2. Introduction of committee members and guests. For a current committee roster, see page 2.

Transcription

1 AGENDA NFPA Technical Committee on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meeting Tuesday, July 19, 2016 Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina Fort Lauderdale, FL 1. Call to order. Call meeting to order by Chair Victor Dubrowski at 8:00 a.m. on July 19, 2016 at the Hilton Fort Lauderdale Marina, Fort Lauderdale, FL. 2. Introduction of committee members and guests. For a current committee roster, see page Approval of August 25, 2015 first draft meeting minutes. See page The process staff PowerPoint presentation. See page Core chapters, second revisions of interest. 6. NFPA 101 Second Draft preparation. For Public Comments, see page NFPA 5000 Second Draft preparation. For Public Comments, see page Committee Input Review. For Committee Inputs, see page Emerging issues, industry trends, 2021 preparation. 10. Other business. 11. Future meetings. 12. Adjournment. Enclosures Page 1 of 97

2 Address List No Phone Educational and Day-Care Occupancies Safety to Life Victor L. Dubrowski Chair Code Consultants, Inc Woodland Parkway St. Louis, MO Alternate: Richard M. DiMisa SE 1/17/1997 SAF-END Kristin Bigda Secretary (Staff-Nonvoting) National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA /02/2016 Kristin Bigda SAF-END 02/03/2016 SAF-END Mark J. Aaby Principal Koffel Associates, Inc Centre Park Drive, Suite 200 Columbia, MD Alternate: Clay P. Aler SE 08/11/2014 SAF-END Judy Biddle Principal US Department of the Air Force AFCEC Tyndall 139 Barnes Drive, Suite 1 Tyndall AFB, FL Alternate: Raymond N. Hansen U 10/29/2012 SAF-END Samuel S. Dannaway Principal S. S. Dannaway Associates, Inc. 501 Sumner Street, Suite 421 Honolulu, HI SE 7/24/1997 SAF-END Richard L. Day Principal Michigan State Fire Marshal's Office 207 Jackson Street Allegan, MI E 08/17/2015 SAF-END Jason Ellis Principal University of Kentucky 252 East Maxwell Court Lexington, KY U 12/08/2015 SAF-END Keith S. Frangiamore Principal Fire Safety Consultants, Inc Alft Lane, Suite 100 Elgin, IL SE 10/4/2007 SAF-END Max L. Gandy Principal Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints AEC Division 50 East North Temple Street 12th Floor West Wing Salt Lake City, UT Alternate: Christopher M. Jenkins U 10/29/2012 SAF-END Jeffrey L. Haidacher Principal Fairfax County Public Schools 8115 Gatehouse Road, Suite 3500 Falls Church, VA U 03/03/2014 SAF-END Howard Hopper Principal UL LLC Benicia Street Fremont, CA RT 08/17/2015 SAF-END Dominick G. Kasmauskas Principal National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc. 960 US Route 6, Suite 171 Mahopac, NY Alternate: Cynthia Giedraitis M 10/3/2002 SAF-END Rosa Lazebnik Principal Primera Engineers 100 South Wacker Drive Suite 700 Chicago, IL SE 08/11/2014 SAF-END Alfred J. Longhitano Principal Alfred J. Longhitano, P.E., LLC 26 Salem Road Chappaqua, NY SE 7/23/2008 SAF-END Page 2 of 97 1

3 Address List No Phone Educational and Day-Care Occupancies Safety to Life Maria B. Marks M 03/05/2012 Principal SAF-END Siemens Industry, Inc Spruell Drive Kensington, MD National Electrical Manufacturers Association Alternate: Richard Jay Roberts Richard E. Merck Principal Montgomery County Fire & Rescue Service 255 Rockville Pike, 2nd Floor Rockville, MD /02/2016 Kristin Bigda SAF-END E 01/10/2008 SAF-END Matthew J. Mertens Principal North Shore Fire Department 665 East Brown Deer Road Bayside, WI International Fire Marshals Association E 3/1/2011 SAF-END Kurt A. Roeper Principal ASSA ABLOY 110 Sargent Drive New Haven, CT Steel Door Institute Alternate: Thomas R. Janicak M 7/26/2007 SAF-END Michael L. Savage, Sr. Principal City of Rio Rancho 3200 Civic Center Circle NE Rio Rancho, NM E 10/4/2007 SAF-END Michael L. Sinsigalli Principal West Hartford Fire Department 95 Raymond Road West Hartford, CT E 7/17/1998 SAF-END Catherine L. Stashak Principal Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal James R. Thompson Center 100 West Randolph Street, Chicago, IL Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal E 1/17/1991 SAF-END Aleksy L. Szachnowicz Principal Anne Arundel County Public Schools 2644 Riva Road Annapolis, MD U 7/24/1997 SAF-END Ann Marie A. Wolf Principal Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Inc East Grant Road Tucson, AZ Alternate: Daniel W. Uthe C 03/05/2012 SAF-END Clay P. Aler Alternate Koffel Associates, Inc Centre Park Drive, Suite 200 Columbia, MD Principal: Mark J. Aaby SE 10/28/2014 SAF-END Richard M. DiMisa Alternate Code Consultants, Inc Woodland Parkway, Suite 300 St. Louis, MO Principal: Victor L. Dubrowski SE 3/4/2009 SAF-END Cynthia Giedraitis Alternate National Fire Sprinkler Association 2013 Oakwood Trail College Station, TX National Fire Sprinkler Association Principal: Dominick G. Kasmauskas M 08/11/2014 SAF-END Page 3 of 97 2

