REVIEW OF THE USE AND PHYSICAL CONDITION OF PROJECT FACILITIES ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS
|
|
- Eunice Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tacoma Hydroelectric Project FERC No REVIEW OF THE USE AND PHYSICAL CONDITION OF PROJECT FACILITIES ON NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS Public Service Company of Colorado MARCH 2007
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page No. ACRONYM LIST...AL Introduction and Background Scope of Study for Condition and Use Assessment Cascade Creek Facilities Assessment of Visual Contrast of Project Facilities in Cascade Creek Area Retired and New Gauging Station on Elbert Creek Forebay Lake and Tacoma Penstock Assessment of Visual Contrast in the Forebay Lake Area Tacoma Powerhouse Assessment of Visual Contrast at Tacoma Powerhouse Area...7 i
3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page No. Figure 2-1 Forebay penstock map....5 ii
4 LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph Title Page No. Photograph 1 Public viewpoint of flume and diversion structure (virtually indistinguishable) from access road bridge...8 Photograph 2 Opposite public viewpoint of flume from access road bridge....8 Photograph 3 View of flume and surrounding landscape (aspen and mixed conifer forest) from the public access road....9 Photograph 4 View of Cascade Creek pipeline from public access road...9 Photograph 5 View of Cascade Creek pipeline from public access road...10 Photograph 6 Storage barn (front view) Photograph 7 Storage barn (back view) Photograph 8 Fenced storage area...11 Photograph 9A Elbert Creek gauging station...11 Photograph 9B Elbert Creek gauging station Parshall flume and chart recorder Photograph 9C Elbert Creek gauging station electronic equipment enclosures and communication tower...12 Photograph 10 Low-lying section of penstock along access roads to Forebay Lake...13 Photograph 11 Raised section of penstock along access road to Forebay Lake Photograph 12 Raised section of penstock crossing access road to Forebay Lake...13 Photograph 13 Penstock parallels access road to Forebay Lake Photograph 14 Forebay Lake with Tacoma Penstock Photograph 15 Forebay Lake with Tacoma Penstock Photograph 16 Surge tank at Forebay Lake Photograph 17 Forebay Lake dam and surge tank Photograph 18 Forebay Lake...16 Photograph 19 Tacoma powerhouse view from across the river Photograph 20 Photograph 21 View of additional structures from across the river...17 View of Tacoma powerhouse facilities from whitewater boating take-out on Animas River (river left)...17 Photograph 22 View of building on river left Photograph 23 View of large shed and concrete pad (river left)...18 iii
5 Acronym List Federal/State Agencies Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Colorado Department of Natural Resources (CDNR) Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) Colorado Department of Natural and Economic Resources, Division of Environmental Management (CDEM) Colorado Department of Wildlife (CDOW) Colorado Division of Water Quality (CDWQ) Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer (CSHPO) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) National Park Service (NPS) National Weather Service (NWS) U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Other Entities Durango and Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNGR) Electra Sporting Club (ESC) Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) Documents 401 Water Quality Certificate (401 WQC) American Disabilities Act Accessible Guidelines (ADAAG) Colorado State Water Quality Standard (COWQS) Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) Environmental Assessment (EA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Forest Service Outdoor Recreation Accessibility Guidelines (FSORAG) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Notice of Intent (NOI) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) Preliminary Draft Environmental Assessment (PDEA) Programmatic Agreement (PA) Scoping Document (SD) Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) AL-1
6 Acronym List Laws/Regulations Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Clean Water Act (CWA) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Electric Consumers Protection Act (ECPA) Endangered Species Act (ESA) Federal Power Act (FPA) Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Terminology Cubic feet per second (cfs) Degrees Celsius (C) Degrees Fahrenheit (F) Dissolved oxygen (DO) Feet (ft) Gallons per day (gpd) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Gigawatt Hour (GWh) Global Positioning System (GPS) Grams (g) Horsepower (hp) International Symbol of Accessibility (IAS) Kilogram (kg) Kilowatt (kw) Kilowatt-hour (kwh) Mean Sea Level (msl) Megawatt (MW) Megawatt-hours (MWh) Micrograms per liter (µg/l) Milligrams per liter (mg/l) Millimeter (mm) Million gallons per day (mgd) National Forest System Lands (NFS) National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) Ounces (oz.) Outdoor Recreation Access Route (ORAR) Outstanding Remarkable Value (ORV) Parts per billion (ppb) Parts per million (ppm) AL-2
7 Acronym List Pounds (lbs.) Power Factor (p.f.) Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) Project Inflow Design Flood (IDF) Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species (RTE) Ready for Environmental Analysis (REA) Resource Work Groups (RWG) Revolutions per Minute (rpm) Rights-of-way (ROW) San Juan National Forest (SJNF) Stakeholders (federal and state resource agencies, NGOs, and other interested parties) Volts (V) Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) AL-3
8 1.0 Introduction and Background Public Service Co. of Colorado (PSCo) owns and operates the Project facilities located on lands within the boundaries of the San Juan National Forest (SJNF). A study was conducted according to a study plan approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 1 in its Study Plan Determination dated March 24, The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of Project facilities on the visual character of the landscape within the San Juan National Forest (SJNF). Specific Project facilities to be studied were identified in the Study Plan, as modified by FERC. The study methodology was described in the Study Plan which is incorporated herein by reference. 2.0 Scope of Study for Condition and Use Assessment The Project facilities under review include those Project works that occupy National Forest Service (NFS) lands along Cascade Creek and in the vicinity of the Tacoma powerhouse area. The Forebay Lake area was also evaluated. The study focused on the assessment of the effects on aesthetic resources and, indirectly, recreational resources. 