUAL" OFFICE - combination of 2.(A) and use of technology to avoid need for office space $10 million to $12 million for 2.(A) plus $ unknown for technology and leased space in key "hub" locations 9. JOINT VENTURE WITH TTC/BUILD TORONTO - TTC is building a new headquarters building at Yonge and York Mills. Possibility of a partnership/equity arrangement Staff has been assisted by representatives of CB Richard Ellis as well as Phil Goldsmith, Architect. RATIONALE At its meeting on April 30, 2010, the Long Term Office Accommodation Working Group accepted the staff recommendation of Option 6 as the option which best meets TRCA needs at the current time while leaving open opportunity to pursue options 1, 2, 2A, 4, 5 and 8. Attachment 1 is the staff report outlining this option. Staff has concluded that the best long term solution to its office accommodation is to take advantage of the future value of the lands at 5 Shoreham Drive and the parking lot at Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV). This value will likely be realizable in 10 to 15 years as the subway is completed and the lands adjacent and at York University are fully built out. In the interim, suitable office accommodation can be purchased in the range of $160 to $175 per square foot. The cost to build office space either at 5 Shoreham Drive or the BCPV parking lot would be in the range of $250 to $300 per square foot. Given the fact that the existing commercial office market is at a relative low point, the purchase price including the land base can be regarded as an investment which in 10 to 15 years can be sold to help finance the redevelopment of the lands at 5 Shoreham Drive and BCPV parking lot. Staff has conducted initial analysis of various scenarios and believes the purchase of suitable office space can be achieved within the existing budget. Cash flow of TRCA is healthy and can sustain the investment. DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff has several properties under consideration with the help of CB Richard Ellis. Staff is meeting with representatives of the Royal Bank to consider establishment of a line of credit sufficient to ensure TRCA has future cash flow so as not to jeopardize any of its existing projects and programs. Upon conclusion of required due diligence, staff will bring to the Authority a proposal for acquisition of an office site. 204

6 Time is of the essence as the market opportunity to secure suitable office space will diminish as the economy improves and interest rates increase. Accordingly, staff will bring a recommendation to the Authority as soon as possible. FINANCIAL DETAILS As noted, staff believe that the financing of this acquisition can be accomplished without impact on existing projects and programs using the funds currently available to TRCA. Staff will report in detail on this aspect of the project when the specific details are available. Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension s: jdillane@trca.on.ca For Information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 6292; Tom Campitelli, extension s: jdillane@trca.on.ca; tcampitelli@trca.on.ca Date: May 04, 2010 Attachments: 1 205

7 Attachment 1 TO: FROM: Chair and Members of the Long Term Office Accommodation Working Group Meeting #1/10, April 30, 2010 James W. Dillane, Director, Finance and Business Services RE: LONG TERM OFFICE ACCOMMODATION PROJECT Status Report, April, 2010 KEY ISSUE Advises of activities to April, 2010 on securement of long term office accommodation. RECOMMENDATION IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the status report on long term office accommodation activities to April, 2010, dated April 21, 2010, be received. BACKGROUND Staff reported to the Long Term Office Accommodation Working Group on January 29, 2010, at which time a report was provided on options and next steps. (see Minutes Meeting #3/09, held on January 29, 2010). With the advice of the Working Group, staff advised that they would pursue the following options: 6. PURCHASE OF EXISTING OFFICE SITE - existing facility (office/commercial) of 60,000 to 100,000 sq ft $5 million - $10 million project 4. LEASE WITH YORK REGION - minimum 40,000 square feet - LEED Gold (minimum), location at subway/transit hub, Steeles Avenue $ - unknown 3. ADAPTIVE REUSE OF INDUSTRIAL/INSTITUTIONAL SITE - 60, ,000 square feet - LEED rated, location to be determined $12 million - $15 million project New. Possible joint venture with Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) on new headquarters RATIONALE Staff has continued to explore the four options described above to meet TRCA's long term office accommodation requirements. The following summarizes the options under consideration: 6. PURCHASE OF EXISTING OFFICE SITE - existing facility (office/commercial) of 60,000 to 100,000 sq ft $5 million - $10 million project 206