4 Address List No Phone Educational and Day-Care Occupancies Safety to Life Raymond N. Hansen Alternate US Department of the Air Force AFCEC/COSM 139 Barnes Drive, Suite 1 Tyndall AFB, FL Principal: Judy Biddle U 12/08/2015 SAF-END Thomas R. Janicak Alternate Ceco Door Products 801 Mark Lane Hampshire, IL Steel Door Institute Principal: Kurt A. Roeper 06/02/2016 Kristin Bigda SAF-END M 10/23/2013 SAF-END Christopher M. Jenkins Alternate Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Church Office Building 50 East North Temple Salt Lake City, UT Principal: Max L. Gandy U 03/03/2014 SAF-END Richard Jay Roberts Alternate Honeywell Fire Safety 624 Hammer Lane North Aurora, IL National Electrical Manufacturers Association Principal: Maria B. Marks M 3/1/2011 SAF-END Daniel W. Uthe Alternate Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Inc. 585 South Stephanie Loop Tucson, AZ Principal: Ann Marie A. Wolf C 10/29/2012 SAF-END Kristin Bigda Staff Liaison National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA /03/2016 SAF-END Page 4 of 97 3

5 MINUTES NFPA Technical Committee on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 First Draft Meeting August 25, 2015 InterContinental Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI 1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order by Chair Vic Dubrowski at 8:00 a.m. on August 25, 2015 at the InterContinental Milwaukee Hotel, Milwaukee, WI. 2. Self-introductions. Self-introductions were made by committee members and guests. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT NAME Victor Dubrowski, Chair Ron Coté, Nonvoting Secretary Mark Aaby, Principal Judy Biddle, Principal Samuel Dannaway, Principal Keith Frangiamore, Principal Max Gandy, Principal Cynthia Giedraitis, Alt. to D. Kasmauskas Jeffrey Haidacher, Principal Howard Hopper, Principal Christopher Jenkins, Alt. to M. Gandy Dominick Kasmauskas, Principal Rosa Lazebnik, Principal Alfred Longhitano, Principal Maria Marks, Principal Matthew Mertens, Principal Richard Roberts, Alt. to Maria Marks COMPANY Code Consultants, Inc. National Fire Protection Association Koffel Associates, Inc. US Department of the Air Force S.S. Dannaway Associates, Inc. Fire Safety Consultants, Inc. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints National Fire Sprinkler Association Fairfax VA County Public Schools UL Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints National Fire Sprinkler Association Primera Engineers Alfred J. Longhitano, P.E., LLC Siemens Industry, Inc. Rep.: National Electrical Manufacturers Assoc. North Shore Fire Department Rep.: International Fire Marshals Association Honeywell Life Safety Page 5 of 97

6 Kurt Roeper, Principal Jeffrey Shirey, Principal Catherine Stashak, Principal Aleksy Szachnowicz, Principal Rep.: National Electrical Manufacturers Association ASSA ABLOY Rep.: Steel Door Institute Maryland State Fire Marshal s Ofice Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal Rep.: Office of the Illinois State Fire Marshal Anne Arundel County MD Public Schools TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS NOT PRESENT NAME Richard Merck, Principal Michael Savage, Sr., Principal Michael Sinsigalli, Principal Billy Upton, Principal Anne Marie A. Wolf, Principal COMPANY Montgomery County Fire & Rescue Service City of Rio Rancho NM West Hartford CT Fire Department Ballou Justice Upton Architects Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Inc. GUESTS NAME James Chauvin Dan Finnegan Daniel Gorham Raymond Hanson Martin Kirk Denise Pappas Jake Pauls Robert Solomon Linda Strobl Joshua Talley John Woestman Fred Worley COMPANY Independent Public Health Advocate & Consultant/Canada Siemens National Fire Protection Association US Department of the Air Force National Fire Sprinkler Association Valcom Jake Pauls Consulting Services National Fire Protection Association Hamilton Public Health Services/Canada Koffel Associates BHMA Texas Department Aging Disability 3. Approval of June 25, 2013 second draft meeting minutes. The minutes were approved as distributed. 4. The process staff PowerPoint presentation. Staff explained the revision schedule and particulars for committee actions at the First Draft meeting via the slides included in the agenda 5. Correlating committee minutes with direction for 2018 editions. The committee reviewed the subject areas raised by the NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 Correlating Committees. Page 6 of 97