2.1 Cascade Creek Facilities Project facilities on or adjacent to Cascade Creek include a diversion dam, intake structure, wooden flume, siphon, and ancillary operation and maintenance (O&M) facilities. The existing diversion structure was constructed in It consists of an approximately 10-foot-high concrete dam spanning 30 feet across Cascade Creek, reinforced with steel and rail sections. The crest of the dam is an ogee section topped by wooden flashboards. The diversion works include an intake with gates and sediment control facilities, which serve to deliver water to a wooden flume. The Cascade Creek flume transports water diverted at the Cascade Creek Diversion Dam about one mile to the Cascade pipeline inlet. The 4,200-foot-long flume is a 10-foot-diameter semi-circular wood flume supported on timber cradles and timber trestles across small creek beds over which the flume crosses. The Cascade Creek siphon and pipeline which begin at the end of the flume are constructed from steel pipe. The entire pipeline is roughly 14,500 feet long with a 64-inch diameter from intake to outlet, which is buried across primarily private property, including the Cascade Village and Durango Mountain Resort developments. The siphon section is approximately 1,400 feet long and crosses Forest Service lands and spans Cascade Creek on a steel bridge. The Project facilities in the Cascade Creek area are set in a narrow valley upstream of U.S. Highway 550. The creek, flume, and ancillary storage structures are nestled among a mixed-conifer and aspen forest (Photographs 1 through 8 - all photographs are located at the end of this report). The area is covered with dense ground-level vegetation. The flume is visible at several locations 1 Refer to Issue Assessment No. 7 and Study Plan Condition of Project Facilities on Cascade Creek. This study plan was modified by FERC in its Study Plan Determination dated March 24, 2006 to include Project facilities and features located at and near the Tacoma powerhouse on National Forest System Lands. 1
9 along the dirt access road that leads to the Project structures (barn and fenced yard) used for storage. The raised flume parallels Cascade Creek through the valley following the same terrain, and while the flume extends above the surrounding vegetated landscape in places, the wooden structure has weathered and merged visually with much of the natural character of the area. At the diversion structure itself, the major components associated with the structure are constructed of concrete and stand in only minor contrast to the immediate surrounding landscape of exposed rock. When considered as part of the wider landscape, the thick ground-level vegetation and stands of aspen and pines provide natural screening and make the diversion structure virtually indiscernible from the primary public viewpoint on the bridge over the access road (Photograph 1). Generally, the structure is not readily visible until it is approached on foot. The siphon section of the pipeline that starts at the end of the flume is set in the ground and above ground on NFS lands. The steel pipe is screened from typical public viewpoints, except, notably, for several locations along U.S. Highway 550 and the dirt access road to Cascade Creek Diversion Dam. Much of the siphon and pipeline mixes with and is screened by the surrounding landscape of mixed conifers, aspens and ground shrubs (Photograph 4) from the major public viewpoints. Where the structure is raised above the ground, the siphon is clearly visible (Photograph 5); however, the contrast with the surrounding landscape is minimal due to the dark (black) color of and background at the pipeline. In addition to the diversion, flume and pipeline, the Project utilizes several ancillary storage buildings near the Cascade Creek Diversion Dam and flume (Photographs 6 through 8). These ancillary storage buildings are located near the end of the public access road which leads to the Cascade Creek diversion facilities. The primary facilities are situated away from both Cascade Creek and the flume. The lone building is a log storage barn and an outdoor surplus storage area bounded by a basic mesh metal fence. The log storage barn dominates the visual landscape, yet it is constructed of natural materials and colors and blends well with the surrounding forested landscape and similar Forest Service cabins in this area. The building s weathered exterior (large log beams and rusted metal roof) presents an aged and darkened structure that is in character with its surroundings. The fenced outdoor storage area displays a disorderly and scattered appearance. The metal fence provides no screening and the scattered items spare log beams, gravel piles and other miscellaneous construction materials are in plain view and stand in contrast to the surrounding landscape of predominantly natural elements Assessment of Visual Contrast of Project Facilities in Cascade Creek Area The Cascade Creek Diversion Dam and associated facilities are located within the 2B Management Prescription Area. Emphasis is for rural and roaded-natural recreation opportunities. Visual resources are managed so that management activities maintain or improve the quality of recreation opportunities. Forest management activities should not be evident, remain visually subordinate, or may be dominant, but blend with the natural setting. Overall, the Project facilities located in this visual management area are evident, and with respect to the raised wooden flume and pipeline are even dominant at localized public viewpoints; however, in both instances the facilities harmonize and blend with the natural setting in compliance with the 2
10 visual management direction for the area. The main storage barn also blends with the natural setting and is similar in appearance to the cabins/residences in the same area. Finally, the outdoor fenced storage area and the spare construction materials stand in contrast to the overall landscape and do not blend well with the natural setting. These Project facilities, however, are not expected to interfere with, prevent, or inhibit recreation use in the area, and are consistent with the multi-purpose use of the SJNF. 2.2 Retired and New Gauging Station on Elbert Creek Retired Gauging Station Elbert Creek flows from the Hermosa Creek Palisades through a saddle in the Hermosa cliffs steeply down the drainage where it levels off as it crosses Highway 550. The creek meanders through a meadowland area before entering into Electra Lake. The gauging station is encased in a partially rusted metal cylinder at the creeks edge in a backwater section of the creek (Photograph 9A). The old structure is set among the riparian vegetation and surrounded at its base by sediment and woody debris. The gauge structure is not readily visible from a trail along Elbert Creek. Once in view, it stands in contrast to the thick vegetation, creek and surrounding forest, specifically due to the color contrast of the gray metal case against a predominantly green landscape. The old gauge structure is extremely small and passive in the landscape, and even in close proximity to a viewer, is not dominant. New Gauging Station (1998) The new gauging station consists of a small metal Parshall flume, chart recorder enclosure, and a colocated steel lattice tower, antenna, solar panel and equipment enclosure (see Photographs 9B and 9C). The gauge structure is not readily visible via public access from a trail along Elbert Creek. Once in view, it stands in contrast to the thick vegetation, creek and surrounding forest, specifically due to the color contrast of the gray metal case against a predominantly green landscape. The new gauge structure is small and passive in the landscape, and even in close proximity to a viewer, is not dominant. 