8 This is considered by the project team to be the most viable option at this time because of the following factors: Favourable/existing market conditions within this sector of the marketplace. It is a buyers market as very limited demand in the marketplace currently exists for large scale facilities of this nature. This is the most affordable option, i.e. a project up to $10 million could be financed by municipal partners at $1 million annually over 10 years (less with longer term) which is likely to be within the capability of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) partners. Can effectively meet TRCA's present, as well as future, needs. The most sustainable option is one where TRCA uses an existing structure. Cost effective i.e. 100,000 square $ PSF = $10,000,000 vs $300+PSF for new building. Excess space (over and above TRCA's immediate requirements provides for additional revenue opportunities via sublease potential). Benefit from existing infrastructure/built out (i.e. lunchroom/cafeteria, computer rooms, back up generator, built out office components, lobby, board/meeting rooms, exercise facilities). With municipal partner support, TRCA could offer a cash deal; if TRCA must have financing, low borrowing rates can be secured. In the long term, such an investment could be sold and the proceeds used to facilitate redevelopment proposal (option 5). Staff has yet to find a suitable facility that meets TRCA needs in terms of space, location, parking and cost. At the meeting, staff will do a short presentation of some of the sites which have been considered. This continues to be the option which meets immediate needs and provides potential cost benefit for future development 4. LEASE WITH YORK REGION - minimum 40,000 square feet - LEED Gold (minimum), location at subway/transit hub, Steeles Avenue $ - unknown Staff has met with the President and representatives of the York Region Rapid Transit Corporation to discuss their development plans for the site on Steeles Avenue between Keele and Jane streets where the new subway station will be located. They described the preliminary plans for this area including potential office space. They were receptive to the idea of TRCA participating in the project as an investor taking space in condominium type office project. The build out time frame remains uncertain but is likely late 2014 or This remains a possible option and staff will continue to work with the Corporation. 3. ADAPTIVE REUSE OF INDUSTRIAL/INSTITUTIONAL SITE - 60, ,000 square feet - LEED rated, location to be determined $12 million - $15 million project Staff asked for advice from Phil Goldsmith, TRCA's architectural advisor, on the potential cost of retrofitting an industrial building. Based on his estimates, staff believe that this option would only be considered if the location, parking and initial cost were such that the site met or exceeded TRCA needs. The cost to retrofit will be in the range of $150 to $200 PSF which when combined with purchase cost brings the per square foot cost close to the cost of building a new structure. This option has been put on hold. 207

9 NEW: JOINT VENTURE WITH TTC Staff has met with representatives of Build Toronto who are working with the TTC on their proposed new headquarters building at York Mills and Yonge Street. The TTC is proposing to build additional space to meet future needs. This might present an opportunity for TRCA to lease such space in the medium term. Such a leasing proposal would have to be competitive with leases in preferred locations. The timing of this project is unknown but would likely have occupancy in DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Staff will continue to pursue Option 6. Should a property be found which meets TRCA needs, staff will bring this forward to the Working Group and the Authority with recommendations. Staff will continue to meet with Region of York representatives to consider Option 4. Other options remain on the table but will be "on hold". Staff will continue to report to the Working Group as the project continues. FINANCIAL DETAILS To date, costs have been limited to modest consulting fees. Funds are available in the 2010 capital budget. Report prepared by: Jim Dillane, extension s: jdillane@trca.on.ca For Information contact: Jim Dillane, extension 6292; Tom Campitelli, extension s: jdillane@trca.on.ca; tcampitelli@trca.on.ca Date: April 21,

10 EX11. APPLICATION FOR PERMITS UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Information has been received and reviewed by staff for the following Scheduled Errata items. The recommendations within the staff reports should be amended to include the following: EX11.31 BRAMPTON HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Sernas Associates, dated May 5, 2010, to address all outstanding TRCA related issues. EX11.32 GENISIS LODGE Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Gregory Design Group, dated May 5, 2010, to address all outstanding TRCA engineering related issues. EX11.33 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to the engineering and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff; dated May 5, 2010; received May 5, EX11.34 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to the engineering and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff and landowner authorizations for works in the regulated area outside the Regional Road Right of Way; dated April 27, 2010; received April 27, EX11.35 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Amec, dated May 5, 2010, to address all outstanding TRCA related issues. EX11.36 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Letter of Undertaking to provide revisions to the engineering and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff and landowner authorizations for works in the regulated area outside the Regional Road Right of Way; dated May 5, 2010; received May 5, EX ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE Site Plan Sketch with dimensions, received by TRCA on May 2, 2010; Light Duty Silt Fence Barrier Standard Drawing, received by TRCA on May 2, EX11.38 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM Letter of undertaking to provide revisions to the engineering and landscape drawings and landowner authorization; dated April 28, 2010; prepared by the Regional Municipality of Durham. 209