7 6. Core chapters, first revisions of interest. The committee reviewed key changes made to the core chapters by the FUN, MEA, FIR, BSF and INT committees, especially those formatted with the words where required by Chapters 11 through 43 and, thus, need to be referenced specifically within the occupancy chapters if they are to apply. First Revisions (FRs) and, in some cases, Committee Inputs (CIs) were drafted, as deemed appropriate by the committee. 7. School security workshop. The report was noted as received. First Revisions (FRs) were developed to address the subject. 8. Final report of the Sandy Hook advisory commission. The report was noted as received. 9. FPRF self-preservation of pre-school children report. The report was noted as received. First Revisions (FRs) were developed to address the subject. 10. New neighborhood school design Sam Dannaway. Floor plans were viewed. No action was taken. 11. CO detection reference section number error in corrected by Errata Information noted as received. 12. NFPA 101 First Draft preparation. All NFPA 101 Public Inputs (PI) were addressed. First Revisions (FR) and Committee Inputs (CI) were prepared as needed. 13. NFPA 5000 First Draft preparation. All NFPA 5000 Public Inputs (PI) were addressed. First Revisions (FR) and Committee Inputs (CI) were prepared as needed. 14. Other business. None. 15. Future meetings. The committee will need to meet for Second Draft preparation approximately the third week of July 2016 along with other occupancy chapter committees. 16. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Page 7 of 97

8 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Occupancy Chapter Committees July 18-22, Fort Lauderdale, Florida National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. NFPA Second Draft Meeting At this and all NFPA committee meetings we are concerned with your safety. If the fire alarm sounds, please proceed to an exit. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 2 Page 8 of 97 1

9 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Members, please verify/update your contact information. Use of visual or audio recording devices capable of reproducing verbatim transcriptions of this or any NFPA meeting is not permitted. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 3 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Guests Sign in and identify affiliations Participation Requested 7 days prior to the meeting, or At the discretion of the Chair Guest chairs are located around the room Equal opportunity granted to opposing views nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 4 Page 9 of 97 2

10 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Members categorized in ANY interest category who have been retained to represent the interests of ANOTHER interest category (with respect to a specific issue or issues that are to be addressed by a TC/CC) shall declare those interests to the committee and refrain from voting on any Public Input, Comment, or other matter relating to those issues throughout the process. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 5 NFPA Second Draft Meeting General Procedures Follow Robert s Rules of Order Discussion requires a motion nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 6 Page 10 of 97 3

11 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Motions for Ending Debate, Previous Question, or Call the Question Not in order when another has the floor Requires a second This motion is not debatable and DOES NOT automatically stop debate A 2/3 affirmative vote immediately closes debate and returns to the original motion on the floor Fewer then 2/3 allows debate to continue nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 7 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Committee member actions Member addresses the chair Receives recognition from the chair Introduces the motion Another member seconds the motion nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 8 Page 11 of 97 4

12 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Timeline: Annual 2017 Revision Cycle Comment Stage (Second Draft): Public Comment Closing Date: May 16, 2016 Second Draft Meetings: June and July 18-22, 2016 Posting of Second Draft for Balloting Date: September 5, 2016 Posting of Second Draft for NITMAM: January 16, 2017 Tech Session Preparation: NITMAM Closing Date: February 20, 2017 NITMAM /CAM Posting Date: April 17, 2017 NFPA Annual Meeting: June 4-7, 2017 Standards Council Issuance: Issuance of Documents with CAM: August 10, 2017 nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 9 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Technical Committee Actions Resolving Public Comments Committee Action and Committee Statement Creating Second Revisions nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 10 Page 12 of 97 5

13 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings 11 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Resolving Public Comments Committee develops a Committee Action Accept Reject but see Reject Reject but Hold (See Regs ) nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 12 Page 13 of 97 6