2.3 Forebay Lake and Tacoma Penstock The Tacoma penstock consists of two distinct sections with Forebay Lake being the point of separation. The first section is a 66-inch-diameter, welded-steel pipeline constructed above ground extending from the outlet at Electra Lake 9,000 feet (half of which crosses NFS) to a bifurcation structure near Forebay Lake. This section of the penstock is supported by concrete thrust blocks and piers. The penstock runs through stands of aspen and mixed conifer trees as well as much of the low-lying ground vegetation between Electra Lake and Forebay Lake. Public access to this landscape primarily occurs along a dirt access road leading from Terminal Dam at Electra Lake. The penstock is not in view along much of the access road, but occasionally intersects or runs along the road. In these instances, the raised steel penstock, piers and concrete thrust blocks appear in contrast to the surrounding landscape (Photographs 10 through 13). 3
11 The second section of the Tacoma penstock starts at the bifurcation structure near Forebay Lake and consists of two welded-steel penstocks (54 and 30 inches in diameter) installed just below the ground level for 2,056 feet until they enter the Tacoma powerhouse. The only visible portion of the structure occurs at the canyon s edge where the penstocks drop steeply down to the powerhouse. At this location, concrete thrust blocks and steel penstocks along with transmission lines are widely visible. The major penstock elements as well as ancillary structures are situated in a broad level area located east of Forebay Lake. At Forebay Lake, a 12-foot-diameter, 116-foot-high surge tank is installed at the aboveground (66-inch-diameter) penstock about 1,000 feet upstream of where the penstock splits and drops below ground and into the Animas River canyon. The structure stands starkly apart from the surrounding landscape in both color and form (Photographs 14 through 18). The lighter beige paint on the surge tank is in direct contrast to the largely darker green stands of trees and riparian vegetation that comprise the majority of the Forebay Lake visual landscape. Furthermore, the linear form of the surge tank extends vertically from the lake and towers above many of the trees where the surge tank rises from the penstock (Photograph 16). Forebay Lake itself is located downstream of Electra Lake with a small release of about 50 gallons per minute that has been released from the penstock into Forebay Lake since 1982, when Forebay Lake s use as an integral part of operations was discontinued. Project facilities and structures at Forebay Lake include Forebay Dam, a concrete spillway and a gaging house. Forebay Dam is an earth and rock dam, roughly 100 feet long and 20 feet high. A low concrete overflow structure is located south of the dam (Photograph 17). The earthen dam blends with the surrounding landscape Assessment of Visual Contrast in the Forebay Lake Area The access road to Forebay Lake and the upper penstock are located in a 2A Management Prescription Area and is not open to public motorized use. Emphasis is for semi-primitive motorized recreation opportunities. Visual resources are managed so that management activities are not evident or remain visually subordinate. The access road to Forebay Lake provides the main public non-motorized access and viewpoints of the Project facilities in this area. Along the majority of the access road to Forebay Lake, the Tacoma Penstock is not visible; however, at several locations the penstock is visible, yet remains visually subordinate to the natural landscape (Photographs 10 and 11). At several other locations (Photographs 12 and 13), the penstock is highly visible and dominates the visual landscape (Figure 2-1). These areas are few, but at these locations, the facilities stand in contrast to the natural landscape and the visual management objectives for the area. The penstock and surge tank structures at Forebay Lake, while hidden from view at times, become highly visible near Forebay Dam and adjacent shoreline of the lake. At these locations, the surge tank towers above the natural vegetation while the connecting penstock sits in front of the shoreline over the water and in front of the riparian vegetation. These Project features dominate the landscape at these locations. 4
12 Figure 2-1 Forebay penstock map. 5
13 2.4 Tacoma Powerhouse The Tacoma powerhouse is located on the Animas River below Electra Lake and Forebay Lake. The powerhouse is a brick building constructed in 1906 and is approximately 108 feet long, 64 feet wide, and 30 feet high. In addition, two cabins constructed of wood with metal roofs and several small wood and metal storage sheds are located at the Tacoma powerhouse site on the right (west) bank of the river. The entire area is able to be viewed from the river itself and across the river from the Durango and Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad (D&SNGR) tracks along the Animas River (Photographs 19 and 20). From these two similar vantage points, the brick powerhouse and ancillary buildings are clearly visible and draw visual attention; however, the brick color of the powerhouse blends with the canyon walls that dominate much of the Animas River canyon downstream of the powerhouse (and even the waters of the Animas River). The area behind and slightly downstream of the powerhouse is used for surplus storage of construction and other Project-related materials. Generally, these areas and materials are not visible due to screening by the powerhouse or vegetation, except for a small area immediately adjacent to the downstream-side of the powerhouse. In addition, both cabins at the powerhouse location are painted white with either gray or green metal roofs. While the predominant white color of both structures stands in contrast to the surrounding landscape, the older, simple structures have weathered and aged presenting an antiquated cabin appearance that tempers much of the tonal contrast to the surroundings (Photograph 21). Ancillary structures are found surrounding the cabins but present a similar antiquated appearance as the cabins and exist on a much smaller scale compared with the powerhouse and cabins. Behind the powerhouse, several unbounded areas are used for surplus storage, which lack any form of fencing and screening from the surrounding landscape. While these areas are visually unpleasing, they are not visible from the public viewpoints on the river and from the railroad as