11 EX11.39 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing No. L-11, West Deane Park - Existing Conditions and Proposed Bicycle Trail Plan, prepared by EDA Collaborative Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated March 2010, last revised March 25, 2010, received on March 30, 2010, red-line revised by TRCA on April 28, 2010; Drawing No. D-1, Details, prepared by EDA Collaborative Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated March 2010, last revised March 25, 2010, received on March 30, 2010; Drawing No. D-2, Details, prepared by EDA Collaborative Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated March 2010, last revised March 25, 2010, received on March 30, EX11.40 CITY OF TORONT0 Drawing L.1 of 4, Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan, prepared by Fleisher Ridout Partnership Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November 2009, last revised January 28, 2010, received by TRCA on February 1, 2010; Drawing L.2 of 4, Demolition and Removals Plan, prepared by Fleisher Ridout Partnership Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November 2009, last revised January 28, 2010, received by TRCA on February 1, 2010; Drawing L.3 of 4, Layout and Grading Plan, prepared by Fleisher Ridout Partnership Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November 2009, last revised April 26, 2010, received by TRCA on April 26, 2010; Drawing L.4 of 4, Details, prepared by Fleisher Ridout Partnership Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November 2009, last revised January 28, 2010, received by TRCA on February 1, EX11.41 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing No. G0008, General, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010;Drawing No. C2100, Grading Site Plan and Details, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Drawing No. A2100, Floor Plan and Roof Plan, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Drawing No. A2101, North and East Building Elevations, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Drawing No. A2102, South and West Building Elevations, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Drawing No. S2102, Section A, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Drawing No. S2103, Sections B, C and D, prepared by Genivar, issued April 2010, received on April 9, 2010; Indemnification Letter, Construction of Facilities and Flood Plain Implications (Humber Treatment Plant), prepared by the City of Toronto, dated March 18, 2010, received on March 19, EX YORK VALLEY CRESCENT Letter of Undertaking, prepared and signed by Adnan Paruk and Sheerin Ali-Paruk, dated May 3, 2010, received by TRCA May 5,

12 EX GLEN ELM AVENUE Drawing No. A-00a, Site Plan, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. LP-01, Landscape Plan, prepared by Urban Forest Associates Inc., Revision No. 3, revised on March 25, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. SSG, Site Servicing & Grading Plan, prepared by Valdor Engineering Inc., dated August 20, 2009, Revision No. 2, revised on March 30, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-06, West Elevation, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-07, South Elevation, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-08, East Elevation, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-09, North Elevation, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-10, Section 1, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, 2010; Drawing No. A-11, Section 2, prepared by Solution Design, dated December 15, 2008, Revision No. 6, revised on March 29, 2010, received on May 3, EX11.44 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing No. 1, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - General Plan, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; Drawing No. 2, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Ex Site Plan/Demolition Plan/Material Site Storage Plan/Sediment Control Plan, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; Drawing No. 3, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Pile Details, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; Drawing No. 4, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Abutments and Wing Walls, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; Drawing No. 5, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Bridge Details, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; Drawing No. 6, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Bridge Bearing Details, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010; 211

13 Drawing No. 7, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - North Approach Details, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010, red-line revised by TRCA staff on May 4, 2010; Drawing No. 8, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - South Approach Details, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, 2010, red-line revised by TRCA staff on May 4, 2010; Drawing No. OD1, Don River Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Located Over the Don River in the Lower Parkland South, Toronto - Orientation Drawing, prepared by Peter T. Mitches & Associates Ltd. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated July 2008, last revised April 23, 2010, received by TRCA on April 27, EX11.45 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing No. M C1, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Site Plan (South Limit of Study Area) to 1+025, prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November, 2009, last revised January 5, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. M C2, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Site Plan to , prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November, 2009, last revised January 5, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. M C3, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Site Plan to (North Limit of Study Area), prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November, 2009, last revised January 5, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. M C4, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Site Plan & Cross Sections - South of Pottery Road, prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November, 2009, last revised January 5, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. M C5, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Typical Cross Sections & Details, prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated November, 2009, last revised January 5, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. M C6, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Sediment and Erosion Control Plan (DVP North Site), prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated December, 2009, last revised March 24, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; 212