14 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Committee Statements Committee must clearly indicate reasons for not accepting the recommendation and/or point to a relevant Second Revision All Public Comment actions must have a Committee Statement Must include a valid technical reason nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 13 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Committee Statements (continued) No vague references to intent Explain how the submitter s substantiation is inadequate Neither Public Comment actions nor Committee Statements get balloted nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 14 Page 14 of 97 7

15 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting New Material No new material after the Public Input Stage since it is not subject to public review What constitutes new material is decided by the TC or Correlating Committee Adding new material at the Comments Stage could successfully be challenged through appeal to the NFPA Standards Council nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 15 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Formal Voting Voting during meeting is used to establish a sense of agreement (simple majority) Secured by letter ballot ( 2/3 agreement) Only the results of the formal ballot determine the official position of the committee on the Second Draft nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 16 Page 15 of 97 8

16 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Ballots Second Revisions (SRs) ONLY Public Comment actions and Committee Statements not balloted Reference materials are available Second Draft, Public Comments, First Draft Report Allowed vote: Affirmative on all SRs Affirmative on all SRs with exceptions specifically noted Ballot form provides a column for affirmative with comment Note: This box only needs to be checked if there is an accompanying comment Reject or abstain requires a reason nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 17 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Circulation Initial ballot Circulation of negatives and comments Members may change votes during circulation Second Revision that fails letter ballot is designated as a Committee Comment in the Second Draft Report, marked as Reject, and not included in the Second Draft nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 18 Page 16 of 97 9

17 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Failed Second Revisions If a Second Revision fails ballot and the subject text was a result of a First Draft change, a Supplementary Ballot is issued Supplementary Ballot asks TC if it still favors the First Revision change reported in the First Draft If yes, same change appears as a Second Revision and is included in the Second Draft If no, the change appears as a Committee Comment and the text reverts to previous edition See Regs nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 19 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Electronic Balloting Ballots are issued and submitted online Alternates are strongly encouraged to return ballots Ballot session will time out after 90 minutes Use submit button to save your work nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 20 Page 17 of 97 10

18 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Click link on the ballot Sign in with NFPA.org Committee Login and Password nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 21 NFPA Second Draft Meeting Select either Affirmative All or Affirmative with Exception(s) nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 22 Page 18 of 97 11

19 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings NFPA Second Draft Meeting Use See FR/SR - # link to review all First/Second Revisions Use Edit election to change individual votes or to modify vote after submitting ballot nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 23 NFPA Second Draft Meeting To complete ballot click Participant Consent and Submit Return and edit any votes before ballot due date. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 24 Page 19 of 97 12

20 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Legal Antitrust Matters It is the policy of the NFPA to strictly comply with state and federal antitrust laws. NFPA expects all participants in its standards development activities to conduct themselves in strict accordance with these laws. It is the obligation of each participant to read and understand NFPA s Antitrust Policy. (You can access this policy at nfpa.org/regs.) nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 25 Legal Antitrust Matters (cont d) Participants must avoid any conduct, conversation or agreement that would constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade. Conversation topics that are off limits include: Profit, margin, or cost data; Prices, rates, or fees; Selection, division or allocation of sales territories, markets or customers; Refusal to deal with a specific business entity. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 26 Page 20 of 97 13

21 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Legal Antitrust Matters (cont d) NFPA s standards development activities are based on openness, honesty, fairness and balance. Participants must adhere to the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards and the Guide for the Conduct of Participants in the NFPA Standards Development Process. (You can access the Regulations and Guide at nfpa.org/regs.) Follow guidance and direction from your employer or other organization you may represent. Be sure to ask questions if you have them. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 27 Legal Antitrust Matters (cont d) Manner is which standards development activity is conducted can be important. The Guide requires standards development activity to be conducted with openness, honesty and in good faith. Participants are not entitled to speak on behalf of NFPA. Participants must take appropriate steps to ensure their statements whether written or oral and regardless of the setting, are portrayed as personal opinions, not the position of NFPA. Be sure to ask questions if you have them. nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 28 Page 21 of 97 14

22 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Legal Patents Disclosures of essential patent claims should be made by the patent holder. Patent disclosures should be made early in the process. Others may also notify NFPA if they believe that a proposed or existing NFPA standard includes an essential patent claim. NFPA has adopted and follows ANSI s Patent Policy. It is the obligation of each participant to read and understand NFPA s Patent Policy. (You can access this policy at nfpa.org/regs.) nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. 29 TC Struggles with an Issue TC needs data on a new technology or emerging issue Two opposing views on an issue with no real data Data presented is not trusted by committee Code Fund Lends a Hand TC rep and/or staff liaison submits a Code Fund Request Requests are reviewed by a Panel and chosen based on need / feasibility Research Project Carried Out Funding for project is provided by the Code Fund and/or industry sponsors Project is completed and data is available to TC Page 22 of 97 15