these areas are screened by the powerhouse and thick vegetation around the powerhouse. Several additional Project structures are located on the left (east) bank at the powerhouse location, where the D&SNGR tracks parallel the river. Four structures are present including one house, a large storage shed with an adjacent concrete pad, and two small sheds with hydrants. The house and large storage shed (with a concrete pad) are primarily white in color, while the small sheds (with hydrants) are painted brown. All of these structures are situated amidst a stand of pine trees. All four structures are situated near the railroad tracks across from the powerhouse and bridge. However, the two white structures are more visible from the public viewpoint at the bridge and stand in contrast to the surrounding treed landscape (Photographs 22 and 23). Also evident is the debris and materials dispersed around these buildings, which do not have any fence or screening to block the debris from the visible landscape. The remaining two small shed structures are generally subordinate visually to the surrounding landscape as they are tucked among the other larger structures and their brown color blends with the surrounding terrain and tree cover. Also located among the various structures toward the downstream edge of the area are the remnants of gas street lights which once shone among the housing and along this section of track. 6
14 2.4.1 Assessment of Visual Contrast at Tacoma Powerhouse Area The Tacoma powerhouse and related Project facilities are located in a 3A Management Prescription Area. Management emphasis is for semi-primitive non-motorized recreation in both roaded and unroaded areas. Visual resources are managed so that management activities are not visually evident or remain visually subordinate. These Project facilities lie along the historic D&SNGR, which has been in continuous operation for over 123 years. The Forest Service manages the corridor [by what authority?] the railroad passes through in order to retain its historic and scenic integrity. The prescription applied to the corridor stresses Rural and Roaded Natural recreation opportunities while retaining or enhancing scenic values inherent in the naturally appearing landscape (USDA 1983, pg. J-24). The Tacoma powerhouse and its ancillary cabins are historic structures of undetermined significance and thus may meet the Forest Service visual management objective of retaining historic integrity along the D&SNGR corridor. PSCo is in the process of determining National Historic Preservation Act eligibility via the Cultural RWG Study Plan #1. Once eligibility is determined, final SJNF historic integrity obligations will be established. J:\Projects\Xcel Energy\ Tacoma\0400-Recreation\Condition of Proj Fclts\T-Cndtns of ProjFclts doc KB/elt /8.0 March 29,
15 Photograph 1 Public viewpoint of flume and diversion structure (virtually indistinguishable) from access road bridge. Photograph 2 Opposite public viewpoint of flume from access road bridge. 8
16 Photograph 3 View of flume and surrounding landscape (aspen and mixed conifer forest) from the public access road. Photograph 4 View of Cascade Creek pipeline from public access road. 9
17 Photograph 5 View of Cascade Creek pipeline from public access road. Photograph 6 Storage barn (front view). Photograph 7 Storage barn (back view). 10
18 Photograph 8 Fenced storage area. Photograph 9A Elbert Creek gauging station. 11
19 Photograph 9B Elbert Creek gauging station Parshall flume and chart recorder. Photograph 9C Elbert Creek gauging station electronic equipment enclosures and communication tower. 12
20 Photograph 10 Low-lying section of penstock along access roads to Forebay Lake. Photograph 11 Raised section of penstock along access road to Forebay Lake. Photograph 12 Raised section of penstock crossing access road to Forebay Lake. 13
21 Photograph 13 Penstock parallels access road to Forebay Lake. Photograph 14 Forebay Lake with Tacoma Penstock. 14
22 Photograph 15 Forebay Lake with Tacoma Penstock. Photograph 16 Surge tank at Forebay Lake. 15
23 Photograph 17 Forebay Lake dam and surge tank. Photograph 18 Forebay Lake. Photograph 19 Tacoma powerhouse view from across the river. 16
24 Photograph 20 View of additional structures from across the river. Photograph 21 View of Tacoma powerhouse facilities from whitewater boating take-out on Animas River (river left). 17
25 Photograph 22 View of building on river left. Photograph 23 View of large shed and concrete pad (river left). 18
Recreational and Visual Resources Study Plan
Grant Lake Project (FERC No. 13212) Recreational and Visual Resources Study Plan Prepared for: Kenai Hydro, LLC 3977 Lake Street Homer, AK 99603 March 2013 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Study
More informationMark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill
Mark Greenig Recreation and Land Use Planner CH2M Hill Land Use (Slide L1) Objectives: Document existing land uses in the Study Area along with identifying applicable land use and management plans. Evaluate
More informationVISUAL RESOURCES PLAN
VISUAL RESOURCES PLAN BIG CREEK HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM MAMMOTH POOL PROJECT (FERC PROJECT NO. 2085) BIG CREEK NOS. 1 AND 2 (FERC PROJECT NO. 2175) BIG CREEK NOS. 2A, 8, AND EASTWOOD (FERC PROJECT NO. 67)
More informationPreservation of Scenery National Historic Trails. Rob Sweeten BLM Kevin Rauhe EPG
Preservation of Scenery National Historic Trails Rob Sweeten BLM Kevin Rauhe EPG EPG Background Landscape architects with expertise in visual resources Resource staff includes: archaeologists, biologists,
More informationVerde Valley Landscape Character Type
Existing Condition Landscape Character The existing landscape character describes the existing set of valued aesthetic attributes for the current landscape. The landscape character descriptions include
More information7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES The following list of social, economic, and environmental issues have been identified based on a preliminary inventory of resources in the project area, an
More informationCanyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016
Canyon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 18, 2016 Marcus Schimank Canyon Lake Manager Capital Regional Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of
More informationRecreation and Aesthetic/Visual Resource Management Plan Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308
Recreation and Aesthetic/Visual Resource Management Plan Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 825 NE Multnomah St., 1500LCT Portland, Oregon 97232 March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section
More informationCHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS
CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS This section identifies and evaluates key visual resources in the project area to determine the degree of visual impact that would be attributable to the project.
