Conceptual Review Agenda

Transcription

1 Conceptual Review Agenda July 21, :30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 Project: Romero Park Community Center Location: 10 th Street, south of Romero, south of Museo de las Tres Colonias Applicant: Betty Aragon-Mitates Contact Info: ; Planner: Anne Aspen Project: Timberline Garden Apartments Location: NW Corner of Timberline & Drake Applicant: Jason VFR Design Contact Info: ; Jason.holland@VFRdesigninc.com Planner: Steve Olt Project: Lincoln Park Major Modification Location: North of the NE corner of Lemay & Lincoln Applicant: Kay Lagunitas Contact Info: ; lagunitas@frii.com Planner: Cameron Gloss Project: Conifer Project Location: SW Corner of Redwood and Conifer Applicant: Kay Lagunitas Contact Info: ; lagunitas@frii.com Planner: Shelby Sommer Project: Crossroads Safehouse Location: 421 Parker Applicant: Vicki Lutz and Justin Larsen Contact Info: ; Planner: Ted Shepard

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 480'-0" EXISTING RESIDENCE ROMERO HOUSE EXISTING RESIDENCE ROMERO PARK PROPOSED SITE N. LEMAY AVE. EXISTING RESIDENCE

9

10 11TH ST LOPEZ CT 10TH ST SAN CRISTO ST 9TH ST ROMERO ST SITE BUCKINGHAM ST ± 1 Romero Park Community Center Conceptual Review 7/14/2008 Aerial Vicinity inch equals 200 feet

11 ROMERO ST Museo de las tres Colonias (Romero House) 10TH ST ROMERO PARK ± 1 Romero Park Community Center Conceptual Review 7/14/2008 Aerial Site View inch equals 30 feet

12 11TH ST RL ALTA VISTA PARK NLEMAYAVE T EVINEDR LMN T TRUJILLO ST LOPEZ CT 10TH ST Romero Park Community Center proposal RL E I 9TH ST ROMERO ST ROMERO PARK BUCKINGHAM ST NLINKLN MMN ± 1 Romero Park Community Center Conceptual Review 7/14/2008 Zoning inch equals 350 feet

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 To: Planning Department From: Jon Prouty Re: Proposed Lincoln Project Major Amendment Date: July 15, 2008 The major elements of our proposal are: Increase the number of units from 165 to approximately 225. Parking estimated at 410 spaces, subject to final layout. Parking will be in excess of City requirements. Eliminate garages (previously tandem garages under each unit plus a few stand-alone garages). Most parking off street, and accessed by private drives. Mix of units from one bedroom to 4 bedrooms per unit, in order to provide more alternatives to meet market requirements. Central recreation center/pool area. Front elevations will have diversity and will all be offset. With no parking at the front of units, streetscape will be very attractive. Most importantly, this layout makes use of all of the existing grading, ROW s, utilities, infrastructure and other public improvements as previously designed and approved. The previous central stormwater detention area will be moved to the south detention pond, which will be enlarged to provide additional capacity. Building pads will be regraded, as necessary, however, with no changes to the elevations of the public improvements. Attached, please find a sketch of our proposal. JP/sjw Attachment C:\DOCUME~1\rmichels\LOCALS~1\Temp\Planning.Major Amendment doc 7/16/ :02 AM

29

30 11TH ST 10TH ST ROMERO ST ROMERO PARK BUCKINGHAM ST 9TH ST NLINKLN 2ND ST 3RD ST DUFF DR RACQUETTE DR ELINCOLNAVE NLEMAYAVE WEBSTER AVE WEBSTER CT COMMERCE DR HEATH PKWY SLEMAYAVE EMAGNOLIAST 12TH ST EOLIVECT SLINKLN ± 1 Lincoln Park Modification Conceptual Review 7/21/2008 Aerial Vicinity inch equals 600 feet

31 ROMERO PARK RL E BUCKINGHAM ST 9TH ST NLINKLN I NLEMAYAVE MMN DUFF DR ELINCOLNAVE ± 1 CCR C Lincoln Park Modification Conceptual Review 7/21/2008 I WEBSTER AVE Zoning inch equals 300 feet

32 ± 1 Lincoln Park Modification Conceptual Review 7/21/2008 Aerial Site View inch equals 200 feet

33 To: Planning Department From: Jon Prouty Re: Conceptual Review for Conifer Project/Light Industrial Component Date: July 15, 2008 While retail is planned for most of the property, light industrial (a permitted use in the C-N-N zone) is planned for the westernmost approximate 9 acres. The building would be well set back from both Conifer and Redwood and such setback area would be heavily landscaped. The building construction would be all masonry with some interest and variation in design and would feature an elegant storefront glass corner entry area. The site would be laid out so all truck parking and deliveries would occur at the east side, thus not impacting streetscape either from Conifer or from Redwood. Furthermore, this parking would be buffered from the retail uses to the east with landscaping. The nature of the light industrial use would be assembly and shipping of prefabricated components. There would be no basic manufacture of any products onsite. It is estimated that the company would employ about 30 people now and about 60 after its Phase 2 expansion at some time in the future. Site would be laid out to allow there to be a private open space and picnic area adjacent to the edge of the City-owned detention pond. JP/sjw C:\DOCUME~1\rmichels\LOCALS~1\Temp\Planning.Light Industrial doc 7/16/2008 7:48 AM

34

35 COULTER ST FOXTAIL ST BREWER DR RED CEDAR CIR BLUE SPRUCE DR Approximate Location NOKOMIS CT SUGARPINE ST SITKA ST MUDDLER CT CONIFER ST RENEGADE CT LUPINE DR REDWOOD ST MULLEIN DR YARROW CIR BELLFLOWER DR ± 1 Conifer Project Conceptual Review 7/21/2008 Aerial Vicinity inch equals 400 feet

36 BLUE SPRUCE DR I NOKOMIS CT RL SUGARPINE ST SITKA ST MUDDLER CT MATUKA CT CONIFER ST CCN LUPINE DR LMN RL REDWOOD ST MULLEIN DR BELLFLOWER DR ± 1 Conifer Project Conceptual Review 7/21/2008 Zoning inch equals 300 feet

37