23 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Document Information Pages About Current and Previous Editions Next Edition Technical Committee Document scope Table of contents Articles Research and statistical reports Latest codes and standards news on NFPA Today blog feed Free access Issued TIAs, FIs, Errata Archived revision information such as meeting and ballot information, First Draft Reports (previously ROPs), Second Draft Reports (previously ROCs), and Standards Council and NITMAM information Revision cycle schedule Posting & closing dates Submit public input/comments via electronic submission system. Meeting and ballot information First Draft Report and Second Draft Report NITMAM information Standard Council Decisions Private TC info (*red asterisk) Ballot circulations, informational ballots and other committee info Committee name and staff liaison Committee scope and responsibility Committee list with private information Committee documents (codes & standards) in PDF format Committees seeking members Online committee membership application Questions nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. Page 23 of 97 16

24 NFPA 101 & NFPA 5000 Second Draft Meetings Thank You nfpa.org National Fire Protection Association. All rights reserved. Page 24 of 97 17

25 of 1 5/20/2016 1:08 PM Public Comment No. 42-NFPA [ New Section after ] New Section Additional Proposed Changes File Name Description Approved 101_CCN_45.pdf 101 CC Note #45 Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 45 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review the additional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FCR-6. This action will be considered as a public comment. Related Item Correlating Committee Note No. 45-NFPA [New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 15:06:01 EST 2016 Copyright Assignment I, CC ON SAF_AAC, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment. By checking this box I affirm that I am CC ON SAF_AAC, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature Page 25 of 97

26 of 1 3/2/ :05 PM Correlating Committee Note No. 45-NFPA [ New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 11:51:19 EST 2016 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review the additional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FCR-6. This action will be considered as a public comment. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 11 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bush, Kenneth E. Hopper, Howard Hrustich, Stephen Hugo, Jeffrey M. Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund Koffel, William E. Pauls, Jake Quiter, James R. Reiswig, Rodger Reynolds, Ronald C. Rosenbaum, Eric R. Page 26 of 97

27 of 1 6/1/2016 9:17 AM First Correlating Revision No. 6-NFPA [ New Section after ] Two releasing operations shall be permitted for educational occupancy classroom doors secured against unwanted entry in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 07:55:19 EST 2016 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: The new provision of is needed so that the new provisions of do not conflict with Chapter 7. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 11 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bush, Kenneth E. Hopper, Howard Hrustich, Stephen Hugo, Jeffrey M. Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund Koffel, William E. Pauls, Jake Quiter, James R. Reiswig, Rodger Reynolds, Ronald C. Rosenbaum, Eric R. Page 27 of 97

28 of 1 5/20/2016 1:10 PM Public Comment No. 16-NFPA [ New Section after 9.13 ] Add New Section after 9.13 Additional Proposed Changes File Name Description Approved 101_CCN_16.pdf 101 CC Note #16 Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 16 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) and the occupancy committees (AXM, END, HEA, BCF, RES, DET, MER, IND) to review the proposed change and determine if further changes are needed in the Code. The Correlating Committee will revisit the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) after they propose any desired changes. This action will be considered as a public comment. Related Item Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA [New Section after 9.13] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 09:37:17 EST 2016 Copyright Assignment I, CC ON SAF_AAC, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment. By checking this box I affirm that I am CC ON SAF_AAC, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature Page 28 of 97

29 of 1 3/2/ :34 PM Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA [ New Section after 9.13 ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 08:26:18 EST 2016 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) and the occupancy committees (AXM, END, HEA, BCF, RES, DET, MER, IND) to review the proposed change and determine if further changes are needed in the Code. The Correlating Committee will revisit the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) after they propose any desired changes. This action will be considered as a public comment. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 11 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bush, Kenneth E. Hopper, Howard Hrustich, Stephen Hugo, Jeffrey M. Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund Koffel, William E. Pauls, Jake Quiter, James R. Reiswig, Rodger Reynolds, Ronald C. Rosenbaum, Eric R. Page 29 of 97