More informationExisting Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains
3.9 Environmental Consequences 3.8 3.8.1 WHAT ARE FLOODPLAINS? are low-lying areas adjacent to rivers, streams, and other waterbodies that are susceptible to inundation (flooding) during rain events. These
More informationSECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS
SECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS This section describes areas of concern and provides specific recommendations for each project reach. Locations of stormwater drains were from GIS coverage supplied
More informationWELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A
WELCOME! 168 TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 6:30 Open House 7 8 Presentation & Q&A 8 8:30 Open House WELCOME Todd Pfitzer City of Omaha Engineer Bob Stubbe City of Omaha Public Works Director Jon Meyer Project
More informationGaliuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16
Galiuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16 INTRODUCTION The 1.7 million acre Coronado National Forest (CNF) is comprised of 12 sky island mountain ranges. CNF visitors have opportunities to sightsee
More informationSTREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS MORTIMER RECREATION AREA Grandfather Ranger District SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGE AREA
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS CREEK @ MORTIMER RECREATION AREA SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGE AREA SITE LOCATION Drainage Area = 1.14 sq. miles STREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS CREEK @ MORTIMER RECREATION
More informationLewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017
Lewisville Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 2 & 4, 2017 Presented By Rob Jordan Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose
More informationLake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017
Lake O the Pines Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting April 25 & 27, 2017 Presented By Matthew Like, Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationOPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS - OXBOW PARK ENTRANCE AND PUT-IN
OPPORTUNITIES AT OXBOW EXISTING WETLANDS Site is undeveloped and we can design a park that works well from the start. SAND BEACH Potential to eliminate invasive species. DEBRIS (CONCRETE, OLD CARS) VEGETATION
More informationScenic Resources Revised 7/19/2011
1 Scenic Resources Revised 7/19/2011 Affected Environment The existing characteristic landscape of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands includes high mesas, dissected plateaus, deep canyons, volcanic
More informationFloodplain Technical Memorandum
Southeast Extension Project Lincoln Station to RidgeGate Parkway Prepared for: Federal Transit Administration Prepared by: Denver Regional Transportation District May 2014 Table of Contents Page No. Chapter
More informationMANAGEMENT. Table 7. Forest Scenery Goal and Objectives: Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Project
Management MANAGEMENT The second phase of Scenic Management Systems is establishing the management requirements including the development of scenery goals and objectives. This phase references the established
More informationNob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR
Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises
More informationDeveloping Dam Operations & Maintenance Manuals
Developing Dam Operations & Maintenance Manuals WEBINAR AGENDA Introduction General Information Operations Inspections Question & Answer Break Instrumentation & Monitoring Typical Maintenance Issues Question
More informationTown of Rico Three Mile Plan for Annexation
Town of Rico Three Mile Plan for Annexation 10.20.2010 Adopted by Resolution 2010-2 Produced with funding support from the Colorado Department of Local Affairs 2 Content Guide Introduction. 3 Annexation
More informationVisual Impact Rating Form - Instructions
Visual Impact Rating Form Instructions Project Name: Baron Winds Project EDR Project No: 13039 Date: 05.16.17 Reference: Visual Impact Rating Form - Instructions These instructions are intended to guide
More informationUwharrie National Forest Aesthetic Study
Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Yadkin Division Yadkin Project Relicensing (FERC No. 2197) Uwharrie National Forest Aesthetic Study Draft Report Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...ES-i 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1
More informationChapter 5: Recreation
Chapter 5: Recreation Introduction and Setting Recreational opportunities within Nevada County are varied, ranging from public parks with intensively used active recreational facilities, to vast tracts
More informationSanta Cruz River Master Plan. Presented to the Arizona Floodplain Management Association Spring Conference June 8-10, 2011
Santa Cruz River Master Plan Presented to the Arizona Floodplain Management Association Spring Conference June 8-10, 2011 Introduction Who is FICO? 2 Project Team Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. River
More informationFinger Lakes National Forest. Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2014 Backbone Horse Camp Water Hydrant Project Scoping Information Hector Ranger District Town of Lodi, Seneca County, New York For Information
More informationHAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
SEWRPC Community Assistance Planning Report No. 282, 2nd Edition CITY OF MILWAUKEE ALL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Chapter IV HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES [NOTE: Throughout this plan update
More informationglenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the
glenwood canyon I-70 design process Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee August 11, 1976 prepared by the TRG Recreation Subcommittee for the Colorado Division of Highways glenwood canyon
More information-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE
CHAPTER 20.504 VISUAL RESOURCE AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AREAS Sec. 20.504.005 Applicability. Sec. 20.504.010 Purpose. Sec. 20.504.015 Highly Scenic Areas. Sec. 20.504.020 Special Communities and Neighborhoods.