14 Drawing No. M C7, Don Valley Parkway West Embankment from 50m south to 25m south of Pottery Road and from 185m north to 610m north of Pottery Road Slope Stabilization Project - Sediment and Erosion Control Plan (DVP Pottery Road), prepared by Trow Associates Inc. on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated December, 2009, last revised March 24, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. TA-1, Don Valley Parkway Slope Stabilization - Tree Assessment Plan, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated November 2009, last revised March 26, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, 2010; Drawing No. TA-2, Don Valley Parkway Slope Stabilization - Tree Assessment Plan, prepared by The MBTW Group, dated November 2009, last revised March 26, 2010, received by TRCA on March 29, EX11.46 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing 582-S824-1 (S1), Dawes Road Bridge Rehabilitation Over Massey Creek - Site Plan, prepared by AECOM on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated December 2009, received by TRCA on May 4, 2010; Drawing 582-S824-1 (S2), Dawes Road Bridge Rehabilitation Over Massey Creek - General Arrangement, prepared by AECOM on behalf of the City of Toronto, dated December 2009, received by TRCA on April 26, EX STRATHEARN ROAD Drawing No. A1, Site Plan, prepared by Maxim Pools, dated April 2010, received on May 3, EX11.48 CITY OF TORONTO Drawing No , Site Plan, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Blower and Flare Compound Area, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Landfill Gas Extraction Well Details, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Plan and Profile - North Landfill Gas Header, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Plan and Profile - North Landfill Gas Header, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Plan and Profile - South Landfill Gas Header, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Plan and Profile - South Landfill Gas Header, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Site Plan, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Landfill Gas Blower and Flare Compound and Fence Details, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Details, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Shelter and Flare Foundation Plan, Elevations, Sections and Details, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March 2010; Drawing No , Blower, Flare and Condensate Trap Details, prepared by Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, dated March

15 EX RIVERSIDE BOULEVARD Site Plan, prepared by Griffith P.S., dated April 27, 2010, received by the TRCA April 29, EX11.50 CHATEAUX OF CALEDON CORPORATION Letter of Undertaking, dated May 5, 2010, prepared by J. Spina, Medi-Terra Properties Corporation, to address all outstanding engineering concerns. EX HUMBER STATION ROAD Site Plan, Dwg. No. 1, prepared by GP Environmental Construction, redline revised by TRCA Planning & Development staff on April 15, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning & Development staff on December 22, 2009; Site Plan, Dwg. No. 2, prepared by GP Environmental Construction, redline revised by TRCA Planning & Development staff on April 15, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning & Development staff on December 22, 2009; Cross-Section A-A, prepared by Soil Engineers Ltd, redline revised by TRCA Planning & Development staff on April 15, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning & Development staff on January 4, 2010; Cross-Section B-B, prepared by Soil Engineers Ltd, redline revised by TRCA Planning & Development staff on April 15, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning & Development staff on January 4, 2010; Restoration Plan, prepared by E. Reed, stamped received by TRCA Planning & Development staff on April 7, EX11.52 TOWN OF CALEDON Letter of Undertaking, dated May 5, 2010, prepared by J. Spina, Medi-Terra Properties Corporation, to address all outstanding engineering and ecology concerns. EX11.53 AMBER PLAINS INVESTMENT Letter of Undertaking, Shaeffers Consulting, Amber Plains Investment, dated May 5, EX11.54 DIGRAM DEVELOPMENTS INC. Letter of Undertaking, dated May 5, 2010, prepared by J. Priamo. SCS Consulting Group Ltd., to address all outstanding engineering concerns. EX PRINCE EDWARD BOULEVARD Site Plan, prepared by Franelli Contracting, dated March 22, 2010, revised by P. Bhargava, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 22, 2010; Elevation, prepared by Franelli Contracting, dated March 22, 2010, revised by P. Bhargava, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 22, EX IDA STREET Site Plan, prepared by Rowan Stanciu Ltd, dated April 28, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development May 5,