30 of 2 6/1/2016 9:19 AM First Revision No NFPA [ New Section after 9.13 ] 9.14 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems Where Required. Where required by Chapters 11 through 43, a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72 and the provisions of through Considerations. The risk analysis required by shall additionally address all of the following considerations: (1) Fire and non-fire emergencies (2) Specific nature and anticipated risks of each facility (3) Characteristics of associated buildings, areas, spaces, campuses, equipment, and operations Emergency Communications System. An emergency communications system in accordance with NFPA 72 shall be provided where need for such is identified by the risk analysis required by , commensurate with the likelihood, vulnerability, magnitude, and potential consequences of emergencies Emergency Action Plan. The completed emergency action plan in accordance with Section 4.8 shall be used for the design of the mass notification/emergency communications system. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-BSF Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Jul 29 18:09:15 EDT 2015 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: This first revision seeks to provide a requirement to conduct a risk analysis and create an emergency action plan for occupancies where required by Chapters The need for effective emergency communications in the United States came into sharp focus in the 20th century in response to threats to homeland security and our educational occupancies. We have learned from the recent incidents that occurred in our college/university campuses, and other buildings, and have created installation guidelines to be followed for life safety. [Aurora, CO. Theater 2012; Columbine 1999; Virginia Tech 2007; Sandy Hook 2012; Weather Tornadoes/Storms]. // The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) School Safety, Codes and Security Workshop was held December 3 4, 2014 in College Park, Maryland, and was sponsored and hosted by NFPA. The resulting report highlights the need for real time communication systems in appropriate occupancies. // NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, has a chapter dedicated to emergency communication systems. This contains the detailed information on the risk analysis and emergency action plan as required in the above proposed sections. // This is NOT intended to require a mass notification system. There are many elements contained within a mass notification system. The process of the risk analysis will outline what is needed based on risk and engineering study for the occupancy. It will be the responsibility of the occupancy to react to the risk assessment. // A task group has been appointed to further review the location of the proposed material in Ch. 9. The committee requests the Correlating Committee review this action in conjunction with any related actions by the TC on Fundamentals and the occupancy chapter committees to ensure the provisions are appropriately coordinated. The committee also requests the Correlating Committee review the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment to recommend any needed changes to accommodate the addition of the proposed language. Response Message: Ballot Results Page 30 of 97

31 of 2 6/1/2016 9:19 AM This item has passed ballot 28 Eligible Voters 5 Not Returned 22 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Chen, Flora F. Donga, Paul M. Grill, Raymond A. Noveh, James Szmanda, Michael R. Affirmative All Bradley, Harry L. Brinkman, Kevin L. Brock, Pat D. Dale, Stephen E. Hagood, Claudia Hammerberg, Thomas P. Hugo, Jeffrey M. Hutton, Claude O. Jardin, Joseph M. Kellett, Michael Killian, David A. Klepitch, David L. Lazarz, Daniel J. Moore, Wayne D. Panowitz, Scott E. Reiswig, Rodger Roberts, Richard Jay Ruchala, Kurt A. Shudak, Lawrence J. Warner, Todd W. Wren, Carl D. Wyatt, David M. Negative with Comment Larrimer, Peter A. As written, this is not ready to be accepted in the Life Safety Code. The text has numerous problems. Editorial Comment Click here Page 31 of 97

32 09 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM Public Comment No. 20-NFPA [ New Section after ] Add new section Additional Proposed Changes File Name Description Approved 101_CCN_21.pdf 101 CC Note #21 Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 21 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Dubrowski and the Negative ballot of Roeper to add a charging statement as the provisions are not presented in context; include the term without special knowledge ; and reference the mounting height of the operable parts of the releasing mechanism rather than the location of the release itself. This action will be considered as a public comment. The Correlating Committee notes, in response to the Committee Statement, that two FCRs have been developed to address the request of the committee statement. Related Item Correlating Committee Note No. 21-NFPA [New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CC ON SAF_AAC Organization: NFPA CC ON SAFETY TO LIFE Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 10:05:37 EST 2016 Page 32 of 97

33 of 1 3/2/ :42 PM Correlating Committee Note No. 21-NFPA [ New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-AAC Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 09:01:42 EST 2016 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Dubrowski and the Negative ballot of Roeper to add a charging statement as the provisions are not presented in context; include the term without special knowledge ; and reference the mounting height of the operable parts of the releasing mechanism rather than the location of the release itself. This action will be considered as a public comment. The Correlating Committee notes, in response to the Committee Statement, that two FCRs have been developed to address the request of the committee statement. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 11 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bush, Kenneth E. Hopper, Howard Hrustich, Stephen Hugo, Jeffrey M. Kalie, Jr., J. Edmund Koffel, William E. Pauls, Jake Quiter, James R. Reiswig, Rodger Reynolds, Ronald C. Rosenbaum, Eric R. Page 33 of 97