More informationInformation for File MMJ Main Stem Bassett Creek Restoration Project
Information for File 2013-03866-MMJ Main Stem Bassett Creek Restoration Project Applicant: Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Corps Contact: Melissa Jenny Address: Corps of Engineers, St. Paul
More informationViews from the Bridge
Chapter 2 Views from the Bridge Alternative 2A would primarily have adverse visual impacts to views from the Bridge, with the exception of a strongly adverse visual impact from Viewpoint 11 (Car View East)
More informationJoe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017
Joe Pool Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting May 23, 2017 Presented By Jason Owen Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose of this
More information4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. Aesthetics refers to visual resources and the quality of what can
More information6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES. Landscape Character
6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES 6.3.1 Affected Environment The DMR discussion is divided into two areas, DMR and Dillingham Trail, which would extend from SBMR to DMR. The ROI includes all areas within the line of
More informationELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION
THURSTON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OPEN SPACE TAX PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA CHECKLIST OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATION Use this checklist to help you determine whether your property is eligible for open
More informationMEMORANDUM OF BOG TURTLE HABITAT INVESTIGATION
MEMORANDUM OF BOG TURTLE HABITAT INVESTIGATION 410-728-2900 Fax: 410-728-3160 www.rkk.com To: From: CC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Jennifer A Ottenberg Miller,
More information6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction
6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS 6.8.1 Introduction The Scenic Highways Element is an optional General Plan element authorized by Section 65303 of the Government Code. The Scenic Highways Element is intended to establish
More information3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.
This section of the Draft EIR addresses the existing land uses on and adjacent to the project site and discusses the potential impacts of the proposed project on existing land uses. Key issues addressed
More informationTHREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS
00216106.DOC NMA/RRK 1/30/14 THREE-STEP DESIGN PROCESS FOR OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISIONS Open space subdivisions, sometimes called cluster developments, maintain a significant portion of a development site in
More informationPublic Information Meeting
Lavon Lake Master Plan Revision Public Information Meeting March 10, 2015 Presented By Michael Kinard Lake Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Purpose of
More informationArchitectural Inventory Form
COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Page 1 of 8 Official Eligibility Determination (OAHP use only) Rev. 9/98 OAHP1403 Date Initials Determined Eligible National Register Determined Not Eligible National
More informationMississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report CITY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 2014 City of RAMSEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Need and Intent The Mississippi Skyway pedestrian bridge
More informationAppendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study
Appendix E Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Prepared by: HDR Alaska, Inc. 2525 C Street, Suite 305 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 February 2014 This page intentionally
More informationPARKS AND RECREATION
PARKS AND RECREATION WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER: Background information on the development of the Park, Recreation, and System Plan (PRSP). General overview of Ellensburg s parks and recreation
More informationRegulation Changes for Open Space and Similar Uses
Regulation Changes for Open Space and Similar Uses What is the Project? This project is an analysis of the Zoning Ordinance relating to public lands and open space regulations. The proposed text amendments
More information2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental
REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ Affected Environment, Environmental 2.1.8 Cultural Resources This section evaluates the potential for historical and archaeological resources within the proposed
More informationWASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON
WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION North Bethany Subarea Stream Corridors: Existing Regulations In Oregon, there is a distinct difference between the land use rules that apply in rural
More informationOVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS
OVERMOUNTAIN VICTORY TRAIL BURKE CALDELL CORRIDOR FEASIBLITY STUDY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CALDWELL COUNTY PATHWAYS Caldwell County Pathways along with our co-partners City of Lenoir, Town of Gamewell,
More informationCHAPTER 1 Background Information
CHAPTER 1 Background Information Introduction Antietam Lake Park is located in Berks County, just east of the City of Reading. The 643 acre county park was assembled through several acquisitions in 2005,
More informationBISCUIT RUN PARK MASTER PLAN
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS November 14, 2018 BISCUIT RUN PARK MASTER PLAN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ANHOLD ASSOCIATES Contents Project Introduction Property Background County Park Planning Process Existing Site &
More informationDraft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies
Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies Instructions- Review each goal and policy and discuss with group any changes, deletions for additions to the list using your groups pen. Keep
More informationNorthern Branch Corridor DEIS December 2011
16 Floodplains 161 Chapter Overview 1611 Introduction The flowing chapter identifies floodplains found within the Northern Branch Corridor in accordance with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management
More informationWELCOME TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE. Please Sign In
WELCOME TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE Replacement of Oxtongue Lake Narrows Bridge & Oxtongue River Bridge, Highway 60 (G.W.P. 93-89-00 & G.W.P. 5550-04-00) Class Environmental Assessment (Group B) Please
More informationPine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014
Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District is revising the 1976 Pine Flat Lake Master Plan and is seeking public
More informationDecision Notice. Proposed Action
Decision Notice Paving Weld County Road 105 USDA Forest Service Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland Pawnee National Grassland Ranger District Weld County, Colorado November
More informationThe analysis area for the scenic resource is the project area described in Chapter 1. Affected Environment/Existing Condition
Chapter 3 - Scenic Resource SCENIC RESOURCES Introduction The Spotted Bear Ranger District is a destination point for outdoor recreation activities and offers a variety of recreation opportunities: driving
More informationRZC Public View Corridors and Gateways
RZC 21.42 Public View Corridors and Gateways 21.42.010 Purpose 21.42.020 Scope and Authority 21.42.030 Administration 21.42.040 Gateways Design 21.42.050 Unidentified Public Views 21.42.060 Identification
More informationDESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE
RFQ: 17-C-00003 DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE PREPARED BY: JAMES E. JACKSON, JR. AIA CITY ARCHITECT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT and INTERFLOW ENGINEERING, L.L.C DESIGN CRITERIA
More informationAPPENDIX G LAND USE INVENTORY STUDY REPORT
APPENDIX G LAND USE INVENTORY STUDY REPORT Study 10.0 - Land Use Inventory Land Use Inventory Loup River Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 1256 Study 10.0 Land Use Inventory August 26, 2010 2010 Loup
More informationExtract from Whitehorse Planning Scheme - LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES - CLAUSE Preferred Character Statements
Extract from Whitehorse Planning Scheme - LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES - CLAUSE 22.03 22.03-5 Preferred Character Statements Bush Environment The streetscapes will be dominated by vegetation with subservient
More informationDepartment of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation
Department of Community Development Michael J. Penrose, Acting Director Divisions Building Permits & Inspection Code Enforcement County Engineering Economic Development & Marketing Planning & Environmental
More informationPURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.