16 EX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff); dated April 28, 2010; received April 28, 2010; prepared by The Regional Municipality of York. EX11.58 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Letter of Undertaking (to provide revisions to engineering and landscape drawings to the satisfaction of TRCA staff); dated April 28, 2010; received April 28, 2010; prepared by The Regional Municipality of York. EX VICTORIA AVENUE Site Plan, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; Site Plan, Dimensions, Setbacks, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; Site Plan - Proposed Screened Porch, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; Ground Floor Plan, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; East Elevation, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; Interior Elevation, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; South Elevation, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010; North Elevation, prepared by Sutton Designs & Associates, dated April 6, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, EX11.60 ARBINT CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. Lot Grading and Siltation Control Plan Carat Crescent, prepared by Higgins Engineering Ltd., dated August 2008, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 6, 2010, redline revised by TRCA Staff; Site Plan, prepared by Rowan Stanciu Ltd., dated June 15, 2009, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development June 22, 2009, redline revised by TRCA Staff July 27, 2009; Drawing L1, prepared by IRGA Landscape Design, dated June 2009, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development June 22, 2009; Drawing L2, prepared by IRGA Landscape Design, dated June 2009, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development June 22, EX NORTH LAKE ROAD Site Plan, prepared by B. Habib, dated April 14, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 14, 2010; Planting Plan, prepared by B. Habib, dated April 14, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 14,

17 EX HUMBERLAND DRIVE Site Plan, prepared by Creative Pools, dated April 19, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 19, 2010, redline revised by TRCA Staff. EX11.63 DUKE OF RICHMOND DEVELOPMENTS INC. Letter of Undertaking, dated May 5, 2010, prepared by P. Slama, Stantec Consulting Limited, to address all outstanding engineering and ecology related concerns. EX11.64 HEATHWOOD HOMES (ROTHBURY) LIMITED Letter of undertaking provided by Adam Ribeiro, Cole Engineering, dated April 8, 2010, to address all outstanding TRCA issues prior to the release of the permit. EX SUNSET BEACH ROAD Landscaping Plan, Drawing L-1, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 15, 2007, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Site Plan, Drawing A1, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Front- Rear Elevation, Drawing A6, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Left Side Elevation, Drawing A7, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Right Side Elevation, Drawing A8, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Typical Cross Section at "A-A", Drawing A9, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, 2010; Typical Details and Specs, Drawing A10, prepared by Delmar Homes, dated February 2006, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 21, EX11.66 TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL Drawing CP1, prepared by Sabourin Kimble & Associates, dated April 8, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 9, 2010; Drawing RP1, Rehabilitation Planting Plan, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated April 8, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 9, 2010; Drawing RP2, Rehabilitation Planting Details, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated April 8, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 9, 2010; Drawing RP3, Rehabilitation Planting Notes, prepared by Cosburn Giberson, dated April 8, 2010, stamped received by TRCA Planning and Development April 9, EX JOHN STREET Site Plan, Drawing No. SP, prepared by 1Riser Designs, revise dated April 23, 2010, received by the TRCA April 30, 2010; Basement and Ground Floor Plan, Drawing No. 1, prepared by 1Riser Designs, received by the TRCA April 30, 2010; Second Floor and Loft Floor Plan, Drawing No. 2, prepared by 1Riser Designs, received by the TRCA April 30, EX11.68 OSMINGTON INCORPORATED Letter of Undertaking, prepared by Beacon Environmental, dated May 5, 2010, received May 5,

18 EX11.69 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION Letter of Undertaking agreeing to provide revisions to the engineering and landscape drawings, to continue to co-ordinate with the Black Creek Optimization Study, and to meet with TRCA to determine long-term monitoring requirements associated with the realignment of Black Creek at the Highway 407 Station, dated April 29, 2010, received May 3, 2010, prepared by Toronto Transit Commission. 217

19 CITY OF VAUGHAN EX FLETCHER DRIVE To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Lot 124, Plan, (242 Fletcher Drive), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed. The purpose is to construct an inground pool and conduct minor landscaping works within a Regulated Area of the Don River watershed at 242 Fletcher Drive in the City of Vaughan. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2010 to May 6, 2012 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: Site Plan, prepared by the applicant, received by the TRCA April 8, 2010, redline revised to clarify setback measurement and indicate the removal of excess fill material and location of sediment control fencing; Detail Drawings, prepared by San Juan Pools, received by the TRCA April 23, 2010 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct an inground pool and conduct minor landscaping works within a Regulated Area of the Don River watershed. The subject property is located along the edge of the West Don River Valley Corridor. The existing top-of-slope of the well vegetated valley is located approximately 2 metres from the rear property boundary. The proposed works are located within a flat, already disturbed area currently devoid of any significant vegetation. A low rock retaining structure (approximately 0.3 metres tall) and the inground pool will be located approximately 1 metre and 3 metres away from the rear lot line, respectively. TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposed works are sufficiently setback from the existing top-of-slope and will not adversely affect the stability of the slope feature. 218