34 of 3 6/1/ :15 AM First Revision No NFPA [ New Section after ] Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. (1) The locking means is approved. (2) The locking means can be engaged without opening the door. (3) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool. (4) The unlocking and unlatching requires not more than one releasing operation. (5) The unlocking and unlatching means are mounted at a height not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor. (6) Locks, if remotely engaged, can be unlocked from the classroom side. (7) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential. (8) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware. (9) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (10) The emergency action plan, required by , addresses the use of the locking and unlocking means from within and outside the room. (11) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of the emergency egress drills required by Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: SAF-END Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Aug 25 11:01:51 CDT 2015 Committee Statement and Meeting Notes Committee Statement: The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry. The multiple provisions proposed as part of / cover the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailed criteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditional egress needs. Ask Correlating Committee to prepare First Correlating Revisions (FCR) to Chapter 7: 101-FCR-xx The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation, unless otherwise specified in , , or , or Statement: The reference to new is needed for completeness and correlation. 101-FCR-xx Two releasing operations shall be permitted for educational occupancy classroom doors secured against unwanted entry in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 14 and 15. Statement: The new provision of is needed so that the new provisions of and do not conflict with Chapter 7. Response Message: Public Input No. 405-NFPA [Section No ] Public Input No. 193-NFPA [Section No ] Ballot Results Page 34 of 97

35 of 3 6/1/ :15 AM This item has passed ballot 24 Eligible Voters 2 Not Returned 18 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Hopper, Howard Upton, Billy E. Affirmative All Aaby, Mark J. Biddle, Judy Dannaway, Samuel S. Day, Richard L. Frangiamore, Keith S. Haidacher, Jeffrey L. Kasmauskas, Dominick G. Lazebnik, Rosa Longhitano, Alfred J. Marks, Maria B. Merck, Richard E. Savage, Sr., Michael L. Shirey, Jeffrey Sinsigalli, Michael L. Stashak, Catherine L. Szachnowicz, Aleksy L. Wassom, Mark S. Wolf, Ann Marie A. Affirmative with Comment Dubrowski, Victor L. The lack of a charging statement is an editorial error that can be addressed by the Correlating Committee. I also agree that, if the Correlating Committee develops language similar to the Section shown in the Committee Statement, it should apply only to existing educational occupancies per Chapter 15. Gandy, Max L. I agree with the new as proposed. The proposed should apply only to chapter 15 and for existing educational occupancies, which allows up to two releasing operations in an existing facility. Chapter 14 for new educational occupancies should only allow one releasing operation. New buildings with new hardware should be able to meet all requirements proposed with with only one releasing operation. Therefore the existing would cover new installations. Mertens, Matthew J. Badly needed direction for field use by the AHJ Negative with Comment Roeper, Kurt A. The ballot language is not what was shown to the Committee, or approved, as the charging statement has now been removed. The Committee approved the following charging statement; Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that all of the following conditions are met: Additionally; Item #1 - Locking systems should be 'listed and labeled', not approved Item #3 - the term special knowledge or effort, as required in ,should be used instead of 'use of a key or tool' Item #5 - Operable parts of releasing mechanisms should be located between 34" and 48" Editorial Comment Page 35 of 97