US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Joint Public Notice Application for a Department of the Army Permit and a Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification and/or Coastal Zone Management
More informationGenex Kidston Connection Project: Draf t Environmental Assessment Report Powerlink Queensland
: Draf t Environmental Assessment Report Powerlink Queensland Chapter 14 \\autsv1fp001\projects\605x\60577456\6. Draft Docs\6.1 Reports\4. Compiled draft 17 September\Covers\Chapters\Ch 14.docx Rev ision
More informationWashington Pass Overlook
Washington Pass Overlook The Washington Pass Overlook is located on the Methow Valley Ranger District on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. The overlook is at the crest of Washington Pass and is part
More informationPresented at USSD Conference April 20-24, 2009, Nashville, TN HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT USING THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE AS A VISUAL BARRIER ABSTRACT
HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT USING THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE AS A VISUAL BARRIER 1 Andrew Aceves, P.G., Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 2 Melissa L. Dubinsky, Ph.D, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 3 Craig Giesmann,
More information3.1 AESTHETICS Background and Methodology
3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 Background and Methodology 3.1.1.1 Regulatory Context The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that project sponsors evaluate the project s potential to cause aesthetic
More informationGarden Bridge Planning Application
Planning Application Additional Verified photomontages and assessment September 2014 Contents Page 1 Visual assessment 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Baseline 2 1.3 Potential effects and good environmental
More informationSherman Pass Project Post-Fire Treatment Scenery Report Barbara Jackson, Landscape Architect, 3/30/2016
Sherman Pass Project Post-Fire Treatment Scenery Report Barbara Jackson, Landscape Architect, 3/30/2016 Introduction This report updates the 2015 Sherman Pass Project Scenery Report based on changes in
More informationStaff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.
Agenda Item D-2 City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services To: Planning Commission From: Stephen Atkinson, Planning Services Division Subject: Open Space Corridors Project Meeting Date: March 1,
More informationB - Coalfield River Corridor Landscape Character Type
B - Coalfield River Corridor Landscape Character Type Landscape Character Type - Coalfield River Corridor The Coalfield River Corridors Landscape Character Type is located in the two converging valleys
More informationDon Narrows Workshop DRAFT MEETING REPORT Saturday, May 24, 2008 South Regent Park Recreation Centre
Don Narrows Workshop DRAFT MEETING REPORT Saturday, May 24, 2008 South Regent Park Recreation Centre Introduction to the Workshop & this Report On Saturday, May 24, 2008 Toronto and Region Conservation
More information3.1 Survey Monument Preservation Guidelines for New and Reconstruction Projects. B. After construction and prior to recording Notice of Completion:
3.0 SURVEY 3.1 Survey Monument Preservation Guidelines for New and Reconstruction Projects A. Prior to construction: 1. Public survey records are to be researched for the location of all possible survey
More informationSECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION
SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION Illinois Route 60/83 IL 176 to the intersection of IL 60 (Townline Road) Lake County P-91-084-07 Mundelein Park and Recreation District Project Limit SECTION 4(f)
More informationVISUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE TRI-STATE MONTROSE-NUCLA-CAHONE TRANSMISSION LINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHWEST COLORADO
FOR THE TRI-STATE MONTROSE-NUCLA-CAHONE TRANSMISSION LINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SOUTHWEST COLORADO Prepared for Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. 1100 West 116 th Avenue Westminster,
More informationMILL POND OVERLOOK. A project of the Town of Oyster Bay. Prepared by Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP
MILL POND OVERLOOK A project of the Town of Oyster Bay Prepared by Cameron Engineering & Associates, LLP Funded in part through an EPF grant from the NYS Department of State Project Goals & Advisory Committee
More informationProject Narrative For Fruita RV Resort Conditional Use Permit
Project Narrative For Fruita RV Resort Conditional Use Permit Date: November 18, 2016 Prepared by: Robert W. Jones, II, P.E. Vortex Engineering & Architecture, Inc. 2394 Patterson Rd., Ste. 201 Grand Junction,
More informationCity of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House
City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House FEBRUARY 6, 2018 The following slides contain the display board content from the open house. Please use boards to answer questions in
More informationPennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.