20 Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be erected and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent the transport of sediment into the adjacent valley feature. Dynamic Beaches: Not applicable. Erosion: TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposed works are adequately setback from the existing top-of-slope. Conservation of Land: As a watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to the existing sodded condition and will not affect any significant natural features. Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: Application #: 0364/10/VAUG Report Prepared by: Anthony Sun, extension 5724 For information contact: Bill Kiru, extension 5306 Date: May 3, 2010 TOWN OF CALEDON EX FERNBROOK HOMES (ETOBICOKE CREEK) LIMITED To site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Part Lot 18, Concession 1 EHS, (Mayfield Road and Kennedy Road), in the Town of Caledon, Etobicoke Creek Watershed. 219

21 The purpose is to place fill and construct within a Regulated area to facilitate grading and pre-servicing works associated with a new residential subdivision. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2010 to May 6, 2012 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: Letter of undertaking provided by Anton Kikas, Anton Kikas Limited, dated May 5, 2010, to address any outstanding TRCA issues prior to the release of the permit. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: This permit application is to allow site grading and servicing works associated with a new residential plan of subdivision located north of Mayfield Road, west of Kennedy Road in the Town of Caledon. This permit is the first of two to be brought forward for works on the subject property. The works proposed under this permit are related to the first phase of site preparation works (topsoil stripping, earth works, servicing) associated with the Fernbrook Homes subdivision, which is located directly south of the Etobicoke Creek valley system. A temporary stormwater management pond will be constructed on-site, outletting to an existing stormwater management outfall on the south side of Mayfield Road. This subdivision is located adjacent to a section of Etobicoke Creek that is presently owned by the TRCA. As a component of this development - which will be brought forward with a future permit - a restored buffer is being provided between the proposed development and TRCA valleylands. An additional permit will be brought forward to a future Executive Committee meeting for works associated with other components of this development, including valleyland enhancement works. 220

22 Control of Flooding: The proposed work area is located outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of Etobicoke Creek. and as such no impacts to the storage and/or conveyance of flood waters are anticipated as a result of these works. Pollution: Erosion and sediment control measures, in accordance with TRCA's guidelines, will be implemented and maintained for the duration of the project. Dynamic Beaches: Not applicable Erosion: Erosion will be minimized through the implementation of the aforementioned erosion and sediment control measures. Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. There will be no in-water works associated with this permit. Plantings A significant planting plan will be provided with the development of the subdivision and as part of the edge management plan for the site. Additional details on the plantings will be provided in future permits associated with this plan of subdivision. Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section Infrastructure and Servicing, of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. CFN: Application #: 0367/10/CAL Report Prepared by: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: May 4, 2010 TOWN OF MARKHAM EX TOWN OF MARKHAM To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure, site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere in a Regulated Area on Birchmount Road, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Town of Markham. 221

23 The purpose is to complete road works and install stormsewers. No timing window will apply to the works. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2010 to May 6, 2012 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: Drawing L-1, Streetscape Plan, Birchmount Road, Sta to Sta ; dated March 2005; received April 26, 2010; prepared by AECOM; Drawing L-3, Landscape Details; dated March 2005; received April 26, 2010; prepared by AECOM; Drawing G-3, New Construction, Birchmount Road, Sta to Sta ; dated March 2010; received April 26, 2010; prepared by AECOM; Drawing TS-2, Typical Sections, Birchmount Road; dated March 2010; received April 26, 2010; prepared by AECOM. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The original proposal approved under Permit #C was to widen and extend Birchmount Road to a 4-lane collector road from 14th Avenue northwards to the northern limit of Highway 407, This included the widening of existing Birchmount Road to a four lane urban section from 14th Avenue to Royal Crest Court; constructing a new road between Royal Crest Road to just north of Highway 407; constructing a CN Rail underpass north of Royal Crest Court/Citizen Court, and constructing retaining walls at both sides of CN underpass. This permit also included approval to relocate and bisect the existing Concanmar stormwater management pond, absorbing a section of existing channel in pond reconstruction, regrading of the flood plain, constructing a new outlet structure, and the construction of a stormsewer at the northern end of the pond. 222