36 of 3 6/1/ :15 AM Click here Page 36 of 97

37 10 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM Public Comment No. 183-NFPA [ Section No ] Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry. Where a door in the means of egress from an occupiable space is lockable from within the space to prevent entry, the locking means shall comply with all of the following. (1) The locking means is approved shall be listed. (2) The locking means can be engaged shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door. (3) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can Egress shall be accomplished without the use of a key or tool. The unlocking and unlatching requires (4), a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (5) Egresss shall require not more than one releasing operation. (6) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching means are the door shall be mounted at a height not exceeding 48 less than 34 in. (865 mm) and not more than 48 in. ( 1220 mm) above the finished floor. (7) Locks, if remotely engaged, can shall be unlocked unlockable from the classroom side egress side of the door without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. (8) The door is capable locking means of the door, other than a door not used for ingress, shall be capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key occupiable space by a key or other credential. (9) The locking means does shall not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware invalidate the listing or labeling, where required, of the door assembly or any of its components. (10) Modifications to required fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80. (11) The emergency action plan, required by , addresses the shall address the use of the locking means from within the occupiable space and the unlocking means from within and outside the room occupiable space. (12) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as means as part of the emergency egress drills required by Additional Proposed Changes File Name NFPA_101_Chapter_14_New_Educational_Occupancies_Locking_First_Revision_Comment_BHMA_ _HC.docx Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Description Approved Attachment illustrates proposed revisions (in Word), includes reason statements, and includes comments regarding the published committee statement. Note: deleting and inserting text of the public comment inadvertently inserted an additional numbered item (5). Reason statements below refer to original numbered list. Reasons: Adds a charging paragraph, and clarifies scope of requirements to occupiable spaces. Occupiable spaces would include classrooms, and also include offices for administrators and support staff, libraries, cafeterias, etc. This public comment proposes language which does not suggest providing locking hardware on a door to prevent unwanted entry is something new, as NFPA 101 currently does not prohibit such locking arrangements. Revisions to Items 1 through 11 are intended to be more consistent with typical syntax and grammar of NFPA 101. Also, revises permissive text to mandatory text. Item 1: Revised, but may not be needed, especially for new construction. The committee-proposed requirement implies all locking arrangements intended to prevent ingress on doors to occupiable spaces will be required to be approved by the AHJ, whereas currently locking arrangements on doors are not explicitly required to be approved. Today s code does not prevent or preclude locking arrangements on doors, and requires locking arrangements on doors to meet all the requirements of the code. Item 2: Revised, but probably does not need to be a requirement even though this is a recommendation by the Sandy Hook Advisory commission. This functionality will be implemented by schools where this is an important consideration. Market factors will drive this Page 37 of 97

38 11 of 259 5/17/2016 9:43 AM functionality. Item 3: Revised to include special knowledge or effort, as required in Item 4: Reinforces requirements of Item 5: Revised to clarify it is the releasing mechanism with the location requirements. Revised requirements to include not lower than 34 above finished floor, to be consistent with requirements of , and consistent with accessibility requirements. Item 6: Revised but probably not needed as a requirement. NFPA 101 today does not preclude the use of remote lock operation preventing ingress, as this proposed language seems to imply. As long as the door can be opened from inside the space as required by the code, the code doesn t regulate how the door gets locked to prevent unwanted entry. Item 7: Revised, and removes the unnecessary necessary word. Also inserts other than on a door not used for ingress which recognizes some doors from occupiable spaces with higher occupancy capacity (i.e. auditoriums or gymnasiums) may be designed and used only for emergency egress and to provide the required egress capacity. These doors typically have interior panic hardware but have no operable hardware on the exterior (the exterior side of the door is smooth). This inserted phrase for doors not used for ingress is not needed if the scope is limited to classrooms. However, if the scope in the charging sentence is expanded to occupiable spaces then this inserted phrase may be important. Item 8: Revisions attempt to address concerns with proposed language which would not allow modifications to this hardware even if the modifications complied with code requirements. Item 9: Limits the scope of the proposed requirement for doors required to be fire door assemblies. It is not uncommon for the same fire rated door assembly to be used in openings required to be fire rated and in openings not required to be fire rated to eliminate inadvertent mistakes during construction and to ensure consistent aesthetics. Items 10 & 11: Revisions suggested should be considered while recalling the current requirements of NFPA 101, as reiterated in Item 3 (as revised): Unlocking and unlatching the door from the egress side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort. If the locking hardware complies with this requirement, there s no need to address in the emergency action plan how to unlock the door from inside the occupiable space. From a slightly different perspective, perhaps these Items (10) and (11) may be better located in and along with the other emergency action plan and emergency egress drill requirements. Regarding the published Committee Statement of First Revision No NFPA [ New Section after ], copied below: Ask Correlating Committee to prepare First Correlating Revisions (FCR) to Chapter 7: 101-FCR-xx The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation, unless otherwise specified in , , or , or Statement: The reference to new is needed for completeness and correlation. 101-FCR-xx Two releasing operations shall be permitted for educational occupancy classroom doors secured against unwanted entry in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 14 and 15. Statement: The new provision of is needed so that the new provisions of and do not conflict with Chapter 7. BHMA does not concur with the committee statement regarding the suggested action by the correlating committee. Most definitely, two releasing operations are not needed for new construction (Chapter 14) as door locking hardware which meets all the existing and proposed (as revised in this public comment) requirements of NFPA 101 is readily available and commonly specified and installed in new construction. BHMA recognizes the challenges of updating and revising door hardware of existing educational occupancies (Chapter 15) to provide the function of lockable from inside the occupiable space, and BHMA recommends NFPA 101 LIFE SAFETY CODE not be revised to allow two releasing operations. Related Item First Revision No NFPA [New Section after ] Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: John Woestman Organization: Kellen Company Affilliation: Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon May 16 08:47:08 EDT 2016 Page 38 of 97