(10/27/14) PennDOT Section 106 Field Assessments and Finding Combined Early tification/finding? Yes Concurrence required or requested: Yes MPMS: 51507 ER# (if consultation with PHMC required) ): County:
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. Design Recommendations
RECOMMENDATIONS While the San Diego River Park will serve to unify the river as a whole, each reach of the river park maintains distinct resources and character. Recommendations for each reach have been
More informationAGENCIES and OFFICIALS CONTACTED FEDERAL Federal Aviation Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.
AGENCIES and OFFICIALS CONTACTED FEDERAL Federal Aviation Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection
More informationVILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN
Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 THE PROJECT VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN TERMS OF REFERENCE The Town of Caledon (Town) is a large, predominantly rural municipality with
More informationLetter of Notification For East Lima Station Expansion Project
Letter of Notification For East Lima Station Expansion Project PUCO Case No. 18-0906-EL-BLN Submitted to: The Ohio Power Siting Board Pursuant to Ohio Administrative Code Section 4906-6-05 Submitted by:
More informationQ&As. 1. Considering other public lands. 2. N & P NFs visitation and opportunities. 3. Sustainable Recreation Definition and Need
Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Stakeholders Forum Meeting November 2015 1. Considering other public lands 2. N & P NFs visitation and opportunities 3. Sustainable Recreation Definition and Need 4. National/regional
More informationMEMORANDUM. Jim Tomberlin, Mountain Valley Properties
MEMORANDUM TO: CC: Jim Tomberlin, Mountain Valley Properties GR Fielding, Pitkin County Engineer Brian Pettit, Pitkin County Public Works Director Dan Cokley, SGM FROM: Lee Barger, SGM DATE: June 16, 2016
More informationRequest for an Exception to the Napa County Road and Street Standards
F Request for an Exception to the Napa County Road and Street Standards Shed Creek Winery Use Permit P16-327 and Use Permit Exception to the Conservation Regulations P17-178 Planning Commission Hearing
More informationROARING FORK RAILROAD CORRIDOR
ROARING FORK RAILROAD CORRIDOR CONSERVATION AREA ASSESSMENT August 28, 2017 Prepared For: Covenant Enforcement Commission Roaring Fork Transportation Authority Prepared By: NEWLAND PROJECT RESOURCES, INC
More informationBiology and Wildlife. Erosion, Drainage, and Storm water. Chavez Ranch Road Project Comment Response Table - Page 1 January 2017
Air Quality Commenters are concerned that there would be increased particulate matter and introduction of chemical pollutants during the construction of the project that could affect the air quality and
More informationIn Title Your Area 5: Amersham to Great Missenden
LOCAL AREA In Title Your Area 5: Amersham to Great Missenden Find out here about: what is proposed between Amersham and Great Missenden; what this means for people living between Amersham and Great Missenden;
More informationConcept Master Plan. for. Draft of. Wildlife Management Area. Prepared for. June, 2008
Draft of Concept Master Plan for Vermillion Highlands: A Research, Recreation and Wildlife Management Area Prepared for Vermillion Highlands Steering Committee - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
More informationSENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY
SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY Chapter 22 Sensitive Lands Overlay 22.1 PURPOSE 22.2 APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS 22.3 SENSITIVE LAND REGULATIONS 22.4 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 22.5 DESIGN STANDARDS 22.6
More informationMcArthur Swamp Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat MCARTHUR SWAMP PLANNING UNIT
McArthur Swamp Planning Unit Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat Conduct surveys of the planning unit to identify biological resources and enable their protection. Most of the McArthur Swamp land acreage
More informationNorth River Mills Bridge Hampshire County State Project # S314-45/ Federal Project # ARRA-4520(003)D FR#: HM-1
North River Mills Bridge Hampshire County State Project # S314-45/20-2.40 02 Federal Project # ARRA-4520(003)D FR#: 10-1463-HM-1 STATE LEVEL OF HISTORIC DOCUMENTATION November 2010 West Virginia Department
More informationIrvington to Kino 138 kv Transmission Line Project April 2018
EXHIBIT H: EXISTING PLANS To the extent applicant is able to determine, state the existing plans of the state, local government and private entities for other developments at or in the vicinity of the
More informationJoint Public Notice. Public Notice Date: February 9, 2015 Expiration Date: March 11, 2015
US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Joint Public Notice Application for a Department of the Army Permit and a Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification and/or Coastal Zone Management
More informationPROJECT COMMITMENTS. Research Parkway -- Winston-Salem. From Stadium Drive to Third Street. Forsyth County. WBS Element TIP Project U-4918
PROJECT COMMITMENTS Research Parkway -- Winston-Salem From Stadium Drive to Third Street Forsyth County WBS Element 40929 TIP Project U-4918 In addition to State and local permit conditions to which Piedmont
More information3. Highway Landscaping Assessment
Guidelines for Highway Landscaping 3-1 3. Highway Landscaping Assessment 3.1 Introduction This section outlines the steps necessary to assess the highway landscaping component of a state highway construction
More informationPreliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument
Preliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument The Monument shall be managed consistent with the values that underlie the designation as a National
More informationSTEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES
STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES Robin Kriesberg, Save the Sound, Inc. Thomas Halavik, US Fish and Wildlife Service Coastal Program An Initiative to Identify, Protect
More information