24 The original permit was issued March 3, 2006 to March 2, The works were not completed within that time and the Town of Markham applied for, and received, a permit extension from March 3, 2008 to March 2, The permit extension has now expired and the works are not yet complete. In order to comply with Ontario Regulation 166/06 requirements, no further extensions are permitted. As such, the Town of Markham is applying for a new permit in order to complete the remaining works located with the Regulated Area. These works include landscaping and installation and relocation of stormsewers. The only modification to the original plans involve the substitution of two 900mm stormsewers with one 1800mm stormsewer under the CN Rail line for a distance of approximately 90 metres. Under Ontario Regulation 166/06, permits are issued for two years and legally there is no opportunity to extend the expiry date of the approval. Staff recognized that some works, especially those related to public infrastructure works, require more than two years to reach completion. Staff implemented a permit re-issuance protocol, approved May 9, 2008, which outlines criteria used to determine if a previously approved Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit may be re-issued. One of the criteria is that there are no prior re-issuances. Therefore, the application is subject to TRCA regular review and procedures, including the requirement for Executive Committee approval. Control of Flooding: The proposed project will have no impacts on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters. Pollution: Standard erosion and sediment control measures (sediment fencing) will be implemented prior to construction and maintained for the duration of construction, and until the site is stabilized and restored, in order to prevent construction generated sediments from entering any watercourse or wetland. Erosion and sediment control measures have been provided in accordance with the TRCA Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Urban Construction. Dynamic Beaches: Not applicable Erosion: There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with the proposal. Conservation of Land: There will be no in stream work associated with this project and there are no concerns related to fish habitat. Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native non-invasive species following construction. Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. 223

25 CFN: Application #: 0371/10/MARK Report Prepared by: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5759 For information contact: Suzanne Bevan, extension 5759 Date: May 5, 2010 TOWNSHIP OF KING EX TH SIDEROAD To construct, reconstruct, erect or place a building or structure and site grade on Part Lot 21, Concession 11, ( th Sideroad), in the Township of King, Humber River Watershed. The purpose is to construct a new single family dwelling within a Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed at th Sideroad in the Township of King.. The permit will be issued for the period of May 7, 2010 to May 6, 2012 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: Site Plan, prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc., received by the TRCA May 7, 2010, redline revised to indicate the removal of excess fill material and location of sediment control fencing. RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information: Proposal: The purpose is to construct a new single family dwelling within a Regulated Area of the Humber River watershed. The subject property is partially located within the Wetland Area of Interference of a wetland located along 17th Sideroad and a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) located along the eastern property boundary. 224

26 Based upon a site visit conducted by TRCA staff on August 5, 2009 and the site plan provided, the property contains a relatively gentle slope between the proposed works and the wetland feature which has not been identified as a PSW. The slope has an inclination of approximately 4 Horizontal : 1 Vertical and the proposed driveway is located approximately 10 metres away from the top-of-slope while the dwelling will be located approximately 20 metres away from the top-of-slope. TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposed works are adequately setback from the slope feature and will not impact the stability of the slope. The proposed works are located a minimum of approximately 60 metres away from the wetland feature which was not identified as a PSW and approximately 150 metres away from the PSW. TRCA ecology staff are also satisfied that the proposed works are adequately setback from both wetland features and will not impact the integrity of these features and any other features identified in the Natural Heritage Evaluation, prepare by SAAR Environmental Limited, revise dated April 9, 2010, which was prepared for the related Site Plan Application (Application No. SPD-09-62). Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. There will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters. Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be erected and maintained for the duration of construction to prevent the transport of sediment into the nearby wetland feature and down the slope. Dynamic Beaches: Not applicable Erosion: TRCA geotechnical staff are satisfied that the proposed works are adequately setback from the slope feature and will not impact the stability of the slope. Conservation of Land: As a watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on or adjacent to the site that may be negatively impacted by the project. Plantings As part of the associated Site Plan Application, a restoration planting plan has been submitted to create a buffer composed of native, non-invasive planting between the proposed residential use and the slope and wetland feature. All other areas will be restored to their existing sodded condition and will not affect any significant natural features. 225